Why would you believe this though? It doesn't really have much precedence.I'm not debating that: I think the movie wants you to think that Han is indeed dead, but that in reality he might not be and will be back in Ep 8 or 9 as a *cheap* twist.
Why would you believe this though? It doesn't really have much precedence.I'm not debating that: I think the movie wants you to think that Han is indeed dead, but that in reality he might not be and will be back in Ep 8 or 9 as a *cheap* twist.
I'm not debating that: I think the movie wants you to think that Han is indeed dead, but that in reality he might not be and will be back in Ep 8 or 9 as a *cheap* twist.
Why would you believe this though? It doesn't really have much precedence.
I doubt Disney has much say in the matter.Simply because killing Han Solo, even a geriatric Han Solo, takes some balls that I don't think Disney nor Abrams have.
But I sure hope to be surprised by a Han Solo beheading!
Simply because killing Han Solo, even a geriatric Han Solo, takes some balls that I don't think Disney nor Abrams have.
But I sure hope to be surprised by a Han Solo beheading!
I doubt Disney has much say in the matter.
I have a feeling they would have agreed to anything to get Ford back. Probably along the lines of "I'll only do one and i want Han to die, like i always wanted"
Disney would never say they can't kill a 73 old Solo. This was done entirely by Lucasfilm. It has nothing to do with Walt Walt Disney Pictures. Disney we have heard countless time let Lucasfilm do their own thing just like they do with Marvel.Remember, these aren't auteur films anymore
Remember, these aren't auteur films anymore
Disney would never say they can't kill a 73 old Solo. This was done entirely by Lucasfilm. It has nothing to do with Walt Walt Disney Pictures. Disney we have heard countless time let Lucasfilm do their own thing just like they do with Marvel.
Remember, these aren't auteur films anymore
An "Auteur" in film just means a director who has a specific style or aspects of their filmmaking that can be traced through their filmography. I.E. It's hard to see a Wes Anderson film and not realize it's a Wes Anderson.
It's not really a qualitative statement. Paul WS Anderson is as much an auteur as Paul Thomas Anderson.
Regardless of what you think of JJ's work, qualitatively, I think it's pretty apparent that he's become an auteur at this point.
But honestly I feel that killing Han, especially this way, is a pretty weak move story wise, and somehow diminish the past achievements.
These characters deserve their peace and happy ending.
He's on the poster I ALMOST used for the image:
![]()
From the OP
December 16th: Review Embargo Lifts
Yawn.
If the rumors are true, Han's a more complex figure in this film than ever before and his murder (30 years after the original trilogy, no less) by his own corrupted son should make for an emotional and dramatic opening salvo for this new trilogy of stories.
Han Solo's son turning to the dark side was a shit idea in the old expanded universe, I'm afraid it's going to be a shit idea in the new fanfictionous universe too
Han Solo's son turning to the dark side was a shit idea in the old expanded universe, I'm afraid it's going to be a shit idea in the new fanfictionous universe too
Where is that from? It's pretty amazing.
Avatar bet: Han Solo doesn't die, or they don't make it clear that he's actually dead (i.e. we don't see a body). First taker gets this bet. Terms are the loser wears the winner's choice of avatars for a month.
I think a lot of those leaks were the original script, because I think they're going to announce Luke in a different way.
When we see him put his hand on R2 it's a firey background. Luke is not on a volcano world, he's at a Jedi temple. Plus, a leaked shooting script has Luke and "S********R" on it. I think he'll show up at the end of the battle. Maybe will follow them to wherever they're burying Han and then go off on his own. Then Rey says her goodbyes and jumps on a ship to join him.
I think a lot of those leaks were the original script, because I think they're going to announce Luke in a different way.
When we see him put his hand on R2 it's a firey background. Luke is not on a volcano world, he's at a Jedi temple. Plus, a leaked shooting script has Luke and "S********R" on it. I think he'll show up at the end of the battle. Maybe will follow them to wherever they're burying Han and then go off on his own. Then Rey says her goodbyes and jumps on a ship to join him.
Luke is in the flash back and then the final scene of the movie.
Revealing him to the audience before Rey goes and meets him for the first time completely destroys the impact that the final scene is supposed to have. It's stupid storytelling.
Avatar bet: Han Solo doesn't die, or they don't make it clear that he's actually dead (i.e. we don't see a body). First taker gets this bet. Terms are the loser wears the winner's choice of avatars for a month.
But honestly I feel that killing Han, especially this way, is a pretty weak move story wise, and somehow diminish the past achievements.
These characters deserve their peace and happy ending.
Fanfictionous in this instance referring to a script written by the writer of The Empire Strikes Back, which has its roots in a basic story outline written by George Lucas.
Who are you kidding?
It would be perfect just to have a 5 second shot of Luke and then the familiar music just before the credits start. But apparently there is some dialogue between Luke and Rey.
Kylo is presumed dead on the planet too after the fight with Rey and Finn, right? What if they both survive together, while working through their issues?Don't make that bet, his body is in the base when it explodes. He's dead. And I know its a movie but if he falls over a rail, after being stabbed, and crawls out of there before it explodes and turns up in 8 then I am done with this.
They dropped the outline from Lucas at the very beginning, there is 0% Lucas in this movie.
They dropped the outline from Lucas at the very beginning, there is 0% Lucas in this movie. I would have loved to see what Lucas would have come with though, I feel I still prefer having the mediocre Lucas-authored prequels than Lucas-less sequels that are mathematically created to hit all the notes they needs to hit to cater to the nostalgia fueled fan base.
Mind you, I think the movie will be pretty good. Recreating greatness, without ever achieving it, has been what made Abrams' career so far, and that made pretty good movies in some cases. Just not great ones.
I don't think this movie will be built to pass the test of time. From what I know so far it will be built way too much around fan service to my tastes, just like the EU was in the 90s.
How do you think Han will die?
Source? That's interesting.That's not true, a lot of Lucas's themes are there, but details they were adapted or changed which happens in every movie, IIRC the Terms "First Order" and "Resistance" are all Lucas.
For better or worse, The Force Awakens began life as an outline by Lucas, was scrapped and rewritten by Arndt, and was scrapped again and rewritten a final time by Kasdan and Abrams.
There is 100 percent going to be some threads of continuity between the different versions, as is normal for any development process. At the end of the day, all three versions continue the story of the Skywalker family into the next generation.
Calling the new film fan fiction is the sort of nonsense you'd expect from a political attack ad.
How do you think Han will die?
- Beheaded
- Pierced
- Slashed
- Force choked
- Force pushed in a crevice or something?
Can't be too graphic for sure.
That's not true, a lot of Lucas's themes are there, but details they were adapted or changed which happens in every movie, IIRC the Terms "First Order" and "Resistance" are all Lucas.
Who to believe?
Lucas says he has nothing to do with the movie. His whole divorce thing.
The Vanity Fair article says Lucas had a script ready to go and they rejected it.
J.J. says he has nothing but respect for Lucas, but midichlorians are terrible, I want to kill Jar Jar and put his bones in the dessert.
Well Lucas said that literally in an interview, and sounded bitter about it.
Who to believe?
Lucas says he has nothing to do with the movie. His whole divorce thing.
The Vanity Fair article says Lucas had a script ready to go and they rejected it.
J.J. says he has nothing but respect for Lucas, but midichlorians are terrible, I want to kill Jar Jar and put his bones in the dessert.
No he didn't. He was joking.
Nothing you've said this entire last page has been all that accurate or well informed.
We spent the 2000's with people insisting the prequels don't count now we have someone crazy trying to claim only the original trilogy and the prequels count.
Guess what ITS ALL STAR WARS. All of it counts!
What does this mean?I'm calling anything non-lucas fan fiction at this point. It's not negative, it's just ... not original Star Wars.
I mean, Rebels is canon and great and everything, *but it doesn't make any fucking sense*. It shouldn't exist, it breaks the OT, render everything irrelevant. It exist only because there's a public with an infinite thirst for Star Wars stories.
It's no better than fan fiction.
That's not true, a lot of Lucas's themes are there, but details they were adapted or changed which happens in every movie, IIRC the Terms "First Order" and "Resistance" are all Lucas.
What does this mean?
Any ideas where that came from.
As far as i know Arndt never even saw Lucas's treatments.
Arndt then did a treatment involving a girl on a desert planet and an Awol trooper but needed another 18months to get it done so JJ and Kasdan started again. Using ideas from the Arndt script.
What, he wasn't clear? A story about the growing rebellion and a Jedi on the run from the Empire has no place during a period of Star Wars canon in which the rebellion was growing and Jedi were on the run from the Empire. It just *doesn't make sense*.