The Game Awards jury lists only 2 women out of 32 jurors (sites selected jurors)

Does this show has credibility ?

I mean instead of arguing about male or female , does the current jury is neutral? The true is that "videogame journalims" is more about fanboys and people oriented to some company because the like their games and receive "gifs" from such companies.
 
Yeah. This seems like somebody's making a mountain out of a mole hill.

More like people are pointing out a mole hill and saying "Oh look a molehill. That molehill probably indicates that we have moles around. Moles are pretty bad to have in our own yard, someone could sprain an ankle. We should probably look at this molehill as a symptom of a larger mole problem and act accordingly."

People are pointing something out and talking about what it is indicative of. Just because a molehill isn't a mountain doesn't mean that it should be ignored. Hell, molehills should be prioritised because unlike mountains, they can be more easily dealt with.
 
People boycotting the whole show because of one writer in the esports award section is one of the silliest things I've read today. It's like saying you'll never eat McDonald's again because one of their board members is a Republican.

Anyway, Geoff shouldn't be taking the heat for this. All he did was ask publications to select a critic. Funny how so many of the publications that continually preach for diversity all provided men to represent them.
 
The world is getting very, very boring.
You cant make or say almost anything anymore

People complain about everything...

How many fat guys are in the jury? How many asians? Women? Cats? Dogs? Elderly? Gays?

Soon someone will be complaining that the stage is grey and it should be purple because purple is not represented enough in games industry.

I dont mean to offend anyone but people must realize its just a freaking game award, start worrying with some valid stuff, help some people, do some community work and stop counting how many girls are voting for the best puzzle mobile game of the quarter.

Would it be better if it was 16/16 men/women? Maybe yes, maybe not, if someobe thinks the judges are not qualified or dont thrust the organization jusy ignore it and go on, play some fallout and spend your time being less cranky and making a huge fuzz on it.

And you want the world to be even more boring to be about just white dudes?

Here's a video response to you people with this generic trivialising sentiment who just want to play games and don't want to get into politics, even though you're here involved in a discussion rather than playing the game :P

Can We Keep Politics Out of Gaming? - Matt Lees

Spoiler: You can't, as gaming criticism gets better and more aware just like film criticism did.
 
People boycotting the whole show because of one writer in the esports award section is one of the silliest things I've read today. It's like saying you'll never eat McDonald's again because one of their board members is a Republican.

Anyway, Geoff shouldn't be taking the heat for this. All he did was ask publications to select a critic. Funny how so many of the publications that continually preach for diversity all provided men to represent them.

Are people actually saying they'll boycott the show over that?
 
People boycotting the whole show because of one writer in the esports award section is one of the silliest things I've read today. It's like saying you'll never eat McDonald's again because one of their board members is a Republican.

Anyway, Geoff shouldn't be taking the heat for this. All he did was ask publications to select a critic. Funny how so many of the publications that continually preach for diversity all provided men to represent them.

The writer in question works a publication that has acted as one of the chief instigators of gamergate. Their presence in the game awards is a spit on the face on anyone hurt by them.
 
Are people actually saying they'll boycott the show

You've got a point there. They're just saying it, but will probably tune in just to tweet about how awful it is.

The writer in question works a publication that has acted as one of the chief instigators of gamergate. Their presence in the game awards is a spit on the face on anyone hurt by them.

And he is what, 1/32 of the critics panel on an award that most people don't care about? Would you snub all the other good writers and the achievements of the game industry just to spite him?
 
I think we should be more pissed that Rise Of The Tomb Raider wasn't nominated for game of the year something obviously wasn't right with this committee from the start.
 
Does this show has credibility ?

I mean instead of arguing about male or female , does the current jury is neutral? The true is that "videogame journalims" is more about fanboys and people oriented to some company because the like their games and receive "gifs" from such companies.

it's a videogame award show, so of course it has no credibility. it exists as a marketing vehicle for showing trailers with some awards breaking up the advertisements.
 
The should do something that doesn't produce the following results:

Male jurors: 94%
Female jurors: 6%

Set up an independent committee that pick the judges or something. Do something else. There are more than one way of setting up a jury, and no one is forcing the GA to chose a method that produces ridiculous results.

So you want quotas.
 
Looking at the list, a Breitbart advisor on the esports part? Fuck off.

Oh fucking hell, this just gets worse. What a shit show.

I find it telling that posters here are citing competency as a defence when the issue of poor representation is brought up, while automatically assuming all the white guys involved are competent.

All men are competent by default, and women have to prove themselves at every step because we all know they're really "token" women only there due to "forced diversity".

Urgh, just writing that. Fuck this whole mindset and situation.

Sigh. Very problematic. Did they at least check there are a minimum of 4 overweight people among them? Fat shaming is a serious social issue too and I honestly hope they don't contribute to it with their lack of representation! I motion for some strict quotas being established for future selections. What's the height discrimination situation? Enough short ones in there? We need to go deep, stopping at binary gender diversity would be so, so shallow. Simply sending who you feel most qualified to give their opinions on some video games is so 2014; and newsflash, it's 2015 now! Ugh.

The Ur-concern troll. Somebody should frame this masterpiece of shit.
 
I think we should be more pissed that Rise Of The Tomb Raider wasn't nominated for game of the year something obviously wasn't right with this committee from the start.

Absolutely. It is hands down one of, if not the best game released this year. Without question. If that isn't on the short list, the list is a joke.
 
Absolutely. It is hands down one of, if not the best game released this year. Without question. If that isn't on the short list, the list is a joke.

Huh. I thought it was because it just came out, but seeing Fallout 4 on there...that is pretty weird. That something like Bloodborne got in but not Tomb Raider. Then again can't blame the committee as being sexist against it, seeing as Lara Croft Go is on the mobile list.
 
-=::[Eagle-Vision]::=-;185984276 said:
So you want quotas.

If the only options are quotas or a jury so preposterously homogeneous that it beggars belief, I'd go with quotas. It's not ideal, but it's got to be better than a jury that is 95% a single demographic.
 
People boycotting the whole show because of one writer in the esports award section is one of the silliest things I've read today. It's like saying you'll never eat McDonald's again because one of their board members is a Republican.

Anyway, Geoff shouldn't be taking the heat for this. All he did was ask publications to select a critic. Funny how so many of the publications that continually preach for diversity all provided men to represent them.

It's a pretty proportional response. No matter how small of an issue you think having Breitbart involved, in any way, is; choosing not to watch an online only Video Game awards show has to be smaller.
 
I think we should be more pissed that Rise Of The Tomb Raider wasn't nominated for game of the year something obviously wasn't right with this committee from the start.

Lmao You can create a thread about this , and you would have people arguing about how Geoff nominated GOTY titles had White dudes as leads ( well except fallout/bloodborne since thats character creation.
 
Huh. I thought it was because it just came out, but seeing Fallout 4 on there...that is pretty weird. That something like Bloodborne got in but not Tomb Raider. Then again can't blame the committee as being sexist against it, seeing as Lara Croft Go is on the mobile list.

Bloodborne was one of the best reviewed titles all year; it's hardly shocking that it made a potential GOTY list.
 
I don't get it anymore.

Why is this even relevant to a videogame ?

The show is about games award not some fashion/talent show ( never mind :( )

*sigh*

Edit: haha sorry about the confusion. The things you (people ) replied to me never crossed my mind.

I'm saying it doesn't matter who the judge is. Just pick the suitable judge and that's it.

The pic from kieth about 1 women is absurd. Who cares if all the judges are women ? or men? If they are suited for the job, it's done. That's what I'm trying to say :)

I totally got what you meant from the start. Suprised so many people read this wrong and didn't click.
 
Sigh. Very problematic. Did they at least check there are a minimum of 4 overweight people among them? Fat shaming is a serious social issue too and I honestly hope they don't contribute to it with their lack of representation! I motion for some strict quotas being established for future selections. What's the height discrimination situation? Enough short ones in there? We need to go deep, stopping at binary gender diversity would be so, so shallow. Simply sending who you feel most qualified to give their opinions on some video games is so 2014; and newsflash, it's 2015 now! Ugh.

What's your angle?
 
Huh. I thought it was because it just came out, but seeing Fallout 4 on there...that is pretty weird. That something like Bloodborne got in but not Tomb Raider. Then again can't blame the committee as being sexist against it, seeing as Lara Croft Go is on the mobile list.

Bloodborne is like the 2nd highest rated game on that list. Plus its an amazing game , are you saying it is surprising it got in because its relatively niche? Because yea it kind of is. I would be really surprised if it won the award , even though I really want it to win.
 
And you want the world to be even more boring to be about just white dudes?

No (im not a white dude by US standards btw), im not against mixing genders/ethnicity or anything like that, im quite in favor of it actually, all I'm saying is that people are just paying too much attention and pissing/whining for everything, if there where 16/16 men/women someone would come and make a whole story of discrimination because there are not enough blondes, or just 1 hispanoc, or just 1 [insert some random characteristic].

You just wont ever be able to include or please everyone and if some company or person organizes an event they have every right to call who they think should participate

And yes, i should be gaming right now.
 
So we should fight for equal representation in every industry? Even industries where one sex might not on average, not be terribly interested in it?

Yes, absolutely. You do so by encouraging people to go down that path and honestly, going down a path where you are alone surrounded by others who aren't like you is scary. You fight for it by being inviting and nurturing.
.

Sigh. The reply from Mesoian is the exact kind of thinking that led me down a career path that I regret instead of following my dreams.
 
He's just concern trolling. Really nothing to respond to.

ooh.gif
 
Like I needed another excuse to not watch this.
I guess it's ok because there will be enough diversity in the games themselves, heh?
 
Does not seem like much of a conspiracy if each outlet had no idea who was being selected to represent other outlets.
 
what makes me mad is on oil rigs that almost no woman works there.
The oil companys should be punished for that, and should be forced to make it a 50-50 gender job.

also mining-industry, there are so few woman in that so should be forced to have 50-50 there also.

garbage-collecting, its rare to see a woman there also.

hope this world gets more equal soon.
Equality isn't 50-50. It's about equal opportunity regardless of gender, sex, sexual preference, religion, etc.

nice try though. and lets drop the whole "qualified" thing. These jurors are filled with people that think you can't record gameplay on PC, that the human eye can't see more than 30fps, etc. The entry barrier isn't exactly all that high
 
More like people are pointing out a mole hill and saying "Oh look a molehill. That molehill probably indicates that we have moles around. Moles are pretty bad to have in our own yard, someone could sprain an ankle. We should probably look at this molehill as a symptom of a larger mole problem and act accordingly."

People are pointing something out and talking about what it is indicative of. Just because a molehill isn't a mountain doesn't mean that it should be ignored. Hell, molehills should be prioritised because unlike mountains, they can be more easily dealt with.

The classic mountain vs. mole hill analogy doesn't imply some kind of underlying larger infestation problem.

The sooner everybody stops viewing things only through various "group warfare" lenses, the better off we'll be, especially when there's ZERO ill intent involved. Geoff absolutely should not be getting grilled for this.
 
So?

It's no secret that the majority of established gaming critics are male so why is it a such a surprise to see that reality reflected among the jurors?
 
it's a videogame award show, so of course it has no credibility. it exists as a marketing vehicle for showing trailers with some awards breaking up the advertisements.

So what's the point of arguing about the gender of the jury if is a settled show , just enjoy it and do not care about the jury or wich game won an award....
 
And he is what, 1/32 of the critics panel on an award that most people don't care about? Would you snub all the other good writers and the achievements of the game industry just to spite him?

Would you invite a member of the Westbero Baptist Church as 1 of 32 jurors for the GLAAD awards?
 
So?

It's no secret that the majority of established gaming critics are male so why is it a such a surprise to see that reality reflected among the jurors?

1. this is not a good thing. just because it exists in A does not mean it should be reproduced in B.
2. Something should be done about sexism and racism and other forms of exclusion/oppression in video games.
 
Does not seem like much of a conspiracy if each outlet had no idea who was being selected to represent other outlets.

Nobody is suggesting this happened due to a conspiracy. It happened because of systemic issues that plague our society but are especially prevalent in the tech sector, and even more-so in gaming.

That this happened is not unexpected, that it was allowed to happen is disappointing.

What about that I just don't care what the gender make up is to judging an awards ceremony that makes no difference to anything. All male? Fine. All female? Fine. All Qbert? Fine. Mix of any of these at any ratio? Who cares? Well not me, obviously.

Seems like you cared enough to come in here and post that.
 
What about that I just don't care what the gender make up is to judging an awards ceremony that makes no difference to anything. All male? Fine. All female? Fine. All Qbert? Fine. Mix of any of these at any ratio? Who cares? Well not me, obviously.
 
What about that I just don't care what the gender make up is to judging an awards ceremony that makes no difference to anything. All male? Fine. All female? Fine. All Qbert? Fine. Mix of any of these at any ratio? Who cares? Well not me, obviously.

Then why are you in this thread? Is it because you want people to be like you and not to care?
 
People boycotting the whole show because of one writer in the esports award section is one of the silliest things I've read today. It's like saying you'll never eat McDonald's again because one of their board members is a Republican.

It'd be like not playing video games
(and only posting on NeoGAF)
because all your game-playing devices have a slavery footprint a mile long.
 
Then why are you in this thread? Is it because you want people to be like you and not to care?

Just to voice my opinion really. Read all the news about it and kind of rolled my eyes about the whole thing. A judging panel of Qbert would be interesting though!
 
Gender and ethnicity is not important; I do not understand how it becomes an issue when the panel should be composed of critics who can be able provide fair and well thought off judging.
 
Just to voice my opinion really. Read all the news about it and kind of rolled my eyes about the whole thing. A judging panel of Qbert would be interesting though!

anything but white men might as well be Qberts with how the industry treat their customers...

Gender and ethnicity is not important; I do not understand how it becomes an issue when the panel should be composed of critics who can be able provide fair and well thought off judging.

they wouldn't have brought people from ign or breitbart if that was the whole point.
 
Top Bottom