Herpes Reasons
Banned
Must have struck a nerve.
Nope. Just calling out bullshit which your statement was.
Must have struck a nerve.
Must have struck a nerve.
Because men who are with women they don't see themselves with for the rest of their lives are happy that the woman they're with currently isn't pregnant means they shouldn't want to be with a woman who actually can get pregnant in the future? Uh...ok.
May I also suggest that many men will be freaked out by the idea of fatherhood when they aren't ready but just as equally embrace it when it happens?
Must have struck a nerve.
Assuming everyone wants a child, either at that time in their life or ever. There's more to life than having kids.
Surely you guys can see the dissonance between the general tone men take towards having children and the piety of fatherhood in these threads. I'm not calling anyone out, it's just.... curious.
Surely you guys can see the dissonance between the general tone men take towards having children and the piety of fatherhood in these threads. I'm not calling anyone out, it's just.... curious.
Wow OK, so homosexuality and transsexualism are preferences now?
Plenty of people second guess why gay men are attracted to men. I've had numerous guys ask me how would I know if I'm not straight since I've never been with a woman. It's a symptom of a hetero-normative society. But again, sexual orientations are not preferences.
Surely you guys can see the dissonance between the general tone men take towards having children and the piety of fatherhood in these threads. I'm not calling anyone out, it's just.... curious.
Surely you guys can see the dissonance between the general tone men take towards having children and the piety of fatherhood in these threads. I'm not calling anyone out, it's just.... curious.
Surely you guys can see the dissonance between the general tone men take towards having children and the piety of fatherhood in these threads. I'm not calling anyone out, it's just.... curious.
Surely you guys can see the dissonance between the general tone men take towards having children and the piety of fatherhood in these threads. I'm not calling anyone out, it's just.... curious.
There is a great deal of thought, but you are correct in the absence of compassion; I tried to be as unemotional as possible in contexts such as this, namely, that of a public forum. And while that comic is amusing enough that I'm going to bookmark it, it is not really applicable, as this thread is a perfectly reasonable location in which I can ask for such explanations. If you are unwilling to read my posts, feel free to refrain from doing so, but please do not tell me that I must leave because you disagree with them. That defeats the entire purpose.![]()
Dude, even I'm a chatty guy and your posts are irking me. I feel like there's no compassion or thought behind them.
No right to what? Engage in critical thinking? Form my own opinions rather than memetically repeating a slew of designated statements?You have no right to do this.
I see your point (and note that I never took the "I need to procreate" approach, despite being a father), but you know that what one person said in one thread says nothing of what another person says in another thread. Several parenting threads exist as well. At least point us to the childless person who was doing an endzone dance over a vasectomy and who's joined us here to explain his sexual preference as nothing more than his desire to make babies.
I'm just asking questions. Can I just ask the questions?
To you perhaps. To others, it's very important. Who are you to dictate what should be important and how important to someone else?
I can't tell you how many people I know who have told me that they weren't ready to be a father and hated the idea when reality hit them and the lady/girlfriend got pregnant. They only really came back to their senses when they see the baby. Many of them are fantastic parents.
Either some here are already parents or they aren't in the current state of time where the gilrfriend just told them the news.
No right to what? Engage in critical thinking? Form my own opinions rather than memetically repeating a slew of designated statements?
My argument isn't just about trans women. There are people here saying that they would not date any woman, xx or xy chromosome, who could not have a child. I think it's kind of silly that one would turn away from someone they like for that reason when there are other options available.
There is a great deal of thought, but you are correct in the absence of compassion; I tried to be as unemotional as possible in contexts such as this, namely, that of a public forum. And while that comic is amusing enough that I'm going to bookmark it, it is not really applicable, as this thread is a perfectly reasonable location in which I can ask for such explanations. If you are unwilling to read my posts, feel free to refrain from doing so, but please do not tell me that I must leave because you disagree with them. That defeats the entire purpose.
No right to what? Engage in critical thinking? Form my own opinions rather than memetically repeating a slew of designated statements?
Not to mention the sheer fucking joy men exhibit when finding out their GF has finally got their period, Dancing in joy when failing paternity tests, etc
These threads? Nope, everybody is an upstanding family man.
I think you misunderstood me; I never said that you didn't love your girlfriend. I merely stated that all the other people that she casually hooks up with do not, as based on your own statements she is emotionally intimate to you alone. I thought that your assertion that sex and love were separate in your relationship would absolve me of any need to explain this dichotomy in detail, but it would appear that on some level you still conflate the two, leading to the aforementioned misunderstanding.I'll give you a piece of helpful advice and say that is isn't really a good idea to imply that someone probably doesn't love their girlfriend.
This forums' tendency to conflate curiosity with criticism never ceases to amaze me.You are questioning someone's own personal choice and attacking it. What do you hope to achieve, understand them more? It doesn't seem so, you want him to feel like he has less of a moral compass than yourself. Quit it.
Amusing that you would (Unintentionally) equate transgenderism with a mental disorder in order to attack my view. Especially with the fact that we treat said disorders with medication and/or suppression. Of course it wasn't your intent, but that's how it came out.
There is a great deal of thought, but you are correct in the absence of compassion; I tried to be as unemotional as possible in contexts such as this, namely, that of a public forum. And while that comic is amusing enough that I'm going to bookmark it, it is not really applicable, as this thread is a perfectly reasonable location in which I can ask for such explanations. If you are unwilling to read my posts, feel free to refrain from doing so, but please do not tell me that I must leave because you disagree with them. That defeats the entire purpose.
No right to what? Engage in critical thinking? Form my own opinions rather than memetically repeating a slew of designated statements?
I guess that's fair. I'm still not compelled to think anyone has to explain those motivations even on a message board, but if people want to, that's their prerogative. At the same time I don't know if continually pressing someone for an answer is all that helpful either.Right, and I get that's how you feel. Contextually speaking though, this thread was founded on the idea of discussions explaining why people feel the way they do about the idea. Outside of this thread I'm not going to try and police you for feeling that people don't need to explain their preferences, but the current tone and direction of the discussion that's being had revolves around the actual motivations behind the preference. That's what I'm trying to explain. "Convince me to eat them," basically.
This forums' tendency to conflate curiosity with criticism never ceases to amaze me.
You're right.I know you're trying so hard to appear smart with your verbose and tedious use of the English language, but the opinions you've provided prove the complete opposite. You're extremely narrow minded and condescending, your views on the things being discussed in this thread out you as someone with little life experience and poor compassion.
I have had my questions answered.Aside from pointing out that NONE of your posts have even a hint of curiosity in them, if you were, don't you already have whatever answer you can get from him?
If you were really curious about open relationships and whether not the kind of love you expect in a relationship to arise, all you can do is ask him if he loves her or that he is happy being in the relationship he is in. Which obviously is a stupid thing to do.
You're right.
I don't have much life experience.
That's why I ask these questions.
I'm not trying to appear to be anything at all.
I'm just trying to learn about the lives of other people.
I don't know how I'm not being compassionate, either.
There is a great deal of thought, but you are correct in the absence of compassion; I tried to be as unemotional as possible in contexts such as this, namely, that of a public forum. And while that comic is amusing enough that I'm going to bookmark it, it is not really applicable, as this thread is a perfectly reasonable location in which I can ask for such explanations. If you are unwilling to read my posts, feel free to refrain from doing so, but please do not tell me that I must leave because you disagree with them. That defeats the entire purpose.
I have had my questions answered.
But he seems to think I was saying something I wasn't.
I don't want him to leave this thread thinking someone insulted him.
Because despite what you believe, I do care about other people.
Well, I won't deny that I'm a bit emotionally invested. I mean, if you're a transgendered woman, what the hell runs through your head when you have people spouting off what essentially feels like "Okay, I'll humor you, but will never really see you as a woman." Maybe I'm just projecting, but that's tragic.
Must have struck a nerve.
Yeah, I see what you mean. My main problem with writing like this is when you're writing how you talk it is really easy to be too emotional. My formal style is tedious to read but it is kind of like a speed bump that stops me forming saying something rash. I would be really embarrassed if I thought that I seriously offended someone. But hey, if no one is actually reading my posts because if it than I guess I'm just wasting my time even with good intentions. I'll try to write more simply in the future; it may not be as elegant but at least people will actually read it.Start with the tone of your posts then. You write with stiff informal language and use words that are rather out of date. You clearly understand how to write well in the strictest sense, but a good writer should know their audience: this is a discussion forum, not an English essay. Write as you would speak. Will prevent you coming off so condescending and aloof.
For example this:
Should be more like:
"I am trying to put thought into this, but I generally try to remain unemotional when I'm talking on the internet. And while that comic is funny - I'm going to bookmark it - it doesn't really apply in this context since this is the best place for me to ask these questions. If you don't want to read my posts that is fine but that doesn't mean I have to leave the thread"
See the difference in tone?
Start with the tone of your posts then. You write with stiff informal language and use words that are rather out of date. You clearly understand how to write well in the strictest sense, but a good writer should know their audience: this is a discussion forum, not an English essay. Write as you would speak. Will prevent you coming off so condescending and aloof.
For example this:
Should be more like:
"I am trying to put thought into this, but I generally try to remain unemotional when I'm talking on the internet. And while that comic is funny - I'm going to bookmark it - it doesn't really apply in this context since this is the best place for me to ask these questions. If you don't want to read my posts that is fine but that doesn't mean I have to leave the thread"
See the difference in tone?
Life throws you curve balls. Hypotheticals are tough to answer when you have limited exposure. I think that everyone deep down, no matter how they fight it, is open minded on a case by case basis.
That is something that a lot of trans people deal with on more or less a daily basis, yeah.
It's not something a lot of us talk about much, except maybe to other trans people, because a lot of folks tend to get defensive and insist they're not like that. But yeah, you're pretty much going to get to always wonder if your friends, your family, your co-workers, etc. are really just humoring you while smirking behind your back.
And yet people continue to wonder why maybe trans people don't always leap at the opportunity to tell everyone they're trans.
I am somewhat confused.
Why is everyone getting riled up? Why is it wrong to say that dating a transgender person is not someones preference? Why are people who are simply saying that getting piled on.
yeah, I know there has been some shit posting going on and some ignorant comments made, but they are not the same as the others I mentioned.
This thread has proven to me that minds don't change. We are how we are. Preferences, prejudices, lines drawn in sand. Because ideas are written instead of spoken, it allows people to think through their thoughts before writing them, still, nothing changes. Just proves we/re all humans, faults and all.
Yeah, I personally wouldn't be able to take it, and am glad I never have to. Like if a whole forum said, "hey, that guy, I'd never date him or give him a chance. I can't see him as really a man; just a preference thing you know?" Shit like that would absolutely destroy me.
After going through junk like that, hearing "supportive" people say things like "it's just a preference thing" to you get old. Probably better if they just not say anything.
Not to mention the sheer fucking joy men exhibit when finding out their GF has finally got their period, Dancing in joy when failing paternity tests, etc
These threads? Nope, everybody is an upstanding family man.
quoting myself since i am still confused and curious
I don't really get this notion. This problem can't be solved with adoption? Why is it such a turn off for people?
I agree. If I were dating a woman that was once quite ugly but had been surgically altered, I'd like to know, as her "inferior genes" would still be passed on to my potential offspring.
That reminds me: if medical science is able to advance to the point that a person can have an entirely new body grown for them from their own DNA but altered to reflect their desired sex and their brain is implanted in that body, then I would probably not have any issue dating such a person; my only hold up would be that I would also require that their genes were also corrected so that any resultant children are not similarly afflicted with being born with the wrong kind of body.
Infertile women are women. I would prefer to not date an infertile women, as being a biological father is a big dream of mine.
I would also have some difficulty eating a pussy made of rearranged penis bits, at least at first.
what a dumb post. for real.Not to mention the sheer fucking joy men exhibit when finding out their GF has finally got their period, Dancing in joy when failing paternity tests, etc
These threads? Nope, everybody is an upstanding family man.