Man what the fuck is wrong with these companies. Still 900p/30fps. Someone ask them the point of having next gen system. 720p to 900p with 30 fps wtf seriously wtf
Agree. After Black Flag I don't want to go back in resolution.
Man what the fuck is wrong with these companies. Still 900p/30fps. Someone ask them the point of having next gen system. 720p to 900p with 30 fps wtf seriously wtf
Is it possible that Sony inadvertently make a mistake by making their console roughly 50% more powerful?
What I meann is, we are seeing a trend where 3rd party devs don't bother with the extra power. EA sports games, destiny, unity etc are identical on both consoles so only 1st party title are really using that extra power. Might make them not push power next gen (ps5) seeing as its not really worth it. Hope that doesn't happen![]()
Yeah, it's sneaky language. "We did not lower the specs" still doesn't mean they didn't intentionally limit them. I actually sent them a follow-up before posting that in hopes of getting some clarity on whether they're claiming that the PS4 version wasn't capable of more than 900p/30fps in the first place, but I'm not expecting much more.Thanks Jason.
That statement is pretty empty though; they pretty much say absolutely nothing.
The XBone has a 10% stronger CPU than the PS4 because of the clock frequency increase of the XBone but the PS4 has a 40% stronger GPU.
But I can't believe they can't reach 1080p on the PS4 if 900p possible on the XBone.
(900p to 1080p is 44% more pixel)
Ubisoft just sent over a statement, FYI all. http://kotaku.com/ac-unity-will-have-same-specs-on-xbox-one-and-ps4-to-av-1643054770
Mmmhmm.No guys you read it all wrong. When he said "we kept them equal so nobody would complain" what he meant to say was "we worked our asses off on both consoles equally". You need reading comprehension internet.
After that PR statement, I'm thinking that MS marketing the game has more to do with it then many suspect.
Why is it the juniors that consistently push this false narrative? Serious question.The XBone has a 10% stronger CPU than the PS4
Meh. Don't believe the statement. If X1 could handle 900p/30 fps I would think PS4 could handle 1080p/30 fps.
But Dragon Age is the following week.![]()
Maybe it's timed parity, after 6 months ps4 owners can play it at 1080p.
Why is it the juniors that consistently push this false narrative? Serious question.
At no point did we decide to reduce the ambitions of any SKU.
Ubisoft's upcoming stealth-action game Assassin's Creed Unity is targeting 1080p/60fps for both the PlayStation 4 and Xbox One versions, level designer Bruno St-André revealed in an interview with GamingBolt conducted at E3 but published today.
Gamespot link
There's not much to discuss. It is what it is. All the complaining on message boards wont change this. Now if folks voted with their wallets on the other hand, and skipping the entry in the series across all platforms, including PC, that might make a difference.Sucks.. Brad from GB said they're not going to talk about this (or at least hinted they're not).
"why would we when Ubi already explained the technical reason behind it?"
![]()
You banned all the others?
I kid! I kid!!!
I wonder if these are actually always the same people just making new accounts.Why is it the juniors that consistently push this false narrative? Serious question.
Thus is such a shitty analogy it's not even funny.Just putting this here.
Who cares about how the game looks, yes the PS4 version will be running at 900p and at 30fps to match that of the Xbox One. Why are people getting so angry, this is the equivalent of 2 brothers/sisters fighting over who gets the better toy. And the Mother (game developers) giving 2 equal toys to the children, and one of them (the one who wanted the better toy) throwing it out of the pram.
I'm getting this game still, and many others will as well.
Just putting this here.
Who cares about how the game looks, yes the PS4 version will be running at 900p and at 30fps to match that of the Xbox One. Why are people getting so angry, this is the equivalent of 2 brothers/sisters fighting over who gets the better toy. And the Mother (game developers) giving 2 equal toys to the children, and one of them (the one who wanted the better toy) throwing it out of the pram.
I'm getting this game still, and many others will as well.
Ubisoft - I didn't care about the female character stuff, in fact I even defended you on the issue. But this is a poor decision - I won't be buying your game, and I will be encouraging my friends not to either. We all spent $449 CA for the ability to play games with better graphics that ran at 1080p. If you want to make a product that intentionally doesn't meet those standards, don't expect my friends and I to show you any interest - it's only fair.
Woah woah woah. Is this just a bad shot or is this representative? And if it's representative what the hell happened to this game?
Ubisoft just sent over a statement, FYI all. http://kotaku.com/ac-unity-will-have-same-specs-on-xbox-one-and-ps4-to-av-1643054770
Yeah, it's sneaky language. "We did not lower the specs" still doesn't mean they didn't intentionally limit them. I actually sent them a follow-up before posting that in hopes of getting some clarity on whether they're claiming that the PS4 version wasn't capable of more than 900p/30fps in the first place, but I'm not expecting much more.
Speaking with Custom PC, representatives from both graphics card manufacturers say that "they're working on GPGPU-accelerated AI in games", and that we could be seeing the first games and hardware to take advantage of this as early as next year.
Nvidia and ATI say they're working right now with developers of both games and middleware on the initiative, with the ultimate goal of taking all AI routines - which spend around 90% of their time performing visibility and path finding queries - off the hands of the CPU, and sticking them in your graphics card instead.
So they sent out the 'putting out the fire' PR statement already.
No guys you read it all wrong. When he said "we kept them equal so nobody would complain" what he meant to say was "we worked our asses off on both consoles equally". You need reading comprehension internet.
What do you mean by vague?Actually it was the home of the 6GB VRAM controversy, where we got dozens of meltdowns from some PC gamers thinking that their video cards were now "worthless". It also went through a bit of a console roller-coaster, where people were mocking the XBO version for being "720p30", based on some sort of vague information that the PS4 was expected to be 1080p60. It turned out that XBO was 900p30 and PS4 was 1080p30, so nearly everybody was wrong until we got our hands on the game.
Hmm.So, is Ubisoft saying that Bruno St-André was lying?
We have no hard numbers from Sony on it and the spec leaks indicated a 1.6GHz processor while MS has officially confirmed 1.75. I honestly don't blame them for not knowing about Matt's post that said they can get more out of the PS4 CPU. It's not that well known and is probably accounting for OS overhead. In all likelihood XBO's CPU is probably clocked higher but is held back by the OS.Why is it the juniors that consistently push this false narrative? Serious question.
Ubisoft just sent over a statement, FYI all. http://kotaku.com/ac-unity-will-have-same-specs-on-xbox-one-and-ps4-to-av-1643054770
Ubisoft just sent over a statement, FYI all. http://kotaku.com/ac-unity-will-have-same-specs-on-xbox-one-and-ps4-to-av-1643054770
Yeah, it's sneaky language. "We did not lower the specs" still doesn't mean they didn't intentionally limit them. I actually sent them a follow-up before posting that in hopes of getting some clarity on whether they're claiming that the PS4 version wasn't capable of more than 900p/30fps in the first place, but I'm not expecting much more.
It's not about how the games looks but how Ubisoft's practices sucks.
Yeah, it's sneaky language. "We did not lower the specs" still doesn't mean they didn't intentionally limit them. I actually sent them a follow-up before posting that in hopes of getting some clarity on whether they're claiming that the PS4 version wasn't capable of more than 900p/30fps in the first place, but I'm not expecting much more.
Microsoft plain and simple paid for this if one way or another.
Just like Sony did with Far Cry 4.