Tinfoilhatsron
Banned
Yup.Let Mr Plinkett tell you all about it.
Yup.Let Mr Plinkett tell you all about it.
I feel like AOTC got a pass on release because everybody got caught up in the afterglow of the Yoda lightsaber fight. They temporarily forgot about the shit romance dialogue and "I hate sand."
The movie makes more sense when you assume Qui-Gon was a Sith apprentice.
I feel like AOTC got a pass on release because everybody got caught up in the afterglow of the Yoda lightsaber fight. They temporarily forgot about the shit romance dialogue and "I hate sand."
Do we know which lines were ad-libbed in the prequels, if any were at all? If I recall correctly Harrison Ford challenged some of the stuff in the OT and for the better
I'm not a huge fan of Hayden or anything, but it always bothers me when people but the blame on him. Natalie Portman is a fantastic actress, but she's fucking garbage in those movies. Only person to overcome all of was Ewan McGregor; he's the one shining thing in the prequels for me, despite some of the stupid shit they have him do.
I feel like AOTC got a pass on release because everybody got caught up in the afterglow of the Yoda lightsaber fight. They temporarily forgot about the shit romance dialogue and "I hate sand."
Apparently the entire breakfast scene where Anakin talks about "agressive negociations" with padme was ad-libbed. It always did stand out to me as the only natural sounding dialogue between the two.
Star Wars the Phantom Menace was the most disappointing thing since my son
I never understood Lloyd getting so much flak.
I feel terrible for the guy. He may not have been young Brando but I can't imagine what it was like for him after TPM. Just watch this interview and see what I mean:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LtkM2JPcHPo
The "Stuck on Tatooine" arc in Episode 1 is my 2nd favourite part of all 6 movies (best is Episode 6's "Stuck on Tatooine" arc). It was a neat little sidequest; ship needs parts, slaves need freedom, must win race to secure freedom.
It's not "slaves need freedom" It's "One slave that I want for selfish reasons needs to be mine".
How is it that The Jedi Order would condone slavery at all? Why would a Jedi pay a slaver? Why require a child to engage in a hyper dangerous death sport to get the money to pay the slaver? Does the Galaxy not have a Western Union? Yoda's not good for it? If you know that Anakin is super important and that fear and anger could lead him to the darkside, why in the blue hell would you allow his mother to remain a slave?
If the Jedi Order is cool with any of this, then how are they better than the Empire again? They don't seem to respect freedom at all. They just want to collect Midichlorians like baseball cards. Why are they far more concerned with a trade negotiation than full blown slavery? Is it because the trade stuff affects them directly? It all seems pretty petty. Then when a Clone Army suddenly mysteriously appears, the Jedi are totally cool with using them. They have no problems ordering Clones to throw away their lives. How is any of this ethical?
Qui-Gon's actions would make more sense if he was a Sith apprentice. He ignores basic human decency to serve Anakin to the Darkside on a silver platter.
Bonus Questions: Why did Lucas make the slaver a lovable curmudgeon? Why did they sell action figures of a Slaver?
I have no idea what lines Hayden might have ad libbed, if any.
Solo's famous "I know" line was entirely Harrison Ford.
When Han Solo is about to be frozen, Princess Leia says, "I love you." In the original script, Han Solo was supposed to say, "Just remember that, Leia, because I'll be back," but at the time of filming, Harrison Ford wasn't entirely certain he did want to come back for a third film. There is a recurring legend that his line, "I know", was ad-libbed; however Alan Arnold's book "Once Upon A Galaxy: A Journal of the Making of The Empire Strikes Back" includes a transcription of the discussion between Ford and Irvin Kershner in which Ford suggested the line.
Because Tatooine is under the control of the Hutts, not the Jedi (or Republic). They say it in the movie, republic credits are no good there.
The guy who nitpicked the prequels and made video reviews that are now considered the "go-to" solution to whenever someone posts anything related to the prequels.
"The prequels? Have you checked out the Plinkett reviews?"
You can see this same sentence posted over and over and over and over again in a Star Wars thread, as if Plinkett's opinion is somehow law. I watched the reviews, and they didn't change my mind about the prequels. They are great movies.
I actually love it. Only thing is don't like is jar jar. Everything else entertains me, which is far more important to me than anything else. It's not like the OT doesn't have any cons.
That really only answers one of my questions and even then, are the Hutts more powerful than the Jedi? What, exactly, do the Jedi stand for? What are they willing to fight for? They don't even try to help anyone on Tatooine other than themselves and the one kid who has value to them. The concept doesn't even seem to enter their minds.
The Prequels have no moral center.
Are the Hutts more powerful than the Jedi? In this corner of the galaxy, yes. It's like Al Capone. Do you really think America was perfectly fine with him because he got away with his crimes for so long? Remember, he was so good at not getting caught that he could only be put away for tax evasion. The Hutts are similar. A vast criminal enterprise who are really good at avoiding the noose. And you can't just go kill the Hutts. Not only do you risk a costly war, you have to deal with the fallout. Who replaces the leaders? How do you go about the economy? How do you ensure the wellbeing of the slaves you freed? As sad is it is, Qui-Gon Jin couldn't really do anything here about the slaves as a whole.