Except the poster I'm responding to isn't talking about just 'boob glancing'. Read what he said again-
Basically he's saying that if you display cleavage, it's ok for men to come up to you and say sexual remarks about you. Because they're practically asking for it by wearing a short cut top.
My mistake, I missed that comment.
I'm sorry, I think you're either projecting or have misunderstood what he is saying. The phrase "sexual response" does not necessarily and singularly mean that it's "ok for men to come up to you and say sexual remarks about you" - in fact, no one here (well, no one except genjiZERO, and it can even be argued that genjiZERO's comments have a basis on reality [the sexual characteristics part, not the advertising part]) explicitly said that cleavage means it's OK to go and verbally harass someone or that a woman showing cleavage means she is a free for all and she's inviting all males in the vicinity to hump her legs.
In this particular case, the peeking and the appreciation (even the staring) is the sexual response, plain and simple. Looking at something or "staring" at something you like and is beautiful, can be a sexual response. If that weren't true, fashion and erotic magazines with enticing covers would have been out of print long ago.
And from my (anecdotal) experience, women who show a tremendous amount of cleavage, do want to be looked at - and there's nothing wrong about that. I'm 27 years old, have a girlfriend for the last 5 and a half years, been in school, universities and work environments just like everyone else, and in all these environments have never seen a woman showing serious cleavage but not wanting to show it. For me it's that simple. There are hundreds of thousands of clothes out there that do not show cleavage, just as there are hundreds of thousands of clothes that show cleavage. There may be many valid reasons for a woman to pick the latter clothes over the former (even if the former are perfectly classy and do not make them look like nuns; I mean, my girlfriend and former female colleagues certainly never looked like nuns) but then complaining that people look at their cleavage when it's up there for the world to see, is mind-boggling.
If peeking at something obvious is harassing, maybe we should invent an eye police while we're at it.
And with this said, I am out of the topic as it's getting weird.
no one here explicitly said that cleavage means it's OK to go and verbally harass someone
Thanks for the link, I needed to laugh this morning.Japanese prank: hot girl
This what happens when you get caught lol
something something mega milk?
nah I just stare a hole through people with eye contact
Those are alot of excuses for wanting to say that showing cleavage means you want unwanted attention. I'm fine with peeking. I'm fine with looking at boobs if you read my earlier posts. However there's a difference between looking, and making inappropriate comments(IE If they show cleavage then they're asking for sexual remarks), or making someone feel uncomfortable just because of the clothing they wear. And yeah, you're making the topic pretty weird.
I don't think I was advocating any of those things.
But real life...
It could be because the writer wants to give the character a matronly vibe, or just flesh out the universe with real, varied people. People have a wide range of figures and attributes, only sticking to a shallow subsection of appearances and modelling all your characters on medium sized people with medium proportions makes fiction boring.
Regardless, the idea that people who are born with any kind of physical beauty should either hide their bodies at all time or forfeit their right to exist without a uniquely dehumanising and uncomfortable glares, by people who think they have the right to stare just because: more than partially depressing.
In her cleave?Act like you've been there.
I try not look but just remember. Research has proven women are just as guilty as looking as men so don't feel bad about it. It's human nature, sex has little to do with it.
It's a good fairy tale, but you're trying to bring the dragon in by any means you can. Seriously, don't do it.
No one said anything is "within their rights" or that women are "advertising" when they're showing cleavage. This is about peeking and appreciating, not actively harassing someone. A man can watch or approach a woman (and vice versa) for all kinds of reasons.
A peek if you are attractive is fine and it's a compliment, if you are ugly it's rude and you are a creep.
Why you think bono always wears sunglasses? Cleavage staring 24/7A glance and no more. You're almost never as smooth as you think.
![]()
A glance and no more. You're almost never as smooth as you think.
![]()
yes oblivion, that is from the hit motion picture Superbad.
I don't think anyone is confused or surprised. We're just saying that our motivation behind wearing a shirt that shows cleavage isn't always going to be to get men's attention.Well, obviously it's rude to stare and if you're making some woman uncomfortable you should definitely stop, but I was mainly referring to women who act confused or surprised when people do stare.
Is that from Superbad?
But do you? Have you ever precisely asked for permission? And if she granted you permission are you sure it was permanent and not just temporary? Maybe have a talk with your lawyerMmmm boobs. Hrmm. Well. Quick glances. Try not to get an erection until later.
I regularly stare at my wife's boobs but I have permission for that.
"I will stare even if it makes her uncomfortable, if she doesn't want me to stare, she wouldn't be wearing this! She's making herself available!"
vs
"Sucks that this happened to her, but hell, did you see what she was wearing? She was clearly making herself available!"
Yeah, absolutely nothing in common. No connection there whatsoever, however faint. *sigh*
you can't however stare at cleavage if there is no cleavage available, so the 2 situations could not be any more different and comparing it really is just off and insulting and in many ways just trivialises rape while trying to make people who disagree with you as evil as possible.
..and you can't rape when there's no person to rape. There are people who literally say things like "what was she doing out by herself", "why did they drink so much", and your comments are pretty much in line with those. You're saying "well if she didn't want people to stare at her cleavage like she's a piece of meat in a butcher shop, maybe she should have covered up" which leads to "well if she didn't want people whistling at her when she walks by, maybe she should have just stayed home". The onus shouldn't be on women to not be harassed, it should be on everyone else to not harass.
Japanese prank: hot girl
This what happens when you get caught lol
actually no, that's not what I was saying at all. feel free to read my whole post. I absolutely do not want to live in a world where women need to cover themselves up because they get harrassed.You're saying "well if she didn't want people to stare at her cleavage like she's a piece of meat in a butcher shop, maybe she should have covered up"
absolutelyThe onus shouldn't be on women to not be harassed, it should be on everyone else to not harass.
I'm currently in talks with GirlGAF and the board White Knight Brigade to see if I'm overstepping my bounds and whether my wife is even allowed to give me access even if she agrees. I thought this would be prudent before even consulting the lawyers. Apparently her boobs belong to all women and they are threatening to sue.But do you? Have you ever precisely asked for permission? And if she granted you permission are you sure it was permanent and not just temporary? Maybe have a talk with your lawyer
Oh, just shoot me. I saw a Cadillac commercial using the lyrics from The Clash's song Brand New Cadillac. I guess that is what happens when you are dead.
Oh what the hell . . . the Kings guy was holding just as much.
..and you can't rape when there's no person to rape. There are people who literally say things like "what was she doing out by herself", "why did they drink so much", and your comments are pretty much in line with those. You're saying "well if she didn't want people to stare at her cleavage like she's a piece of meat in a butcher shop, maybe she should have covered up" which leads to "well if she didn't want people whistling at her when she walks by, maybe she should have just stayed home". The onus shouldn't be on women to not be harassed, it should be on everyone else to not harass.
..and you can't rape when there's no person to rape. There are people who literally say things like "what was she doing out by herself", "why did they drink so much", and your comments are pretty much in line with those. You're saying "well if she didn't want people to stare at her cleavage like she's a piece of meat in a butcher shop, maybe she should have covered up" which leads to "well if she didn't want people whistling at her when she walks by, maybe she should have just stayed home". The onus shouldn't be on women to not be harassed, it should be on everyone else to not harass.
Now on the other hand that doesn't give you the right to stare,
..and you can't rape when there's no person to rape. There are people who literally say things like "what was she doing out by herself", "why did they drink so much", and your comments are pretty much in line with those. You're saying "well if she didn't want people to stare at her cleavage like she's a piece of meat in a butcher shop, maybe she should have covered up" which leads to "well if she didn't want people whistling at her when she walks by, maybe she should have just stayed home". The onus shouldn't be on women to not be harassed, it should be on everyone else to not harass.
This is insane logic.
A person being present, or being alone, or drinking, doesn't have any connection to whistling or raping.
Something being visible means it's being looked at. Pretty much by definition. Exposing your cleavage necessarily means it's visible and being seen. Getting mad when something you choose to display is looked at is goofy.