0 to aggressive in a single post.
Didn't he have some depth in Brawl? Enough to give him a pop from background colors, I thought at least. I was just making a comment. Not taking an outline side (which, that's a pretty silly fight to begin with) or trying to shit on the poster's pictures.
Pink Gold Peach should be added to one of these leaks one of these days.
Sorry, can't see the 3DS version as anything but the "Smash Bros. Lite" version.
Just the fact that local multiplayer is much harder to do for me is enough to make it that in my eyes.
That and the fact that I'm going to drop it and never play it again (because smash to me is a multiplayer game, I'm not interested in the single player content) when the WiiU version releases makes it much less appealing to me.
Pink Gold Peach should be added to one of these leaks one of these days.
I have a slightly (not really) off topic question.
Way before Palutena was revealed, there was a "leak" with two pics of her in a 3DS stage
Now, did the officially announced 3DS model matched the 3DS model "leak"?
I'm asking this because even tho I'm wary about this roster's veracity, I wouldn't rule it out just because it looks "fake" from what I've seen in this and the previous thread, cons and pros about it being real are basically equal.
It is, but it's called "Pac'N-Jump" for some reason... which is apparently the name of an iOS game released in 2011. I suppose the move could have been inspired by this Mappy level.
I love how all the #teamfake bullets are facts, while you provide arguments and explanations against all the #teamreal bullets.Apologies if I couldn't find all original posts/sources on my summary. I have limited time!
Things that make it seem believable:
Things that cast doubt onto the leak:
- Clone Corner - if a leaker wanted their leak to be believable, they'd have put lucina next to marth/robin, Dr mario near mario/luigi, and dark pit next to pit/palutena
- The thicker black bar for kirby - actual behaviour from the game that pretty much nobody noticed. It'd be incredibly impressive for a leaker to add that knowing it was in the game.
- Removal of names - E3 build had names under each character. A leaker would have probably left those in to make their leak believable.
- Tomodachi stage - living room is nearly identical to the one in the famitsu scan
- Highlighted stage actually increases in size, therefore overlaps w/ UI - known behavior of stage select.
- The CSS isn't 100% full. Every other leak fills out the entire screen.
- Ness's shirt is not up to other smash standards! (maybe sakurai and team took some creative liberties?)
- Falco's render is similar to other smash poses (Maybe it is! Why not? - also, his scanner is in a different position)
- Dr Mario/Bowser Jr/Jiggly is similar to existing promo art (So are palutena, pac man, and lucina!)
- Duck Hunt is a ridiculous name, it should be duck hunt dog, etc (It's ridiculous indeed... why would a leaker try to make his leak LESS believable though?)
- Game and watch didnt have an outline in the pac man trailer (Game and watch was not confirmed or updated in that trailer, either)
Things that are 100% proof that it's Fake:
- ... someone could have photoshopped it all, i guess?
- http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=126205046&postcount=16800
You are the one who made the argument about renders taking things from art.
I'm just aking, if they did why not use a Dr.mario pose
Also that was melee this is smash 4 , maybe sensibilities change
Pink Gold Peach should be added to one of these leaks one of these days.
I don't think there was ever a final verdict on that one
Oh was there? I may have missed that discussionWasn't their Mario style starmen on her outfit as trinkets that later appeared on her official model? That seems pretty concrete to me regardless of other differences.
Pink Gold Peach should be added to one of these leaks one of these days.
Wasn't their Mario style starmen on her outfit as trinkets that later appeared on her official model? That seems pretty concrete to me regardless of other differences.
Jesus... Thread XIII?!
The hype is real
But is this leak real?
Jesus... Thread XIII?!
The hype is real
Apologies if I couldn't find all original posts/sources on my summary. I have limited time!
Things that make it seem believable:
Things that cast doubt onto the leak:
- Clone Corner - if a leaker wanted their leak to be believable, they'd have put lucina next to marth/robin, Dr mario near mario/luigi, and dark pit next to pit/palutena
- The thicker black bar for kirby - actual behaviour from the game that pretty much nobody noticed. It'd be incredibly impressive for a leaker to add that knowing it was in the game.
- Removal of names - E3 build had names under each character. A leaker would have probably left those in to make their leak believable.
- Tomodachi stage - living room is nearly identical to the one in the famitsu scan
- Highlighted stage actually increases in size, therefore overlaps w/ UI - known behavior of stage select.
- The CSS isn't 100% full. Every other leak fills out the entire screen.
- Ness's shirt is not up to other smash standards! (maybe sakurai and team took some creative liberties?)
- Falco's render is similar to other smash poses (Maybe it is! Why not? - also, his scanner is in a different position)
- Dr Mario/Bowser Jr/Jiggly is similar to existing promo art (So are palutena, pac man, and lucina!)
- Duck Hunt is a ridiculous name, it should be duck hunt dog, etc (It's ridiculous indeed... why would a leaker try to make his leak LESS believable though?)
- Game and watch didnt have an outline in the pac man trailer (Game and watch was not confirmed or updated in that trailer, either)
Things that are 100% proof that it's Fake:
- ... someone could have photoshopped it all, i guess?
- http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=126205046&postcount=16800
Here's a new piece of evidence in the leaks favor; Fox had a green background in the demo, but the leak has the blue background just like the back of the box.
The leak has another visual angle on a room we have not seen until today in the Tomodachi Life stage. (from Smashboards)
![]()
This room has not shown up in any previous screenshots of the stage.
Potential proof it's real. I would want to see something more substantial first though.
You're one if us now! A part of the gaf body! Embrace the assimilation!I finally made the list ;_;
I made the list.![]()
Here's a new piece of evidence in the leaks favor; Fox had a green background in the demo, but the leak has the blue background just like the back of the box.
Here's a new piece of evidence in the leaks favor; Fox had a green background in the demo, but the leak has the blue background just like the back of the box.
A breakdown of the stages in the leak--
New:
Battlefield
Final Destination
3D Land
Golden Plains
Paper Mario
Rainbow Road
Gerudo Valley
Spirit Train
N's Castle
Prism Tower
Mute City(?)
Arena Ferox
Tortimer Island
Kirby GameBoy
Reset Bomb Forest
Boxing Ring
Magicant(?)
Living Room
Tomodachi Life
Find Mii
Balloon Fight
Guar Plains(?)
Wily Castle
Pac-Maze
Returning:
Mushroomy Kingdom
Jungle Japes
Yoshi's Island (Brawl)
Brinstar
Corneria
WarioWare, Inc.
Distant Planet
PictoChat
Flat Zone 2
Green Hill Zone
24 new stages, 10 returning. That's fewer stages than in Brawl period, fewer new stages than Melee introduced, and is easily the worst new to returning ratio of any Smash yet with big gaping holes in series representation--Donkey Kong, Yoshi, Metroid, Star Fox, Wario, Pikmin, Game & Watch, and Sonic represented solely through past stages (so possibly no new music for them at all either thanks to the 3DS version's limited music) while odd franchises like F-Zero and Earthbound get a new stage and Mario gets four (plus all of the music that comes with that) alongside a returning one.
Just... not good. If this is real and if the Wii U version is this bad in stage representation and numbers then the decision to split the stages between the versions was a very bad one.
One problem I have with some of the arguments is that the justification is "Of course that's a dumb name / of course that's silly, and someone making a fake leak would be smart, so of course they would not make a silly mistake, which means it's probably real!"
Basically it seems almost any actual MISTAKE someone made could be used as justification for why it's actually real, while simultaneously dismissing any arguments otherwise.
Most of the thread names have been crap since the beginning.Terrible thread name..
P.S. Ness doesn't have that shirt pattern consistency ALL the time:
One problem I have with some of the arguments is that the justification is "Of course that's a dumb name / of course that's silly, and someone making a fake leak would be smart, so of course they would not make a silly mistake, which means it's probably real!"
Basically it seems almost any actual MISTAKE someone made could be used as justification for why it's actually real, while simultaneously dismissing any arguments otherwise.
P.S. Ness doesn't have that shirt pattern consistency ALL the time:
Ah, good, I'm not the only one to think it's kinda bad. Good-intentioned, but bad execution.Terrible thread name..
24 new stages, 10 returning. That's fewer stages than in Brawl period, fewer new stages than Melee introduced, and is easily the worst new to returning ratio of any Smash yet with big gaping holes in series representation--Donkey Kong, Yoshi, Metroid, Star Fox, Wario, Pikmin, Game & Watch, and Sonic represented solely through past stages (so possibly no new music for them at all either thanks to the 3DS version's limited music) while odd franchises like F-Zero and Earthbound get a new stage and Mario gets four (plus all of the music that comes with that) alongside a returning one.
Just... not good. If this is real and if the Wii U version is this bad in stage representation and numbers then the decision to split the stages between the versions was a very bad one.
EDIT: Also potentially means there are only three unrevealed new stages for the 3DS version.
I'm surprised Emcee didn't immediately change it again.Ah, good, I'm not the only one to think it's kinda bad. Good-intentioned, but bad execution.
Ah, good, I'm not the only one to think it's kinda bad. Good-intentioned, but bad execution.
P.S. Ness doesn't have that shirt pattern consistency ALL the time:
P.S. Ness doesn't have that shirt pattern consistency ALL the time: