• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Canadian General Election (OT) - #elxn42: October 19, 2015

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yep. As a Conservative, this thread is anything but a general election thread. It certainly feels like people are voting NDP/Liberal more out of extreme dislike for Harper than for actually supporting the other two parties' platforms.

There are multiple reasons I'm not supporting Harper which include the way he and his party have been running the government in the last few years and the disgusting campaign they have been running in the last month or so.
 
ksharp, if the Conservatiave would have kept the P party of their party, they wouln't be receiving such a backlash.

Brian Mulroney stood up to Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan on South Africa's Apartheid. Mulroney was alone out of three to be outspokenly against Apartheid

the Brits had to wait for John Major to replace Margret Thatcher to finally change positions to be against Apartheid.

LOL, Americans. Ronald Reagan didn't give a fuck.


that P of Progressive Conservatives has disappeared from the present Conservatives and they have lost people like Scott Brisson who did not seem himself anymore in Harper's merged party.
 
I'd like to introduce the concept of the "veil of ignorance".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veil_of_ignorance

The "veil of ignorance", along with the original position, is a method of determining the morality of a certain issue (e.g., slavery) based upon the following thought experiment: parties to the original position know nothing about their particular abilities, tastes, and position within the social order of society. When such parties are selecting the principles for distribution of rights, positions, and resources in the society they will live in, the veil of ignorance prevents them from knowing about who they will be in that society. For example, for a proposed society in which 50% of the population is kept in slavery, it follows that on entering the new society there is a 50% likelihood that the participant would be a slave. The idea is that parties subject to the veil of ignorance will make choices based upon moral considerations, since they will not be able to make choices based on self- or class-interest.

For our purposes, let's modify the though experiment to be as such.

In 5 years time you will be born to a family in Canada, but you get to choose who wins this election right now (out of the 3 parties). You do not get to choose which family you are born into, and you could be born into any family in equal likelihood. Who do you choose?

Probably not the Conservatives.

Again, it's not a troll. It truly depends on your situation. Living downtown Toronto, with a mortgage, and a family and kids and $200k will not take you very far.

Lol.

The richest person I know is voting Liberal. I don't know how much exactly he makes, but he's definitely going to be paying a lot more taxes soon. He's also working in finance, so I'm guessing he's not too worried about the Liberals ruining the stock market :p
 
ksharp: How can you support a government that destroys its own ability to gather information and systematically dismantles the parts of the government that exist to speak hard truths to power (the statisticians and scientists most obviously)? How can a government make good choices if it has made it impossible to have good data?
 
Yeah, I hate it when a politician says they're going to run a 10 billion dollar deficit and then does it. I much prefer politicians who say they'll run a surplus and then run a 50 billion dollar deficit.
Exactly. We actually had a surplus and the Conservatives blew that on wasteful shit while giving tax breaks for the upper class. Conservative party can't manage money at all. After 10 years we are in a far worse state than before. A healthy economy supports their weakest links and to do that we need to tax the upper class and make them pay their fair share. We need better social services in Canada and we actually had them.

10 years of cuts is going to take a while to fix and who knows how bad it actually is. Federal CPC will probably do what they did in Alberta and shred public documents hiding as much corruption as they can.
 
Again, it's not a troll. It truly depends on your situation. Living downtown Toronto, with a mortgage, and a family and kids and $200k will not take you very far.
people get by with a quarter of that and you're trying to tell me that's nothing? fuck off.
 
gonna barge in. Can I bring a pay stub as one of my pieces of ID? >_> is that the same as a check stub like it says in the pamphlet
 
gonna barge in. Can I bring a pay stub as one of my pieces of ID? >_> is that the same as a check stub like it says in the pamphlet

You'll need a piece of ID with your picture and name on it, and as long as your pay stub has your address and name on it, together they should be adequate.
 
This election isn't about Harper.

source: Harper
vuzHH7l.gif
 
people get by with a quarter of that and you're trying to tell me that's nothing? fuck off.

No need to resort to attacks. It's not about "getting by", but more about trying to live a comfortable lifestyle. And in certain parts of this country, $200k is not exactly "balling".

People here would think that people making $200k drive Bugattis to work, but let me tell you that's not the case at all.

Then you know that the 50%+ rate only affects the last dollar range, right?

Yes, I know. Still not happy, though.
 
You'll need a piece of ID with your picture and name on it, and as long as your pay stub has your address and name on it, together they should be adequate.

yeah I got my driver's license. that's the primary or whatever. the secondary asks for two pieces and one has to have an address and name on it and the only thing I have with my address on it is a pay stub. everything else is name only. Thanks, heading out in a bit

edit: I can't read. I voted now so it's all good. thanks, everyone
 
The average tax rate for 200k is 36.08%. A far cry from 50+. Your math does not check out.

I suppose you have not read this article.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news...ax-avoidance-economists-warn/article24263994/

New Brunswick would be affected the most. The combined top tax rate in New Brunswick would increase to 58.75 per cent, including an increase announced in this year’s provincial budget that raises the rate on incomes above $250,000. Nova Scotia would have the second-highest combined rate at 54 per cent, followed by Ontario at 53.53 per cent, including the provincial surcharge. Quebec’s combined top rate would be 53.3 per cent, followed by 51.37 per cent in PEI, 50.4 per cent in Manitoba and 49.8 per cent in British Columbia.
 
yeah I got my driver's license. that's the primary or whatever. the secondary asks for two pieces and one has to have an address and name on it and the only thing I have with my address on it is a pay stub. everything else is name only. Thanks, heading out in a bit
If you have your driver's license that's all you need! :D
 
No need to resort to attacks. It's not about "getting by", but more about trying to live a comfortable lifestyle. And in certain parts of this country, $200k is not exactly "balling".

People here would think that people making $200k drive Bugattis to work, but let me tell you that's not the case at all.



Yes, I know. Still not happy, though.

Lmaoo how am I still reading this fuckery.

200k salaries are not comfortable enough.
 
No need to resort to attacks. It's not about "getting by", but more about trying to live a comfortable lifestyle. And in certain parts of this country, $200k is not exactly "balling".

People here would think that people making $200k drive Bugattis to work, but let me tell you that's not the case at all.



Yes, I know. Still not happy, though.
rich people are so out of touch with reality
 
So not "every dollar you earn".

Only "every dollar you earn over 200k".

Yeah this is why there's technically a slim amount of 1%ers that won't get a tax increase under the Trudeau plan. If you make 200k but not a dollar more you don't get a tax increase. You do get ~$600 from the middle class tax cut tho lol.
 
Yep. As a Conservative, this thread is anything but a general election thread. It certainly feels like people are voting NDP/Liberal more out of extreme dislike for Harper than for actually supporting the other two parties' platforms.

Yeah, I'd say I'm voting out of extreme dislike for Harper -- not him personally, but his track record over the past decade and his proposed policies. Eliminating the long form census? Dumb. Doing nothing about missing and murdered Aboriginal women, while pretending to be tough-on-crime by writing virtually useless legislation? Disgusting and cowardly. Raising the TFSA limit to $10,000? Terrible economic idea. Even Joe Oliver acknowledged it's going to cause problems for future generations.
 
It's relative deprevation. Folks like that see people doing better than them and say that's not fair. They don't look at the people doing worse and think the same thing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom