Thanks for letting us know that you found it boring to wa
The Order 1886 gameplay vids
- Thread starter Loudninja
- Start date
- Status
Thanks for letting us know that you found it boring to wa
DirgeExtinction
Member
So do reviewers usually play games on the lowest difficulty? Also, how long is Gears 1 normally? The speed run took about an hour, though I dunno if glitches were involved.
Inf3cted_b3ast
Member
I really hope this game is long and those 5hr rumors or whatever aren't true.
Would you watch a 5 hour movie?
The game is 3 and a half hours too long if you ask me.
Man-is-Obsolete
Member
Hoo boy the jokes today are top notch and original.
LookAtMeGo
Member
Thats assuming that slo mo is available from the start. It could be but who knows.
That would be amazing if RAD are up for it. They did an incredible job with the God of War games on PSP. If Santa Monica ever stopped making GoW, the torch can be passed to RAD, hopefully as a reboot with new setting and characters.
Or they could just continue with The Order, or yet another new IP.
Clear
CliffyB's Cock Holster
Its interesting to me that a lot of the time a game will have allowances made if it looks ordinary but plays really well, and yet if those strengths/weaknesses are reversed its alright to pan it for it.
The Order looks absolutely amazing, so how good does it really need to be gameplay-wise to avoid a critical beating? I mean specifically the sort of "not next-gen enough" complaints that I've read in several places.
I'm not suggesting pretty graphics should be a "get-out-of-jail-free" type of clause, but surely when so much effort is put into the visual presentation of something some credit must be given to it? If just for the reason that if something is presented really well, you can't complain about the makers inability to sell you on the time/place/theme, at best you can say is that fiction fundamentally doesn't appeal to you.
Which is fair enough, but can't really be taken as anything but the most subjective of reactions - it's not a true criticism if you simply dislike the genre or theme.
What I'm getting at is basically can presentation ever elevate average but adequate gameplay to the extent that it makes it a recommended purchase? Or should the game be treated more harshly because its visuals make promises the mechanics fail to keep?
The Order looks absolutely amazing, so how good does it really need to be gameplay-wise to avoid a critical beating? I mean specifically the sort of "not next-gen enough" complaints that I've read in several places.
I'm not suggesting pretty graphics should be a "get-out-of-jail-free" type of clause, but surely when so much effort is put into the visual presentation of something some credit must be given to it? If just for the reason that if something is presented really well, you can't complain about the makers inability to sell you on the time/place/theme, at best you can say is that fiction fundamentally doesn't appeal to you.
Which is fair enough, but can't really be taken as anything but the most subjective of reactions - it's not a true criticism if you simply dislike the genre or theme.
What I'm getting at is basically can presentation ever elevate average but adequate gameplay to the extent that it makes it a recommended purchase? Or should the game be treated more harshly because its visuals make promises the mechanics fail to keep?
WordsintheWater
Member
5 headshots in blacksight and a gold trophy makes me think that it wasn't obtained until about an hour into the game, maybe longer.
XxRampage07xX
Member
Surfing NeoGaf on my phone is also painful ;_;Never use Chrome for threads like dis
Haha I know it will happen
Edit: Okay this is not a legit site so I shouldn't take it seriously.
Primethius
Banned
Article just seems to be speculation.
shinobi602
Member
"5 hours" and now this. Must be Bullshit News Day on the net!
At least the 5hrs is based on something. The R@D buying article is pure speculation.
WordsintheWater
Member
I feel the exact opposite, guess we will see come the 20th.
Evil_Silver
Banned
Should of had multiplayer.
SlasherJPC
Banned
viveks86
Member
lol
It's like people are willing this game to fail for absolutely no reason at all.
It's a new IP, developed by a great developer, interesting setting, cool (gory) gameplay, incredible visuals, and an enticing story involving werewolves.
I personally feel like a lot of the abuse this game is receiving is weirdly manufactured and without any substance.
If the reviews come back and are miserable, well then, it may be justified, but if it scores favorably, crow shall be eaten with a fine wine.
Would the baying mob like gold or silver plates to dine on the black bird?
Lay down you're torches, it's time to bask in the shimmering light of Victorian London.
I can't wait for Feb 20th.
Literally nothing about it has given me that feeling, so I disagree wholeheartedly. If anything, the stuff they've shown the past few months has inspired more confidence in me than anything they showed before.
I don't get it either, getting very tired of the "oh another third person shooter with QTEs lol boring where is the innovation" lines. Even if it's only that, there is a market for it. I don't mind that type games, I enjoy them immensely, especially when it has a cool storyline, setting, or even better, some nice graphics as well. I also like other types of games. Choice is good. Not every 'new IP' needs to up the Peter Molyneux "This game changes everything you know about gameplay trust me I know what Im doing" bar.
Pound_lb003
Member
bananafactory
Banned
Why do so many people want multiplayer? I thought there was a general consensus that we decided we don't want MP modes shoehorned into something designed as a single player experience.
What happened, GAF?
What happened, GAF?
XxRampage07xX
Member
I think there won't be any stream posted here when Sony ninjas are observing this thread 24/24
I understand they didn't add multiplayer because of time and budget constraints. But I'd love something like Killzone: Shadowfall intercept. Imagine you and your friends each controlling a different member of the order, each with different weapons, taking on hordes of Lycans and rebels. I think it could be awesome.
TheSpaceBetween
Member
It might have been a matter of time and budget, but I really found the PSP GOW's lacking. I can understand not having all the epic set pieces since it was on a handheld, but the level design was sorely lacking compared to SSM's efforts.
semiconscious
Member
me, i've seen nothing indicating i'll be disappointed. otoh, i'm not expecting some kinda 'next gen gameplay' revelation, but merely a good-looking, well-built bit of fun...
i find that one's level of disappointment can only ever be in proportion to one's level of expectations. & that, if the latter is within reason, the former's that much less likely to occur at all
...TheSpaceBetween
Member
Probably just different people speaking. I'm always thrilled when devs focus on a great single player experience. However, some people will always beg for multi nomatter what, even in games that don't need it.
I'd say save it for the sequel. The gameplay looks like it leans a lot on shooting, so I think the resources that would have gone to MP are probably better used making the core experience as tight as possible.
If they get a sequel, I'd be pretty surprised if it didn't include MP. For a new IP though, can't really blame them for sticking to making the campaign as memorable as possible.
Yeah, but the game is done now. The assets are there. Why not create a multiplayer add-on?
schaft0620
Member
The Order 1889: Featuring 4 player Co-op 2017.
-tetsuo-
Unlimited Capacity
Because barely anyone would play it.
LOL that's such a pointless article. "If this game sells at least this arbitrary amount, I think Sony might aquire the studio!"
viveks86
Member
People don't want a shoehorned MP. They want a good MP, and this game is in a genre that is popular for MP.
Begaria
Member
So, according to that person who had completed the game and had those trophies shown on their PSN Profile, The Order: 1886 did not take them 5 hours to beat.
https://twitter.com/JVB/status/563084726593126402
https://twitter.com/JVB/status/563084726593126402
bananafactory
Banned
This is a cinematic, (seemingly) linear, story driven shooter. I haven't seen anything shown that indicates this would be a good candidate for multiplayer. The main hook/draws seem to be the story and setting.
XxRampage07xX
Member
If I recall correctly, GAF love Wolfenstein The New Order and the game didn't have any MP mode at all. So, not every game is required to have a multiplayer mode.
KoopaTheCasual
Junior Member
Your wording was weird (and so is his). He's implying it took longer, correct?
viveks86
Member
4 hour game + 1 hour lunch break confirmed!
I need some 1886 snacks for this game.
Rogue_Ledr
Banned
Hang on!
Less than 5 hours? That can't be right, can it? PLEASE SAY NO!
Less than 5 hours? That can't be right, can it? PLEASE SAY NO!
Basically just saying he didn't earn the first trophy immediately, so the game is more than 5hrs. I doubt it took much more than 1hr to earn the first trophy.
- Status