• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Avengers: Age of Ultron |OT| If you open this thread, you're an Avenger

Status
Not open for further replies.
Say, was there a reason (possibly behind the scenes) why
Falcon
didn't appear in the fight? We saw his character at the party and at the end, but it feels weird that he wasn't at the fight. I mean,
War Machine
was there!

It's something that happens in the movie, so yes. :P

But everyone knows Mr. T!
 
Just finished the movie.
As of the moment I feel Avengers and AoU are on the same level. I need to watch it again.
The ending fight could have been longer though, it ended to fast imo.
 
Eh, underwhelming that it's not even worth putting spoilers, but whatever.

Thanos puts on the Gauntlet and says "It looks like I have to do it myself".

I wish I didn't read this. It's nothing major, but it would have been cool to see this without knowing.
 
Friend invited me to see this tomorrow, mulled it over and decided I didn't want to fight the teens and fanboys. Will catch it next week maybe.

Sounds like it's pretty much the first Avengers again, for better or worse.
 
I'm hoping that those who were disappointed were expecting WAY too much and that the movie isn't actually bad. Marvel has been on a roll lately and the expectations are sky high.
 
Just came back from the movie...

It's ok. I wasn't blown away by it.

Some quick early thoughts...

- There are a lot of quips and jokes in this film. I don't mind these scenes where a serious
action piece is followed by a quip, but I felt Whedon went overboard with this.
- Some CGI was really rough looking.
- Ultron was really mixed for me. I dig Spader voicing him but some of his dialogues was so bad. Ultron
cracking jokes all the time
(not sure if spoiler, but just in case) felt off to me. Felt like some shitty Stark imitation.
- Movie is very dense with tons of action.

More thoughts in the spoiler thread.

3/5
 
Just got back.

I thought it was a good deal better than the first Avengers film. Whedon's direction was actually leagues above his previous outing, so well done to him. I also appreciated that while the plot was convoluted at times, that this film - unlike the previous film, took the time to actually develop the individual characters and their relationships with each other in a way that didn't feel perfunctory.

ILM's work was outstanding.

Ultron was a huge letdown of a villain, though. Talk about muddled motivation. Also, any sense of intimidation or threat he starts with is quickly undermined and evaporated as he turns into just another forgettable, light-hearted butt of a joke, saturday-morning cartoon villain.

So colour me surprised. I was expecting a film on par with the middling first one and got something better.

Whedon's script could do with a little more economical use of screentime, but what's there is much better than the first film.

3D was pretty much worthless outside of adding depth in the in-helmet close ups of Tony and his HUD.

TWS > AoU > IM1 >>> >>> etc
 
Just came back from the movie...

It's ok. I wasn't blown away by it.

Some quick early thoughts...

- There are a lot of quips and jokes in this film. I don't mind these scenes where a serious
action piece is followed by a quip, but I felt Whedon went overboard with this.
- Some CGI was really rough looking.
- Ultron was really mixed for me. I dig Spader voicing him but some of his dialogues was so bad. Ultron
cracking jokes all the time
(not sure if spoiler, but just in case) felt off to me. Felt like some shitty Stark imitation.

- Movie is very dense with tons of action.

More thoughts in the spoiler thread.

3/5
Not what I am/was expecting. I was hoping Ultron to be taken very very serious. Who knows, gotta see it for myself anyway
 
Ultron was one of my most hyped things about the movie so color me disappointed that he lacked presence. Guess I will see for myself though next week.

What the fuck, a couple guys clapped at the end of the flick.

Which American theater released the movie early?
 
Just got back. I thought it was a great deal better than the first Avengers, and I loved the first one. The action is phenominal and there are alot more "fuck yea" moments and pretty much everyone hàd their time to shine. There are just some great moments and I think Whedon really improved in alot of aspects compared to the first. There are ALOT of quips though but I never it was bad enough to get annoying. Overall I think I'd put this on my top tier Marvel movies along with Winter Soldier.
 
Ultron was one of my most hyped things about the movie so color me disappointed that he lacked presence. Guess I will see for myself though next week.

He has presence, especially physically since he is quite big. His character was a major issue for me. Felt like a really missed opportunity to make him more menacing. But I guess a serious robot doesn't work in this universe.
 
Just got back.

I thought it was a good deal better than the first Avengers film. Whedon's direction was actually leagues above his previous outing, so well done to him. I also appreciated that while the plot was convoluted at times, that this film - unlike the previous film, took the time to actually develop the individual characters and their relationships with each other in a way that didn't feel perfunctory.

ILM's work was outstanding.

Ultron was a huge letdown of a villain, though. Talk about muddled motivation. Also, any sense of intimidation or threat he starts with is quickly undermined and evaporated as he turns into just another forgettable, light-hearted butt of a joke, saturday-morning cartoon villain.

So colour me surprised. I was expecting a film on par with the middling first one and got something better.

Whedon's script could do with a little more economical use of screentime, but what's there is much better than the first film.

3D was pretty much worthless outside of adding depth in the in-helmet close ups of Tony and his HUD.

TWS > AoU > IM1 >>> >>> etc

Well shit.
Now I'm excited again.
 
Just saw it.

Great movie on a lot of levels, and better than the first. It has one big problem though. All the action is an over edited mess of weightless, CG white noise, and there's a lot of it. Really glad the Winter Soldier directors are taking over now.
 
Just came back from the movie...

It's ok. I wasn't blown away by it.

Some quick early thoughts...

- There are a lot of quips and jokes in this film. I don't mind these scenes where a serious
action piece is followed by a quip, but I felt Whedon went overboard with this.
- Some CGI was really rough looking.
- Ultron was really mixed for me. I dig Spader voicing him but some of his dialogues was so bad. Ultron
cracking jokes all the time
(not sure if spoiler, but just in case) felt off to me. Felt like some shitty Stark imitation.
- Movie is very dense with tons of action.

More thoughts in the spoiler thread.

3/5

How is the first point any surprising though? It's what plagues the damn MCU movies. The overboard humour and quips and what not. I hate it. I really do.
 
Just got back.

I thought it was a good deal better than the first Avengers film. Whedon's direction was actually leagues above his previous outing, so well done to him. I also appreciated that while the plot was convoluted at times, that this film - unlike the previous film, took the time to actually develop the individual characters and their relationships with each other in a way that didn't feel perfunctory.

ILM's work was outstanding.

Ultron was a huge letdown of a villain, though. Talk about muddled motivation. Also, any sense of intimidation or threat he starts with is quickly undermined and evaporated as he turns into just another forgettable, light-hearted butt of a joke, saturday-morning cartoon villain.

So colour me surprised. I was expecting a film on par with the middling first one and got something better.

Whedon's script could do with a little more economical use of screentime, but what's there is much better than the first film.

3D was pretty much worthless outside of adding depth in the in-helmet close ups of Tony and his HUD.

TWS > AoU > IM1 >>> >>> etc

oh shit, and i thought you were gonna hate it
 
Didn't Joss say this would be deeper and darker than the first one? It sounds like the first one again but with a cookie-cutter villain and a lot of jokes. Humor is fine but I don't really want it or need it everywhere especially after an action sequence. I'll keep my hype in check.
 
For those who care about Rotten Tomatoes:

All Critics
84%
Average Rating: 7.4/10
Reviews Counted: 45
Fresh: 38
Rotten: 7

Top Critics
100%
Average Rating: 7.4/10
Reviews Counted: 9
Fresh: 9
Rotten: 0

Critics Consensus: Exuberant and eye-popping, Avengers: Age of Ultron serves as a suitably satisfying sequel, reuniting its predecessor's unwieldy cast with a few new additions and a worthy foe.
 
Just got back.

I thought it was a good deal better than the first Avengers film. Whedon's direction was actually leagues above his previous outing, so well done to him. I also appreciated that while the plot was convoluted at times, that this film - unlike the previous film, took the time to actually develop the individual characters and their relationships with each other in a way that didn't feel perfunctory.

ILM's work was outstanding.

Ultron was a huge letdown of a villain, though. Talk about muddled motivation. Also, any sense of intimidation or threat he starts with is quickly undermined and evaporated as he turns into just another forgettable, light-hearted butt of a joke, saturday-morning cartoon villain.

So colour me surprised. I was expecting a film on par with the middling first one and got something better.

Whedon's script could do with a little more economical use of screentime, but what's there is much better than the first film.

3D was pretty much worthless outside of adding depth in the in-helmet close ups of Tony and his HUD.

TWS > AoU > IM1 >>> >>> etc

Good, just what I wanted.

Hearing many different things about Ultron so I'll wait and see. So far the film is sounding like what I wanted out of a sequel.
 
Ultron being a bad villain is par for the course tbh.

It doesn't have to be. I really wish they would get their shit together with villains. Kind of an important thing, especially when it's part of the fucking subtitle. That subtitle makes it sound like Ultron is going to be a hugely amazing villain, but these impressions paint a different picture. I kind of got burned out on Loki but at least he could be intimidating and had good dialogue.
 
It doesn't have to be. I really wish they would get their shit together with villains. Kind of an important thing, especially when it's part of the fucking subtitle. That subtitle makes it sound like Ultron is going to be a hugely amazing villain, but these impressions paint a different picture. I kind of got burned out on Loki but at least he could be intimidating and had good dialogue.

It's probably a mix of Marvel wanting to shoehorn Ultron in as a villain and Whedon trying to make the best out of that situation that made Ultron come out the way he did.
 
Didn't Joss say this would be deeper and darker than the first one? It sounds like the first one again but with a cookie-cutter villain and a lot of jokes. Humor is fine but I don't really want it or need it everywhere especially after an action sequence. I'll keep my hype in check.

i think he said that because of the character centric moments like with natasha and hawkguy. none of that were present in the first one.
 
Sounds like an Avengers film directed by Joss Whedon.

Same thing happened when I saw the first Avengers except it was the whole audience and not just a couple of guys. Felt a bit weird but hey, it's great that people enjoyed the movie.

I feel like audiences clapping at the end has been happening more often. It used to be pretty rare, something I only really saw at midnight showings, now it seems to happen all the time.
 
There was some clapping at the end, and I joined in a bit. There was also cheering at the beginning when the Marvel logo appear. Its all in good fun.
 
It's probably a mix of Marvel wanting to shoehorn Ultron in as a villain and Whedon trying to make the best out of that situation that made Ultron come out the way he did.

What shoehorning? Whedon has said repeatedly that before he even started the first Avengers he said they should do Ultron for the second, and cited him as one of his favorite villains.
 
If there really is an overabundance of quips, then I'm glad Whedon won't be on for Infinity Wars. His characters are always a bit too 'smart' and I've never really liked any of his other work because of it. That "I don't see how that's a party" line in the first movie sums up his writing for me.
 
It was good. It didn't do anything bad with the characters, the pacing was decent. The action was good.
My taste in movies has gone to shit because I think I liked Furious 7 more.
 
It's probably a mix of Marvel wanting to shoehorn Ultron in as a villain and Whedon trying to make the best out of that situation that made Ultron come out the way he did.

Wasn't Joss the primary driving force for including Ultron as a villain in the film?
 
Really enjoyed it! Brief thoughts, I think it's better than the first putting nostalgia aside,
seems like you could watch this repeatedly, character development is a major plus but I think they missed the mark with explaining Stark's and Ultron's motives since it got convoluted.
. The action at times is a top-notch. Probably goes TWS > GotG > IM1 > AOU etc
 
Really not getting the Ultron complaints. He's pretty much how he is in the comics, and one of the highlights of the movie.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom