FunkyPajamas
Member
No, all the spartan 2s are demons.
No Grazzt. You are the demons.
Then Grazzt was a Zombie.
No, all the spartan 2s are demons.
Well, that's not exactly true. There are other IIs who are/were better, smarter, faster, stronger, etc. But John is the natural leader, and he's lucky.
Thinking too much into it. They won't stray away from a linear story. The teasers are just showing how there are two sides to every story. Chief is viewed as a betrayer in Locke's eyes and Locke is the one down in Chief's. I imagine this will play out like Halo 2's campaign where we switch between both of them throughout the campaign and then they end up crossing paths at one point.So going by those teasers last night, what does everyone think about them possibly making it to where at one point you can play the same mission as both of them. I know people would probably hate that as I don't know how you bring it back around if you kill Chief.
Its true there were Spartans better than Chief in certain areas.
But as a whole when you combine both his physical and mental abilities he is the greatest UNSC soldier ever hands down. Chief, as Locke said, is THE Spartan. Especially at this point in the timeline. He has become a living legend to the people of that Universe.
Yeah, I don't think they'll do that. That's been very criticized in games that have done it in the past and I don't see 343i going down that road. I would personally hate it.So going by those teasers last night, what does everyone think about them possibly making it to where at one point you can play the same mission as both of them. I know people would probably hate that as I don't know how you bring it back around if you kill Chief.
I'd say it's mostly because of his battle experience than his physical/mental abilities combined. He's been involved in a lot of battles and has been in the spotlight during a lot of events. He's always emerged victorious due to a combination of luck and will (which now we know to be his geas).
I mean, Kelly/Linda/Fred surpass the Chief in physical and mental abilities (Speed, Accuracy, Leadership). Yes, the chief may be a more "balanced" soldier overall, but in the end it's always luck and sheer will that get him through so much (Cortana probably counting as "luck").
Am I the only one who think that Chiefis searching for the Forerunners to save Cortana? We know they experimented a ton with expanding life through digital means so they have a ton of knowledge on it. We hear Diadect at the end of Halo 4 talk about how the Forerunners are coming. What if Chiefs quest he finds them and somehow unleashes war with them, thus why Locke views him as a traitor?
While this is all true, no Spartan has ever come within lightyears of the accomplishments of John. His actions speak for themselves, he is the greatest Spartan thats ever lived.
While this is all true, no Spartan has ever come within lightyears of the accomplishments of John. His actions speak for themselves, he is the greatest Spartan thats ever lived.
I am not debating that, I agree, 100% percent. I just think it's not because of a combination of mental/physical prowess but rather because of will and luck.
In the kilo 5 novels, the elites call Naomi a demon too.Arbiter says otherwise
yeah for sure...i agree with you 100 percent man
An insult to be sure, but one with a modicum of respect...In the kilo 5 novels, the elites call Naomi a demon too.
I hope we don't have to play as locke for more than a 1/3 of the game
I hope we don't have to play as locke for more than a 1/3 of the game
I hope we don't have to play as locke for more than a 1/3 of the game
I am not debating that, I agree, 100 percent. I just think it's not because of a combination of mental/physical prowess but rather because of will and luck.
There's a book, I think it's either First Strike or Fall of Reach, where Halsey tells John something to the effect of how he always goes against the odds and tries to salvage even the worst scenario to make a win out of it. That's just what I mean. He is the greatest Spartan/Soldier to ever live. The why and how is the only thing that's up for debate I think.
I hope we don't have to play as locke for more than a 1/3 of the game
2/3s and you will like it, mister!
I dig Locke on a surface level, so I'm alright regardless.
I thought he was supposed to be getting slightly more playtime as him?
Locke in Halo 5 is also going to be testing the waters as the new protagonist whenever they want to take out the Chief.
Please let me know if I'm wrong, anybody.
It could be really interesting playing as Locke.
Now I want to re-read the Nylund trilogy.
Are there other books like those? I read the Forerunner trilogy and I didn't like it as much (though it was somewhat still enjoyable). I want more military sci-fi lingo, less metaphysical forerunner hippie loving.
I hated Contact: Harvest.
You, sir, are an anomaly.
Hmm, well steer clear of Broken Circle unless you're all about the Covenant. Kilo-Five is polarizing but it's human focused. And New Blood is digital only, but really good (and is about Buck from ODST).
Now I want to re-read the Nylund trilogy.
Are there other books like those? I read the Forerunner trilogy and I didn't like it as much (though it was somewhat still enjoyable). I want more military sci-fi lingo, less metaphysical forerunner hippie loving.
I hated Contact: Harvest.
Woah woah woah, why did you hate Contact Harvest?
Don't take it personal (unless you're Staten, heh), but I found the writing to be very amateurish. I only read it once so there's a lot of stuff I don't remember anymore, but the sex scene felt so out of place. Then there was the Covenant stuff in there, the Brutes just felt forced (no pun intended) and the depiction of the Prophets and how they came to power also felt like the typical "ok, we know we need three guys to be the prophets, let's just come up with three guys and make it all fit".
I remember liking the AIs presented in it (and also Mendicant Bias), plus I remember feeling sad about the Unggoy/Huragok's friendship (i.e. I felt empathy for them); I mean, the book is not worthless or anything like that, it's just that I came from reading Fall of Reach/First Strike and then this kind of killed my hype (was Onyx before or after Harvest?).
Don't take it personal (unless you're Staten, heh), but I found the writing to be very amateurish. I only read it once so there's a lot of stuff I don't remember anymore, but the sex scene felt so out of place. Then there was the Covenant stuff in there, the Brutes just felt forced (no pun intended) and the depiction of the Prophets and how they came to power also felt like the typical "ok, we know we need three guys to be the prophets, let's just come up with three guys and make it all fit".
I remember liking the AIs presented in it (and also Mendicant Bias), plus I remember feeling sad about the Unggoy/Huragok's friendship (i.e. I felt empathy for them); I mean, the book is not worthless or anything like that, it's just that I came from reading Fall of Reach/First Strike and then this kind of killed my hype (was Onyx before or after Harvest?).
Harvest was before everything but the forerunner trilogy.Don't take it personal (unless you're Staten, heh), but I found the writing to be very amateurish. I only read it once so there's a lot of stuff I don't remember anymore, but the sex scene felt so out of place. Then there was the Covenant stuff in there, the Brutes just felt forced (no pun intended) and the depiction of the Prophets and how they came to power also felt like the typical "ok, we know we need three guys to be the prophets, let's just come up with three guys and make it all fit".
I remember liking the AIs presented in it (and also Mendicant Bias), plus I remember feeling sad about the Unggoy/Huragok's friendship (i.e. I felt empathy for them); I mean, the book is not worthless or anything like that, it's just that I came from reading Fall of Reach/First Strike and then this kind of killed my hype (was Onyx before or after Harvest?).
Ghosts of Onyx was released before Harvest, but chronologically, Ghosts of Onyx come later.
Right, I should have worded that better. I was wondering about release order.Harvest was before everything but the forerunner trilogy.
I think all three Nylund books would make for a killer trilogy, but Onyx ends in one hell of a cliffhanger, heh.Onyx would actually make one killer fucking Halo movie, I think. I always got that impression from it.
so is there like a summary of what's happened for this ad campaign so far
i found out something really interesting
in the trailer locke throws his rifle to the ground in the mud, while Chief holsters his rifle..
i think it shows that Chief is still a much more disciplined soldier than Locke?
what do you guys think
i found out something really interesting
in the trailer locke throws his rifle to the ground in the mud, while Chief holsters his rifle..
i think it shows that Chief is still a much more disciplined soldier than Locke?
what do you guys think
i found out something really interesting
in the trailer locke throws his rifle to the ground in the mud, while Chief holsters his rifle..
i think it shows that Chief is still a much more disciplined soldier than Locke?
what do you guys think
i found out something really interesting
in the trailer locke throws his rifle to the ground in the mud, while Chief holsters his rifle..
i think it shows that Chief is still a much more disciplined soldier than Locke?
what do you guys think
I think Locke is a douche
Well that escalated quickly.
Seriously though, I remember looking forward to Locke when they first unveiled him. Then I watched a couple of Nightfall episodes. He's just... I don't even know. He doesn't feel like a hero or an antihero so far, he's just like a regular guy doing a job. I wish they would flesh out his personality a bit more.
The Locke hate is real....
Honestly, he has the potential to be a really awesome character, and Halo is in need of some awesome characters.
Unless you want another Palmer spin off tablet game![]()
Is that in a novel, or was just released as bio/promotional material?Like I said, had we gotten a minseries about his time freelancing before ONI gave him an offer to join, I think people would be more open to him. Nightfall was a dud, and I think the scenes where he was barely holding it together were far more interesting than when he was playing leader. Nightfall wasn't the best first taste of Locke. I know the character can be better, and I know Colter can perform more memorably (he's the bomb on The Good Wife).
I really, really doubt H5 will have the chief openly killing ONI/UNSC soldiers, though I'm always open to surprises, and I would love 343i to take the franchise in a bold direction if they're able to deliver (like Foe Hammer!).I'm more concerned why the planet is scorched and the infinity is in flames. Perhaps this is the end of chief's escape after being captured by ONI/UNSC?
Would also make sense if initially chief is talking to himself. Basically saying he sacrificed all of this for a race/army that betrays him.
so the UNSC and the public see Chief as their messiah their savior.....
does Chief by into that or not? it would be interesting to see what he thinks of his legacy of pretty much being the greatest human soldier of all time
Just theories. Most prevalent one is that it's Macer (NIghtfall), Buck, and Mickey (ODST, New Blood).
After New Blood... I have a feeling it ain't Mickey. Maybe you mean Romeo?