Tropes vs Women author Sarkeesian vacates home following online threats

Status
Not open for further replies.
People with certain types of mental illnesses (and as someone with a type of mental illness, I clearly am not referring to everyone) are the ones who take things like this that far and that openly. Normal people can be cruel vicious assholes, but even on the internet they will have limits and boundaries. The thing is that these people are influenced by society. Their extremism is very much influenced by societal values and undercurrents

Most of that is true, but that's an utterly different thing from what most would mean by mental health. You're talking about anti-social patterns in behavior. That was my point. I made an earlier post describing similar ideas to what you're saying here. Citing a correlative pattern as though it were a causative one is simply dangerous.
 
And this is why some services will start to reinforce that real name policy and non-anonymity in the net :/ cant be throwing threats around if everyones real names and addresses are known.
 
Anita's videos and her series have gotten better in quality and tone since her first FF videos, which also means that the people who do hate her(I mean the real vile hate that blinds) and her work are now resorting to threats in order to get their message across.

If this threat doesn't convince her or anyone here her work isn't culturally relevant or something of interest with regards to video games, I can't help you and nobody else can.

Does anyone know if her work is directly influencing developers or big name game directors?

I would highly doubt it.
 
And this is why some services will start to reinforce that real name policy and non-anonymity in the net :/ cant be throwing threats around if everyones real names and addresses are known.
People still engage in similar kinds of vile behavior on Facebook, even with their real names there for everyone to see. It's pretty wild, honestly.
 
The Not All Men argument? What? If you could reply to me like a human being instead of throwing some hashtag my way I'll gladly listen to what you have to say...

I'll try as a human being now, then:

About the #NotAllMen:
"It’s a sharp, damning satire of a familiar kind of bad-faith argument, the one where a male interlocutor redirects a discussion about sexism, misogyny, rape culture, or women’s rights to instead be about how none of that is his fault. And it struck a nerve."

So, basically, by asking "Is this representative?" or saying "Not all tech industry is like that" (#NotAllMen are sexist) you are only shifting the discussion (which is about a woman) towards another subject and evading the answers or the consequences that discussion can bring. It is not encouraging the discussion, it is only changing the focus from the things that matter, even though it may have had sincere intentions of being a useful argument. We are talking about how a woman has been receiving death threats because she voiced her opinion about the industry and not trying to determine who is and who isn't sexist within that industry. In short, it portrays the oppressor as being a victim of misjudgement.

Bonus:

Hm48gkl.jpg
 
How old are you? ;)

White-Knight is a put-down term I've been familiar with for ages (I'm 36), but Social Justice Warrior is something new that I only (personally) started hearing over the last year or so.

We need to take back White Knight, Agrias would want it that way
 
When someone posts your address online and you're fearing for your life because of the things people are saying to you, it is not unreasonable to relocate.
I didn't catch the address part. My mistake.
How could someone obtain that info anyway?
 
The #NotAllMen argument...

Seriously, though. Yes, it is representative of anti-woman attitude in the tech-industry as a whole.

Here is another example about Women in Science.

The video you posted was awesome, yet you respond to the topic in a way I dont think that the youtuber would have wanted, since she made it clear the majority of her comments are good, but the bad ones make it harder, because they are more personal(and since there are so few women doing what she does the motivations to keep going is less)... Anywho

This article does a good job at explaining that it isnt simply, specifically, an anti-women atmosphere(though that exists), but more of a no women atmosphere. But that it is definitely harder for a woman, regardless of the reasons.
 
"Wait, so anonymous Twitter trolls are now representative of the entirety of the tech community? Don't get me wrong, I absolutely hate what people are doing to miss Sarkeesian, but is that really "proof" that the tech community as a whole hates / despises women? Am I alone in having doubts that anyone (regardless of gender) will be harassed by internet trolls should you open your mouth about anything?"

Your reply incorrectly inferred that she was making a blanket statement about the tech community. She never said that.

She was referring to harassment of women IN the tech community.

NOT harassment of women BY the tech community.

Again, my point was that perhaps one of the things at play here is that anyone that opens his or her mouth on the internet can / will face harassment. I don't think it is fair to take an anonymous twitter troll and use that as an example of "harassment of women IN the tech industry", instead I think it is an example of the consequences of online anonymity.

Besides, you said:

Just because it happens all the time to everyone, doesn't mean that the solution is to "deal with it".

And my response was that I never said that we should just "deal with it" and that I was just asking questions. But don't bother addressing that...
 
And this is why some services will start to reinforce that real name policy and non-anonymity in the net :/ cant be throwing threats around if everyones real names and addresses are known.

Twitter and Facebook largely disprove this idea. Plenty of people use their real name while saying this stuff. As far as addresses? The last thing anyone needs is a easier way to find that information out about people they disagree with. This issue in particular is largely made worse because people exposed her address on the internet.
 
People still engage in similar kinds of vile behavior on Facebook, even with their real names there for everyone to see. It's pretty wild, honestly.

Exactly though I think its much easier to point authorities in the right direction at least

I think you see less criminal death threat material on there and more just vile insults
 
The difference between this case and people committing genocide is that there really is no "legitimate" authority telling guys like this to do this stuff. And a rational person would realize this won't help their cause. Normal people can do incredibly horrible things, but it almost always has to be under a specific set of conditions.
Average human behavior isn't rational. Phobias (usually not considered mental disorders) are everywhere and are irrational. Confirmation bias exists everywhere and is not rational.

And it's not just legitimate authority. Your average white southerner 300 years ago believed slavery was moral and black people were subhuman. They believe this because other people they frequently interacted with believed this.

I feel societies has issues with the way we deal with mental health. I also think immediately assuming mental health disorders are responsible for the threats is not sensible, nor does it address the issues that made people feel the threats were acceptable.
 
Labels are necessary and important.

No, not really. Pretty much any label can be used in a negative light when a pattern emerges. For instance, I now consider Gamer to be a bad word and refuse to be identified as such.

There should only be one label in this world that matters.

0073.JPG
 
People with mental issues aren't just born into the world slinging death threats at people who make youtube videos. I think it's a bit insulting how you're trying to pin all of this on them, as well as insulting to the plenty of people with mental issues who don't act in this manner.
I think you're viewing the correlational link he was making backwards (whether or not you agree with it) I don't think he was implying that all people with mental issues are sending death threats, but that almost all the people sending death threats have mental issues. And to at least some extent, I would have to agree. The only people who would be so inflamed, so angered and so obsessed as to issue death threats against Anita have to have some kind of mental imbalance.
 
I disagree a lot of things with Sarkeesian but this is...a little much. (Understatement I know XD)

People are weird. What the hell do people like this get out of these death threat? What do they think they would accomplish by pulling that shit off?
 
It was worthy in this case. Reading those tweets yesterday made me physically ill for several hours. It had a similar effect on one of my friends.

Not that I'm trying to put you down, but why exactly did you get physically ill over this, for hours?
 
That's absolutely true, and that's an utterly different thing from what most would mean by mental health. That was my point. I made an earlier post describing similar ideas to what you're saying here.
To an extent yes, but it's more a combination of that and actual mental illness. The people doing stuff like this would probably do similar things in any situation, these just give them an outlet where it's somewhat easier to get away with it (or justify it in their minds). I think it's wrong to think that most of the sexist douchebags would take it that far, or approve of this. Case in point, the fact that they're trying to say she's overplaying it, or fabricated the scenario entirely, rather than outright agreeing with the perpetrator. Most of them know that the perpetrator and what they did is vile and disgusting. But rather than admit that it's a sign that they were in the wrong, they try to rationalize and downplay the situation so as to convince themselves that they aren't at fault
 
I would highly doubt it.

I know Tim Schafer refers to it quite a bit, especially with that whole Jontron-Schafer Twitter spat.

But I haven't heard from guys like Kojima, Miyamoto, Levine, Cliffy B, Denis Dyack, et al.

I'd like to know how they feel about her and whether that has made any real impact.

Because the women who do great work in the field, like Jade Raymond or Amy Hennig, have the recognition to impact the industry.

Given that Joss Wheedon, Tim Schafer, CliffyB, and a host of other creatives have said that all developers should watch them, I'd say yes.

That's cool to know. I'm glad her message is getting to the people who have clout.

Have any EPs or Producers step up to recognize her work?
 
The video you posted was awesome, yet you respond to the topic in a way I dont think that the youtuber would have wanted, since she made it clear the majority of her comments are good, but the bad ones make it harder, because they are more personal(and since there are so few women doing what she does the motivations to keep going is less)... Anywho

This article does a good job at explaining that it isnt simply, specifically, an anti-women atmosphere(though that exists), but more of a no women atmosphere. But that it is definitely harder for a woman, regardless of the reasons.

But she also mentions the fact that even though the majority of the comment she receives are supportive, the nastiness, as she said herself, of the sexist and misogynist comments may put other women interested in being part of such endeavours off. It is still a problem.
 
People still engage in similar kinds of vile behavior on Facebook, even with their real names there for everyone to see. It's pretty wild, honestly.

Eh, I'd say it's less then twitter or a random forum. Also, with facebook your ability to surround yourself with like minded people, through friends, is a different atmosphere if you were on a forum with your real name, without all your personal friends backing your train of thought.
 
Anita's videos and her series have gotten better in quality and tone since her first FF videos, which also means that the people who do hate her(I mean the real vile hate that blinds) and her work are now resorting to threats in order to get their message across.

If this threat doesn't convince her or anyone here her work isn't culturally relevant or something of interest with regards to video games, I can't help you and nobody else can.

Does anyone know if her work is directly influencing developers or big name game directors?


We got The Last of Us wonderful characterization, so yeah Druckman credit her for giving him some idea on how to make meaningful female character
 
No, not really. Pretty much any label can be used in a negative light when a pattern emerges. For instance, I now consider Gamer to be a bad word and refuse to be identified as such.

There should only be one label in this world that matters.

0073.JPG

How you just gonna chop off my second sentence that basically said exactly what your post did? Labels are important. Words are labels. Labels mean something, and are important to discussion. Words don't mean exactly the same thing to every single person, similar to how ideas don't mean the same to every single person. That's why we have tangents such as this in every thread where both sides pick their favorite dictionary definition and argue around that instead of the core topic. This juncture is where context comes in to play.
 
Average human behavior isn't rational. Phobias (usually not considered mental disorders) are everywhere and are irrational. Confirmation bias exists everywhere and is not rational.

And it's not just legitimate authority. Your average white southerner 300 years ago believed slavery was moral and black people were subhuman. They believe this because other people they frequently interacted with believed this.

I feel societies has issues with the way we deal with mental health. I also think immediately assuming mental health disorders are responsible for the threats is not sensible, nor does it address the issues that made people feel the threats were acceptable.
Oh of course. There are a shit ton of factors involved in these things and the mental health of the perpetrator is just one factor that lead to such an extreme situation.
 
Please stop with this. It isn't helpful to blame an entire group of people. There's lots of men in this very thread who are very sympathetic, and this is unfair to them. It doesn't really accomplish anything to cast such a wide net other than to upset your allies and further enrage those displaying already despicable behavior.

Thank you for stating that.

I am a loving son and husband and I'd like to think I'm a nurturing father to my little girl. Blanket statements like the one you responded to are quite offensive and hurtful to me, no matter how innocuous they may seem.

I really don't agree with Anita's approach to the issues she studies/talks about and find it heavy handed, but no one should have to live in fear for their safety simply for having an opinion.

This whole thing is ludicrous and out-of-control.
 
No one deserves threats for making videos, but she is constantly going out of her way to misrepresent games to appear more sexist than they actually are and all of you are just eating up her narrative. I would be really glad if I never had to hear about her or her victim complex ever again.
 
Wait, so anonymous Twitter trolls are now representative of the entirety of the tech community? Don't get me wrong, I absolutely hate what people are doing to miss Sarkeesian, but is that really "proof" that the tech community as a whole hates / despises women?

You have your causality backwards on that one. The "proof" of hostility towards women in the tech and gaming communities is years of observation of these communities and their growing hostility towards women; the harassment of Anita is just easier to explain once you know about that ongoing hostility.

Except there have been studies (linked it earlier in the thread) that shows that internet trolls usually DO have deep seeded psychological issues. I'm not sure why you're insulted by this fact. I'm not pinning the blame on anyone specifically, nor am I saying that anyone with any sort of mental issue is instantly a misogynist... Only that these people who would deliver death threats via twitter aren't normal rational people.

"I'm not saying people with mental illness are to blame for harassment, I'm just saying people who harass are all mentally ill!"

This is not a good argument. Angry and violent internet harassment is not symptomatic of an identified mental illness. It is a result of being a sadistic, narcissistic asshole, but that's not a mental illness unless we use a tautological definition like "anyone who does stuff we don't like is mentally ill."
 
Does anyone know if her work is directly influencing developers or big name game directors?
Just one example from the latest episode, I posted this before. Bioshock 2's developers (Jordan Thomas, JP LeBreton, Ryan Mattson, David Pittman, Steve Gaynor) who reflected on the brothels that Anita found objectionable among other things:
https://twitter.com/nullspeak/status/504045057507217408
ibjmcIcwllopWt.png

https://twitter.com/vectorpoem/status/430896253652582400
ijW0Xd3ySmQmO.png

https://twitter.com/fullbright/status/504656148385890304
ieZ6OYFmtixTK.png
 
I remember the days when if you didn't like a person or didn't like what that person had to say, you would either agree to disagree or just ignore them altogether?

You do? That's not what I remember, nor what history as a whole remembers lol.

Remember how wars are fought or began? It's all about people disagreeing with each other. Whether it's disagreement about a person(s) religion, sex, way of life, or race. We can only hope to learn from history to make the best future.

....so far that hasn't happened yet. :(
 
Honestly in this case it's both. People with certain types of mental illnesses (and as someone with a type of mental illness, I clearly am not referring to everyone) are the ones who take things like this that far and that openly. Normal people can be cruel vicious assholes, but even on the internet they will have limits and boundaries. The thing is that these people are influenced by society. Their extremism is very much influenced by societal values and undercurrents

I'm not sure how true this is.

Yes, people's attitudes and their expressions of their attitudes are very much influenced by what they perceive of societal values, etc. And it doesn't seem to be the case that the internet is worse than anywhere else due to anonymity or anything like that, although it might add social distance that makes it easier for people to be jerks. But one thing the internet is really good at is letting people build echo chambers, and a side effect of this is that people come totally unmoored from actual culture in favor of what culture looks like from within their echo chamber.

Normal people can clearly go well beyond sending threatening messages. When it's perceived as a normal sort of thing to do, they can go around killing people; there doesn't seem to be a limit to how far "normal" can go, given the right cultural context.

Today we have much more power to construct the culture we perceive than people used to have. A lot of ink has been spilled on how this helps drive political polarization, for example. When people don't talk about some issue offline, and only ever talk about it online in groups which self-select for a particular opinion on the issue, they start to believe that their insular group's opinion is actually a mainstream one, and this can normalize a lot of behavior that most of society would regard as way over the line.
 
No one deserves threats for making videos, but she is constantly going out of her way to misrepresent games to appear more sexist than they actually are and all of you are just eating up her narrative. I would be really glad if I never had to hear about her or her victim complex ever again.

how does it feel to be so enlightened
 
No one deserves threats for making videos, but she is constantly going out of her way to misrepresent games to appear more sexist than they actually are and all of you are just eating up her narrative. I would be really glad if I never had to hear about her or her victim complex ever again.

How sexist are games, actually?
 
No one deserves threats for making videos, but she is constantly going out of her way to misrepresent games to appear more sexist than they actually are and all of you are just eating up her narrative. I would be really glad if I never had to hear about her or her victim complex ever again.

Continue. If we were like animals, what kind of animals would we be?
 
But she also mentions the fact that even though the majority of the comment she receives are supportive, the nastiness, as she said herself, of the sexist and misogynist comments may put other women interested in being part of such endeavours off. It is still a problem.

Sure, but I dont see how you trying to make the subjective argument that everyone who uses "not everyone" type arguments are doing a disservice and what not. If you would have left the snark out, I'd imagine your post would have come across better, and less push-back would mean more people listening to your message.

Personally, I think the "putting people in their place" mindset(specifically on the internet) does more harm to a discussion(poisonous almost), then actually just addressing the points. And I realize I'm being a bit hypocritical here, since I'm practically doing the same thing, but I'm honestly not meaning to in the sense of trying to force a perception of you. I just think that sometimes good points get lost in delivery and it doesn't serve anyone.
 
Not that I'm trying to put you down, but why exactly did you get physically ill over this, for hours?

Eh, I can relate. People have been saying it's been a bad week for video games. It hasn't been a bad week for games, it's been a bad week everywhere, and honestly the overwhelming lack of any sort of optimism or positivity ANYWHERE is enough to effect you on some level.

It doesn't help when after you finish getting caught up on Ferguson and Chicago and Staten Island and Texas and ISIS and you just want to talk about the game you had a good time playing the night before, you come to GAF and the top story is that segments of people chased a woman who said something they didn't like out of her house. It's exhausting and there's no real meaningful change of behavior on the horizon.

It sucks. It makes people feel sick. It makes me feel angry. And it makes me feel sad that there's no actual meaningful solution outside of talking about it and denouncing these people's behavior and, quite frankly, stating the fucking obvious.
 
Just one example from the latest episode, I posted this before. Bioshock 2's developers (Jordan Thomas, JP LeBreton, Ryan Mattson, David Pittman, Steve Gaynor) who reflected on the brothels that Anita found objectionable among other things:

Really awesome. Thank you for sharing this.
 
I'm not sure how true this is.

Yes, people's attitudes and their expressions of their attitudes are very much influenced by what they perceive of societal values, etc. And it doesn't seem to be the case that the internet is worse than anywhere else due to anonymity or anything like that, although it might add social distance that makes it easier for people to be jerks. But one thing the internet is really good at is letting people build echo chambers, and a side effect of this is that people come totally unmoored from actual culture in favor of what culture looks like from within their echo chamber.

Normal people can clearly go well beyond sending threatening messages. When it's perceived as a normal sort of thing to do, they can go around killing people; there doesn't seem to be a limit to how far "normal" can go, given the right cultural context.

Today we have much more power to construct the culture we perceive than people used to have. A lot of ink has been spilled on how this helps drive political polarization, for example. When people don't talk about some issue offline, and only ever talk about it online in groups which self-select for a particular opinion on the issue, they start to believe that their insular group's opinion is actually a mainstream one, and this can normalize a lot of behavior that most of society would regard as way over the line.
Oh this is true of course, I'm just not sure it applies as such in this specific situation. As I said, this guy is clearly super extreme even amongst those groups because otherwise we'd get a lot more people outright supporting and even praising him, rather than trying to deflect the issue by suggesting she fabricated the experience or is overplaying it.
 
I don't agree with some examples of her videos, but no one deserves to be harassed and become the target of threats. I hope they will catch the ones who did this.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom