I remember the good old days when corps used to test interest by conducting market research...
Regardless, I hope that Suzuki pulls it off.
It's not like you know, Sony is a struggling company with a lot of uncertainty about its future after the last few hard years. Nope they should just be throwing money at Shenmue!Everyone is making huge assumptions. And of course, Sony is the big corporation. Therefore they should spend money, and take all the risk.
Yeah you only spend your money if the project gets funded. But I just don't understand why Sony couldn't have just funded the project entirely by themselves because the $2m won't make a dent in that game's budget. For the record, I have the same issues with Bloodstained and I'm worried that this sort of thing is becoming a trend. I'd rather these publishers/developers open the game for preorder before development because that way you can cancel at any time and you get your money back if the project fails. My main issue is that why is Sony forcing Shenmue fans to become investors into the game when the money received from the kickstarter is hardly enough to make a dent in the development costs of the games. It seems really unnecessary to me.
Everyone is making huge assumptions. And of course, Sony is the big corporation. Therefore they should spend money, and take all the risk.
This should have been disclosed straight up when Yu Suzuki got on stage. I mean it's a tad scummy to angel invest only after fans throw down big bucks (the average pledge is quite high) but I think it's tolerable so long as people know that.
It's not like you know, Sony is a struggling company with a lot of uncertainty about its future after the last few hard years. Nope they should just be throwing money at Shenmue!
/s
Absolutely agreed.Sure.
Even if they aren't struggling and were doing well, it's ridiculous that people think they MUST fully back a high risk project.
This thread really is part two of Bayonetta 2 Wii U exclusivity...
What is wrong with Sony making money? Their involvement doesn't just stop with them pledging like we do. Their money goes beyond that point. We pledge, and we get the items promised. They give more money way beyond any we could, and thus have a right to make money. I fail to see the ethical problem in that.
We are all making mass assumptions without knowing what actually went down.
Since Shenmue has never gotten backing again, my assumption is that, he would have made a KS project anyways at some point, if he could not get backing. The way I see it, this is fans taking a risk like they take with any KS project. Everyone knows the format. We know the risk. Except this time, this project has a safety net from Sony. The project is not guaranteed as no KS project is guaranteed. But we have better odds with this project because of that safety net.
You are saying fans are being asked to take the risk, and that makes Sony scummy or immoral. Sony is a company that has to make money. We don't know their exact financial situation, or what kind of money they actually have to throw around in each quarter. We don't know what money they already have tied up in other projects. We don't know the data companies have on Shenmue, and why they don't think it's worth backing (there is a reason the third game has never had backing from any major company all these years). We don't know a lot of things.
We are making so many assumptions. And to act like Sony is this immoral entity. That because they are a company and thus have money, they should 100% back this completely and take all the risk. That consumers should never have to take any risk. I just think that is bullshit. Sony is a player in this free market, the same way we are a player. They have every right to be cautious of the projects they back. The money they invest in.
I'm not going to view Sony as this rich entity that must take all the risk and just back it, because a vocal minority want Shenmue badly. Get real. The past Shenmues flopped. There is probably data we don't have, that is a reason companies don't want to touch this thing. Sony knows that this vocal minority is passionate and wants it badly. So KS provides a format where the project can be started, and the consumer takes on some of the risk, and Sony provides a safety net that most KS never will get.
I fail to see the problem, or how Sony is being ethically immoral here. I see Sony trying to work with a shitty situation, and trying to give a vocal minority something they want badly.
Well I guess maybe that's my issue then? I don't know how far Sony is involved in this project. Sure if Sony invests say 20 million into this project (pulling this number from my ass) and sees none of that money back, then of course that's a pretty awesome thing for Sony to do.
But we don't know the true extent that Sony is involved with this. We don't know the conditions of the investment that is being made here. So I guess the controversy that is being generated is that a bunch of us see it like Sony forcing fans to invest money into something and then profiting off of it. Then a bunch of others are seeing Sony as losing a lot of money in order to make fans of an IP happy. I honestly don't see how Sony being vague about their involvement is helping them out here.
Thats the whole point.Yeah you only spend your money if the project gets funded. But I just don't understand why Sony couldn't have just funded the project entirely by themselves because the $2m won't make a dent in that game's budget. For the record, I have the same issues with Bloodstained and I'm worried that this sort of thing is becoming a trend. I'd rather these publishers/developers open the game for preorder before development because that way you can cancel at any time and you get your money back if the project fails. My main issue is that why is Sony forcing Shenmue fans to become investors into the game when the money received from the kickstarter is hardly enough to make a dent in the development costs of the games. It seems really unnecessary to me.
How often do you know how much a publisher invests in a project. Why does that even matter? So only if they make no money are they the good guy? This is the video game business not the video game charity.
Stop using that idiotic word "forcing". Nobody's forcing anything.
So I guess the controversy that is being generated is that a bunch of us see it like Sony forcing fans to invest money into something and then profiting off of it.
Grimløck;168461778 said:well there it is.jpg
Dude. Who the fuck had a gun to their head being forced to fund the kickstarter? Are you fucking high?
Sony is forcing fans to back a kickstarter before they will fund the rest of the game. Without the funding given by Sony, the game is not able to be made. Therefore they are forcing fans of Shenmue if they want another game to back a kickstarter because without the goal being reached, they would not provide those additional funds. 2 million is not nearly enough to make this game so it's clear that the kickstarter alone could never fund this.
It matters because the publisher stands to make money as an investor but you as a kickstarter backer do not, though you are investing as well. And yes they are forcing you as a Shenmue fan to back the kickstarter if you want the game to be made. If you (collectively) don't back the kickstarter the game would not be made.
Sony is forcing fans to back a kickstarter before they will fund the rest of the game. Without the funding given by Sony, the game is not able to be made. Therefore they are forcing fans of Shenmue if they want another game to back a kickstarter because without the goal being reached, they would not provide those additional funds. 2 million is not nearly enough to make this game so it's clear that the kickstarter alone could never fund this.
Sony is forcing fans to back a kickstarter before they will fund the rest of the game. Without the funding given by Sony, the game is not able to be made. Therefore they are forcing fans of Shenmue if they want another game to back a kickstarter because without the goal being reached, they would not provide those additional funds. 2 million is not nearly enough to make this game so it's clear that the kickstarter alone could never fund this.
Sony is forcing fans to back a kickstarter before they will fund the rest of the game. Without the funding given by Sony, the game is not able to be made. Therefore they are forcing fans of Shenmue if they want another game to back a kickstarter because without the goal being reached, they would not provide those additional funds. 2 million is not nearly enough to make this game so it's clear that the kickstarter alone could never fund this.
Everyone is making huge assumptions. And of course, Sony is the big corporation. Therefore they should spend money, and take all the risk.
I'm hoping this game is a success, but my con-job alarm bells are going off. Here's why:
1.) This game take's place in Guilin, China which is a very beautiful scenic area. But the only things going on there are tourism and agriculture. To make a comparison for the United States, it would be like having the game set in Martha's Vinyard.
2.) That trailer was ridiculous, and kind of felt condescending. It was pretty much "Hey otaku nerds! Do you like beautiful Asian women? Just look into her sparkling eyes! She could be yours... but we need funding for this game first.
3.) Just like what other people are arguing. They're taking advantage of the goodwill of their fans to front the bill for a game that should be paid for by the publisher.
4.) The game creator just rubs me the wrong way. Yeah, intuition amounts to shit in any debate but that's just how I feel.
Yu Suzuki initially stated the production budget was $70 million[4] (equivalent to $99 million in 2015) but later stated it cost $47 million[5] (equivalent to $67 million in 2015).[6] The game was followed by a 2001 sequel, Shenmue II, with at least one more planned as a Dreamcast series
I'm hoping this game is a success, but my con-job alarm bells are going off. Here's why:
1.) This game take's place in Guilin, China which is a very beautiful scenic area. But the only things going on there are tourism and agriculture. To make a comparison for the United States, it would be like having the game set in Martha's Vinyard.
2.) That trailer was ridiculous, and kind of felt condescending. It was pretty much "Hey otaku nerds! Do you like beautiful Asian women? Just look into her sparkling eyes! She could be yours... but we need funding for this game first.
3.) Just like what other people are arguing. They're taking advantage of the goodwill of their fans to front the bill for a game that should be paid for by the publisher.
4.) The game creator just rubs me the wrong way. Yeah, intuition amounts to shit in any debate but that's just how I feel.
The purpose of such kickstarters is usually to show the investor there is a demand for that.
Nowadays quite a lot of KS use that model. They have an investor, but the investor wants to see that there really is a demand for that.
No one is forcing you to fund it. If you want it, you can also wait and see if enough other people want the game to be made.
I'm hoping this game is a success, but my con-job alarm bells are going off. Here's why:
1.) This game take's place in Guilin, China which is a very beautiful scenic area. But the only things going on there are tourism and agriculture. To make a comparison for the United States, it would be like having the game set in Martha's Vinyard.
2.) That trailer was ridiculous, and kind of felt condescending. It was pretty much "Hey otaku nerds! Do you like beautiful Asian women? Just look into her sparkling eyes! She could be yours... but we need funding for this game first.
3.) Just like what other people are arguing. They're taking advantage of the goodwill of their fans to front the bill for a game that should be paid for by the publisher.
4.) The game creator just rubs me the wrong way. Yeah, intuition amounts to shit in any debate but that's just how I feel.
You're exactly right, but $3M raised in a day is nothing to sneeze at. Those are sales. Granted the game isn't done yet but that's already $3M in sales. Not too bad for a series that's been dead for 14 years.Sony can probably push a game to way more than 30K in sales just by giving it heavy promotion on the PSN Store and/or releasing a demo. In the grand scheme of things the numbers are not exactly staggering.
I'm hoping this game is a success, but my con-job alarm bells are going off. Here's why:
1.) This game take's place in Guilin, China which is a very beautiful scenic area. But the only things going on there are tourism and agriculture. To make a comparison for the United States, it would be like having the game set in Martha's Vinyard.
2.) That trailer was ridiculous, and kind of felt condescending. It was pretty much "Hey otaku nerds! Do you like beautiful Asian women? Just look into her sparkling eyes! She could be yours... but we need funding for this game first.
3.) Just like what other people are arguing. They're taking advantage of the goodwill of their fans to front the bill for a game that should be paid for by the publisher.
4.) The game creator just rubs me the wrong way. Yeah, intuition amounts to shit in any debate but that's just how I feel.
Con-Job? You mean Sony is going to put money in with a veteran developer and the game might now happen? I mean really. Your stake in it is you get a game for your money or you don't.
See and I think that's a problem. If this trend continues this will become something just like pre-order culture. But instead of locking content behind a payment for the game before it's out, we'll be doing this with games themselves instead. I wouldn't care if this began and stopped with Shenmue, but it's clearly looking like it's not. And I wouldn't even give a shit if they opened pre-orders before development, but the kickstarter model doesn't guarantee you even a final product or your money back.
Without funding from anyone (which hasn't been done for 14 years) the game won't be made. It was a complete financial failure before. Sony stepped up under the condition that a successful kickstarter campaign could be undertaken (a totally prudent business decision on their part), in order to mitigate risk. It's a win win win for everyone involved. You're seriously in some fantasy land lollipop insane zone if you think this is somehow anything less than a best case scenario from where we were 5 years ago.
Dude. Pull your head out your ass
Your logic here is faulty. If the game never reached 2 million for a kickstarter, then the game would sell like crap, then sony would have wasted their money funding Shenmue 3 and then Sony wouldn't want to fund the game to please a very small subset of fans,l and it doesn't get made. The Kickstarter proved there was a market for it.
I'm kinda amazed this is coming to PC with Sony funding it, though.
People are still pulling this non-sense idea? 2 million is ripping off the customers?
I'm not saying they are ripping off their customers. We all know the people backing this project feel very strongly that they are getting value from their donation, and I think it's more than likely that a well received game will be made as a result.
What I think is wrong is that this game doesn't need a kickstarter to be made and that it's only happening to save the publisher 10-20% on development costs. Just look at Nier getting a sequel: it's a big old flop that slowly garnered a cult following, and not nearly one as big as Shenmue I should add.
Why are people mad? You are getting the game for $30. It is essentially a pre order to ensure the game gets made(and a higher budget to make a nicer game). That is easily worth going the kickstarter route. I'm all for this way of funding games if it means we can also get a new Parappa.
This has to be parody.
I can't tell if this post is serious or a joke.
Con-Job? You mean Sony is going to put money in with a veteran developer and the game might now happen? I mean really. Your stake in it is you get a game for your money or you don't.
Not a fan of this using kickstarter to essentially have people preorder the game before it's made. Like it's one thing if you need the funds to make your game but that $2 million isn't going to make a dent in this project. What happens if the game falls through or gets stuck in development hell for years? Nobody gets their money back which makes this a pretty scummy move imo.
Do you trust everything you read on the internet?
I doubt Sony would.
They read, I would assume, hundreds of posts about shenmue over the years, if not thousands. But what does that translate into if the game a bunch of people are talking about hasn't been sold in 14 years?
You need this kind of gimmick to solidify that it's not all just hot air from the internet, and that people actually DO still want this.
Do you trust everything you read on the internet?
I doubt Sony would.
They read, I would assume, hundreds of posts about shenmue over the years, if not thousands. But what does that translate into if the game a bunch of people are talking about hasn't been sold in 14 years?
You need this kind of gimmick to solidify that it's not all just hot air from the internet, and that people actually DO still want this.
I'm open to having a discussion if you guys have something else you want to say.
Well I could be wrong, but I just don't think this kickstarter was necessary to get the game going.
Well I won't disagree that it's a great marketing tool. Heck, I wouldn't even say that it's ethically wrong, as people should be free to do what they wish with their money and I don't think there is much overt deception going on here. But I do think that Sony should have fronted the whole bill, and it looks bad from my side that they're asking their fans to do so.
I'm open to having a discussion if you guys have something else you want to say.
Well I could be wrong, but I just don't think this kickstarter was necessary to get the game going.
The problem with this logic is the same thing could happen if it was a normal Kickstarter. In fact, I'd say the game has a much better chance of not only coming out, but being better than it would have without Sony's support.
I'll put it as simply as I can. Right now it's like pre-ordering a game with the option to get some extras if you're willing to pay enough. Shit could happen and the game might not come out, and there likely wouldn't be a refund.
Or, if they did just the Kickstarter, the developers would be on their own. Maybe the game would come out and be the best game ever. It's basically a pre-order that you have the option to get extra stuff if you're willing to pay. If the game doesn't come out, there very likely won't be a refund.
So what's the better option? A "pre-order" that involves Yu working with one of the most prominent publishers, a publisher that has a track record of giving developers creative freedom, a company that has an incredibly talented studio that often works with third party developers on their games (Santa Monica), a publisher that is footing presumably a large portion of the budget, a publisher that gave the game the biggest possible chance for exposure for the Kickstarter project.
Or, Yu announces a Kickstarter for a "pre-order" for the game and hopes he gets enough money and has the right team to make the game.
It's hard not to view anybody who prefers the second option as either very biased, or just very...well, nothing flattering.
I'm not saying they are ripping off their customers. We all know the people backing this project feel very strongly that they are getting value from their donation, and I think it's more than likely that a well received game will be made as a result.
What I think is wrong is that this game doesn't need a kickstarter to be made and that it's only happening to save the publisher 10-20% on development costs. Just look at Nier getting a sequel: it's a big old flop that slowly garnered a cult following, and not nearly one as big as Shenmue I should add.