• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Batman v Superman [Official Trailer Release]

Status
Not open for further replies.
Last time I checked Iron man and Cap are not invincible aliens. You literally have a invincible being vs a human with no super powers fighting. Superman has always been OP, that's why people question it. The ONLY reason Batman has ANY chance is because Superman checks himself.

And Batman cheats like A-Rod.
 
Last time I checked Iron man and Cap are not invincible aliens. You literally have a invincible being vs a human with no super powers fighting. Superman has always been OP, that's why people question it.

Superman isn't even the strongest guy in the Justice League in regards to power level. I'll never understand the "Superman is OP" comments. This idea that he is invincible and can't be beaten hasn't been a thing in the comics for, what, 4, maybe 5 decades.
 
What happened to that thread where the avengers couldn't stop a the Kryptonians from Man of Steel but we're to believe Batman in a C grade Iron Man suit can stand toe to toe with Superman?

Yes, I'm aware this is based off a comic book storyline in which this happens but it doesn't make this any less dumb.

He's Batman though, presumably the one from the comics (the unbeatable genius who knows everyone's weaknesses, thinks five steps ahead, and knows advanced chemistry, physics, anatomy, etc). It won't (or shouldn't be, anyways) a contest of brute force.
 
Why is it that people find it hard to believe that 2 heroes with different views can't fight?

And yet people aren't questioning Civil War. Why would iron man fight captain America? The double standards and hypocrisy

I think it's because of the characters.

Superman should be above fighting somebody who is basically like an ant to him. He should know better. It's like when a toddler antagonizes an adult. It's kind of ridiculous for the adult to engage the toddler in combat and stomp his ass.

And on the flip side, Batman is supposed to be incredibly smart and cunning. And it's very hard to imagine a set of circumstances through which engaging a god like Superman in a physical contest of all things could be considered smart or cunning.

So yes, whilst context may very well lay all of these fears to rest, the context of the trailer images followed by the title Batman v Superman does inspire the fear that maybe the filmmakers really are just fulfilling some nerd wish fulfillment at the expense of satisfying narrative motivation.

I don't understand how others don't understand this reaction. Using Frank Miller's TDKR book as an example to assuage these fears is maybe the worst response, since the motivation for these characters to physically fight as they do in that book is just as dumb as the things we're fearing now.

But as I said before. We barely have any context for what Snyder is going for, so they have every opportunity to prove those doubts wrong and thus have the benefit of the doubt so far.
 
I thought kryptonite doesn't exist in this universe.

he never said that

With regards reaction to the first film, Snyder acknowledged fan complaints that there's no Kryptonite in the film, and that Lex Luthor doesn't appear. "By no means am I saying those things don't exist, I'm just saying he didn't run into them here", Snyder said. As we noted here, there's an obvious Easter egg in Man Of Steel that makes it clear that Lex Luthor is already active within the world of the film.

http://www.denofgeek.com/movies/sup...eel-2-kryptonite-and-lex-luthor#ixzz3XvCg5BVk
 
I thought kryptonite doesn't exist in this universe.

I have no idea. At the end of the day it's a comic book movie. Power levels are only made up by the writers of said script. There have been plenty of animated movies where Kal El was nerfed to hell and got beat by average villains. It's not out of the ordinary in this scenario for him to be nerfed.
 
I have no idea. At the end of the day it's a comic book movie. Power levels are only made up by the writers of said script. There have been plenty of animated movies where Kal El was nerfed to hell and got beat by average villains. It's not out of the ordinary in this scenario for him to be nerfed.

But we know his power level. I'm supposed to belive batman has any chance when he was doing shit like this?

idxIm2UcF5DcP.gif
 
I think it's because of the characters.

Superman should be above fighting somebody who is basically like an ant to him. He should know better. It's like when a toddler antagonizes an adult. It's kind of ridiculous for the adult to engage the toddler in combat and stomp his ass.

And on the flip side, Batman is supposed to be incredibly smart and cunning. And it's very hard to imagine a set of circumstances through which engaging a god like Superman in a physical contest of all things could be considered smart or cunning.

So yes, whilst context may very well lay all of these fears to rest, the context of the trailer images followed by the title Batman v Superman does inspire the fear that maybe the filmmakers really are just fulfilling some nerd wish fulfillment at the expense of satisfying narrative motivation.

I don't understand how others don't understand this reaction. Using Frank Miller's TDKR book as an example to assuage these fears is maybe the worst response, since the motivation for these characters to physically fight as they do in that book is just as dumb as the things we're fearing now.

