The Witcher 3 | Review Thread

So who do you believe? IGN or videogamer?

I think Ign is referring more to the tension of a narrative, emotional, somehow directed experience (which you have playing the main quest) and the nature of open world games, where players are distracted everywhere with tasks, random combat, new side quests, etc. You can try to make carefully done dramatic in-crescendo in the main plot but the payoff is wasted because the player chose to do in between some other silly sidequests with jokes.
 
6QjPPYi.png

Knowing Jeff he played it for 3 hours and put it away. There was no chance he'd like the game. More interested in what Vinny and Rorie will have to say.
 
I have no doubt that this a good/great game but the inconsistencies between review points are really weird. I think this game might be more polarising than reviews suggest.
 
Fuck that. In many ways the first Witcher is superior to the second.

Second. My memory of The Witcher series always goes back to the 1st game. The story the 1st game told is just something else. I'm using that as my reference point on how I judge Witcher 3's story.
 
It takes four or five hours, but eventually The Witcher’s own personality begins to shine through – as well as your own influence on the world. Choosing to rescue a villager from a gang of thieves or curing a sick herbalist isn’t just a case of earning experience points and then moving on. Your actions can alter everything from the prices in shops and the side quests available, to whether a town is prematurely invaded. But so too can everything from the weather to the time of day, creating what is arguably the most believable and interactive video game world ever seen.
We’ve never seen a video game with both this volume of moral choices and lasting consequences for them, most of which are entirely unintended. Bad things often happen despite the best of intentions, and entirely self-motivated choices can actually lead to a positive outcome for all.
In Short: A colossal achievement in technical terms, with a level of interaction with the game world and its inhabitants that is unsurpassed in modern video games.

.
 
It's the game he spent the most time with and enjoyed the most. If you're a Call of Duty fan, Advanced Warfare was really solid. It's become the hipster thing to hate Call of Duty, but they are really well polished games with fun multiplayer.
 
Great reviews all around. Getting PS4 version myself.


They explained that the reviewer wanted to give the game a 10, but their editor in chief said "No" to it and it got down to a 9.9, which was still a bit much for the game.

Wow, never heard about this. The score always looked inflated to me.

Sure is a great game, but going but GT standards it seemed strangely high.
 
It's possible that several of the PoE reviewers didn't encounter any bugs. I put over 50 hours into the game during the week following release, and I didn't encounter a single issue.

Also, I think that ploughing thing was a joke.

That's my point though. I didn't encounter the bugs either but they were there and they affected the game very badly for a lot of players. Similarly, the balance issues made the endgame basically a joke. Reviewers writing a day-one review aren't well-placed to assess the quality of an RPG. It's very, very bad practice to place stock in the 9s and 10s that are getting thrown around here.

The ploughing bit is more that I'd prefer if a hyper-enthusiast for the franchise wasn't the one reviewing an already hugely marketed game that's been hyped up to the heavens.
 
I've been eyeing this, I have the Witcher 2 on X360 but never played it, should I beat it before considering the Witcher 3 or is the universe newcomer-friendly ?
 
so much for all that 'little to no fetch quests' promise CDPR :(

"From this main narrative arc unravels multiple story and quest threads; some important, others minor, but all intriguing. You're barely see a shadow of the "Fetch this, Kill X of these" missions that plague other titles.This is the new gold standard for the genre."

That's from the gamereactor review. So believe who you want or better yet play and decide for yourself.

And I totally expected Jeff's tweet. These games are not for him and that's okay. I'm curious what he'll say about it on the podcast but Jeff loving W3 would have been a huge surpise to me.
 
Knowing Jeff he played it for 3 hours and put it away. There was no chance he'd like the game. More interested in what Vinny and Rorie will have to say.

Well if a game doesn't grab me after 3 hours i drop it too.
 
Gerstmann doesn't like Yoshi's Island, Resident Evil 4, Super Metroid, or Red Dead Redemption. I spend an inordinate amount of time consuming Giant Bomb content, and it's hilarious how much he really does hate videogames.
 
Guy needs a vacation from games.... his GOTY for 2014 was Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare.

Jeff is fucking great, but it almost seems like him and I have the exact opposite tastes.

Well, I do love Persona 4, and I suppose he liked it too. But other than that.

e: oh, and great scores! And the thread is already delivering! My exam went terribly, but at least this thread will lighten me up
 
Guy needs a vacation from games.... his GOTY for 2014 was Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare.
Wait a minute, are you telling me not everyone likes the same kind of games? That sounds very disturbing if true, why was I not informed of this sooner?
 
I don't think reviews can be boosted.

To be fair it should be lower due framerate issues but seems like reviewers don't care if the game have big issues or not.

Yeah.. I guess with such a large game, the drops are less concentrated, so it's not as important to impact scores?

I'd expect a game with noted framerate problems to be dropped a few points, but to have other versions (PC) to score higher and be noted as the best standard.
 
Best things in the Witcher 3:

- Main Storyline
- Sidequest
- World

worst things in The Witcher 3:

- Character progression doesn't change anything much
- Balancing, some standard monsters are harder than bosses, lots of quests are too hard and if you come back later, too easy
- Handling in Menues is mediocre.

gamestar. (german)
 
Fetch quests, the bane of good game design. I don't give a shit about your lost chicken or cap. I just want to pillage and burn and be a dick, and plow my way through the story like that.
 
The worst things about The Witcher 2 for me were the combat, the janky animation and some sidequests were boring as fuck.

All the 10/10s must mean they improved upon all of these. Which reviews would you guys recommend that go a bit in depth about the combat and quest systems? I am about to watch the Gametrailers video myself. Gaffer reviews welcome.
 
It's the game he spent the most time with and enjoyed the most. If you're a Call of Duty fan, Advanced Warfare was really solid. It's become the hipster thing to hate Call of Duty, but they are really well polished games with fun multiplayer.

I think it's less "hispter", and more "fashionable" to hate on CoD.

AW was an awesome game, people who sneer at it are loco.

what does CODAW being jeff's goty 2014 have to do with him not liking witcher 3 much?

He's not a real gamer, too casual cod dudebro.
 
Top Bottom