Gematsu: Sony to hold Playstation Experience event in December

Status
Not open for further replies.
The game that became Final Fantasy XV was announced as a PS3 exclusive, though. If all it took for Versus XIII to go multi-platform was a couple of years and a name change, I don't see how Agent would be impervious to that. Especially when Tretton already seemed doubtful on its exclusivity status.

Thats a big if that just seems to easy. These exclusive contracts are not written up by kids and just say said game will be exclusive on said platform , they are most likely pages long and cover all kinds of variables. I am sure sony could have stopped the game from going multiplat if they wanted too.
 
TLG is a title that will release 2016 most likely.... (PS4 install base of 20m plus) and a 9.0 meta or above we are talking least 6m when all is said and done a year from release.
Lol, such lofty goals. It would amazing if it sold half of that. You're basically expecting this new core-centric IP to have Assassin's Creed level of platform penetration.

Very unrealistic.
 
It does? Then how come Tretton was unsure of its exclusivity? Sony doesn't own the trademark to the game either.

Was Tretton involved with third party relations?, and that would pretty be something someone in his position would say to divert and not answer straight up about an information he cant give away.

"Sony doesn't own the trademark to the game either"

As I said, I dont see Sony going into a deal like this without owning the IP

According to Shorrock, "Rockstar really wanted to make a game that you can truly only do on PS3" and added that the reason Sony locked the IP down as an exclusive deal was because Sony believed the franchise would "set the bar for the rest of the industry.
 
Depends on whether or not you're the market leader, specially in the U.S and whether the marketing for the game is substantial. (specially with the "enthusiast press")
Market leading is irrelevant, you set the condition at twenty million units, regardless of placement in the market.

And the second part is unrelated to the install base or MC score. Marketing is always what sells games, so sure, if Sony spent $100m on the marketing budget, maybe it sells six million, but again, that has nothing to do with your original post.
 
But that's clearly not true.

PS3 exclusive would be utterly moronic. If it exists, it's next-gen. Which platforms, we can only speculate, but being PS3 exclusive is categorically not true.

clearly not, that was my point.
I dont believe in Agent as we "know" it any more than R* new IP coming out exclusively on ps3. If this is clearly not true then we have no reason to believe any other info (spy stuff etc..) advertised on the Agent website either. Or believe in this Agent game altogether
 
Market leading is irrelevant, you set the condition at twenty million units, regardless of placement in the market.

And the second part is unrelated to the install base or MC score. Marketing is always what sells games, so sure, if Sony spent $100m on the marketing budget, maybe it sells six million, but again, that has nothing to do with your original post.

I set the condition at 20m plus (20m being minimum) in 2016...(and it will also depend if it gets a holiday release or a Feb/March release). I am however not sure how a holiday release would work given the way Sony operates - my guess is that SSM GOW game will release holiday 2016. It's a prediction nonetheless....
 
Because Take Two ain't bitch made. You think they are going to let Sony control what they do with their games in this day and age?

Sony couldn't even hold Square Enix down.

Lol, do you even know how gaming IP works

It has nothing to do with being someones bitch, if Sony approached Rockstar with the funding and collaboration to make a game with the rule that they own the IP and Rockstar agrees, the deal is sealed

Rockstar and Sony have very close relations, unless somehow Sony lets go of the IP, its pretty much still theirs as long as there is a contract
 
clearly not, that was my point.
I dont believe in Agent as we "know" it any more than R* new IP coming out exclusively on ps3. If this is clearly not true then we have no reason to believe any other info (spy stuff etc..) advertised on the Agent website either. Or believe in this Agent game altogether
There's a difference though.

Agent was a project. If during the course of development, the globetrotting was dumped in favor of a single open world location, maybe London, to give it at cool Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy-vibe. Maybe the seventies were taken back to the sixties for a more hippy vibe and a cooler soundtrack. Maybe the spy stuff was moved to a more gangster angle. Maybe they renamed the project GTA: London II, and that's what finally ships. In that case, it's still the Agent project.

Everything about it can be different, but if it came from the same stain of development, it's still the game people are asking for.
 
It does? Then how come Tretton was unsure of its exclusivity? Sony doesn't own the trademark to the game either.

Probably bc sony was waiting on R* to decide what they wanted to do. If I was sony id rather get a game from them then sue them for breach of contract . I just find it very hard to believe sony would have such a weak contract in place that they are left with marketing deals that they have to pump more money into
 
Don't be absurd.

Lots of Sony PS3 exclusives have higher than a 90 on MC, and not come even close to six million.

That's not true at all. They don't like to publish major games without owning the IP, but they were never publishing Agent, so that's irrelevant. TakeTwo own the IP.

Well that's faulty logic for two reasons, firstly it didn't receive a lot of praise, or really any. It had a little hype, but that's it. And it also presumes that none of their studios are working on it, which we don't really know.

I never said it recieved a lot of praise, I didnt even say by who

According to Shorrock, "Rockstar really wanted to make a game that you can truly only do on PS3" and added that the reason Sony locked the IP down as an exclusive deal was because Sony believed the franchise would "set the bar for the rest of the industry

Ben Feder, former president of Rockstar parent Take-Two Interactive, said that the game would be "genre-defining" and "a whole new way of experiencing videogames that we haven't really seen before.

There's the praise

And if one of Rockstar's studios was working on Agent, there would be something by now, Which is why I still believe Sony has a huge decision on it
 
agent1159-610.jpg

agent1157-610.jpg


Don't see what the big deal about AGENT was and still don't see it now.

The concept of an espionage videogame set at Cold War at the end of the 1970s won't bring the same excitement as a FFVII remake or the return of an old legend Sony mascot like Crash Bandicoot.
 
It would be nice after PSX if we can compile some interview and see if any gaffer here can get an interview with Shuhei, obviously not asking for games but for the ins and outs of what goes on in the process of getting a game greenlighted at Sony.
 
Probably bc sony was waiting on R* to decide what they wanted to do. If I was sony id rather get a game from them then sue them for breach of contract . I just find it very hard to believe sony would have such a weak contract in place that they are left with marketing deals that they have to pump more money into
You're implying the contract was breached by some loophole. There's no reason to think that's the case.

Maybe the contract was something like this 'one year exclusivity on PS3 in exchange for one year of first party royalties reduced by 80% and eighty million dollars co-marketing budget', and it got to the point where Sony knew the game wasn't going to have a significant enough impact on the PS3's sales that they didn't want it.
 
So, does everyone have the IGN Deals email thing where you get $30 off 2-day tickets?

If not and anyone is interested in purchasing 2-day tickets, then let me know for a discount code (if it still works).
 
Ah well, you will have to prove it then

Basing on how Sony works and the details of Agent I have seen, Sony have locked down the IP
Sure, that's why Tretton wasn't so sure about it being exclusive.. in 2011. You do realise Sony back then did secure exclusives without ever owning the IP. Sony of today is not Sony of 2008.
 
Ah well, you will have to prove it then

Basing on how Sony works and the details of Agent I have seen, Sony have locked down the IP

Owner (APPLICANT) Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. CORPORATION DELAWARE 622 Broadway New York NEW YORK 10012
 
agent1159-610.jpg

agent1157-610.jpg


Don't see what the big deal about AGENT was and still don't see it now.

The concept of an espionage videogame set at Cold War at the end of the 1970s won't bring the same excitement as a FFVII remake or the return of an old legend Sony mascot like Crash Bandicoot.

I can't believe how much stock some of you guys put into Crash. He wasn't worth this kind of talk ten years ago, let alone right now.
 
agent1159-610.jpg

agent1157-610.jpg


Don't see what the big deal about AGENT was and still don't see it now.

The concept of an espionage videogame set at Cold War at the end of the 1970s won't bring the same excitement as a FFVII remake or the return of an old legend Sony mascot like Crash Bandicoot.

Simple: A Rockstar game that is/was supposedly exclusive. Those two things are enough to create the perfect storm of hype.
 
Sure, that's why Tretton wasn't so sure about it being exclusive.. in 2011. You do realise Sony back then did secure exclusives without ever owning the IP. Sony of today is not Sony of 2008.

And how is wasnt so sure a good evidence as Tretton was not involved in third party relations of PS

Sony PS division of 2008 is still very close to the one of today, they never really get into deals without collaboration or owning IPs, just look at the back log of second parties and third parties IPs they own worked on by other studios
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom