Microsoft/Phil Spencer to appear at PC Gamer/AMD's PC gaming show at E3

Status
Not open for further replies.
I was about to make the same post more or less.

What we are supposed to believe:
  1. Phil Spencer, empowered by the spirit of Nadella, recognized the sorry state of DX11.
  2. He single-handedly crafted DX12 out of his sweat and tears and the love he feels in his heart for PC gamers.
  3. Through his heroic effort, your hardware will be 100% faster now!

Here's what happened:
  1. AMD created a low-overhead API, and was opening it up to the Khronos group for broad adoption.
  2. Microsoft aren't idiots and realized that the only reason they are at all relevant in PC gaming these days is DirectX. If DirectX goes, then so does Windows' hold on PC gaming. Ergo...
  3. They actually put effort in PC graphics API development for the first time since 2009 and produced D3D12.
  4. ... but of course, it's still Windows 10 exclusive, even though 99% of its advantages could easily be achieved on any post-Vista Windows.

Thank you for this post.
 
8.1 was distributed as a patch as well, and used the previous Windows 8 key. Something similar will likely happen. Also, I've never been required to re-enter a Windows key after installing a new video card, and I've changed mine many times.

So you're saying that Win10 will accept Win7 and Win8 keys for initial installation? If this is that simple then why didn't MS say that out loud yet?

H/w monitoring is dependent on Windows edition AFAIK. Boxed versions tend to be more forgiving than digital ones and regional versions can be different here as well.
 
Would PC gaming have been as successful on the disjointed scene of Linus distros? Or on the closed hardware world of Apple?

Yeah as a matter of fact maybe pc game could have been more successful across multiple platforms without microsoft's constantly vying for control.

Have you used steam on a mac or linux machine? It's actually quite nice. That is... what's there is quite nice. Aside from all the games that are windows only thanks largely to directx, you would hardly know what desktop os is running under your game.
 
The current state of PC gaming is different then the state of PC gaming some ten years ago. It was on the same platform.

If you cannot take the platform out of the equation to talk about the actual factors that are contributing to the growth of PC gaming, I don't know what to tell you.

I'm just saying that the platform is part of the equation and it makes no sense to remove it from there. The MS platform has been conducive to quite a few PC gaming golden ages.

Yeah as a matter of fact maybe pc game could have been more successful across multiple platforms without microsoft's constantly vying for control.
I disagree. From the Linux side Valve deciding it needed to roll its own distro speaks volumes about how hard it is to target a game for Linux. From the Mac side, is the Witcher 3 even announced for Macs?
 
So you're saying that Win10 will accept Win7 and Win8 keys for initial installation? If this is that simple then why didn't MS say that out loud yet?

H/w monitoring is dependent on Windows edition AFAIK. Boxed versions tend to be more forgiving than digital ones and regional versions can be different here as well.

Must be an OEM version thing I guess.
 
Yeah as a matter of fact maybe pc game could have been more successful across multiple platforms without microsoft's constantly vying for control.

Have you used steam on a mac or linux machine? It's actually quite nice. That is... what's there is quite nice. Aside from all the games that are windows only thanks largely to directx, you would hardly know what desktop os is running under your game.

Sucks that the options on Mac and Linux versions of Steam are limited =/

This is why I'm a lot more excited for Vulkan than DX12 because of its platform agnosticism.
 
I'm just saying that the platform is part of the equation and it makes no sense to remove it from there. The MS platform has been conducive to quite a few PC gaming golden ages.

I disagree. From the Linux side Valve deciding it needed to roll its own distro speaks volumes about how hard it is to target a game for Linux. From the Mac side, is the Witcher 3 even announced for Macs?

Your missing my point. Of course the platform is relevant. But PC gaming has not always been in the state it currently is. However, the platform back then and the platform now is the same.

So clearly, there are factors other then the platform which has made it a success. Falsely attributing too much success to the platform and using it to defend MS's acts and the treatments their executives receive for things they say about PC gaming just seems to be putting too much value on something that shouldn't.
 
Sucks that the options on Mac and Linux versions of Steam are limited =/

On linux in particular there's been a relative explosion since the introduction of steam for linux, but compared to the number and importance of games on windows it's laughable or tragic depending on your attitude. On the other hand, taken on it's own merits, it's now viable to use as a gaming platform.

But my point was that the games run just as nice and have all the features (less a little performance hit for the rough and ready opengl) and we as users have nothing to lose and everything to gain from games being os agnostic.
 
Your missing my point. Of course the platform is relevant.
That's all I'm saying and that that is a bit of context that works in Microsoft's favour.

Falsely attributing too much success to the platform
I have not and have never said that the rise of digitial distribution and especially Valve/Steam hasn't been the primary reason that PC gaming is where it's at today. I'm just saying the OS that all of this is running on shouldn't be ignored and it seems to me like it is ITT. A whole hell of a lot of good things have happened on Microsoft Windows.

