FonkyByNature
Member
30 million consoles, yet no one bought Tearaway lol.
haha, kinda true but i did buy it on PS4. Amazing game !
30 million consoles, yet no one bought Tearaway lol.
YouTube, Netflix, Blu-ray... Games don't exist on PS4.
Updated
![]()
It's a nice way of showing consumer excitement for your product and tells you more about what people are actually buying than shipments. You're definitely right about that. It's not like I'm saying that it's not a much more "down to earth" way of reporting sales.
But when it's not a traditional metric (and when the reporting of traditional metrics has been watered down), there's no good way (for us laymen who don't have all the internal estimates) to use it to make comparisons (which are necessary for identifying long-term trends).
Seeing sold through gives you a idea about long term trends cause you see the pace it selling at .
Are you really trying to say ship numbers are better than sold through ?
That doesn't make it a first party title though.
But sell-through wasn't reported for PS2 or PS3, so we can't see the long-term (multi-generation) trends - just how well PS4 is selling over the short-term (single generation).
Well just use the ship numbers we get from sony then
For making comparisons to generations that didn't have reported sell-through numbers? (Look at the point at which I entered this conversation.) Yes.
If you look at cumulative ship numbers, PS4 is actually trending downward toward PS2 sales, despite PS4 launching in way more markets than PS2 including literally the entire West.
common core math .. its the future....
It's just semantics and neither Sony or Microsoft give a shit. "Second party" is as good as first party, and will officially presented as first party.
Well just use the ship numbers we get from Sony every quarter .
I think most people expect PS4 to get behind PS2 since Japan in now a dead market .
I think you should blame PS4, just imagine how much better consoles would be doing in Japan if Microsoft bought a bunch of exclusives, spreading support out like last gen.Impressive, although I'm not getting one until the SE RPGs start coming out.
The industry has changed so much, so I can't blame the PS4 for Japan's shift toward mobile, but I always sought for a successor to the PS2 in both Japanese support and dominance, but those days are over.
Joke?
Its a pretty consistent ratio, has been like this since right after launch, MS strategy of releasing number sold to retailers (not even that anymore) might have confused you.
I 100% agree it makes no difference, but you don't just say it's first party when it's not.
But, last November, they were "nearly" 10 million shipped. So do you think they shipped and sold nearly another 10 million in the past year?
15-16 million I believe is more likely than 20 million.
It took PS2 26 months to hit 30 million. PS4 did it in 24 months.
I think you should blame PS4, just imagine how much better consoles would be doing in Japan if Microsoft bought a bunch of exclusives, spreading support out like last gen.
Maybe the sales of the PS4 further cements that sony's plans of focusing on third party games is a better strategy overall than microsoft's plans of locking down more first party games.
I mean did Sunset overdrive, Titanfall, Rare replay, Rise of the tomb raider, Forza 6, Gears ultimate, halo master chief and even halo 6 even make a dent in the lead that Sony had? I'd say not the extent anyone thought or even microsoft had hoped for.
I think you should blame PS4, just imagine how much better consoles would be doing in Japan if Microsoft bought a bunch of exclusives, spreading support out like last gen.
The point is PS4 is reaching into more people's homes at a faster pace than PS2, even when launch-aligned, and more importantly it's bringing in much more revenue than PS2 ever could have managed at the exact same time. This is nothing but a win-win for Sony.But sell-through wasn't reported for PS2 or PS3, so we can't see the long-term (multi-generation) trends - just how well PS4 is selling over the short-term (single generation).
For making comparisons to generations that didn't have reported sell-through numbers? (Look at the point at which I entered this conversation.) Yes.\
If you look at cumulative ship numbers, PS4 is actually trending downward toward PS2 sales, despite PS4 launching in way more markets than PS2 including literally the entire West.
The point is PS4 is reaching into more people's homes at a faster pace than PS2, even when launch-aligned, and more importantly it's bringing in much more revenue than PS2 ever could have managed at the exact same time. This is nothing but a win-win for Sony.
I might finally tip my hand and join the flock in 2016 with the way the lineup is shaping up to be. Unless Nintendo really comes out stunning w/ the NX
It's a nice way of showing consumer excitement for your product and tells you more about what people are actually buying than shipments. You're definitely right about that. It's not like I'm saying that it's not a much more "down to earth" way of reporting sales.
But when it's not a traditional metric (and when the reporting of traditional metrics has been watered down), there's no good way (for us laymen who don't have all the internal estimates) to use it to make comparisons (which are necessary for identifying long-term trends).
But ARS told me not to read into the day on sales numbers.http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2013/11/dont-read-too-much-into-the-ps4s-million-day-one-sales/
lol
They give regular 'shipped' numbers in their investors reports, don't they?
Let me rephrase myself. "Second party" is not a real thing, it's just a fucking stupid term and a subgroup of "first party".
Also Titanfall, Sunset Overdrive and Tomb Raider aren't first party.
and more importantly it's bringing in much more revenue than PS2 ever could have managed at the exact same time. This is nothing but a win-win for Sony.
Sony never disclosed sell in (shipped) figures for PS2 until after PS3 released. The only figures available for the first half of PS2's life are "production shipments (units manufactured), so any comparison isn't like for like.
Yeah, that's part of what I find troubling about the way reporting's shifting. There's no reliable way to compare long-term performance measures.
I'm really happy that this gen is going to break that bullshit "THE MOST POWERFUL CONSOLE NEVER WINS DERP" argument, as if the weakest console being WEAK is the reason why it won previous gens.
I've tried to draw parallels between gaming and politics. It just doesn't work.I don't know why I visit MisterxMedia's twitter every now and again but the fact he equates Gaf's apparent love-in with Sony to the US' foreign policy in regards to Russia is hilarious.
He praises Trump.
I don't know why I visit MisterxMedia's twitter every now and again but the fact he equates Gaf's apparent love-in with Sony to the US' foreign policy in regards to Russia is hilarious.
He praises Trump.
So what will happen with Sony's first party focus next year? Well, actually, I think they will be focusing on both first and third party next year.Maybe the sales of the PS4 further cements that sony's plans of focusing on third party games is a better strategy overall than microsoft's plans of locking down more first party games.
I mean did Sunset overdrive, Titanfall, Rare replay, Rise of the tomb raider, Forza 6, Gears ultimate, halo master chief and even halo 6 even make a dent in the lead that Sony had? I'd say not the extent anyone thought or even microsoft had hoped for.
I'm really happy that this gen is going to break that bullshit "THE MOST POWERFUL CONSOLE NEVER WINS DERP" argument, as if the weakest console being WEAK is the reason why it won previous gens.
Has anyone ever seen him and TimDog in the same place at the same time?