ErasureAcer
Banned
Ah yes! The "He tried to grab my gun!" excuse used time and time again to justify abuse of authority.
http://youtu.be/GVaU8qm2LhQ
This country man.
Ah yes! The "He tried to grab my gun!" excuse used time and time again to justify abuse of authority.
http://youtu.be/GVaU8qm2LhQ
The video needed to be released. You complained about them even releasing it.What the hell are you talking about? I'm talking about the shitty job the police did in handling just about everything.
After so many year's of the "reaching for my gun" excuse, most black men are smart enough to not actually do it. I hope nobody here really believes that shit. After everything that has happened, you can't trust anything the Ferguson police department says without corroboration from an outside party.
From the Daily Beast:
Police in Ferguson, Missouri, once charged a man with destruction of property for bleeding on their uniforms while four of them allegedly beat him.
On and/or about the 20th day of Sept. 20, 2009 at or near 222 S. Florissant within the corporate limits of Ferguson, Missouri, the above named defendant did then and there unlawfully commit the offense of property damage to wit did transfer blood to the uniform, reads the charge sheet.
The address is the headquarters of the Ferguson Police Department, where a 52-year-old welder named Henry Davis was taken in the predawn hours on that date. He had been arrested for an outstanding warrant that proved to actually be for another man of the same surname, but a different middle name and Social Security number.
The rest of story is here:
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/08/15/the-day-ferguson-cops-were-caught-in-a-bloody-lie.html
I believe that is a prime example of the infamous "dehumanizing stare"
But she really needs a shoulder mount or to change her grip, that shot won't be stead-oh.
Sorry, I use that camera, it's heavy![]()
Unless Missouri courts have interpreted robbery differently than most jurisdictions, that's not robbery in the video with two possible exceptions: (1) the clerk was holding the cigarillos and Brown grabbed them from him or (2) Brown threatened the clerk with the immediate use of a dangerous instrument (possible, I suppose, because we don't have sound).
Not just the police force, but the city council and school board as well. I'd love to see a map of Ferguson's districts, because it has to be gerrymandered to hell and back to end up with only 1 black councilman and no black school board members, given the demos of Ferguson.I hope Ferguson diversifies their police force to better reflect the demographics of the city. That's what the did in cincy.
What in the world are you talking about? Every city has a police force on standby that doesn't mean the protests are being restrained. Last night they seemed to be allowed to organize wherever they wanted.
I hope Ferguson dismantles their police force and rebuilds from scratch
I believe that is a prime example of the infamous "dehumanizing stare"
Expand Reply Retweet Favorite More
Bruh. ‏@TheePharoah Aug 9
@SLIKK_DARKO yeah man. 7 times i think
Expand Reply Retweet Favorite More
DIGITAL ERA ‏@SLIKK_DARKO Aug 9
@TheePharoah from behind ?
Expand Reply Retweet Favorite More
Bruh. ‏@TheePharoah Aug 9
@SLIKK_DARKO the first two was, the next 5 werent, he turned around
Is that an FX1?
Great camera. It's the only kind I was comfortable using when I did video services.
Has any press asked directly what they are waiting for to release the autopsy report? It seems like it would answer a lot of questions.
How are you pretending to be confused? The police did not need to show the amount of force that they've been doing since the vigil. From day 1 theres been an intimidating police presence. The people holding candles didn't need dogs barking at them to begin with. Leave the dogs in the staging area too.
Just have them wait at a near by staging area -- for when the rioting goes down. Much like the senator said (forget her name) But the militarized heavy presence and training guns on people protesting only makes the situation worse.
I didn't say anything about restraining a protest. I said keep the visibility of your forces away from the protest, and use them when needed. It only incites angry reactions from people protesting police violence. Then you have them taunting protesters, shooting tear gas at journalists, assaulting journalists, and arresting journalists. This all doesn't provide any atmosphere for protesting. Its just an amped up police force waiting to suppress/disperse as soon as a bottle is thrown.
Mine's an HDR FX-1000, but most of Sony's MiniDV camcorders like that look real real similar. They all function the same. We use em for sports!
Well, I hope your foolish gloating was worth a likely permaban. Assuming you arent an alt.
I'm discussing the current state of the police with Captain Johnson running things. There is, from what I can tell, no reason for the protests to turn violent given the situation on the ground.
The video needed to be released. You complained about them even releasing it.
Has any press asked directly what they are waiting for to release the autopsy report? It seems like it would answer a lot of questions.
Not a MO attorney, but from reading the statutes, it seems as if MO has subsumed what most jurisdictions would call "battery" into their criminal assault statutes. For example: http://www.moga.mo.gov/statutes/c500-599/5650000070.htmIt was actually kind of funny, because I saw the video, read the report, and thought to myself "you can get Brown for assault, maybe criminal battery if MO has that which I would have to look up on the Revised Statutes, and larceny sure... But there is nothing here really rising to the level of any degree of robbery." I could actually ask some friends who do practice in criminal law this question later too, but at this point, I think the robbery angle is one giant play of misdirection by Ferguson PD.
Definitions.
455.010. As used in this chapter, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, the following terms shall mean:
(a) "Assault", purposely or knowingly placing or attempting to place another in fear of physical harm;
(b) "Battery", purposely or knowingly causing physical harm to another with or without a deadly weapon;
I'm pretty sure there wouldn't have been much of a backlash if Higgins had originally given us more than one lazy sentence - if he'd objected to the framing of Brown as a child because it shouldn't matter whether or not the victim was a child, if he'd wanted to acknowledge that Brown was "capable of robbery" because it shouldn't matter that Brown was "capable of robbery", etc.
But come on. Clearly that's not what Higgins was aiming at. He doesn't even hint at this in any of his subsequent posts, when that'd be a really obvious way to explain where he was coming from if that was in fact where he was coming from. To the extent that you have a point in general, here you've got to admit that people's instincts were right on.
I guess I feel like if you're sufficiently knowledgeable about a topic that you have an opinion worth sharing, it's on you to be careful not to express your opinion in a way which makes your position indistinguishable from what are uncontroversially pretty common and gross positions. Like, if you don't have a good enough model of what other people are thinking that you can't understand why your ambiguous one-liner is going to be taken the wrong way, you don't really have any business thinking that you understand what's going on. What's in the best interest of civil discussion is to not participate in discussion only by dropping ambiguous (or worse) one-liners, and I sort of doubt that we'd be missing much of value if people didn't do that for fear of being misinterpreted.
The the police managed to accomplished what they likely set out to do. Steer clear of some comments about it on social media, this mentality is out in full force as of late.That robbery video is so sad for so many reasons, because in the end, even if it was completely unrelated to the shooting, the American public will see Brown as a criminal, and someone who deserved to be stopped. His innocence is lost in their eyes. And that is so sad because it was completely unrelated to the shooting.
At the end of the day, Brown's family have no hope for actual justice. That's the saddest part.
Sista with the camera is not playing games. Fierce as fuck! <3
Yeah, I used it for baseball at UVA.
I was garbage on camera, though. I almost always stuck to TD and replay.
That robbery video is so sad for so many reasons, because in the end, even if it was completely unrelated to the shooting, the American public will see Brown as a criminal, and someone who deserved to be stopped. His innocence is lost in their eyes. And that is so sad because it was completely unrelated to the shooting.
At the end of the day, Brown's family have no hope for actual justice. That's the saddest part.
How the fuck did they (meaning anyone who has any semblance of authority in this) allow Chief Sweaty McFuckwit handle either of these press conferences today?I'm assuming we won't be seeing peaceful protests after this clusterfuck today.
That robbery video is so sad for so many reasons, because in the end, even if it was completely unrelated to the shooting, the American public will see Brown as a criminal, and someone who deserved to be stopped. His innocence is lost in their eyes. And that is so sad because it was completely unrelated to the shooting.
Mine's an HDR FX-1000, but most of Sony's MiniDV camcorders like that look real real similar. They all function the same. We use em for sports!
Back on topic:
That Twitter thing is terrifying. Any possibility of it being a troll/hack/etc? It's got timestamps and everything...And he's -far- too detailed. If it's true, that makes three witnesses who, it seems, are completely unrelated to one another.
How the fuck did they (meaning anyone who has any semblance of authority in this) allow Chief Sweaty McFuckwit handle either of these press conferences today?
Scroll (a lot) down his twitter page. Highly unlikely to be fake.
Yes we must wait for all of the facts to come in. Perhaps the officer was disabled and had no other option besides his firearm.
The point is that the trend is there. We already know how they reacted to the protests, we already know that an unarmed black teen was killed. Trust me, I enjoy skepticism and the like as well. It's simply not necessary here, as it contributes nothing.
Depends, here's the relevant language:
If the box of cigars he grabbed as described in this line was in the hands of the clerk, then, yes, that would meet the statutory definition of a robbery (felony).
If they were on the counter, then theft/larceny (misdemeanor).
Not a MO attorney, but from reading the statutes, it seems as if MO has subsumed what most jurisdictions would call "battery" into their criminal assault statutes. For example: http://www.moga.mo.gov/statutes/c500-599/5650000070.htm
However, it does maintain a distinction in other areas:
Sista with the camera is not playing games. Fierce as fuck! <3
Wasn't that the gist of the Polygon article that everyone was pissed off about? I'm guessing they were just not happy with linking this to video games, but I agree every cop should be monitored these days.Camera's on cops. Every cop, every time they patrol.
It is 2014, shits like 30$.
That twitter is soul crushing.
she's wearing that,
"...say just ONE more mothafuckin thing, hear???"
look.
I don't think the police officer is going anywhere but jail now.
1. It's entirely possible that MO courts have so interpreted the statute to include use of force after the taking of the property to elevate larceny to robbery, but that is not traditionally how most jurisdictions interpret the force requirement in robbery statutes. I'm not a MO attorney and haven't looked at case law, so this is based upon my familiarity with Alabama law, which is similar to Missouri's.Wouldn't use of force against the person at the door satisfy the statute? Honest question as I am ignorant of Missouri law.
The force requirement in robbery doesn't mean that you have to push or assault the victim. It only means you have to exert enough force to overcome the actual resistance being exerted by the victim over the property in order to take it from their possession. A clear example is purse snatching: if the purse snatcher takes the purse off a woman's shoulder, it's robbery. If, however, the woman places or drops the purse on the ground and the purse snatcher grabs it, it's larceny because he didn't have to overcome the physical resistance of the victim. Does that make sense?
From looking at the video, I see larceny and assault, but not robbery. Both larceny and this level of assault are misdemeanors.
Wasn't that the gist of the Polygon article that everyone was pissed off about? I'm guessing they were just not happy with linking this to video games, but I agree every cop should be monitored these days.
why?
Waiting for toxicology? Can't wait for there to be cannabis in his system so we can stop caring about him dying.
/s
This is happening in San Diego because of grouping incidents. But its not always onCamera's on cops. Every cop, every time they patrol.
It is 2014, shits like 30$.
That twitter is soul crushing.
Too many corroborating eyewitness reports, the bungling of the initial investigation forcing the FBI to step in, what is likely to be extreme political pressure to have this situation ended as quickly as possible, etc. The media also seems to not give two fucks about any anecdotal information about Brown. They want the shooting report, they want the shooter, and they want to know what on earth caused that militarized reaction. The police have lost control of the narrative.