You never go full Tumblr...
Block tumblr access on their network.
All I could think about was tumblr while reading this. Ugh, haha. This story is so ridiculous.
You never go full Tumblr...
Block tumblr access on their network.
No problem. I'm just seeing PC Principal spammed everywhere. That usually ends in banning that particular image meme.
I always tell the boys, Youre going to have a turn and Im like, Yeah, when hell freezes over in my head, Keller told the Bainbridge Island Review. I tell them, Youll have a turn because I dont want them to feel bad.
Ive post it twice on gaf so far, haven't seen it elsewhere tho. I don't want to ruin the pic so I'll stop it.
Wow this woman is crazy. She needs to be fired and never be let to be in charge of kids again. Get rid of the dolls and just have Lego then.
You could just buy another damn set of legos and say one set is for boys and another is for girls. So both genders have equal access and then let the kids decide what they want to play with. What she's doing is stupid.
Maybe those particular girls didn't want to play with the legos.
No matter your gender, you will suffer when you step on a Lego. That's equality.
Dolls aren't girl toys, all children benefit from empathy play.
Why get rid of the dolls? There is nothing wrong with girls wanting to play with girl toys. Let the kids make their own decisions on what they want to play with but make sure there enough of each type of toy so both genders can play with either or both of they wish.
My feet aren't made of concrete so i have hurt my foot many of times on Lego.This is not true. I thought it was a meme at first, but some people really believe this.
Used to stomp my legos all the time as a kid. Unless they are making spikes now, I don't think they hurt.
A lot of people find it more frustrating than offensive.What exactly is this woman guilty of? Trying to make things easier for girls on some small level?
I shouldn't be surprised that's considered so offensive, but I am.
Because "dolls offer little challenge or opportunity for growth."
Guess role playing is useless in her eyes.
There's no conspiracy here. There have been follow-up comments from her and the school.
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/u...boys-in-name-of-gender-equity/article/2576760
This as well. It could be an issue of not enough supply or just general interest.This would work. Maybe also get a set of dolls/crayons or whatever for only boys then both genders get equal access to all sets of toys and junk.
This is true as well.
Maybe she could have asked the children why they would rather play with one set of toys over the other. Maybe it's not "Only boys like that" and more "I'd RATHER play with these".
You don't ask, you don't find out. *shrug*
Don't see the problem. The boys can still play with their male privilege.
What exactly is this woman guilty of? Trying to make things easier for girls on some small level?
I shouldn't be surprised that's considered so offensive, but I am.
Classic backtracking and is in no way believable. I've meet people like this before, sure we all have at some point, where to build up one thing they purposefully hold something else back. That's exactly what she's doing here.
There is another thing happening here. Her actions possible erode trust those boys will have in her as a teacher or authority figures in general. If something happens often enough kids will catch on to it.
This as well. It could be an issue of not enough supply or just general interest.
What exactly is this woman guilty of? Trying to make things easier for girls on some small level?
I shouldn't be surprised that's considered so offensive, but I am.
What exactly is this woman guilty of? Trying to make things easier for girls on some small level?
I shouldn't be surprised that's considered so offensive, but I am.
Don't see the problem. The boys can still play with their male privilege.
So progressive.
One teacher.
This shouldn't even be news let alone something that goes viral.
how bout just let little kids decide what they want to play with
Did you even read the thread title? Those kids are in kindergarten. That's about 8 years too early to play with their male privilege.Don't see the problem. The boys can still play with their male privilege.
Tries to fight against sexism / for gender equity by
A. Denying boys the use of Lego's
B. Using pink and purple blocks to encourage usage by the girls
Oh yeah, we've got a real winner right here.
I've worked in a daycare for a number of years, and there was never a problem. We had a massive lego corner and as far as I remember it was pretty 50/50 Split between who played with the LEGOs.
but boys are always problematic. Or some of them are, because they have just too much energy. We couldn't always faciliate it. When our class rooms have 30+ kids and 4-5 boys who display massive ADHD symptoms we just have to tell them go outside because, we're 2 adults taking care of 90 kids, while still having to answer the phone, preparing meals, talk to parents.
boys lose out because they are not as good as sitting still and keep it down. Its just easier dealing with girls, because you can always sit them down, tell them to read, draw or play a game.
I've always felt bad about that because our solution to help these wild boys is just always give them ritalin. That is the right thing to do some of the time, but I don't think it should be this fire-sure solution.
But this has nothing to do with gender equality, feminism or anything. It has just something to do that our public school institution are not good enouge at egaging boys at a level that makes sense, and even when we are, by taking them out to play sports- we still loose other kids in the process who are not into physical sports.
I got heavy into roleplaying with them. making plastic foamswords in a workshop was a big hit, as was doing treasure hunting on the play ground. But it's really limited on how much we can facilitate their learning.
It leads to low self worth, that they are unwanted and cliques. it's weird seeing social hierarchy patterns forming in 6 year olds depending on how good they are at sport or how strong they are.
The other big thing from my workplace, was that DS and 3DS was just the king. when we really couldn't facilitate the kids, then we would roll out "gameboy playtime" and it would just be a sea of (mostly boys) playing mario, pokemon, batman and lego star wars.
To be fair, your second point is supported directly by Lego: http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_s...rds=lego+friends&sprefix=lego+friends,aps,118
You don't make things easier for girls by taking away from the boys.
She is guilty of depriving boys for the sake of "making things easier" for girls.
None of the children shouldn't be deprived of their educational toys. They should all have equal access and opportunity.
A lot of people find it more frustrating than offensive.
It's not your job to tell a kid what they can or can't play with. You want equality? Let them play with whatever the fuck they want to play with.
Wikipedia said:In July 2005, CNN/Money and Money magazine named Bainbridge Island the second-best place to live in the United States.
I've worked in a daycare for a number of years, and there was never a problem. We had a massive lego corner and as far as I remember it was pretty 50/50 Split between who played with the LEGOs.
but boys are always problematic. Or some of them are, because they have just too much energy. We couldn't always faciliate it. When our class rooms have 30+ kids and 4-5 boys who display massive ADHD symptoms we just have to tell them go outside because, we're 2 adults taking care of 90 kids, while still having to answer the phone, preparing meals, talk to parents.
boys lose out because they are not as good as sitting still and keep it down. Its just easier dealing with girls, because you can always sit them down, tell them to read, draw or play a game.
I've always felt bad about that because our solution to help these wild boys is just always give them ritalin. That is the right thing to do some of the time, but I don't think it should be this fire-sure solution.
But this has nothing to do with gender equality, feminism or anything. It has just something to do that our public school institution are not good enouge at egaging boys at a level that makes sense, and even when we are, by taking them out to play sports- we still loose other kids in the process who are not into physical sports.
I got heavy into roleplaying with them. making plastic foamswords in a workshop was a big hit, as was doing treasure hunting on the play ground. But it's really limited on how much we can facilitate their learning.
It leads to low self worth, that they are unwanted and cliques. it's weird seeing social hierarchy patterns forming in 6 year olds depending on how good they are at sport or how strong they are.
The other big thing from my workplace, was that DS and 3DS was just the king. when we really couldn't facilitate the kids, then we would roll out "gameboy playtime" and it would just be a sea of (mostly boys) playing mario, pokemon, batman and lego star wars.
This is the sort of thing you only say if your ideology lines up with the person being accused of wrongdoing.