• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Star Wars The Force Awakens Trailer

Status
Not open for further replies.
MVhkmQa.gif

Looks like a new Rogue Squadron game without the camerawork and direction. Shows how very important they are even for special effects sequences.
 
So I was just thinking the first line "there's been an awakening, have you felt it?" is not something a lesser would ask to his superior (especially with the sith) but more the other way around. Statement and then to question the lesser to see if (s)he's also capable of feeling it. So my guess is the character we're hearing is the 'Master' if we are dealing with the Sith.
 
It's better this way. The original films had a different director on each movie and mission impossible does the same thing and for the most part has been successful.
It's not really better. A good director on three is better than a good director on one or two, and then a handful of bad and masterpiece directors having equal chance at the next entries.

Personally, I love Casino Royale and would have loved that director locked in because he is masterful and then the character would be safe, but then a good-not-great movie comes in the form of Skyfall and they decide to lock in that director and now I'm annoyed.
 
Because Luke was totally a Jedi in A New Hope.

He looks great and I like the energy he gave off the two seconds we got of him. I'm super pumped.

Luke started his Jedi training in A New Hope. It was the beginning of his evolutionary arc as a Jedi that would ultimately lead to a confrontation with the Dark Side.
 
What makes you think I didn't realize it was a reference to A New Hope? Other than your ever present hubris of course.

Basic cognition isn't hubris. Seeing the things you post and understanding the words contained within them isn't an act of haughty superiority. It's just reading.

In the multitude of posts you've made about this 88 seconds of commercial between yesterday and now, you never once mentioned in any of the attempts to point out how poor a choice JJ Abrams is, the fact he apparently ripped off "Look sir, Droids" for the first shot of his teaser. (which still isn't actually confirmed, either)

Leading me to believe it didn't even occur to you that such a thing had happened until someone put up that gif featuring them side by side, which only THEN led to you pointing out how lazy/cheap JJ Abrams is.

Because if you'd noticed it before, I have little doubt you'd have pointed it out yourself, quite loudly.

I don't know. Maybe that supposition is a little hubristic? I'll allow for that, I guess.
 
The stabilization shot really shows incompetent tie-fighter shooting though. The camera really hides how badly they miss. To be clear, I like the original shot.
 
Things happen on Tatooine because it's a no man's land. Anywhere else, Anakin might have been found and trained by the Jedi, anywhere else, his mother wouldn't have been killed by sandpeople, anywhere else, they wouldn't have been able to hide Luke.

so the same reason why the Hutts and Han are doing shady deals on this planet, is the reason Luke or Anakin haven't been discovered or drafted by the Empire yet.

Feels like the story could happen nowhere else but on Tatooine :)



you know what's super sad? racist assholes?

you know what's also weirdly sad to me? that there's still people around who are geniunely shocked how many vocally racist assholes there are on the Internet. Talk about privilege :/ (not meant as an offense - but if you seriously are shocked about what's happening with #blackstormtrooper, you haven't been paying attention to things like people going batshit when they watched the Hunger games and little Rue was black...)

I'm not surprised, I was asking because I was wondering if it was because storm troopers were supposed to be clones or whatever. But I guess it's just because they're racists. And I'm a minority where I live, so please spare the privelege talk. Smh
 
first of all, it's 30 years, afaik.

secondly, you know what's still in service? the F-16 fighting Falcon, ... it's been in service since 36 years now.

also those X-Wings are heavily modified. Their S-foils have undergone a massive re-design.
Do you expect the Incom Corporation (the company who makes the T-65 X-wing fighter) to entirely re-invent their best selling model?

this might be an iterative improvement. Just like the AK74 to the AK47.

These are good points, but the minor changes to designs aren't consistent with the evolution of the SW tech from the prequels to the trilogy.

Don't get me wrong, I have little issue with the filmmakers taking a big ol' dump on any established...well, any established anything from the prequels. However, I have a sneaking suspicion that the motive behind the very very familiar designs has little to do with conventional design philosophies in the SW universe.

The newest Star Trek films showed Abrams and co. tripping over themselves time and again in their rush to fill those films with as much distracting fluff to appease hardcore fans that the films were greatly harmed. Apparently, Abrams is a much bigger Star Wars fan than Star Trek. I remain skeptical.
 
And has it been confirmed that the two lines spoken in the teaser are the same actor? Because the more I watch it the more I think it are two different actors.
 
Wow, that was a pretty awfully cut trailer.

Luckily it was short and showed nothing, it was more confusing than anything. I still have hopes for the film.
 
Wasn't overly fussed on the teaser after my first viewing, but after seeing it a again (and again) I'm really excited for this film. Same with the lightsaber, kinda scoffed at it in the beginning, but it's nothing to be annoyed about, I don't mind it. The droid is the only bleh part for me, it just looked dumb to me, I can't tell if the ball is a part of it or if it's actually meant to be a football or something.

Everything else I love, the Stormtroopers shot, the Falcon with the TIEs and the best one... those motherfucking X-Wings!
3AQmK.gif
 
Looks like a new Rogue Squadron game without the camerawork and direction. Shows how very important they are even for special effects sequences.
I think this kind of shaky cam adds a whole lot to CGI effects. Really noticed that when I saw the new Battlestar Galactica for the first time. I just hope it's not too much, sometimes you just want to get a proper, normal look at the spaceships.
 
Wow, that was a pretty awfully cut trailer.

Luckily it was short and showed nothing, it was more confusing than anything. I still have hopes for the film.

Huh??? It was only confusing if you assumed a less than 2 minute trailer (teaser really) was enough for you to fully understand a movie, which clearly wasn't its intention. I don't see anything poor about it
 
Basic cognition isn't hubris. Seeing the things you post and understanding the words contained within them isn't an act of haughty superiority. It's just reading.

In the multitude of posts you've made about this 88 seconds of commercial between yesterday and now, you never once mentioned in any of the attempts to point out how poor a choice JJ Abrams is, the fact he apparently ripped off "Look sir, Droids" for the first shot of his teaser. (which still isn't actually confirmed, either)

Leading me to believe it didn't even occur to you that such a thing had happened until someone put up that gif featuring them side by side, which only THEN led to you pointing out how lazy/cheap JJ Abrams is.

Because if you'd noticed it before, I have little doubt you wouldn't have pointed it out yourself, quite loudly.

I don't know. Maybe that supposition is a little hubristic? I'll allow for that, I guess.

The only things I 'loudly" complained about were the saber and my dislike of Abrams. I also said I never intended to shit up the thread with nothing but negative comments. I've clarified on multiple occasions why people might dislike the hilt but only when prompted. I've deliberately avoided going further into why I dislike Abrams because it wouldn't contribute anything to the thread. So yeah, I think your hubris is causing you to read too much into my posts by making baseless assumptions. I haven't complained about anything else that other people have brought up.

Any star wars fan worth their salt would have seen a storm trooper on tatooine suddenly entering the picture zoomed in from the bottom edge of the frame and thought "hey, A New Hope."
 
Watching a New Hope gets me even more excited for this movie!

Seeing as we're getting a new trilogy, do you think we'll get a new Lego Star Wars game based off the Episode 7, 8 and 9.
 
Any star wars fan worth their salt would have seen a storm trooper on tatooine suddenly entering the picture zoomed in from the bottom edge of the frame and thought "hey, A New Hope."

Either you didn't or you chose not to.

I believe the former because nothing in your posting history suggests you're that observant on your own.

"Any Star Wars fan" my ass, by the way.
 
Yo Bobby, when are you putting out your podcast with reactions to the teaser by the way?

We recorded a quick 10-15 minute hit to insert at the beginning of an episode we already had in the can: We'd bumped that episode twice already, and didn't wanna bump it a third time. Plus, every other show and their spinoffs is going to be doing like, 90 minutes on that trailer, I already know, so we figured it'll probably be better to just do a quick hit than to just add another 90 minutes of the same takes everyone else has :)
 
Either you didn't or you chose not to.

I believe the latter because nothing in your posting history suggests you're that observant on your own.

"Any Star Wars fan" my ass, by the way.

Believe what you want, my posting history is pretty clear that I've been choosing not to talk about every negative thing that comes to mind.
 
Believe what you want,

I will continue to do so!

And thank you for not pointing out my momentary, coffee-addled mistaking of former & latter in that post before I edited it. I appreciate that you still got what I meant as I was maligning your observational skills. :)
 
We recorded a quick 10-15 minute hit to insert at the beginning of an episode we already had in the can: We'd bumped that episode twice already, and didn't wanna bump it a third time. Plus, every other show and their spinoffs is going to be doing like, 90 minutes on that trailer, I already know, so we figured it'll probably be better to just do a quick hit than to just add another 90 minutes of the same takes everyone else has :)

Haha, it is true. I already listened to Rebel Force Radio and The ForeCast's reactions. Both were around the 90 minute mark I think. Rebel Force Radio's is worth it just because you can tell Kyle Newman who adores the prequels to death is squirming as everyone makes little snipes about the quality of the prequels compared to their expectations for this film.
 
The Bad:
- The seemingly slavish devotion to the originals. It's supposed to be about 50 years after the OG trilogy. Why the heck are X-Wings and the Millennium Falcon still a thing? What the hell are stormtroopers still around for? Why are we back on Tatooine? Because nostalgia pandering, that's why.
I'm not as upset about it, but it's totally nostalgia pandering.

What I appreciated about The Prequel Trilogy is that it tried to stomp out some of its own ground with unique vehicle designs. We've seen so little here though, and there have already been new vehicles/bots introduced (new droid). Still, when you look at who is cast in this film, it really does seem like they're throwing anyone and everyone back in, and I'd much rather them not have to drag through all of that again. Many of those characters had 3 movies to their name, let it go.
 
I will continue to do so!

And thank you for not pointing out my momentary, coffee-addled mistaking of former & latter in that post before I edited it. I appreciate that you still got what I meant as I was maligning your observational skills. :)

You're pretty easily antagonized, I felt it unnecessary to add more fuel to the fire ;-)
 
I'm not as upset about it, but it's totally nostalgia pandering.

What I appreciated about The Prequel Trilogy is that it tried to stomp out some of its own ground with unique vehicle designs. We've seen so little here though, and there have already been new vehicles/bots introduced (new droid). Still, when you look at who is cast in this film, it really does seem like they're throwing anyone and everyone back in, and I'd much rather them not have to drag through all of that again. Many of those characters had 3 movies to their name, let it go.

I'm guessing Han Solo, Luke, and Leia will just serve to bridge the two stories. So perhaps they'll only be in the first film or just be in the background.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom