Gematsu: Sony to hold Playstation Experience event in December

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't think Square Enix is doing it. I think CyberConnect2 is doing it.

See below...

1. They get the rights to make G Bike...
http://www.siliconera.com/2014/09/17/final-fantasy-vii-g-bike-gets-new-trailer/

2. CyberConnect2 states they want to do a remake of VII themselves.
http://kotaku.com/final-fantasy-vii-bike-game-could-pave-the-path-to-a-fu-1589803588

3. Well... their huge announcement. http://www.siliconera.com/2014/11/1...looking-forward-announcing-something-awesome/

Just my speculation but those are some major points there...

BARRET'S WRATH LET'S FUCKING GO
 
It'd only sell gangbusters. You're right. Probably not worth it.

The name Final Fantasy VII will take you a long way, as the spin-offs proved (Hi, Crisis Core!), but as others proved (Hi, Dirge!) if the game is not perceived as good, doesn't review well, etc, it won't carry you that far. A game with Final Fantasy VII in the title can still bomb. I think Square is acutely aware of this, too. Remasters I think get a degree of a 'pass' with reviews - look at FFX & KH - because you can't expect them to invent the wheel. With FF7's source FUBAR/missing, it'd have to be a more full remake from the ground up - and that's likely to be practically judged as a new game as a result. Can you put out those systems in 201X? How will they review? Would they be called archaic? Is a player who has been addicted to Skyrim, who is plainly who SE is eyeing to grow the FF fan base with, likely to come (back?) to FF7 with those mechanics? If the answer is no, and you're already rebuilding from the ground up, the smart choice is to reimagine.

I think more of those lost 4 million or so would be more likely to come back if FF7 were refashioned as a more modern game with the same characters, story and aesthetics, and with the code lost, this'd probably be the smartest thing for them to do. For the people that love the game at a higher level, though, that raises another question, like I say, because it comes down to this 'you're repainting the Mona Lisa' argument.

Or, to use a movie analogy: I think any FF7 remake would be more likely to be a akin to a movie remake/reboot than a 'special edition' on blu-ray with new CG, to try to take maximum advantage of the name. That's a dangerous proposition in a sense, but an exciting one.
 
I don't think Square Enix is doing it. I think CyberConnect2 is doing it.

See below...

1. They get the rights to make G Bike...
http://www.siliconera.com/2014/09/17/final-fantasy-vii-g-bike-gets-new-trailer/

2. CyberConnect2 states they want to do a remake of VII themselves.
http://kotaku.com/final-fantasy-vii-bike-game-could-pave-the-path-to-a-fu-1589803588

3. Well... their huge announcement. http://www.siliconera.com/2014/11/1...looking-forward-announcing-something-awesome/

Just my speculation but those are some major points there...
0AZnj2E.gif


I would love to see current CC2 doing a JRPG.
 
CC2 needs to make a .Hack RPG with Dragon's Dogma's pawn system and a Yuki Kajiura OST. No more Naruto fighting games please :(
 
The name Final Fantasy VII will take you a long way, as the spin-offs proved (Hi, Crisis Core!), but as others proved (Hi, Dirge!) if the game is not perceived as good, doesn't review well, etc, it won't carry you that far. A game with Final Fantasy VII in the title can still bomb. I think Square is acutely aware of this, too. Remasters I think get a degree of a 'pass' with reviews - look at FFX & KH - because you can't expect them to invent the wheel. With FF7's source FUBAR/missing, it'd have to be a more full remake from the ground up - and that's likely to be practically judged as a new game as a result. Can you put out those systems in 201X?

I think more of those lost 4 million or so would be more likely to come back if FF7 were refashioned as a more modern game with the same characters, story and aesthetics, and with the code lost, this'd probably be the smartest thing for them to do. For the people that love the game at a higher level, though, that raises another question, like I say, because it comes down to this 'you're repainting the Mona Lisa' argument.

Or, to use a movie analogy: I think any FF7 remake would be more likely to be a akin to a movie remake/reboot than a 'special edition' on blu-ray with new CG, to try to take maximum advantage of the name. That's a dangerous proposition in a sense, but an exciting one.

They can't remake FF7 without it looking like Advent Children cause expectation already set so it make no sense doing it any other way.
Plus the spin off hardly ever sell as good as the original and you putting to much stock in reviews .
 
The only FF7 remake I would want would be in the style of The Monkey Island remakes a few years ago.

monkeyisland2compare_1--article_image.jpg


Just redraw the 2D art in HD and update the models and redo the CG. Have a option to switch between classic FF7 and FF7 HD if possible.

Do not change the gameplay, Do not go adding VO, Do not go adding extra content.

I do not what to see current Square Enix try and retell that story with their current design philosophies. Just give me that game cleaned up. Then do the same with 8 and 9.


Or maybe the RE remake would be another example of keeping the core of the classic game while tweaking a few things. But that would be as far as I would go.
 
what does that mean.

"Sound made when one is attempting to sound reassuring yet non-commital."
"Something somebody says when they are thinking about what you have just said. They have an opinion.. but dont want to tell you what it is.

1. (used typically to express thoughtful absorption, hesitation, doubt, or perplexity.)"
 
I think it is time to stop trying to pry new info from insiders. Thread has become too cluttered with truly random game speculations.

Lets wait put TGA and PSX in peace.
 
And we're still a week away from this event. It's making it hard to concentrate at working when I'm checking this thread every few minutes.
 
When was the last time Kitase directed a game? He did wonders in that role.
It's been WAY too long without him at the helm of a title. I have no idea why he doesn't see all these issues and just say "everyone stand back, and let me show you how it's done". He's been too busy hyping up Toriyama as some sort of protege, when that man really does not have what it takes to inherit the franchise.
 
No FFVII Remake please.
I too want it, but it's too soon.
Let Sony deliver something new and exciting with PSX and SE focus on the absurdely promising FFXV, then give the remake, just in time for the 20th anniversary of the game.

I don't think Square Enix is doing it. I think CyberConnect2 is doing it.

See below...

1. They get the rights to make G Bike...
http://www.siliconera.com/2014/09/17/final-fantasy-vii-g-bike-gets-new-trailer/

2. CyberConnect2 states they want to do a remake of VII themselves.
http://kotaku.com/final-fantasy-vii-bike-game-could-pave-the-path-to-a-fu-1589803588

3. Well... their huge announcement. http://www.siliconera.com/2014/11/1...looking-forward-announcing-something-awesome/

Just my speculation but those are some major points there...

Considering SE it's announcing a completely new game, which is not a remake, and it hinted it's a collaboration with another studio, isn't it more plausible CC2 it's the first candidate?

I'd actually love CC2 developing a new Star Ocean. (either that or Strelka Stories, or another SE IP)
 
The only FF7 remake I would want would be in the style of The Monkey Island remakes a few years ago.

Just redraw the 2D art in HD and update the models and redo the CG. Have a option to switch between classic FF7 and FF7 HD if possible.

Do not change the gameplay, Do not go adding VO, Do not go adding extra content.

I do not what to see current Square Enix try and retell that story with their current design philosophies. Just give me that game cleaned up. Then do the same with 8 and 9.

Or maybe the RE remake would be another example of keeping the core of the classic game while tweaking a few things. But that would be as far as I would go.

Again, a lot of FF7's original code is lost, so it sadly isn't really possible to do the Monkey Island or Halo 1/2 style treatment. It'd have to be built from the ground up. Definitely possible for 9 and quite likely for 8, however! Would love to see this happen for 9. A lot of the art for that game in particular was rendered at a much higher quality than made it onto the disc, as Mama Robotnik uncovered all that time ago. Hopefully Square has all that stored...

They can't remake FF7 without it looking like Advent Children cause expectation already set so it make no sense doing it any other way.
Plus the spin off hardly ever sell as good as the original and you putting to much stock in reviews .

Right. The game would have to look modern. The question I was posing and making a point around was if the game would also need to play modern, and in line with that how much it would have to change to be a viable release if it was more a remake than a remaster (since a remaster seems largely impossible).

RE Spin-offs vs the original: Obviously. FF7 is over 10 million. Crisis Core actually ended up getting well over 3 million - on PSP, a machine which didn't really do very well! It was hugely successful. Dirge was a bad game, received poor reviews and poor word of mouth, and the sales reflected that, not even hitting half of what Crisis Core did on the PlayStation 2, a machine with one of the largest install bases of all time.

FFX-2 was simialrly successful - over 4 million copies of it were sold compared to FFX's 6.5 million (ish). Again, that was a good (if polarizing) game. That carried it. If you want an example of what happens to less well-received games, just look at the sales of FF13's sequels, which drop off at a faster rate. Anyway, point is - the numbers do largely end up bearing out the quality in these instances.

As for reviews, bit off topic but -- it's not about reviews as much as it is about the general public perception and word of mouth. Reviews are just one thing that feeds into a melting pot of opinion, but reviews are a major force in that; they help to create a narrative for many before they even try the game themselves. In that sense, bad (p)reviews can absolutely 'sink' a game and good (p)reviews can make a game, but only through association with a generally good or bad buzz. They can help to create a bad (or good) buzz, which is key. This is more true than ever in the social media age and all that; reviews and previews are often the conduits which kick off discussion on places like GAF and Twitter and the like, and from there people make their choices, take their sides, and fight their corners for their opinions. All of this can effect a game deeply when it comes to performance at the store.

Unless FF7 visibly came out as a remaster, at a remaster price, in the same way KH & FFX did, the expectation from the public would likely be for a version of the game that's evolved, not just graphically, but in all departments. So the game would probably have to change - it very likely wouldn't just be the same game but prettier. That's all I'm saying.
 
So much going on in this thread.

FF VII Remake. The Last Guardian. So much secrets.

I won't be surprised to see both of them in the future at some point.
 
Well I think we'd have to wait for FFXV to be finished before a potential VII Remake is announced so since XV is never coming out then we can safely say we're never getting VII Remake.
 
It's been WAY too long without him at the helm of a title. I have no idea why he doesn't see all these issues and just say "everyone stand back, and let me show you how it's done". He's been too busy hyping up Toriyama as some sort of protege, when that man really does not have what it takes to inherit the franchise.

Yep Kitase needs to show everyone how it's done again .
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom