Kccitystar
Member
Speaking of this, is Bonnie Rotten still doing porn after the assault against her? She got beat up real fucking bad![]()
You mean Christy Mack? It can be easy to confuse the two.
I don't think she's returned yet.
Speaking of this, is Bonnie Rotten still doing porn after the assault against her? She got beat up real fucking bad![]()
Speaking of this, is Bonnie Rotten still doing porn after the assault against her? She got beat up real fucking bad![]()
Well the fact that Stoya mentioned safewords we can assume they were having rough sex
Speaking of this, is Bonnie Rotten still doing porn after the assault against her? She got beat up real fucking bad![]()
Speaking of this, is Bonnie Rotten still doing porn after the assault against her? She got beat up real fucking bad![]()
First of all, that was Christy Mack that got assaulted. Second of all, nope. And the lawyers for her abuser are actually trying to claim that because she filmed rough scenes, what he did to her was actually consensual.
The BDSM community needs to be more concerned with someone being raped than trying to excuse it with "that might be BDSM tho"
Not only are his videos poorly labeled, the way in which he uses choking does not have the perception of affirmative consent or desire. I don't see women bringing his hands to their neck, a form of affirmative consent, but rather it always seems like he just whips it out of nowhere and they're just going with it. His marketing always seems to hide these actions too, so people are told that this is a friendly feminist guy and then all of a sudden they have to see choking.
Affirmative consent is sexy, affirmitave consent is a component of feminism. Deen does not espouse these views and makes all efforts to portray himself as "real" while riding the brogressive PR wave.
Oh give me a fucking break....
Was there an article somewhere about this? I'd like to see it.
Oh give me a fucking break....
Was there an article somewhere about this? I'd like to see it.
Oh give me a fucking break....
Was there an article somewhere about this? I'd like to see it.
During the Nov. 23 hearing, Koppenhaver's attorneys unsuccessfully argued that because Mackinday is an adult actress whose work included filming rough sex, the former MMA fighter had "consent" for "a particular form of sex activities that were outside of the norm."
"The jury needs to know the nature of this relationship, and what was customary and consensual," Sua told reporters outside the courtroom.
Prosecutors were skeptical of that claim.
"I don't see how any of those activities that she did in adult movies would ever show her consent to the acts with the defendant that he's charged with," Cadish said, according to the Review-Journal. "I'm not seeing that connection."
Well yeah, we now know because it was confirmed by her tweet.
I'm talking about thinking that James Dean must like rough, dominating sex because he does those scenes in porn. The scenes they shoot means very little to a porn star's personal sex life.
The BDSM community needs to be more concerned with someone being raped than trying to excuse it with "that might be BDSM tho"
Not only are his videos poorly labeled, the way in which he uses choking does not have the perception of affirmative consent or desire. I don't see women bringing his hands to their neck, a form of affirmative consent, but rather it always seems like he just whips it out of nowhere and they're just going with it. His marketing always seems to hide these actions too, so people are told that this is a friendly feminist guy and then all of a sudden they have to see choking.
Affirmative consent is sexy, affirmitave consent is a component of feminism. Deen does not espouse these views and makes all efforts to portray himself as "real" while riding the brogressive PR wave.
Bonnie Rotten also made fun of Christy Mack for being beaten by her boyfriend.
The BDSM community needs to be more concerned with someone being raped than trying to excuse it with "that might be BDSM tho"
Not only are his videos poorly labeled, the way in which he uses choking does not have the perception of affirmative consent or desire. I don't see women bringing his hands to their neck, a form of affirmative consent, but rather it always seems like he just whips it out of nowhere and they're just going with it. His marketing always seems to hide these actions too, so people are told that this is a friendly feminist guy and then all of a sudden they have to see choking.
Affirmative consent is sexy, affirmitave consent is a component of feminism. Deen does not espouse these views and makes all efforts to portray himself as "real" while riding the brogressive PR wave.
I've always found the weird stuff that some dudes do like the choking and the fish hooking especially really puts me off. Not sure if they ad lib that or if that's done for pain/punishment guys but I find it extremely distasteful whenever it pops up.
So presumably if someone decided to beat the crap out of him it would be a valid defence to say that his job was as a fighter so therefore it implied he was consenting to be involved in a fight at any other time in his life?
Porn is scripted though, if the actresses had a problem with it the producers would tell him to stop. What he does in the bedroom is different and seems to be the problem here.
I'm sorry but affirmative consent in the moment is definitely not sexy, and not always needed.
Holy shit, weren't they dating recently? I thought they were even engaged.
2 years ago. No.
The wording of this reminds me of the type of conversation starter that comes up unprompted with forced distant uncle interactions during thanksgiving.I'd argue the other direction, it's possible that due to the increasingly realistic rapey scenes this dude carried out on a daily/weekly basis, all that dopamine and all of those primal instincts start to rewire your brain in subsconcious ways. The abuse might be pre-planned, but it's still a physical act you're carrying out. And a handful of scenes I've seen him in I've turned off because they go a bit past BDSM, they were getting downright brutal.
Affirmative consent isn't sexy and isn't needed? The hell?
If you think asking someone if they want to keep going or have something done to them has a chance of them telling you no or them stopping so you avoid doing so, you're not having consensual sex with them.
I use affirmative consent all the time. Every single one of my partners has liked it. You're not dryly going "DO YOU WISH TO HAVE SEXUAL COPULATIONS WITH ME IN THIS INSTANCE?", all it takes is whispering into their ear "you want some more?" or "you ready for some dick?" or letting them bring your hand to their neck first, an unspoken form of affirmative consent.
If you don't think affirmative consent is "needed" then you are not qualified to speak on consent. At no single moment in time does anyone ever have a default right to someone's body.
Porn is scripted though, if the actresses had a problem with it the producers would tell him to stop. What he does in the bedroom is different and seems to be the problem here.
If you browse efukt you can easily see a lot of "legal rape" its seriously disturbing. In particular face fuckers.
I've always found the weird stuff that some dudes do like the choking and the fish hooking especially really puts me off. Not sure if they ad lib that or if that's done for pain/punishment guys but I find it extremely distasteful whenever it pops up.
Porn is that person turned up to 11.
And you can definitely be raped on a porn set. One's profession does not make their rape excused nor less likely.
Whoa, even Joanna Angel stepped into this.
I recall several scenes with Deen and Joanna too, here's hoping she wasn't hurt like this as well. :/
If you browse efukt you can easily see a lot of "legal rape" its seriously disturbing. In particular face fuckers.
Edit:
something bothers me about this. she said she used her safe word. So let me guess this straight. This was consensual sex for a porn scene that got out of hand? I need more info.
If you browse efukt you can easily see a lot of "legal rape" its seriously disturbing. In particular face fuckers.
Edit:
something bothers me about this. she said she used her safe word. So let me guess this straight. This was consensual sex for a porn scene that got out of hand? I need more info.
Safewords are also used in the bedroom, so I don't know.If you browse efukt you can easily see a lot of "legal rape" its seriously disturbing. In particular face fuckers.
Edit:
something bothers me about this. she said she used her safe word. So let me guess this straight. This was consensual sex for a porn scene that got out of hand? I need more info.
If you browse efukt you can easily see a lot of "legal rape" its seriously disturbing. In particular face fuckers.
Edit:
something bothers me about this. she said she used her safe word. So let me guess this straight. This was consensual sex for a porn scene that got out of hand? I need more info.
People use safe words in real life too.
Nah. This was most likely off screen during their own personal time. The two did date for a while.
Safewords are also used in the bedroom, so I don't know.
One poster said it was not for a scene?
What I'm trying to say is, indicating a safe word exists means it started out as consensual. Otherwise the safeword would not exist. I only assumed it was a scene, but it can also apply to the bedroom.
The wording of this reminds me of the type of conversation starter that comes up unprompted with forced distant uncle interactions during thanksgiving.
What more do you need? The whole thing is that she used her safe word and the sex continued. Hence she is calling it rape.What I'm trying to say is, indicating a safe word exists means it started out as consensual. Otherwise the safeword would not exist. I only assumed it was a scene, but it can also apply to the bedroom.
edit: the way its worded indicates it was used during this encounter. Im not making conclusions, i just need more info.
What I'm trying to say is, indicating a safe word exists means it started out as consensual. Otherwise the safeword would not exist. I only assumed it was a scene, but it can also apply to the bedroom.
edit: the way its worded indicates it was used during this encounter. Im not making conclusions, i just need more info.
You mean Christy Mack? It can be easy to confuse the two.
I don't think she's returned yet.
Jesus she got beat up?
EDIT: Oh you got her and Mack confused. Mack is the one with the MMA ex.
Bonnie Rotten is pregnant. You're thinking of Christy Mack. She's not working as far as I know.
First of all, that was Christy Mack that got assaulted. Second of all, nope. And the lawyers for her abuser are actually trying to claim that because she filmed rough scenes, what he did to her was actually consensual.
What I'm trying to say is, indicating a safe word exists means it started out as consensual. Otherwise the safeword would not exist. I only assumed it was a scene, but it can also apply to the bedroom.