forgeforsaken
Member
Bit odd that for a guy of Brown's size there were no center mass shots.
So basically just making up facts to fit his preconceptions. Got it.
They don't keep disciplinary records for them. Probably for this exact reason.
The internal investigation says it's a good shoot, and it's time for the community and the family of officer Wilson to be able to move on and heal.
No need for charges or anything that could cause more trauma.
Fantastic piece. Do recommend to all.
That's not making up facts. Right now there is no criminal case against Wilson. An arrest of Dorian Johnson would just rile the pot up moreso in an already tense situation.
You're probably right. So no grand statements, just a small press release when the internal investigation is completed in six months and finds that it was a good shoot.I think the possibility of this happening is gone now.
The police kicked around the idea of not pressing charges of someone they have on film because of optics.
Instead they thought a curfew because of protests was good optics.
Yup...
Even if he doesn't that proves nothing anyway. He may not have ever been in that position before. He may have been reacting to getting ruffed up by Brown if that's what happened.
That's not making up facts. Right now there is no criminal case against Wilson. An arrest of Dorian Johnson would just rile the pot up moreso in an already tense situation.
I'm not super familiar with Missouri law, but what does the DA have to gain by trying Dorian Johnson at this point? It pisses off the community to put a charge that is hard to prove and probably will carry very little repercussions because the tape (as far as we've seen it) shows that he was just present with Brown as he committed the act.
bigots
extremist
agenda
None of these words should be in the same sentence as 'anti-racism'. Hell, the fact that you're condemning not being racist is disgusting in itself.
Bit odd that for a guy of Brown's size there were no center mass shots.
Unless you have evidence to present that the cops decided not to charge Darien Johnson due to political reason, that's exactly what it is. Do you have such evidence?
You're not even making sense...
They release a video of Brown pushing a store clerk out of his way at the same time they release Wilson's name, and that amps up the already tense situation, but they won't arrest Johnson because they don't want to amp up the already tense situation? What?
That's not making up facts. Right now there is no criminal case against Wilson. An arrest of Dorian Johnson would just rile the pot up moreso in an already tense situation.
I'm not super familiar with Missouri law, but what does the DA have to gain by trying Dorian Johnson at this point? It pisses off the community to put a charge that is hard to prove and probably will carry very little repercussions because the tape (as far as we've seen it) shows that he was just present with Brown as he committed the act.
Experience with family members who are Chicago homicide detectives. Does that count? .
You're probably right. So no grand statements, just a small press release when the internal investigation is completed in six months and finds that it was a good shoot.
Experience with family members who are Chicago homicide detectives. Does that count?
And that is a super plausible explanation for what happened. Why haven't any of the witnesses posited that this is the way it went down? I'd be more inclined to believe that this is what happened if a single witness offered this up as an explanation and not just "he fired at the guys back without provocation because he was walking down the middle of the road."
Experience with family members who are Chicago homicide detectives. Does that count? Ideally if the guy was guilty he'd be charged, but this isn't exactly an unreasonable leap of logic.
Have police officially said that Wilson's police vehicle did not have a dash cam?
That's make making up facts. Right now there is no criminal case against Wilson. An arrest of Dorian Johnson would just rile the pot up moreso in an already tense situation.
I'm not super familiar with Missouri law, but what does the DA have to gain by trying Dorian Johnson at this point? It pisses off the community to put a charge that is hard to prove and probably will carry very little repercussions because the tape (as far as we've seen it) shows that he was just present with Brown as he committed the act.
Feel like im going to get shit on for saying this but the autopsy really just nullified this entire story. At first this was being framed as if the victim was surrendering and assuming thr position before a rabid gun toting fanatic cop decided to take him out. The fact that Dorian's story is demonstrably false now and most of the eyewitness testimony has just been turned to garbage regarding how the incident went down as far as position during the act of the shooting really should put some perspective into this story.
The fact that this case has acted as a tipping point regarding race relations in the u.s. is kind of a shame since there are numerous cases that are more egregious such as the ny choke hold victim and trayvon martin. But I guess that's what happens when you take stories at face value before the information comes out.
The ensuing riots during protests as well as the local police force dick waving contest is still terrible, but this incident is starting to look a lot more 50/50 as a result of that autopsy report. If gun powder residue shows up on his clothes to confirm that the shots happened close range it's going to a justified shooting.
Or, and I know this is crazy, but maybe Johnson didn't actually do anything:You are saying the police aren't acting consistent. I'm giving you a logical explanation as to why they wouldn't pursue the charge. That's not moving goal posts.
The video shows Brown passing something back to Johnson, but it also shows Johnson placing it back on the counter.http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/michael-brown-a-suspect-in-robbery-of-cigars-from-store/article_52c40b84-ad90-5f9a-973c-70d628d0be04.html said:Asked whether Dorian Johnson will be charged, Ferguson Police Chief Tom Jackson said today, "No. We determined he didn't steal anything or use force."
You're not even making sense...
They release a video of Brown pushing a store clerk out of his way at the same time they release Wilson's name, and that amps up the already tense situation, but they won't arrest Johnson because they don't want to amp up the already tense situation? What?
No, of course it doesn't count. It's speculation without evidence, and you're attempting to use it to contradict eye witness testimony. It's incredibly disingenuous.
Or, and I know this is crazy, but maybe Johnson didn't actually do anything:
The video shows Brown passing something back to Johnson, but it also shows Johnson placing it back on the counter.
That's why they're bringing in the Guard. It won't be as likely to fuckup and cause trouble firing tear gas and crap at people so in two days the Governor can declare the "state of emergency" over and the local media can write about his quick thinking to end the crisis.Ferguson isn't being torn apart by rioting mobs, entire streets aren't aflame. Yes, someone was shot last night, yes there are assholes looting and causing trouble, but I really think that National Guard is a hugely disproportionate response to what I've seen on the live streams the past two-three nights.
Well, then it's a mistake. Brown was constantly referred to as a suspect in a robbery (and before someone says it, yes I know Wilson was not aware when he engaged him). I have not seen the police retract that story until now.
That's why they're bringing in the Guard. It won't be as likely to fuckup and cause trouble firing tear gas and crap at people so in two days the Governor can declare the "state of emergency" over and the local media can write about his quick thinking to end the crisis.
And then he can get back to Ham Breakfasts.
We're talking about Johnson.Well, then it's a mistake. Brown was constantly referred to as a suspect in a robbery (and before someone says it, yes I know Wilson was not aware when he engaged him). I have not seen the police retract that story until now.
Brown, yes. Not Johnson.
The only evidence we have is witness testimony and an autopsy report. This entire thread is speculation without evidence. My original post said that the autopsy report made this situation seem a lot more 50/50 than 100% one way or the other. I even caveated that the results of the GSR tests would tell us more.
He was with Brown at the time that Brown is alleged to have committed a robbery and/or theft.My use of the word accomplice referring to Johnson was predicated on the fact that he was with Brown who was considered a suspect.
But not this years...There's more important work than Ham Breakfasts: appearing at state fairs.
My use of the word accomplice referring to Johnson was predicated on the fact that he was with Brown who was considered a suspect.
John Newshaw said:It's as simple as training your dog. If you don't tell them stop biting, guess what, he's going to continue to bite."
The only claim i'm making is that criminal charges are subject to political pressures, and considering I've heard numerous stories from family members and friends who are in law enforcement as to how political the court system can be in regards to charging suspects, I feel i'm qualified to make that claim.
My use of the word accomplice referring to Johnson was predicated on the fact that he was with Brown who was considered a suspect.
Yeah, okay, but what if they had committed armed robbery.Doesn't matter. Johnson has been cleared in literally every way possible. Even if they wanted to charge him with something, they can't. He returned the items given to him, he's not at fault at all. Additionally, the store clerk said he would not have pressed charges against Johnson OR Brown, further invalidating this claim. Finally, the DOJ has said that releasing the video was inflammatory and non-responsive to the Freedom of Information Act. They said this has no bearing on the case, and it doesn't matter. So unless you're saying that you have more authority and knowledge on this than the Department of Justice, I'd say you stop disregarding Johnson's testimony, and stop bringing up the store altogether.
Were still waiting for you to point out how this autopsy suddenly throws everything into doubt. Where had it changed anything?The only evidence we have is witness testimony and an autopsy report. This entire thread is speculation without evidence. My original post said that the autopsy report made this situation seem a lot more 50/50 than 100% one way or the other. I even caveated that the results of the GSR tests would tell us more.
The only claim i'm making is that criminal charges are subject to political pressures, and considering I've heard numerous stories from family members and friends who are in law enforcement as to how political the court system can be in regards to charging suspects, I feel i'm qualified to make that claim.
If I have to state before so that it's just an informed opinion of how the criminal justice system is dysfunctional using anecdotal evidence from life experience, I can do that.
It's a shame that a young man was killed, my belief is that this story is way murkier than originally framed.
Well, then it's a mistake. Brown was constantly referred to as a suspect in a robbery (and before someone says it, yes I know Wilson was not aware when he engaged him). I have not seen the police retract that story until now.
Yeah, okay, but what if they had committed armed robbery.
The only evidence we have is witness testimony and an autopsy report. This entire thread is speculation without evidence. My original post said that the autopsy report made this situation seem a lot more 50/50 than 100% one way or the other. I even caveated that the results of the GSR tests would tell us more.
And just for clarity's sake, here's the relevant statute:My use of the word accomplice referring to Johnson was predicated on the fact that he was with Brown who was considered a suspect.
Johnson took an affirmative step to prevent the commission of the offense by placing the cigarillos back on the counter.Responsibility for the conduct of another.
562.041. 1. A person is criminally responsible for the conduct of another when
2. However, a person is not so responsible if:
. . .
(2) Either before or during the commission of an offense with the purpose of promoting the commission of an offense, he aids or agrees to aid or attempts to aid such other person in planning, committing or attempting to commit the offense.
. . ..
(3) Before the commission of the offense he abandons his purpose and gives timely warning to law enforcement authorities or otherwise makes proper effort to prevent the commission of the offense
And just for clarity's sake, here's the relevant statute:
Johnson took an affirmative step to prevent the commission of the offense by placing the cigarillos back on the counter.
White cop comparing black people to dogs. The embodiment of everything wrong in this situation.
"They're going to keep pushing the envelope," he said of demonstrators who've gotten violent during protests in Ferguson. "There's no reason to stop. ... It's as simple as training your dog. If you don't tell them stop biting, guess what, he's going to continue to bite."
So whatever is reported in the autopsy is irrelevant and inconsequential, but the "fact" that everyone defending the police is racist is proof that Brown was unjustly murdered?4 people have said it was an execution, no matter what the autopsy says or the lieing Police say I know it was an execution. 4 people would not just lie, the Police executed an innocent boy. I have no doubt, I know it in my heart. the people defending the Police are all racist, that is just further proof he was unjustly murdered.