For everyone suffering this affliction, here are some Skyrim PS3 captures:I really want to bang my head on something when I hear stuff like this. I'm guessing you've forgotten what PS3 games look like, my friend.
FYI
The Witcher 3 - New screenshots
- Thread starter Sn4ke_911
- Start date
FYI
sublimit
Banned
Yeah but i don't think these are looking so much worse as others seem to think.
While I don't agree that they are anywhere close to the cartoony stylized designs of WoW, they definitely aren't given enough resource priority to be so closely featured in screenshot promos.
While Metal Gear 5's DD is a central character and probably deserves more resource allocation, you can't help but notice the stark difference in texture resolution and polygon count. It's kind of hard to go back after seeing better, but I feel that way with a lot of games that try for a more realistic approach to their art direction.
I really want to bang my head on something when I hear stuff like this. I'm guessing you've forgotten what PS3 games look like, my friend.
jim2point0
Banned
Not with that amount of downsampling. It's probably the PC version (unfortunately). There's no reason for them to show off console quality graphics with downsampling when they can just show the PC version.
This shot in particular does nothing for me. Pretty rough foliage. The short render distance for grass makes the terrain look really dull. No detail in anything. I guess the sky looks nice though.
The horse in the last screenshot just looks like a big porcelain statue. Animals are so hard to get right through...
artsi
Member
I just look at them as they are.
michaeljordanlaugh.gif
Yeah, that one screenshot doesn't look hot, but it's not outright bad or anything. Just different from other shots we've seen. I do like that they aren't sharpened to high hell though.
This game continues to look great.
More like Hairworks wasn't enabled. We already know how it looks like.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5DvVxbmu3OU&list=PL4FII4B-zM0f9w-s3jnjpp46DiU6zDoCA
Or Pantene Pro V.
Crossing Eden
Hello, my name is Yves Guillemot, Vivendi S.A.'s Employee of the Month!
I'm sure we're all aware that these aren't screenshots of the pc version at the highest settings. Isn't the fur tech exclusive to pc anyway?
Dictator93
Member
Nah, those are just the console wolves.
I'm going to nip the joke in the bud here and say that the realistic fur is PC/Nvidia(?)-exclusive, just in case people get the wrong idea.
CDProjekt haven't confirmed it, perhaps the low preset could be used.
EDIT :
http://gamingbolt.com/the-witcher-3-tech-interview-ps4xbox-one-performance-challenges-dx12-redengine-3-mods-more#G7K8EtQ4oXyIQ6oW.99
Perhaps that has changed, I wish everyone to experience this impressive tech.
Hairworks runs on AMD cards, at least in COD Ghosts the low preset can. The high one is CUDA exclusive.
No idea what will happen with TW3.
They look bad even by console standards. Those textures cant be representative of the quality we are to expect of the game.
Ah, right. Fixed.
Dictator93
Member
Actually the Fur should run on AMD. Hairwaorks isn't based off CUDA.
BTW JaseC, I legitiamtely read your posts in that actress's voice.
Then they should have said "next ultra pc only gen wolf" instead of "next gen wolf".
DD is completely optional, there is a chance we won't find him on any given playthru.
Yeah, I edited my post just before you quoted it, as you've probably noticed.
My plan is working perfectly!
You are correct. Hairworks uses DirectCompute, then why was the max fur setting locked to Nvidia in Ghosts ?
Purely artificial ?
No I don't think so, maybe a different platform. The shaders are different. Must be PS3.
Canis lupus
Member
Really unimpressive, thought it would look better.
Lol at that last gen fur.
Lol at that last gen fur.
Dictator93
Member
They never called it a "next gen wolf." That was Dennis' gif with his added text.
It could be an older version of Hairworks perhaps? I would have no idea why it would be limited. Perhaps AMD cards just suck at it with higher densities?
Brerlappin
Member
Yeah that one leapt out at me as being pretty unimpressive. I mean they do look good dont get me wrong, but im gonna say it, i think Deep Down looks better based on these screens anyway.
Target render was overambitious, or these are just XB1/PS4 version screens.
While I don't agree that they are anywhere close to the cartoony stylized designs of WoW, they definitely aren't given enough resource priority to be so closely featured in screenshot promos.
While Metal Gear 5's DD is a central character and probably deserves more resource allocation, you can't help but notice the stark difference in texture resolution and polygon count. It's kind of hard to go back after seeing better, but I feel that way with a lot of games that try for a more realistic approach to their art direction.
If you watch the video, you can see that the fur is not actually "real" fur or use some high quality physics system. This pic makes things look better than it actually is. It looks great nonetheless.
Pretty much
I think most people who like it, had seen those screens on mobile. On big screen those screenshots look pretty rough, especially this one (I cropped picture).
Now that you tacke the subject, Hairworks uses isoline tessellation which AMD claim is inefficient on their hardware.
TPP is open world.
That's a cop-out argument, really.
Firmus_Anguis
Banned
Compared to previous shots, I'll say it like it is: It looks like shit by comparison.
I'm sure the game will be more polished until launch though.
Some of the stuff shown barely passes off as "next-gen".
I'm sure the game will be more polished until launch though.
Some of the stuff shown barely passes off as "next-gen".
CyberPunked
Member
Yeh, these screens don't look like they're on the highest settings. They wouldn't remove the Nvidia fur, it was implemented and worked.
my reaction^
Now high res screen of that moment with Geralt between Triss and Yennefer.
Nvidia is hardly above such behaviour; for instance, it was initially possible for AMD GPU owners to run an Nvidia card purely for PhysX, but Nvidia later cracked down on this.Edit: Ah, noticed your follow-up.
We have seen open world games that are already released that sure dont have the textures that this wolf has. There is something wrong, the tech is there , the hardware also, it might be open world but these textures are just too bad.
Also TPP is not a linear game.
DudeWithNoName
Member
Same here. Between this and HMCC, I don't need to buy another game until 2016.
I Eat Thumbtacks
Neo Member
Geralt looks really weird in the second pic, he looked a lot better here.
The Albatross
Member
I guess I'm the only person who thought that open vista looked great.
Similar threads
- Poll