Raise the flame shield: Your "controversial" gaming opinion.

You have a very limited knowledge of gaming if that's all you could come up with.

Maybe I do, which is why I'm asking you to enlighten me.

Please, point me towards some examples of tomboyish/masculine/butch female main characters in popular fiction (as in, something you'd see a topic for on GAF and not something niche) that are explicitly involved in heterosexual relationships with men.

It's definitely not harmful, it's absolutely a good step forward.

And not everything has to subvert to be great. It can just be a plain old reflection of life written in a well balanced way.

Tell that to a straight tomboy:

vBlm7dO.png

Contrary to popular belief, depicting almost every woman who dresses and behaves a certain way as also being a certain sexuality is absolutely problematic. It's just as bad as every ultra-femme princess being straight.
 
When? In popular fiction, I can't think of many examples of explicit heterosexual relationships with empowered, "tomboyish/masculine" women at all. Especially playable/main characters.

LGBT: Ellie, Korra, Athena (Borderlands), Ciri, Chie...

Asexual: Furiosa, Katniss (she is portrayed as not being thrilled with her time with Peeta), Lara Croft (possibly LGBT)...

Straight: Fetch from Infamous and er... Claire Redfield?

Nonplayable is a different issue, with characters like Jack from Mass Effect coming into play, but even then it's the story of Male Shepard romancing Jack instead of the other way around.

Look, my core point is that Bill sexuality was great because it subverts expectations of what a gay man "is supposed to be like" according to popular media. Ellie's sexuality is a bland development because she's everything society tells us lesbians/bisexuals are (in a manner that is totally baseless and harmful for women in general, as behavior/style should never be indicative of sexual preference).

Chie as in Chie from Persona?

Oh FFS people, can't a girl be friendly with a girl without her being immediately Yuri-fied? There's NO indication whatsoever that Chie swings that way in that game, it's just ridiculous.
 
I just finished playing (and getting the platinum for) Bloodborne. I have to say it was my least favourite of From's "Souls" RPGs (using the quotes because I know it's not technically a Souls game). It was the first time I never really felt the need to create a new character for another playthrough.

I agree. Part of this is because the game just didn't feel like it have enough variety to justify multiple playthroughs.
 
Chie as in Chie from Persona?

Oh FFS people, can't a girl be friendly with a girl without her being immediately Yuri-fied? There's NO indication whatsoever that Chie swings that way in that game, it's just ridiculous.

Yep, there's all sorts of stuff going on between Yukiko and her, but it's really a Harley and Ivy type deal. Nothing confirmed. Still, I've seen them mentioned in a lot of LGBT threads.

You might as well say " can't someone write a girl who can be friendly with a girl without them both being immediately Yuri-fied?" Evidence points to "no" when at least one of those girls could be thought of as fitting a male role.
 
Yep, there's all sorts of stuff going on between Yukiko and her, but it's really a Harley and Ivy type deal. Nothing confirmed. Still, I've seen them mentioned in a lot of LGBT threads.

You might as well say " can't someone write a girl who can be friendly with a girl without them both being immediately Yuri-fied?" Evidence points to "no" when at least one of those girls could be thought of as fitting a male role.

No there aren't, and it's nothing but a bunch of hyperactive imagination of people who have nothing better to do with their time.

Look, LGBT characters are cool, sure, but when people start ascribing things to characters that aren't there just to satisfy their Yaoi/Yuri fangirling/fanboyish stuff then I personally think it's just really annoying.

Especially so since Yaoi/Yuri fangirls/fanboys tend to immediately create scenarios in their heads whenever they see guy-guy or girl-girl friendships. Geezz.
 
Ellie's sexuality is a bland development because she's everything society tells us lesbians/bisexuals are (in a manner that is totally baseless and harmful for women in general, as behavior/style should never be indicative of sexual preference).
Considering the fact that you think Chie is gay based on 'evidence' that amounts to her being a tomboyish friend, you are guilty of what you describe. Guessing somebody's sexual preferences based on behaviour/style.
 
i lost 1 hour to that backward ass save point system.
LOL

Huh? You mean the checkpoint system, right? Those games continuously save your progress. There aren't many checkpoints in the games, but there are plenty shortcuts that help. Maybe you never bothered to look for them.
 
The Last of Us: Left Behind screwed up Ellie's character.

The exploration of Bill's sexuality in the main game was awesome because he's everything mainstream society says gay men are not: Empowered, confident, competent and skilled.

The exploration of Ellie's sexuality in the DLC took a really unique female character and made her into a stereotype. Modern writers still can't write a empowered female character with combat skills and traditionally boyish behavior who is explicitly straight. Nor can they address the huge lack of platonic friendships between female characters in fiction.

Many people treated it as a groundbreaking moment, but making tomboyish girls lesbians is same-old same-old. When Princess Peach starts making out with ladies, then I'll be impressed.

Brienne from ASoIF/GoT? Though she isn't a video game character.

Good point.The archetype recently started to emerge again due to the LGBT movement, though the execution of it has been wishy-washy at best. I think Ellie is one of better written examples though, so I can't really say it's problematic in this case. A stereotype or archetype is only as good as the one who writes it IMO.

On Topic: The Evil Within should have been the 2014 GOTY, performance be dammed. Though I think it will be thought of more positively as time goes on ( and if it gets patched more).
 
GAF reflects the gaming landscape. Right now, Sony are the outright leaders this gen in sales terms so it makes sense there might be a few more Sony fans here these days. If Xbox or Nintedo start kicking ass, or Sony fuck up big time, things would likely be very different around here.

Yup. People are going to get excited about the system they own. Sony is selling more units, so...yeah. Tables were turned in the early PS360 era and eople still make "$599 PS3 LOL" posts.

Although to contests my own logic, I see plenty of love for Nintendo products. I think people are just mistaking the lack of enthusiasm for Xbone as Sony love. MS just soured GAF after that DRM debacle and releasing an overpriced system.
 
Yep, there's all sorts of stuff going on between Yukiko and her, but it's really a Harley and Ivy type deal. Nothing confirmed. Still, I've seen them mentioned in a lot of LGBT threads.

You might as well say " can't someone write a girl who can be friendly with a girl without them both being immediately Yuri-fied?" Evidence points to "no" when at least one of those girls could be thought of as fitting a male role.
I actually thought your point on Left Behind was really interesting but now you're just veering off into goofiness.
 
I hate that some people aren't adventurous with games and stay within their confided bubbles but feel they can have opinions on games they never played, much yet liked or even tried.

Maybe not controversial but whatever.

---

Watching games are not and will never be equal to playing them. You can't watch someone else's life and know what they went through, the same shouldn't be applied to games.

---

I hate that the word "multiplaform" is now and insult rather than a good thing. But I hate that "exclusive" is described as greedy rather than being strictly business.
 
RTS is the best genre of gaming. It's not massively popular because people can't handle it (strategy, multitasking etc). It requires a lot more skill to be good at than most other genres.

AoE 2 is the best RTS.
 
Yeah, I think they're fairly flawed games too; it's reasonable to have issues with them for one reason or another. But complaining about losing three hours of progress to one error and about the "ass-backwards save system" (which really isn't particularly punishing) shows bad taste.
A comment like that shows that they don't understand how the save system works in the first place. Taste doesn't even enter the equation.
 
No there aren't, and it's nothing but a bunch of hyperactive imagination of people who have nothing better to do with their time.

Look, LGBT characters are cool, sure, but when people start ascribing things to characters that aren't there just to satisfy their Yaoi/Yuri fangirling/fanboyish stuff then I personally think it's just really annoying.

Especially so since Yaoi/Yuri fangirls/fanboys tend to immediately create scenarios in their heads whenever they see guy-guy or girl-girl friendships. Geezz.

Considering the fact that you think Chie is gay based on 'evidence' that amounts to her being a tomboyish friend, you are guilty of what you describe. Guessing somebody's sexual preferences based on behaviour/style.

The implication is there and it's pretty explicit. Yukiko's shadow referring to Chie as her "strong prince," Chie's shadow being a dominatrix that represents her control over Yukiko, the whole "My soulmate is a girl?" thing, etc.

That's not really speculative, it's a pretty concrete suggestion that there are deeper feelings between the two. Feelings that the writers chose to include, again, because Chie is a tomboy and tomboys can't be purely platonic friends with girls.

So yeah, it falls into a similarly problematic category as the other examples.
 
The implication is there and it's pretty explicit. Yukiko's shadow referring to Chie as her "strong prince," Chie's shadow being a dominatrix that represents her control over Yukiko, the whole "My soulmate is a girl?" thing, etc.

That's not really speculative, it's a pretty concrete suggestion that there are deeper feelings between the two. Feelings that the writers chose to include, again, because Chie is a tomboy and tomboys can't be purely platonic friends with girls.

So yeah, it falls into a similarly problematic category as the other examples.

No not really. They're just very good friends. Not a single time in P4 or P4G it was suggested that Yukiko and/or Chie has romantic feelings toward each other.

Oh, and if what you say is true then Naoto should also want to bang all the female characters in the game. And don't forget Marie as well, in P4G. I mean, they're tomboys too, you know; Naoto even more so than Chie.
 
No not really. They're just very good friends. Not a single time in P4 or P4G it was suggested that Yukiko and/or Chie has romantic feelings toward each other.

Oh, and if what you say is true then Naoto should also want to bang all the female characters in the game. And don't forget Marie as well, in P4G. I mean, they're tomboys too, you know; Naoto even more so than Chie.

B-but Naoto and Marie didn't have scenes that placed them in sexually charged roles (domme and prince) in relation to other same-sex characters. What's the point of doing that as a writer if you aren't trying to say....

Okay fine, let's drop Chie then. I'm not doing a good job of illustrating what the problem is with her, as obviously suggestive as I think some of that stuff is.

The larger point, which people were agreeing with, still stands.
 
Chie doesn't want Yukiko; she wants someone to control to feel better about herself and how she views her own life. Yukiko doesn't want Chie; she wants someone to tell her what to do so she doesn't have the pressure of self-determination. Both of them grow out of those notions as the game goes along. Neither situation has anything inherently to do with their sexuality.

Shipping is the worst

--

Most Nintendo party games--Mario Party, Nintendoland, etc--are tedious at best. I play them to have something to do with friends but I prefer it when we do nearly anything else.

Smash games are cool right up until people take them too seriously and think they're playing a real fighting game.
 
Shenmue games are boring.

Conker's Bad Fur Day is mediocre.

Twin Snakes is better than the PS1 original.

Fallout 3 is better than New Vegas and Obsidian doesn't deserve all the praise they get.
 
The implication is there and it's pretty explicit. Yukiko's shadow referring to Chie as her "strong prince," Chie's shadow being a dominatrix that represents her control over Yukiko, the whole "My soulmate is a girl?" thing, etc.

That's not really speculative, it's a pretty concrete suggestion that there are deeper feelings between the two. Feelings that the writers chose to include, again, because Chie is a tomboy and tomboys can't be purely platonic friends with girls.

So yeah, it falls into a similarly problematic category as the other examples.

What in the world? I would say that is a controversial real world opinion... Tomboys can be purely platonic friends with whomever they want.
 
Not sure if this is a controversial opinion but Gamergaters and Antigamergaters are just as bad as one another and it is basically impossible to discuss the topic of sexism within the games industry because the loudest voices on both sides are the dumbest.
 
FF10 is one of the worst ff games

I literally just started playing FFX for the "first" time last week, and it's also pretty much my first Final Fantasy game. I went on vacation, brought my Vita for the downtime I'd have, and started the game. And I'm not ashamed to admit that I am absolutely loving it.

What would you say are the best games? I'd love to check them out after I finish this game (and, well, likely also X-2).

Not sure if this is a controversial opinion but Gamergaters and Antigamergaters are just as bad as one another and it is basically impossible to discuss the topic of sexism within the games industry because the loudest voices on both sides are the dumbest.

I'm not gonna lie, I have absolutely no clue which side of "gamergate" is which. I also don't really know what the whole deal is about. I know it's sexism, but I have no idea where it's centered.
 
Smash games are cool right up until people take them too seriously and think they're playing a real fighting game.

I agree with this, Smash has been ruined for me by a few people I used to play with getting super competitive. Makes it so you just can't play the game for a laugh anymore.
 
I'm not gonna lie, I have absolutely no clue which side of "gamergate" is which. I also don't really know what the whole deal is about. I know it's sexism, but I have no idea where it's centered.

Same here. I suppose I could probably be considered a gaming enthusiast - I like to follow the news, I'm interested in how any and every console is doing even if I don't own them, I usually know of most new game releases, I've put a bunch of money in my gaming PC etc etc - but I'm absolutely unable to give a single fuck about any of this GG/anti-GG business.
 
Gaf is diverse for sure. No denying that fact. Maybe it's the way view topics, but I still stand by it. I'll give you an example. Last gen, people here destroyed MS for having 3rd party exclusive content, CoD for instance. Now that the shoe is on the other foot, it's alright that Sony is doing it. Granted not all are alright with it, but MS got owned here for doing it. Another example, everytime there is a game that's releasing on Xbox One and PC, inside the thread, everyone has to say "I'll get this on PC". Why state this? If it's a MS Game Studio game, you are still paying MS. From my viewpoint, it's more severe in MS threads than Sony's when a game is releasing on PC too. Like I said, this is my opinion.

That's a pretty selective way to look at it. During the last gen it was all about 599€, 4D with Cell, giant enemy crabs, George Foreman grills, and Riiiidge Raceeeer. Not to mention, how even minor differences between the multiplatforms were scrutinized, and the PS3 had no games. Now even more major differences are seemingly less visible and meaningful, and the PS4 has no games eventhough the facts speak differently this time. Many people have already let the DRM and cloud debacle pass, when it took years for the PS3 to get rid off the stigma.

As for COD's timed exclusive content, I don't remember it being such a hot topic when it was exclusive to the 360, but I admit that my memory could play tricks on me. On top of that, when a PC developer, like The Chinese Room, goes to the PS4, the response can be vitriolic. Yet the response wasn't the same, when Alan Wake turned out to be a 360 exclusive, eventhough the game was previously shown at PC events, unlike Everybody's Gone to the Rapture.
 
GTAIV has the best driving physics in the entire series. They're not perfect, mind you, but with a couple of tweaks and improvements they could've been. And that's what Rockstar promised for V, and that's what makes me salty because they forgot to mention that they completely fucked up the driving and turned it into a kid friendly dumbed down disaster. It's functional and whatnot, I wouldn't mind if it was there as an alternative for people who don't care about a shred of realism in their driving and just want to blast away. But it is the only option, so.
 
XB1's exclusive games lineup is the most uninteresting home console lineup since the Atari Jaguar
 
I agree with this, Smash has been ruined for me by a few people I used to play with getting super competitive. Makes it so you just can't play the game for a laugh anymore.

I think that's something I grew out of, when me and my brothers played Brawl together I'd get super salty if I lost. Now it's all good fun; a party game, as it should be.
 
People who play "Smash" competitively are the worst. All the ones I've had personal contact with, anyway.

Lol, no. GAF worships Vita and thinks no one wants to play NSMB games. GAF thinks Bayonetta was the best game released last year. GAF passionately hates Paper Mario Sticker Star. GAF hates mobile games. You get the point :P

Hardly.
 
I'd rather have a Shadow of the Colossus sequel than the Last Guardian, I don't care about some goddamn catbird thing that's gonna try and make me cry when it gets a fakeout(or real) death scene.
 
I love my Vita but the "THREE THOUSAND VITA GAMES COMING!" topic where we're treated to a PS3 indie port from two years ago, an obscure Japanese RPG that's somehow the secret best game ever (and isn't), and a Looney Tunes minigame collection that would make the App Store blush is a little much.
 
I love my Vita but the "THREE THOUSAND VITA GAMES COMING!" topic where we're treated to a PS3 indie port from two years ago, an obscure Japanese RPG that's somehow the secret best game ever (and isn't), and a Looney Tunes minigame collection that would make the App Store blush is a little much.

I see nothing wrong with a topic meant to counter the toxic attitude people have about the system. I always saw it as a means to keep owners and prospective buyers up to date on new and future releases, not a bragging thread.
 
I've tried playing SF4 twice now, once Vanilla once Ultra
it feels terrible
for a while I thought 2d fighters weren't for me, but then I played skullgirls and loved it, so yeah
 
Top Bottom