It would have to be an attack on congress.
Edit: I know the NSA is reading this. Please don't raid me.
He doesn't want to ban guns. He's calling for restrictions to make it less easy for people to obtain guns.
How is this even controversial for sensible, non-insane people? Christ.
False cause.
never doubt the power of rich lunatics
Uhh except an attack on Congress did happen in 2011.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gabrielle_Giffords
Great speaker, comes of as really sincere and honest about his belief in this. I know he'll get criticized for politicizing a tragedy, as he anticipated himself, but politics is exactly what is needed, and the only thing that can prevent these things from happening again and again and again.
Now is the time to act, yesterday was the time to act, let's hope he can get some motion around gun regulation now. Use that anger, Obama.
Glad I live in the UK where we have much stricter gun control. The amount of power the gun lobby has in America is abhorrent.
Best of luck to those Americans who want things to change. I think you're gonna need it :/
NRA, Tea Party, etc etc.I really wish Obama could get another 8 years.
What (who) do you mean?
Yeah I don't even see the issue in politicizing that. Politics are about protecting the welfare of the population. And when the population gets shot at on a regular basis, its welfare is reaaally compromised (duh).
So yeah that's exactly when politics should start considering some action, nothing wrong with that. On the contrary, it's inaction from the politics that would be wrong.
I wonder why he didn't mention NRA by name. I know he did with the sentence "contact the organisation who thinks is representing you" (paraphrased), but actually speaking out the name.
NRA, Tea Party, etc etc.
Obama has opened up people's hearts for America. You can clearly tell in this speech, that he truly cares for his country, that he truly believes it can be great. Many people outside of America, has never seen that honest portrayal from an American politician.
Fucking awful that this just keeps on happening. :'(
Obama has opened up people's hearts for America. You can clearly tell in this speech, that he truly cares for his country, that he truly believes it can be great. Many people outside of America, has never seen that honest portrayal from an American politician.
Fucking awful that this just keeps on happening. :'(
You can just feel the empathy for the victims in this tweet.
Would they keep saying the same thing if the next slaughter happened inside the NRA building.
He doesn't want to ban guns. He's calling for restrictions to make it less easy for people to obtain guns.
How is this even controversial for sensible, non-insane people? Christ.
Yes. sort of.
![]()
http://kff.org/other/state-indicator/firearms-death-rate-per-100000/
For reference my state(Louisiana) has more gun violence then Mexico.
States with stricter gun laws tend to have lower rates of gun violence. Same applies to countries. We have a notably higher gun violence rate then any other western developed, highly functioning nation.
CNN ‏@CNN 8m8 minutes ago
A request from @POTUS: American deaths in terrorism vs. gun violence in one graph: http://cnn.it/1j4XgPX
Inappropriate for the president to lose his cool? FOH..
Guns and (crazy) peoples access to them are a problem. We owe it to ourselves and our country to try and do something besides throw up our hands.
Maybe we should start thinking it's inappropriate for people to go on about "Politicizing a tragedy."
It's not politicizing it's common fucking sense.
![]()
Fixed. Graph should start at 0.
I don't know if like this reasoning, because if some unstable murderer gets his hands on a gun in Australia and perpetuates another tragedy, I don't want to hear the smug gun fans in the US go "see? It doesn't work." How common was gun violence in Oz before the ban anyway, out of curiosity?Australia had one major tragedy neigh on 20 years ago, changed our gun laws and have not had such a massacre since.
I don't know if like this reasoning, because if some unstable murderer gets his hands on a gun in Australia and perpetuates another tragedy, I don't want to hear the smug gun fans in the US go "see? It doesn't work." How common was gun violence in Oz before the ban anyway, out of curiosity?
He doesn't want to ban guns. He's calling for restrictions to make it less easy for people to obtain guns.
How is this even controversial for sensible, non-insane people? Christ.
I'll bet you think the cable lobby has nothing to do with Republicans' opposition to net neutrality too. Just a big ol' coincidence!
Y'AIN'T GITT'N MAH GUNZ!Didn't want to put it in the OP, but I also found this.
Totally insane gun nut responds to speech. Like "I don't even know if this thing took place" crazy. This is what we're up against.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JeD0eR3ol6c
Y'AIN'T GITT'N MAH GUNZ!
Jesus Christ in a blender this guy is a fucking nutjob. See, THIS is the kind of asshole who should not own a fucking gun. This guy shouldn't even own a goddamn spork or any other plastic cutlery. This is a dangerous man, hands down.
What the fuck does he believe will happen if our guns are taken away? I hope this dipshit realizes if the government wanted to deep six you they can even if you own a fucking arsenal. Your pea shooter won't stop them from doing whatever the fuck it is these people believe is going down, FFS.
In-fucking-sane.
http://theconversation.com/how-us-gun-control-compares-to-the-rest-of-the-world-43590I read a post here saying they had a average of one mass shooting a year until the ban and none since going on 16 (?) years.
The story of Australia, which had 13 mass shootings in the 18-year period from 1979 to 1996 but none in the succeeding 19 years.
In these events alone, 112 people were shot dead and at least another 52 wounded