The colors of this photo will appear different to everyone. I think?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Currently in talks with the admins to create a special subforum for people who incorrectly see it as white to post in. You'll be able to access the regular boards with weekend passes if you apply early and on time.

you fucking people with the green names always ruining shit
 
Guys, nobody is arguing the cold hard hex values. It's a matter of how the eye perceives it; the eye takes into account the background and the camera exposure and so people aren't necessarily going to see the colors exactly as they are in the photo. It's like the illusion with the shadow on the checkerboard.
Eyes, man. How do they work? This stuff is crazy/
 
Do you black and blue people really see those as black and blue too ?
It's definitely a greyish blue and brown !

It's a mix of people being trolled by different images and people saying they see 'blue' when it's really an off-white with a hint of light blue. So not what you think of when someone says it's a blue dress.

Not sure how people are seeing black though. Their monitors must suck.
 
Right, but when people say white and gold, they mean when the picture is properly white balanced. The RGB value is technically blue, but if that is really supposed to be the dress it would be white.

Yeah. It's like someone asking what colour the sky is and you say blue but really, at the moment its overcast so it's grey so you are wrong. It's like, well yeah, now its grey but the sky is actually blue when not covered with clouds. That dress is white when actually seen and not in shadow or badly exposed or whatever the photography term is.
 
But it's blue and black, because of the lighting the colors seem a bit washed out and the black a bit brownish...

but white and gold? that's just wrong buddy

GUYS STOP AND READ THIS POST

This is a person who swears by Blue and Black.

He has said, "because of the lighting the colors seem a bit washed out and the black a bit brownish."

It's not black then is it? People, please post what colours you ACTUALLY SEE, not what you think the colour represents.

I did wine-tasting once and I was told that some "sweet" wines weren't actually sweet, but that we were used to calling flavours sweet because we associated it with it. For example, a non-sweet fruit we'd call sweet because when we eat it in a juice it is, so the smell of the actual fruit we interpret as sweet even though it isn't.

EVERYONE who is calling it white, it isn't white white is it? It's just that with the stupid choices given to us, white and gold, black and blue, we are just choosing one of those.

Those who are seeing the white as more blue are calling the other black, and those who don't see it as black are calling the blue as white.

I think the troll is the choice we have.

And those who are saying they see two different things... Do the colours when isolated ever change? We can objectively see that the pixels are actually blue and brown, no question.
 
I see exactly what happens when you isolate the pixels. I am convinced that people who see otherwise have the bad eyes.

Your eyes and the the image processing part of your brain are failing to compensate for the overexposure in the picture. The camera didn't compensate for it either, as it captured the effect of the overexposure, hence the RGB values you're getting.
 
At first I saw white and gold. I am tired right now and have been staring at a white screen, typing up shit for a couple hours. I started scrolling through some other things, then I looked back at the photo.......blue and black. Am I a wizard?
 
I can only see blue and "black" if I my hold my phone far away and tilt it so it's almost flat.

On my laptop the first time I saw it was white and gold no doubt about it, now I'm starting to notice a lot more of the greyish blue but that seems to be due to the shade and what not.
 
Blue and brown. Very vividly blue. Exactly the same on my phone and my TV. Sorry, whities.

Focus on the brighter gold area of the neck for a few seconds, with widened eyes if you can, and see if it changes for you after a while. This seems to work for getting myself to see white/gold again.
 
http://i.imgur.com/LrYZm6Z.png



Wait, that is like a grey/blue and a charcoal/black

It kind of reminds me of this, but with color. So weird, can't say I've ever seen anything quite like it.

What way is the dancer spinning, to the right or to the left?

0,,5693171,00.gif

the right, clearly
 
The colours I actually see are still pale blue and gold.

However, now that I've been away from the computer for a while, my brain is interpreting it to be an overexposed blue and black dress but with light falling over it to give the black a gold tint. (This is with my laptop screen facing directly towards me.) Earlier today, I was interpreting it as a white and gold dress.
 
OP, now you've got people arguing semantics about light blue and bluish white. See what you've done?

Your eyes and the the image processing part of your brain are failing to compensate for the overexposure in the picture. The camera didn't compensate for it either, as it captured the effect of the overexposure, hence the RGB values you're getting.

But we're looking at a light-based representation of a digital photo of a dress, not a dress.
 
I went and played some Rouge Legacy and when I came back it became blue and black. Perhaps I've died and come back without some ailment.
 
LrYZm6Z.png




Wait, that is like a charcoal/black and a greying/blue

It kind of reminds me of this, but with color. So weird, can't say I've ever seen anything quite like it.

What way is the dancer spinning, to the right or to the left?

0,,5693171,00.gif

I love that gif because if you know how you can swap the way she appears to spin.
 
Focus on the brighter gold area of the neck for a few seconds, with widened eyes if you can, and see if it changes for you after a while. This seems to work for getting myself to see white/gold again.

No change.
 
GUYS STOP AND READ THIS POST

This is a person who swears by Blue and Black.

He has said, "because of the lighting the colors seem a bit washed out and the black a bit brownish."

It's not black then is it? People, please post what colours you ACTUALLY SEE, not what you think the colour represents.

I did wine-tasting once and I was told that some "sweet" wines weren't actually sweet, but that we were used to calling flavours sweet because we associated it with it. For example, a non-sweet fruit we'd call sweet because when we eat it in a juice it is, so the smell of the actual fruit we interpret as sweet even though it isn't.

EVERYONE who is calling it white, it isn't white white is it? It's just that with the stupid choices given to us, white and gold, black and blue, we are just choosing one of those.

Those who are seeing the white as more blue are calling the other black, and those who don't see it as black are calling the blue as white.

I think the troll is the choice we have.

And those who are saying they see two different things... Do the colours when isolated ever change? We can objectively see that the pixels are actually blue and brown, no question.
We could argue the tint of the black sections of the dress... because of the light they seem a bit brownish.

But the blue is so very clearly blue. Where do the white comments come from?
 
Guys this is an OPTICAL ILLUSION

There's no point in arguing the actual color of the dress. We have other pictures of it, its black and blue.


Whats insane is that the OP image is some sort of straaaaaaange optical illusion due to who knows what in the image.

Its just that specific image that causes the illusion. No one is "wrong" about the color they see. They are really interpreting it that way.
 
Neither. White and black aren't colors. They're the absence/combination of all colors depending on if you're talking pigment vs. light.

But the dress itself has color. Can't you make it out in my image? Your eyes aren't compensating?
 
We could argue the tint of the black sections of the dress... because of the light they seem a bit brownish.

But the blue is so very clearly blue. Where do the white comments come from?

People who see it as white are interpreting it to be a white dress under blue-ish light.
 
OK so I originally saw white and gold. After seeing many people saying it was black and blue I was convinced they were trolling. However I remembered that spinning shadow girl with her leg stuck out. I was able to switch between the direction I saw her spinning depending on where I looked and how I chose to perceive it. I decided to attempt the same with this dress.
It turns out it's pretty simple to go between the different colours. It's just a matter of perception. Are the bright areas hhighlights on a dark colour or are the dark areas shadow on a brighter colour. If you focus intently on one or the other before taking in the rest of the picture you should be able to perceive it either way.
 
GUYS STOP AND READ THIS POST

This is a person who swears by Blue and Black.

He has said, "because of the lighting the colors seem a bit washed out and the black a bit brownish."

It's not black then is it? People, please post what colours you ACTUALLY SEE, not what you think the colour represents.

I did wine-tasting once and I was told that some "sweet" wines weren't actually sweet, but that we were used to calling flavours sweet because we associated it with it. For example, a non-sweet fruit we'd call sweet because when we eat it in a juice it is, so the smell of the actual fruit we interpret as sweet even though it isn't.

EVERYONE who is calling it white, it isn't white white is it? It's just that with the stupid choices given to us, white and gold, black and blue, we are just choosing one of those.

Those who are seeing the white as more blue are calling the other black, and those who don't see it as black are calling the blue as white.

I think the troll is the choice we have.

And those who are saying they see two different things... Do the colours when isolated ever change? We can objectively see that the pixels are actually blue and brown, no question.

No, I've seen both. Both were equally convincing. My brain said "blue" at one point and "white" at another, without hesitation. And no, when the colors are isolated they are always blue and brown, because that's what the hex values actually are. Once again, it's not a matter of what the screen is objectively displaying, it's a matter of how the brain interprets what one sees. It's the context of the picture that creates the discrepancy.
 
One thing to note is that black as it is in real life isn't a perfect even gray as people tend to think of it. The photo overexposure (or however it was brightened) probably interpreted the black as a golden hue that happened to be an incredibly dark one and the blue got lightened into a bluish white.
 
OP, now you've got people arguing semantics about light blue and bluish white. See what you've done?



But we're looking at a light-based representation of a digital photo of a dress, not a dress.

Quite, and your eyes still aren't adjusting to the captured effects of the overexposure. You're seeing it purely as the colour values captured, and taking it as normal without any further adjustment. People seeing black and blue are doing this automatically.
 
People who see it as white are interpreting it to be a white dress under blue-ish light.
The problem is that even if the color was much lighter than it is now, it would still look blue to me.

Like I've seen lighter blue than this where no one would say it looked white.
 
Greyish-blue and a sort of bronze-y gold.

OQob.png

Yep. I don't care what color the dress is normally or what the context of the lighting does to it's colors. The question is what are the colors of the dress in this (overexposed) photo. My eyes see the colors quoted above. No black here at all.
 
Alright. I know I said I was done, but it would be too rude not to respond.

The picture is definitely light blue tho

But it's blue and black, because of the lighting the colors seem a bit washed out and the black a bit brownish...

but white and gold? that's just wrong buddy

No, the color of the photo's representation of blue is blue, not white. A washed out blue but it's still blue. The black in the photo is a browny 'golden' color undoubtedly due to the crappy photo color balance.

The only mental compensation needed to process the color the dress is in real life however is for the blacks, not as much the blue. My mind can easily tell the browns are meant to be blacks due to the color balance. However the blue is blue in the photo itself (any color picker will confirm this).

Most people on the white and gold side (from what I've seen) admit that the white is "bluish white" so when I say that the pixels are white, I'm just trying to stick to the "blue and black v. gold and white" terminology. The "white" that the "white and gold" people see is definitely bluish.

The problem with this theory is that there are people adamant that the dress isn't blue at all. What we have is a combination of what you're saying mixed with differing levels of ability to contextualise tonal shifts. Which, personally, I find fascinating.

It is fascinating. I guess my theory doesn't really account for the people who see white and gold, even after seeing the actual color of the dress. It could just have to do with the fact that people tend to not change their minds. That once and answer is in your brain, it tends to stick there, no matter how much you try to budge it. But then there's the people that did have their minds' changed...

That would make sense, except I saw blue and black very clearly at first, then just a few minutes later it was white and gold, equally clearly. Then a few minutes after that it was blue and black again. I do think that the dress itself is blue and black, but in both cases the colors are very convincing. I honestly kind of jumped when it first changed to white and gold.

I don't think my theory necessitates that everyone sees white and gold first, nor that the black and blue people didn't see it after the original came out. Only that seeing the original tends to change peoples' minds, and that for the most part, people are arguing because they're not agreeing on terms.

Well two points to this:
First, that's kinda a weird way to answer the question. If you ask what color something is and then show a picture, reality shouldn't matter. What color is this rectangle?
red_zpsrgopsnku.png

Nobody's going to say "red" even though that's what it was before I inverted the colors. I agree that some people are answering the question that way. I just think answering the question that way is objectively wrong. You could add a qualifier like "outside of the lighting conditions, the dress is..." but that doesn't change how the dress appears in the image.
Second, I think most people who are answering blue/black actually see those colors.
To those people, I whipped this up real quick:
blackgold1_zps352oceyp.png

I took the default MS Paint Black color and a brownish/gold color that I kinda randomly picked using "edit colors" tool. The black band across the dress really looks like the top and nothing like the bottom to some people? I think everyone can agree the object on the left side of the dress is black.

I feel I basically covered this with the White House example. Sometimes people interpret "what color is this" as "what color is the thing in this picture, that isn't necessarily showing true colors." It's not that unusual of an interpretation.

Except tons of people started saying black/blue before the more accurate images of the dress popped up. Your explanation would be correct if your assumption here was as well.

I don't think my explanation says that people can't see black and blue first. Only that those people who were originally white and gold, but switched after seeing the real picture, did so because their minds were now compensating for the false colors in the washed out photo.

But I feel like the more I'm typing, the less clear my ideas are coming out. They all seem so clear in my head, so sorry if it's confusing.
 
Loving #teamblackblue posting "real" pics of the dress. Yes, because I'm sure that dress only exists in one colour style.

Its white gold that's shaded.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom