So they intentionally forced parity in order to avoid debates? FUCK OFF UBISOFT
Seriously Ubisoft should really catch hell for this.
So they are CPU bound...so how would one version be better than the other one? Of course ps4 has better specs but if the engine relies heavily on CPU a better gpu won't help much.
Im sorry. Your cancelling a pre order for a watch.... because of parity.
A watch.
I can't GAF. Your politics are too funny. Lets all tweet at ubisoft about how rustled your jimmies are and watch them respond back to us with the laughs of them swimming in that MS money.
I really don't think MS is paying publishers to make shitty PC ports.
Fantastic.
Heh, that comment caused as much debate as not doing it would.
So it's thanks to Azura if the xone version it's 900p I suppose.Agree. Sony had exclusive agreement with Bungie and MS was still able to get it up to 1080p. If people believe MS paid them to hold it at 900p, Sony would have done the same on Destiny.
It's a developer decision. A lot of people have been saying for awhile that both consoles are CPU gimped, and its why MS is pushing for its Azure cloud computing to take the load off.
aka
The PS4 game is being gimped by the Xbone game.
"We decided to lock them at the same specs to avoid all the debates and stuff"
Send a tweet to @assassinscreed with #PS4NoParity in there. It won't make a difference but it'll be fun.
Regardless of whether its an 'up-port' or not, what does that matter at all?
PS4 had enough power to do more than the XB1 version yet Bungie didn't take advantage of that. Whether it was an up-port or not, that happened. And its not because MS paid them.
So there is precedent for this.
Wow. I don't think that's going to work out for them if the speed at which this thread is moving is any indication."We decided to lock them at the same specs to avoid all the debates and stuff,"
Fitting.
And now they've created an even worse debate. Way to go guys.
This thread is literally keeping up a matched post/viewcount.
I'm willing to bet this has little to no effect in sales. Maybe the .01% of the population here.
Last time I checked GAF was absolutely furious about Skyrim on PS3, with people complaining it was unfair that 360 got a superior version.
Now that PS4 is more powerful than XBONE, no one seems to be crying foul now.
Isn't that the lead singer of Blink 182?Who is this cool man
Might as well admit ps4 could have easily hit 1080No fucking way did he seriously say "to avoid all the debates and stuff".
REALLY?
Occam's razor leads us to MS literally paying them money to technically gut the PS4 version, to make the PS4 version artificially worse for PS4 users. There is no other motive or reason I can think of.
You crazy if you will get the same performance of consoles from a Ubisoft game, with the same specs of the consoles, there games are poorly optmized on pc and always have issues.
A producer would be privy to the finer details of the co-marketing agreement, a better source for detail I would argue.
Doesn't look good IQ-wise to me.
![]()
And that's a relatively easy scene to anti-alias.
As I said, the "avoid discussion" thing is obviously false because this causes far more. They don't care about discussion. Only a tiny % of AAA game buyers discuss this stuff on forums, and of those many will buy their shit anyway, regardless of news like this.
Occam's razor leads us to MS literally paying them money to technically gut the PS4 version, to make the PS4 version artificially worse for PS4 users. There is no other motive or reason I can think of.
And that's.... Well, wow, that's just bad. I wish I could say they'd pay for this, but they won't, because people will buy AC anyway.