Kindergarten Teacher Bans Legos For Boys Citing ‘Gender Equity’

Status
Not open for further replies.
Why not just keep some Lego for the girls to play with (if they want) and have some Lego for the boys to play with? Or have times when the boys are allowed certain toys, and then times when the girls are allowed certain toys? Why stunt the boys' growth and motor skills in order to allow the girls a chance to develop? This is not equality; I don't think she understands the term.

Oh and I bet you'd like her to have PINK legos for the girls and BLUE legos for the boys?

This type of aggressive reinforcement of gender stereotypes is why we have gamergate in the first place. /s
 

Apathy

Member
Wow this woman is crazy. She needs to be fired and never be let to be in charge of kids again. Get rid of the dolls and just have Lego then.
 
Why not block girls from the dolls and then the boys will flock to those? Or maybe, just maybe these girls just happen to like dolls and those boys just happen to like legos?
 

Zoe

Member
There's no conspiracy here. There have been follow-up comments from her and the school.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/u...boys-in-name-of-gender-equity/article/2576760

Keller claimed she only instituted the "girls only" Lego play for the first month of school to get them interested in the toys. She also said her "hell freezing over" remark was "a casual, off-record aside meant to convey my frustration with the marketing to girls in our society." She said that it was "not appropriate" and "taken out of context." She insisted that every student in her class has access to Legos.
 

Velcro Fly

Member
this is horrible

just get enough legos for everyone to play with them if you feel this way. that would be true equality.

also i'm not sure it is a 5 or 6 year old boys fault that a 5 or 6 year old girl does not want to play with Legos.

I realize kids are savvy and many of them are on to gender issues at a young age, but at a certain point you are projecting your own bias onto kindergarten kids in a way that is wholly harmful to all involved.

everyone should be able to play with whatever they want to, regardless of gender. girls shouldn't feel bad for wanting to play with dolls more. boys shouldn't be totally locked out of playing with legos if they want to.
 
hqdefault.jpg
 

PillarEN

Member
You know. Not everyone likes Lego. I never liked them and they were lying around in preschool and probably in early years of elementary. Let kids play with the toys they want to play with.
I personally was a huge Oregon Trail fan on the school's Mac computers back then. Oh and I remember some kind of action figure castle play set in 1st grade. You play with what you want to. I couldn't be forced to build Lego because I would get bored with them.
 
She may be facing an uphill battle if her goal is to encourage the girls to play with gender neutral toys like LEGO. Outside of school these girls may be encouraged to play with dolls and frilly princess-type affair at home and among friends. Most parents stick to what they know when raising children.

We are pretty focused on letting our daughter play with whatever stimulates her imagination and play sessions at home.
 

Futureman

Member
uhh sounds like an Onion article. We sure this is a legit news source?

If I had a boy in kindergarten and saw that quote about "hell freezing over" I'd make it my personal mission to get the teacher fired or pull my kid from a that shitty classroom.
 

Futureman

Member
if she was that serious about everyone having access, I guess that means Legos are in high demand for her students. I would just personally buy another set or two if the school wouldn't fund it.

the update to the article sounds OK I guess. Still seems like good intention, bad implementation.
 
Fucking ridiculous.

I distinctly remember playing with Legos when I was in Kindergarten and having my teacher smile and encourage me.

I'd hate to grow up today w/ how everything is politicized.

Encourage girls to use legos all day. But don't take them away from boys.
 

EthanC

Banned

Trojita

Rapid Response Threadmaker
I'm not sure I'd trust what she says without verification

this

Keller claimed she only instituted the "girls only" Lego play for the first month of school to get them interested in the toys. She also said her "hell freezing over" remark was "a casual, off-record aside meant to convey my frustration with the marketing to girls in our society." She said that it was "not appropriate" and "taken out of context." She insisted that every student in her class has access to Legos.

Sounds like the backtracking you see from politicians or racists.

"I said it, but I didn't mean it!"
 

JDSN

Banned
I saw someone bringing up South Park, now im compelled to give the teacher the benefit of the doubt. That was weird.
 
if she saw that the boys were not letting the girls play with them, then she should make stations or rotate out groups that get to play with them for the day. It's usually boys that keep girls from playing with stuff, girls will whine to get their way though.

What she did... I just don't know how she could not see what she was doing was bullying those boys.
 

Emerson

May contain jokes =>
Stupidest shit ever.

Anybody who approaches these "gender equality" issues by trying to actively encourage their children to do one thing over another totally does not get it at all.

Guess what, a higher percentage of boys probably like Legos than girls, and a higher percentage of girls might like dolls than boys. That's fine, I promise. But no boy should be discouraged or embarrassed from playing with dolls, and no girl should be discouraged from playing with Legos. Trying to force your female students or children to play with Legos when they don't want to is not productive. Let everyone do what they want and encourage them individually.
 

Drencrom

Member
Update: The school district, Keller and the Blakely Elementary principal have each released statements regarding the report.

Keller claimed she only instituted the "girls only" Lego play for the first month of school to get them interested in the toys. She also said her "hell freezing over" remark was "a casual, off-record aside meant to convey my frustration with the marketing to girls in our society." She said that it was "not appropriate" and "taken out of context." She insisted that every student in her class has access to Legos.

Huh?

"I always tell the boys, 'You're going to have a turn' — and I'm like, 'Yeah, when hell freezes over' in my head,"

Riiiight...
 
There is a difference between gender equality and a favoritism bias. This is an offensive thing to do to children and will only worsen the gender divide, not improve it.
 

Kinyou

Member
Oh and I bet you'd like her to have PINK legos for the girls and BLUE legos for the boys?

This type of aggressive reinforcement of gender stereotypes is why we have gamergate in the first place. /s
The irony is that she actually tried to entice the girls with pink Legos first.

She first used pink and purple Legos to try to attract the girl students to play with the toys, but she found this ineffective.
 

Ralemont

not me
Having difficulty thinking of a context in which thinking that she'll let the boys have a turn when hell freezes over is fine, but I'll give her the opportunity to explain the proper context of that quote which she suspiciously failed to do in the "clarification."
 

ElRenoRaven

Member
Weirdly, I found a reference to her in the search directory.

http://www.bisd303.org//site/default.aspx?PageType=6&SiteID=13&SearchString=Karen Keller

Might be that they took her out after the story started to blow?



Called it!

That would be my guess since it has a contact phone number and an email address in the results. Probably trying to keep the crazies from harassing her and making her life hell.

Course if she wasn't a dumbass to begin with they wouldn't have to. Let the damn kids play with what they fucking want to play with. As others said if you think it's a case of the boys taking them all buy more so that there are plenty for everyone. Problem solved.
 
Maybe the girls just don't want to play with Legos? Or better yet, why not have a teamwork project where a mixed group of girls and boys have to build something using Legos?

Yeah, she should find a new career if this is going to be her way of thinking.
 

mclem

Member
I can't work out exactly what the problem her idea is meant to solve is. Is it that the boys were hogging the lego so the girls couldn't play? Is it that the girls didn't want to play with the lego because they saw boys playing with it?

If the goal is 'encouraging girls to feel free to play with Lego if they wish to' (which, in itself, is absolutely a laudable goal), then those are the only two ways I can see that her methods might assist in that goal, but I can't help that each of them really has a better solution (1: Buy more lego. 2: There's gender stereotyping at fault here, but I'm not sure what the best solution is)
 

Drencrom

Member
What a silly society we are becoming.

I wouldn't say this incident reflects very much what society is "becoming".

Anyone that think her actions were legitimate is an idiot that doesn't know the meaning of gender equality and is simply unfit to be a teacher
 

entremet

Member
I'll tone it down and be much more selective, sorry.

But yes, this sort of thing is related to PC culture and people being irrational for the sake of feeling self righteous.

No problem. I'm just seeing PC Principal spammed everywhere. That usually ends in banning that particular image meme.
 

Pizoxuat

Junior Member
I can't work out exactly what the problem her idea is meant to solve is. Is it that the boys were hogging the lego so the girls couldn't play? Is it that the girls didn't want to play with the lego because they saw boys playing with it?

The problem my daughter runs into is boys insulting and gender policing her to keep her from playing with things they like, even when they aren't using them. Luckily my daughter has a bulldozer personality and lagging social skills, so she just gets mad and plays anyway. If she was higher sensitivity, I'd worry a lot more. That said, it does work on other girls in her class.

This approach wouldn't help in that situation either. If the boys make fun of the girls for playing with boy toys, not letting the boys use them isn't going to stop that.
 

Scrooged

Totally wronger about Nintendo's business decisions.
Why is a teacher trying to enforce her version of 'gender equality' anyway? If a parent buys dolls of their daughter and then the daughter would rather play with dolls than legos at school...then the teacher should respect that. It's not her place to manipulate the kids. Fucking hell.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom