• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Apple announces Apple Watch

Status
Not open for further replies.
Weird that we're finally about to see what this is (or isn't) all about. Hurry up and release it, Apple!

...Because mostly, I want iOS 8.2 and 10.10.3.

I'm going to be really curious to see what features they highlight in iOS 9 for all of this. That's when we'll probably see things start to get interesting.

I'm also wondering what we might see launch beside the iPad Pro/12" MBA. The rumored stylus, an updated low power bluetooth 4.0 keyboard, and a new AirPort Extreme/Express are a few thoughts that come to mind.
 
why do you guys keep calling it iWatch when its clear as day Apple is branding and calling it Apple Watch?

iWatch actually sounds very dated. I'm happy they are dropping that nomenclature.
 
why do you guys keep calling it iWatch when its clear as day Apple is branding and calling it Apple Watch?

iWatch actually sounds very dated. I'm happy they are dropping that nomenclature.

It's worse than when people called iPod Touch an iTouch. At least the i was somewhere in the name. I guess it's a habit to some people with Apple?
 
Weird that we're finally about to see what this is (or isn't) all about. Hurry up and release it, Apple!

...Because mostly, I want iOS 8.2 and 10.10.3.

I'm going to be really curious to see what features they highlight in iOS 9 for all of this. That's when we'll probably see things start to get interesting.

I'm also wondering what we might see launch beside the iPad Pro/12" MBA. The rumored stylus, an updated low power bluetooth 4.0 keyboard, and a new AirPort Extreme/Express are a few thoughts that come to mind.

iOS 9's supposed to be getting a big stability focus. I expect a lot of feature concentration in WatchOS 2.0, though (we already know that that's where actual native apps will start happening).

We don't know much about OS X 10.11 but supposedly Mark Gurman's coming out with a report on that sometime soon. iOS and OS X both need some stability improvements but I think they can achieve that without slowing down too much on feature improvements (I'd like to see some UI/UX improvements in both, but surely they won't add as many new APIs as iOS 8/Yosemite added for a really really long time).

I wouldn't be surprised to see iOS 9 grant users a fuller version of iCloud Drive and/or filesystem access, and I kind of expect big Apple Maps improvements before long too. Mail.app really ought to get some improvements to catch it up to Google Inbox/Dropbox's Mailbox app or to Microsoft's new Outlook mobile app. The Music app is clearly going to be getting a significant revamp in iOS 9.

It'd be nice to see significant iPad-exclusive UI improvements but I don't expect it.

As for OS X, Siri and Control Center are probably going to happen (Siri's been in development for the Mac for years and Control Center almost made it into Yosemite). Hopefully we'll get a Photos framework and a general iTunes unbundling too. Most of that stuff would require very little from a new-APIs point of view and therefore wouldn't present much of a stability challenge for third parties (though hopefully UXKit for OS X happens to make things easier for devs).
 
why do you guys keep calling it iWatch when its clear as day Apple is branding and calling it Apple Watch?

iWatch actually sounds very dated. I'm happy they are dropping that nomenclature.

Habit, maybe. Just a shortening. I do wonder if they preferred calling it iWatch and just didn't get the name (doubtful, I suppose, given that they usually throw tons of money around). I bet they would've wanted iTV.

Personally I prefer Apple Watch anyway. It gela better with their range. "I" devices run iOS. Other non-"proper" iOS devices can get the Apple branding, such as Apple TV and Apple Watch. (Yes I know Apple TV runs a flavour of iOS).
 
I don't understand why people think this should be treated so differently from how people who like to upgrade computers and iPhones every year with trades and such do it. People are coming up with this speculative, complex repair and upgrade idea that has no real need to exist with how current tech upgrading goes, and has no major logic or Apple precedent to suggest the possibility.
 
Macrumors speculates launch will be during the first week of April:

According to a reliable source that spoke with MacRumors, Apple is planning to begin moving Apple Watches to centralized distribution points in the U.S. during the first few days of the month, with an Apple Watch release possibly coming during the first full week of April, between April 6 and April 10.

http://www.macrumors.com/2015/02/26/apple-watch-early-april-launch/
 
I don't understand why people think this should be treated so differently from how people who like to upgrade computers and iPhones every year with trades and such do it. People are coming up with this speculative, complex repair and upgrade idea that has no real need to exist with how current tech upgrading goes, and has no major logic or Apple precedent to suggest the possibility.

totally agreed. I think it has to do with the freak outs over the gold watch pricing. But, as has been said, those items are for people with so much money that buying another gold watch in 3 or 4 years isn’t a hardship.
 
totally agreed. I think it has to do with the freak outs over the gold watch pricing. But, as has been said, those items are for people with so much money that buying another gold watch in 3 or 4 years isn’t a hardship.

I think it's also freakouts from people who've never spent more than $100-200 on a watch. For them (and I'm included in that group), $350 and above seems completely insane for a watch. I'm sure we'll hear from that group even more after the March 9 event.
 
I think it's also freakouts from people who've never spent more than $100-200 on a watch. For them (and I'm included in that group), $350 and above seems completely insane for a watch. I'm sure we'll hear from that group even more after the March 9 event.

yeah, I see that. But as someone who has recently (past 2 years) started spending four figures on watches - and seeing what product and service that gets me and what the expectations are when spending that amount - I don’t assume Apple will do anything special for upgrades.

Whether you compare it to the current watch industry or to apple’s current products, i don’t see a compelling enough case to figure that they’ll suddenly make the watch their most upgradeable product.

people have highlighted the modular nature of the S1 chip but I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s stuck in with so much glue that getting it out is impossible.
 
Damn, my 50$ Swatches seem pricey each time I buy one lol.
Can't wait for the March event. Theres gonna be like at least a month to decided on pricepoints, etc.

Really hoping for some sort of headphone/accessory segment. I want some damn BT earpods and I want them yesterday.
 
http://www.fastcodesign.com/3042987/you-guys-realize-the-apple-watch-is-going-to-flop-right

I kind of get his point - the infrastructure may not be ready, but that's a two way street. Mass adoption could well drive that forward. As for the technology side, I only partly agree, although the battery life concerns are valid the rest of the technology is very much at that level of development which Apple tends to enter the fray.

Current estimates say Apple is building 5 million or so Apple Watches for launch. Every news station in America will rush to capture the lines forming around the block at the Apple Store. We live in the Apple era. By real demand or smart PR, the first run will surely sell out.

As a point of comparison, Apple sold 100 million iPhones in three years. Then the company sold 100 million iPads in two years.

This is rubbish though. Is that how are we defining success? 100 million units? There is no way that we can expect the level of ubiquity we see with iPhones. Selling out those initial 5 million units would already be a relative success - if it's true that 6.8 million smartwatches were sold in TOTAL last year.
 
Apple better up their battery life game.

LG are releasing a new bersion of their
G Watch R with a 700mah battery, replacing the 410mah battery that could already last some people 2 days.

Apple watch imo will face the problems that iphones faced in that releasing one product a year means you will literally always be behind in developments.

Ios may have the best smartwatch the day that apple watch releases (not so sure bout that) but after that there areare365 days of technologicaal advancement they will have no answer for. If the Apple watch 1s misses a trick at launch, itll slip back further

They need to be super on point, but i dont know if they are.
 
Apple better up their battery life game.

LG are releasing a new bersion of their
G Watch R with a 700mah battery, replacing the 410mah battery that could already last some people 2 days.

Apple watch imo will face the problems that iphones faced in that releasing one product a year means you will literally always be behind in developments.

Ios may have the best smartwatch the day that apple watch releases (not so sure bout that) but after that there areare365 days of technologicaal advancement they will have no answer for. If the Apple watch 1s misses a trick at launch, itll slip back further

They need to be super on point, but i dont know if they are.

But they aren't selling to the android market. They really just need to be better than the pebble to control the market they are after.
 
Indeed, just stating that market can become demoralized if its sub par v competing platforms and products.

If battery life is going to be such a important battleground in smart watches then the Pebble wins out on that front. I'm not convinced an Android Wear manufacturer with a slightly better battery than the Apple Watch has any tangible advantage. They certainly won't be able to match Apple in marketing or availability.
 
I'm hoping that they have at least dummy models in Apple Stores that you can try on before they release.

Not sure whether to go with 38 or 42, or what band to go with it.
 
I'm hoping that they have at least dummy models in Apple Stores that you can try on before they release.

Not sure whether to so with 38 or 42, or what band to go with it.

I have really small wrists so I should go with the smaller one but I want the larger screen size.
 
Is it weird to only want this for the time keeping part? 2 or more days battery life and I'm on board. The smart features I'm not really interested in.
 
Is it weird to only want this for the time keeping part? 2 or more days battery life and I'm on board. The smart features I'm not really interested in.

ONLY timekeeping. literally only that?

Maybe a little... there are watches that communicate with radio signals for accurate time display. Or just a decent quality quartz watch that will be accurate for years on end before needing battery replacement. not expensive at all.

maybe you like the looks of the Apple Watch more?
 
Is it weird to only want this for the time keeping part? 2 or more days battery life and I'm on board. The smart features I'm not really interested in.

I only want this for the time keeping part and the fact that I can check incoming notifications by looking at my wrist (and then use my phone to respond to e.g. messages or calls).
 
Yes, it's weird. There are lots of cooler watches for time only.
Sounds like you just want a screen on your wrist?

I only want this for the time keeping part and the fact that I can check incoming notifications by looking at my wrist (and then use my phone to respond to e.g. messages or calls).

Well, that's not "only timekeeping" then. ;)
 
I only want this for the time keeping part and the fact that I can check incoming notifications by looking at my wrist (and then use my phone to respond to e.g. messages or calls).

That's more than time keeping. I want this primarily for notifications. That's why I'm not willing to pay too much above the $350 base and why I am also still considering a Pebble which, as far as I know, handles notifications from iOS without much issue.

I like the look of the Apple Watch a lot more though and that is why I am willing to pay more.
 
I only want this for the time keeping part and the fact that I can check incoming notifications by looking at my wrist (and then use my phone to respond to e.g. messages or calls).

I only want the watch for the time keeping part. Plus notifications, fitness tracking, walking directions and eventually third party apps.
 
They need to be super on point, but i dont know if they are.

Keep in mind that most of the news we've heard is speculative and is coming from the press' rumour mill. Reserve judgement for the presentation on the 9th.

So when she would expect pre-orders? A week after the event? Night after the event?
Im going to bet that there won't be preorders at all. They need the lineups and fervor for 5 million units. They want bodies in front of Apple stores.
 
Does Pebble's new gold-colored Time Steel smartwatch look familiar to you?
9to5Mac said:
61BQRIV.png
Lol. Lots of "Is that a Pebble Time?" going to be directed at iWatch E wearers

:P obviously most likely vice versa
 
Controlling music is the biggest appeal for a smart watch for me. Being able to easily change track, like a song on Spotify or quickly add a song to a playlist without having to awkwardly try and get my phone out my pocket on a busy bus would be amazing.
 
I just bought an LG G watch R as it was about £150 on the Amazon warehouse deals. Assuming it works the same as the moto 360 it is quite nice for notifications but still plenty of space for improvement. Eg I'd like to be able to customise the vibration so I could tell the difference between an incoming text or email etc. or for navigation let me know whether to turn left or right (one buzz or two)

Music control is very nice though

I'm curious to try out an apple watch and hear more impressions about how it works day to day after the initial honeymoon is over. I'm sure it'll do some things better than android wear, which will hopefully feed back into better android wear support too.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom