zeopower6
Member
They are directly referencing the /r9k/ thread on CNN right now.
O boy.
They are directly referencing the /r9k/ thread on CNN right now.
I have absolutely no doubt. 4chan in particular is going to cop a smashing, especially if a journalist gets on /b/ and just sits there and watches it for an hour.
As a male that admittedly bought his first gun in part because I thought it was cool and just what men did here in the south, yeah, I think there is plenty of truth to it. A ton actually. If you are gonna hide behind needing a neatly presented research paper(of which I'm sure you would just poke holes in anyway) then these sort of speculative posts aren't for you.This is such a big reach, how is this a good post? I don't know what to say.
Where are your studies to back this all up, because it all makes zero sense to me.
Chads = alpha males who get all the girls, leaving whiny little 'nice guys' in the dust
Stacies = the 'slutty girls' that go after the Chads and ignore the 'nice guys'
Normies = people who have 'normal' social interactions with people. People over on the reddit 'Forever Alone' group throw this term around to talk about the people who have romantic relationships
All of these terms are tossed around by 'nice guys', who in reality aren't very nice at all.
His post made a lot of sense. I'm certain that a venn diagram of gun owners would have significant overlap with individuals who identify as "manly men". Whether their guns are just for protection or for hunting, both of these activities fall in line with that concept.
Australia made it out fine.A gun ban, at this point would be pretty much useless. The criminals already have guns, the militias already have guns, the crazies already have guns, the country is flooded with guns and a gun ban would be inneffective.
A buyback program would be a joke
Sending federal agents to confiscate guns would result in a civil war.
We made our bed and now we must lay in it.
Chads = alpha males who get all the girls, leaving whiny little 'nice guys' in the dust
Stacies = the 'slutty girls' that go after the Chads and ignore the 'nice guys'
Normies = people who have 'normal' social interactions with people. People over on the reddit 'Forever Alone' group throw this term around to talk about the people who have romantic relationships
All of these terms are tossed around by 'nice guys', who in reality aren't very nice at all.
What does this have to do with a massacre?
What does this have to do with a massacre?
A gun ban, at this point would be pretty much useless. The criminals already have guns, the militias already have guns, the crazies already have guns, the country is flooded with guns and a gun ban would be inneffective.
A buyback program would be a joke
Sending federal agents to confiscate guns would result in a civil war.
We made our bed and now we must lay in it.
I care about what drives people to mass murder.
This is disturbing...
The shooter posted on a section of 4chan that uses these terms.
A gun ban, at this point would be pretty much useless. The criminals already have guns, the militias already have guns, the crazies already have guns, the country is flooded with guns and a gun ban would be inneffective.
A buyback program would be a joke
Sending federal agents to confiscate guns would result in a civil war.
We made our bed and now we must lay in it.
Australia made it out fine.
You saw the hissy fit they threw over that white trash flag? Imagine that, but a thousand times worse.
I like my guns and I'm a law abiding citizen. Why would I want to give up my right to own a firearm that's afforded to me by the 2nd amendment?
I'll admit, I'm a an extremely selfish person. I give zero fucks about anyone other than my family and close friends.
insults half the population? so all males are concerned with their masculinity?
Not all males own guns?
crazy that those military analyst went on CNN and talked about having more guns and less gun free zones......
it's all about money. money money money money. when will someone hack into these gun manufacturers emails and expose how much they pay these people to talk like this?
What does this have to do with a massacre?
Fuck if I know, and if the shooter is dead then we might not ever know.
Just an FYI Brady campaign had a family sue lucky gunner for selling ammo to someone legally that later went on to kill people. They lost the case and abandoned the family with a 300k bill from the lawsuit.
http://www.cnn.com/2014/09/17/justice/colorado-theater-shooting-lawsuit/
http://freebeacon.com/issues/federa...-dealers-legal-fees-after-dismissing-lawsuit/
this is what i saw: https://archive.is/riMWo
...a 20-something white guy killing random people somewhere at school.
Again.
So any details on the shooter? Race, gender, etc.
So any details on the shooter? Race, gender, etc.
What does this have to do with a massacre?
Australia made it out fine.
20 something white male. I wonder when they'll identify him. :/
The post in question is blaming gun violence on masculinity and implying that men who love football, for example, is an inherent problem with society. It's a gross oversimplification of the issue of mass shootings.
What makes you say that?Tbf I don't think guns have ever really been a big part of Australian culture like it is the US.
Do you have any articles that actually claim the Brady Center abandoned them?
That article is very inconclusive; it also mentions an appeal.. if you are appealing a decision you don't immediately have to pay things off.
We don't know that he is white.
America is weird as hell, this happens like once a month or something and yet nobody bans guns. What is wrong with that country
It shows what kind of mentality this guy had. Preoccupied with not getting feminine attention. It's a pretty common white guy shooter stereotype at this point
The people that want to keep guns are half the population and they vote consistently. Simple as that.
They are directly referencing the /r9k/ thread on CNN right now.
While true, I feel like they would've said if he wasn't...
White male you say?
FOX NEWS: "OPPRESSED GUN OWNING CITIZEN DRIVEN TO VIOLENCE".
The law says we are responsible for these fees, which we recognize. We do not have the money to pay this amount. The Judge insinuated in his order that Brady should pay since he said they were the instigators. If this was a ploy designed to give the appearance that Brady was responsible and turn us against each other, it did not work.
Brady is still fighting for us pro bono and we see no evidence that the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence will not help us raise funds if and when that time comes.
Stoever said whatever the Phillipses pay to the defendants “will come out of their own pockets,” not from the Brady Center, which, according to him, never pushed the Phillipses to sue. “The Brady Center provided legal support,” he said. “It was not ‘behind’ this lawsuit.”
America is weird as hell, this happens like once a month or something and yet nobody bans guns. What is wrong with that country
Australia made it out fine.