But as I said before. We barely have any context for what Snyder is going for, so they have every opportunity to prove those doubts wrong and thus have the benefit of the doubt so far.

Any "doubts" are by people who already have their minds made up before we even saw any footage.
 
I already posted that Snyder never said that kryptonite doesn't exists, opening the possibility of it being used in this film and you keep posting the same stuff. We haven't seen the movie, we don't know Batman's motivations, we don't know how the fight is going to play out, we don't know how Batman levels the playing field. We don't know anything.
 
I already posted that Snyder never said that Kryponite doesn't exists, opening the possibility of it being used in this film and you keep posting the same stuff. We haven't seen the movie, we don't know Batman's motivations, we don't know how the fight is going to play out, we don't know how Batman levels the playing field. We don't know anything.

At the end of the day this is basically it. We know nothing. Only going by some of what goes on in DKR of course. Even then they said it's an original plot. Which is perfect
 
Let's get real though.

Nobody wants Superman's powers watered-down. Yet, at the same time, nobody wants Kryptonite introduced into this fight, because Kryptonite in a setup like this is just the worst get-out-of-jail-free card imaginable. It's boring and uninteresting.

What would be interesting is to witness Batman's cunning, his brain over Superman's brawn. Find a way to put Superman in a situation in which brute strength isn't the measure of the playing field, because Batman is smart enough to know that isn't how you beat Superman. When Michael Jordan wants to adopt the same dog from the kennel that you do, you don't challenge him to a fucking basketball game to decide who gets to keep it. You change the game.

One of the greatest things about the Joker in Nolan's TDK was how clearly it was shown that all of Batman's strength and training and money meant jack shit when the opposition is playing an entirely different ball game where those talents don't mean anything.
 
I'd appreciate another movie not made around what fans want it to be. I have faith this will be one of the best super hero movies in years since DoFP. I'm more excited about Diana's appearance. The fact that since FOX made Elektra we haven't had a single female super hero in the forefront. I'm glad FOX and DC know what they're doing. I have faith they will once again bring a serious tone and actual coherent plots to the table.
 
I get the criticism people level at Snyder and Man of Steel, even if I don't personally agree. Snyder is a bit gratuitous and has a distinctive visual flair, and that's bound to be divisive. I can also appreciate that people are fatigued with the "grim dark" tone the movie has set forth so far. I tend to disagree that it's overdone (I think a bit of darkness is exactly what Superman needed to make him relevant again), but once again - I can see where people are coming from.

I don't understand how people on a video game messaging board (we're all ostensibly "nerds" to one degree or another) reading a thread about a comic book movie have never read nor seen the inspiration source for this movie. People asking "Why are Batman and Superman fighting?" have clearly never read The Dark Knight Returns, which to me is baffling. Even if you haven't read it, you should be aware of it. Spend 10 or 15 minutes on Wikipedia. Now, obviously this isn't an adaptation of that story - clearly Snyder is just borrowing certain elements. I do think it's fair to assume that Snyder will be pitting Supes and Bats against each other for their differing philosophies, similar to TDKR.

Superman is the Big Blue Boy Scout, and is likely working with governments around the globe to prevent disasters. At the end of Man of Steel, Clark told Col. Lennox that it would be on his own terms, but let's remember that he's still a relatively naive hero who really wasn't a "hero" at all before the Battle of Metropolis. Nobody had seen him in the costume before then. So, it makes sense to a degree that he might be manipulated by governments into doing something questionable. I think what's most likely is that he enables Lex Luthor to attain some position of power, and Bruce Wayne's proximity with Luthor in the business world brings him into the fold.

Now, Batman has obviously always been someone who operates outside of the law even while trying to uphold parts of it (read: he doesn't kill people, he turns them over to the police for trial). He's also a loner, and aside from allying with Jim Gordon, he doesn't cooperate with the police or the government (and may be seen as an antagonist by them). This is bound to bring Batman into conflict with Superman, because either A) the government tells Superman that Batman is a threat/villain, similar (but with obvious differences) to TDKR, or B) Batman antagonizes Superman to prevent Lex from making his ultimate play (whatever the 3rd act baddie is), since Supes has been furthering Lex's agenda unbeknownst to him.

Ultimately, the fight between Superman and Batman isn't really all that philosophically different than Cap's fight with Stark in Civil War. Cap and Stark disagree on trading liberties for protection, much as Batman might disagree with hanging up his cowl for Superman's (and whoever is pulling his strings) protection.
 
Here's the ant sized version. Brought the brightness up a bit in Photoshop since the original was nearly pitch black. Seeing Supes run like that looks silly.

JaR8e2a.gif

WHAT!

WHAT!

Batman moves a lot faster than I thought he would in that suit. I love it as it means he's likely even faster in his stock costume.
 
Whoever recorded that gif has balls of steel. Isn't there possible $15 000 fine?

Edit: also supes running is fine. Dont see why he has to fly when batman is 15 metres away.

What difference does it make anyway? We all know batman is going to get his ass whooped. I'm a huge batman fan, but supes mos is way too powerful to be beaten.
 
Let's get real though.

Nobody wants Superman's powers watered-down. Yet, at the same time, nobody wants Kryptonite introduced into this fight, because Kryptonite in a setup like this is just the worst get-out-of-jail-free card imaginable. It's boring and uninteresting.

What would be interesting is to witness Batman's cunning, his brain over Superman's brawn. Find a way to put Superman in a situation in which brute strength isn't the measure of the playing field, because Batman is smart enough to know that isn't how you beat Superman. When Michael Jordan wants to adopt the same dog from the kennel that you do, you don't challenge him to a fucking basketball game to decide who gets to keep it. You change the game.

One of the greatest things about the Joker in Nolan's TDK was how clearly it was shown that all of Batman's strength and training and money meant jack shit when the opposition is playing an entirely different ball game where those talents don't mean anything.
There's just one problem, they do play the same game, and Batman isn't a Villain that will kill indiscriminately. Short of deus ex machina, Outrageously advanced tech or Kryptonite, Batman can't defeat Superman no matter how he strategizes. That's why Lex hates Superman, all of his intellect means nothing in the face of a being so powerful that he can punch the time-space continuum so hard people are brought back to life.
 
I'd appreciate another movie not made around what fans want it to be. I have faith this will be one of the best super hero movies in years since DoFP. I'm more excited about Diana's appearance. The fact that since FOX made Elektra we haven't had a single female super hero in the forefront. I'm glad FOX and DC know what they're doing. I have faith they will once again bring a serious tone and actual coherent plots to the table.

Wait wasn't DoFP last year?
 
Iron man got wrecked pretty good, I'm pretty sure Thor could kill him if that went any longer.

That is likely what will happen here. Batman will toss everything at Superman and Superman will just break all his toys and tell Batman to stop. That's how nearly every fight between them has gone in animation and comics. The nearest he came to a win was knocking Suerman down after he got hit by a nuclear bomb.
 
I find statements of "Superman is holding back" silly because at that point, why would Superman bother to engage with Batman at all? He is fast enough to completely subdue Batman, wrap a mile's length of metal railing around him and that would be that.
 
That is likely what will happen here. Batman will toss everything at Superman and Superman will just break all his toys and tell Batman to stop. That's how nearly every fight between them has gone in animation and comics. The nearest he came to a win was knocking Suerman down after he got hit by a nuclear bomb.

Was it a Hydrogen Bomb? cuz, fusing hydrogen is Superman's Bread and Butter... literally.
 
I find statements of "Superman is holding back" silly because at that point, why would Superman bother to engage with Batman at all? He is fast enough to completely subdue Batman, wrap a mile's length of metal railing around him and that would be that.

Which is why this is Superman weakened trying to get into a serious fight ( not to kill but to hurt) with Batman and giving it whatever he has.
 
The concept of Batman and Superman fighting has almost always been bad to me because the circumstances that would cause that to happen always involve writers contriving a way to compromise the strength of one (Superman), or insulting the intelligence of the other (either Batman or Superman, or both), and neither is particularly interesting to me, especially when the outcome is incredibly predictable.
 
The concept of Batman and Superman fighting has almost always been bad to me because the circumstances that would cause that to happen always involve writers contriving a way to compromise the strength of one (Superman), or insulting the intelligence of the other (either Batman or Superman, or both), and neither is particularly interesting to me, especially when the outcome is incredibly predictable.

Easy solution - Batman found Zod's Kryptonian armour. He reverse engineers it into a Batsuit.
 
Drained of some of his powers?

Initially I made the same assumption, but I presume the scene when supes is floating in the air and bats asks him if he bleeds precedes this one. He looked plenty powerful there with his landing, so I can only guess like others that he's holding back.
 
I mean, they had Thor and Iron Man fight and Tony came out relatively unscathed.

Yeah well Tony is Sitting on the most important technological discovery ever. Not the miniaturization of the Arc Reactor, but inertial dampeners. By all rights after being shot out of the air in Iron Man 1 by the Tank he should have died on impact with the ground. Just because you stuff something Fragile into something durable doesn't change the laws of physics.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom