Looks like a new Rogue Squadron game without the camerawork and direction. Shows how very important they are even for special effects sequences.
It's not really better. A good director on three is better than a good director on one or two, and then a handful of bad and masterpiece directors having equal chance at the next entries.It's better this way. The original films had a different director on each movie and mission impossible does the same thing and for the most part has been successful.
Because Luke was totally a Jedi in A New Hope.
He looks great and I like the energy he gave off the two seconds we got of him. I'm super pumped.
What makes you think I didn't realize it was a reference to A New Hope? Other than your ever present hubris of course.
Things happen on Tatooine because it's a no man's land. Anywhere else, Anakin might have been found and trained by the Jedi, anywhere else, his mother wouldn't have been killed by sandpeople, anywhere else, they wouldn't have been able to hide Luke.
so the same reason why the Hutts and Han are doing shady deals on this planet, is the reason Luke or Anakin haven't been discovered or drafted by the Empire yet.
Feels like the story could happen nowhere else but on Tatooine
you know what's super sad? racist assholes?
you know what's also weirdly sad to me? that there's still people around who are geniunely shocked how many vocally racist assholes there are on the Internet. Talk about privilege :/ (not meant as an offense - but if you seriously are shocked about what's happening with #blackstormtrooper, you haven't been paying attention to things like people going batshit when they watched the Hunger games and little Rue was black...)
first of all, it's 30 years, afaik.
secondly, you know what's still in service? the F-16 fighting Falcon, ... it's been in service since 36 years now.
also those X-Wings are heavily modified. Their S-foils have undergone a massive re-design.
Do you expect the Incom Corporation (the company who makes the T-65 X-wing fighter) to entirely re-invent their best selling model?
this might be an iterative improvement. Just like the AK74 to the AK47.
And has it been confirmed that the two lines spoken in the teaser are the same actor? Because the more I watch it the more I think it are two different actors.
I think this kind of shaky cam adds a whole lot to CGI effects. Really noticed that when I saw the new Battlestar Galactica for the first time. I just hope it's not too much, sometimes you just want to get a proper, normal look at the spaceships.Looks like a new Rogue Squadron game without the camerawork and direction. Shows how very important they are even for special effects sequences.
Yeah, the only person speaking in that trailer is Andy Serkis.
Ok, thanks. My mind playing tricks on me then.
Wow, that was a pretty awfully cut trailer.
Luckily it was short and showed nothing, it was more confusing than anything. I still have hopes for the film.
Huh??? It was only confusing if you assumed a less than 2 minute trailer (teaser really) was enough for you to fully understand a movie, which clearly wasn't it's intention. I don't see anything poor about it
Wasn't Disney going to do a standalone movie before this trilogy started? Or is that coming after?
Ok, thanks. My mind playing tricks on me then.
Don't you understand that everyone here are professional editors?
Wasn't Disney going to do a standalone movie before this trilogy started? Or is that coming after?
Basic cognition isn't hubris. Seeing the things you post and understanding the words contained within them isn't an act of haughty superiority. It's just reading.
In the multitude of posts you've made about this 88 seconds of commercial between yesterday and now, you never once mentioned in any of the attempts to point out how poor a choice JJ Abrams is, the fact he apparently ripped off "Look sir, Droids" for the first shot of his teaser. (which still isn't actually confirmed, either)
Leading me to believe it didn't even occur to you that such a thing had happened until someone put up that gif featuring them side by side, which only THEN led to you pointing out how lazy/cheap JJ Abrams is.
Because if you'd noticed it before, I have little doubt you wouldn't have pointed it out yourself, quite loudly.
I don't know. Maybe that supposition is a little hubristic? I'll allow for that, I guess.
after I think, there are 4 Star Wars movies planned including TFA
Wasn't Disney going to do a standalone movie before this trilogy started? Or is that coming after?
Plus one other standalone film.After the plan IIRC is to have a standalone movie between every major episode
2015- Ep VII
2016- Standalone
2017 - Ep VIII
2018- Standalone
2019- Ep IX
Any star wars fan worth their salt would have seen a storm trooper on tatooine suddenly entering the picture zoomed in from the bottom edge of the frame and thought "hey, A New Hope."
After, the plan IIRC is to have a standalone movie between every major episode
2015- Ep VII
2016- Standalone
2017- Ep VIII
2018- Standalone
2019- Ep IX
After, the plan IIRC is to have a standalone movie between every major episode
2015- Ep VII
2016- Standalone
2017- Ep VIII
2018- Standalone
2019- Ep IX
lets say you turn off the main blade, what you have is like a bent dagger
Sweet. The universe has so much potential and now that Lucas is gone I actually have hope.
Oh shit, so there will be a scene of him falling down and then turning on the handle to plant it in the wall.
Yo Bobby, when are you putting out your podcast with reactions to the teaser by the way?
Either you didn't or you chose not to.
I believe the latter because nothing in your posting history suggests you're that observant on your own.
"Any Star Wars fan" my ass, by the way.
Believe what you want,
Im afraid this is going to ruin my childhood memories of the prequel trilogy.
We recorded a quick 10-15 minute hit to insert at the beginning of an episode we already had in the can: We'd bumped that episode twice already, and didn't wanna bump it a third time. Plus, every other show and their spinoffs is going to be doing like, 90 minutes on that trailer, I already know, so we figured it'll probably be better to just do a quick hit than to just add another 90 minutes of the same takes everyone else has![]()
Wow, that was a pretty awfully cut trailer.
Luckily it was short and showed nothing, it was more confusing than anything. I still have hopes for the film.
Wow, that was a pretty awfully cut trailer.
Luckily it was short and showed nothing, it was more confusing than anything. I still have hopes for the film.
I'm not as upset about it, but it's totally nostalgia pandering.The Bad:
- The seemingly slavish devotion to the originals. It's supposed to be about 50 years after the OG trilogy. Why the heck are X-Wings and the Millennium Falcon still a thing? What the hell are stormtroopers still around for? Why are we back on Tatooine? Because nostalgia pandering, that's why.
I will continue to do so!
And thank you for not pointing out my momentary, coffee-addled mistaking of former & latter in that post before I edited it. I appreciate that you still got what I meant as I was maligning your observational skills.![]()
I'm not as upset about it, but it's totally nostalgia pandering.
What I appreciated about The Prequel Trilogy is that it tried to stomp out some of its own ground with unique vehicle designs. We've seen so little here though, and there have already been new vehicles/bots introduced (new droid). Still, when you look at who is cast in this film, it really does seem like they're throwing anyone and everyone back in, and I'd much rather them not have to drag through all of that again. Many of those characters had 3 movies to their name, let it go.