Which is why I offered the more appropriate, and less annoying phrasing (cultural) indoctrination rather than saying "It's for religious reasons". Using your own circumcision example I seriously doubt most parents would cite "religious reasons" because the connotation that is flying completely over your head is "this is a direct result of my beliefs". If you want to cite the history of a practice go ahead but saying something like the real reason you do this isn't because just about everyone in America has their kids foreskin cut... It's really and truly for religious reasons is kind of ignoring the whole usage of the phrase.
Also stop saying I avoid pork for any sort of health reasons. You've put those words in my mouth more than once and I can only assume it was because I spelled deity, diety... The context clues should have cleared that up I would have thought though but I guess not.
You can re-read each and every post I've made carefully and I think you'll find all of your pleas here are un-necessary.
1. The very first post I made to your says "religious
influence", which is an even more fair and neutral term than what you are trying to get me to agree to in your first paragraph. Influence doesn't imply that the person is religious, or is secretly religious... only that the source of the belief is likely from a historically religious reason (like an atheist saying "oh my god").
2. I don't think you'll find a single post asserting that you abstain for dietary reasons. My first posts assumed that
could be the reason... But I was willing to hear your explanation for why (for all I know you had scientific studies which I would like to read). But the whole rest of the debate, I haven't been talking about you, I've been talking about society. I can tell you weren't offering up many reasons for why, and I wasn't going to press on assuming I knew.
Really, you guys did the thing where you acted offended/incredulous/dismissive when I was making a legitimate point. So I did the thing which preserved dignity which was to state it as factually as possible as long as you guys kept responding. So, that's how debates go... Assumptions in this discussion seem to keep making it about
me ("annoying"/"makes assumptions about black culture") or
you ("secretly religious"/"thinks its for dietary reasons") but I'm not interested in
us at all. I was interested in talking about the origin of pork abstinence in secular society.