Plus Nadella isn't Ballmer and Spencer isn't Mattrick or Allard. A lot of posts here feels like slashdot posters talking about Borg Gates of M$ or something.
 
Microsoft are just a custodian they won the OS battle. Before PC there was successful Personal Computers with similar games, mods and cracks, video and image editing programs such as Deluxe Paint.

Just look at Steam OS and all the recent games that work. If Microsoft disappear tomorrow, PC gaming carries on and probably does better.

If anything the OS in the last 15 years has been a barrier and 90% of it is aimed at business and for a long while you had no proper choice but to buy a desktop with Windows on. It's a hugely complicated costly system that goes far beyond what the browser and gamer needs. Selling a hugely business oriented OS doesn't fit today for the general consumer hence all the changes.
 
I expect something similar to what happened in E3 2006 or E32007 where Microsoft announced the wireless Xbox 360 receiver and a Viva Piñata PC port with the then new GFWL service.

This time it will be the Xbox One wireless receiver plus the new controller and some Xbox One ports.
 
With all the hate that goes towards Microsoft in the PC space, no other company has even come close to showing they would be a real and better alternative to what Microsoft gives me. Only Apple comes close and their offering is still subpar. Bottomline it isn't easy, look how hard a time Valve is having creating an OS that is even viable. I welcome the new leadership and will watch and see new additions they make. Truthfully I'm OK with them just releasing new versions of Direct X every few years, that's really the bare minimum. All they need is to create the sandbox let other people play in it.
 
If anything the OS in the last 15 years has been a barrier and 90% of it is aimed at business and for a long while you had no choice.
If 90% of Windows is aimed at business than 90% of Linux and OSX is aimed at business. Only console OS are mainly focused on games.

Like I said the fact that Valve had to roll its own distro doesn't speak greatly about Linux prior to SteamOS in terms of games and the slow pace of hardware improvement on Mac doesn't speak well for OSX. And those are the alternatives to Microsoft Windows.
 
Because maybe you don't want windows 10? Seriosuly have you considered that?

Well then you don't want it.
Microsoft are trying to make it easier for themselves, they don't want another XP situation with Windows 7 so they are luring and pushing consumers and businesses towards upgrading to Windows 10.
 
If 90% of Windows is aimed at business than 90% of Linux and OSX is aimed at business. Only console OS are mainly focused on games.

Like I said the fact that Valve had to roll its own distro doesn't speak greatly about Linux prior to SteamOS in terms of games and the slow pace of hardware improvement on Mac doesn't speak well for OSX. And those are the alternatives to Microsoft Windows.

I think you're underestimating the market for home computer games and the gap would be filled if vacated. You look around after 25 years of Microsoft of course there isn't much. Even after all that there's many top PC games you don't even need anything Microsoft to play. Others are there waiting to pick up the batton.
 
edit:

SteamOS is based on Debian ...

... and all *buntus are based on debian, and mint is based on debian.... It's really not so fragmented. I've run almost a dozen distros lately and they all work with steam.


Well then you don't want it.
Microsoft are trying to make it easier for themselves, they don't want another XP situation with Windows 7 so they are luring and pushing consumers and businesses towards upgrading to Windows 10.

Yes, exactly. We get zero benefit from this at best. Those of us who want anything other than windows 10, be it windows 7, or osx, or open source will have to use Vulkan and hope dx loses some grip.
 
As long as I don't have to pay for online gaming or have to buy it in the Windows Store, I'm interested in all games that Spencer is about to announce for Windows 10 :-)

yes, I am sure that it makes a whole lot of sense to microsoft to satisfy your demands.
halo mcc, halo 5, horizon 2, forza 5 & 6, gears 4 coming riiight 'up! specially for you! on steam of course!
 
Which versions detect hardware changes? Just curious, honestly.

Any digitally bought version I think. I have a Win8Pro and it does loose activation on a videocard change.

I don't know how it is with Win8 but in Win7 lineup the only version which didn't drop activation on h/w changes was boxed Win7Ultimate if my memory serves me right.

And all of them detect h/w changes, but the tolerance to them is different between editions.
 
Any digitally bought version I think. I have a Win8Pro and it does loose activation on a videocard change.

I don't know how it is with Win8 but in Win7 lineup the only version which didn't drop activation on h/w changes was boxed Win7Ultimate if my memory serves me right.

And all of them detect h/w changes, but the tolerance to them is different between editions.

Weird. I have digital versions of both Windows 8 Pro and Windows 8.1 Pro and have never had an issue when changing video cards.
 
I never expect anything worthwhile when MS is hyping up PC conferences and yet somehow despite this they always still manage to dissapoint me :D
 
Yes, exactly. We get zero benefit from this at best. Those of us who want anything other than windows 10, be it windows 7, or osx, or open source will have to use Vulkan and hope dx loses some grip.

Having used Windows 10 for the past couple of months...I truly believe you'll have a hard time on DX losing it's grip. It's definitely going to be as big as Windows 7.
 
Oh, you mean Fable and a few other random re-releases? The stuff that hardly anyone asked for? Sure, let's go with tangible. Just not GOOD tangible.

Uh, Age of Empires 2 was the single most requested game on GoG and Steam for a long while. Now it's the single most played RTS on Steam. Not exactly "hardly anyone."
 
Any digitally bought version I think. I have a Win8Pro and it does loose activation on a videocard change.

I don't know how it is with Win8 but in Win7 lineup the only version which didn't drop activation on h/w changes was boxed Win7Ultimate if my memory serves me right.

And all of them detect h/w changes, but the tolerance to them is different between editions.
I lost my Windows 8 Pro activation when one of my RAM sticks went bad, but I had no problems changing GPUs.
 
I think you're underestimating the market for home computer games and the gap would be filled if vacated.
I'm pointing out that golden ages have happened for PC games on Microsoft Windows. That's a fact. What might have happened in an alternate future or history where MS Windows ceases to exist or never existed is speculation but both alternatives to Windows have challenges that Microsoft's platform don't have. Fragmentation at the O/S level at one (to the point that there's no common desktop even) and slow hardware upgrades at the other.
 
But any post-Vista Windows can upgrade to 10 for free, so why does that even matter?

We understand why MS makes DX12 W10 exclusive - to sweeten the deal. And that is totally ok (at least for me).

FordGTGuy said:
It's a Windows 10 exclusive because they are giving everyone with Windows 7, 8 and 8.1 Windows 10 for free.
But sure, ignore that little fact.

It's not exclusive because they give it away. That's some crude logic. DX 10 was Vista exclusive, DX 11 W7 exclusive, DX 11 W8 exclusive (although they didn't give those away for free). MS always used Dx as a sales argument to upgrade. They never cared about openess and they don't do it now with Windows 10.

That is ok and it is their right to handle it like this. It's their business model. But don't paint a picture where MS' DX politics have ever been about beiing open. That's just wrong.
OpenGL runs on every OS, whether it is ARM or x86 based and on smartphones or a desktop pc. MS could do the same with Dx, if it would make sense to them.

They did some good things with DX and that is cool, but they don't give W10 away "to improve our gaming". They have good business reasons to do so and Dx 12 is just one point to get more people to update as early as possible.
 
I thought you mentioned it here like two years ago.. where is it?

Hooking my wireless controller to a cord just feels wrong.

You are right. Always in the plan, we were going back and forth on how we would do it. As I'm sure you've all seen we've been prioritizing other stuff (like the monthly updates). Which I like, but that's why stuff like this gets delayed.
 
You are right. Always in the plan, we were going back and forth on how we would do it. As I'm sure you've all seen we've been prioritizing other stuff (like the monthly updates). Which I like, but that's why stuff like this gets delayed.

so how is the show coming up Albert? are you excited? anything happening that will catch us unaware?
 
It doesn't sound like they're bringing games reading that quote.

Don't be like that. Glass half full buddy.

"We're growing the Killer Instinct player base by releasing KI on Windows 10 with cross play! And it can run at 60 frames on Surface 4!!! And its cross buy!!!!!"

I would die.
 
Well, Major Nelson is teasing a "surprise," whatever that could be.

http://majornelson.com/2015/06/03/xbox-at-e3-2015/

For our PC gaming fans already getting excited for the upcoming release of Windows 10 on July 29, we recently announced that we’ll be co-sponsoring the PC Gaming Show on June 16 from 5-8 p.m PDT. Head of Xbox Phil Spencer and key members of the team will be showing off some great gaming experiences for Windows 10 (and maybe even a surprise), so be sure to catch the livestream of the show on the official PC Gaming Show site or on Twitch.
 
You are right. Always in the plan, we were going back and forth on how we would do it. As I'm sure you've all seen we've been prioritizing other stuff (like the monthly updates). Which I like, but that's why stuff like this gets delayed.

Gotcha. As long as it works and looks awesome, I'm on board day one. I might even buy another controller just for my computer.

Updates have been great, keep up the good work with that. I'm looking forward to the Win 10 update coming soon.
 
so how is the show coming up Albert? are you excited? anything happening that will catch us unaware?

You know I don't know. I'm invited to the reviews and dress rehearsals, and to be honest I've avoided as much as I can. I know bits-and-pieces, but I miss the old days of just showing up and being excited, so I'm avoiding spoilers that way I can enjoy it just like everyone else.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom