I can't really explain it, but Kylo is pretty much exactly what I thought Lucas was trying to go for with Anakin as he was making his transition to Vader, but either the script held Hayden back or Hayden held Hayden back..or both. Just the angst and lack of stability is what Anakin was for the final half of Episode 3, but Kylo wasn't anywhere near as cringeworthy. It was nearly perfect and how I imagine someone conflicted with the light and the dark would act.
Well Kylo had his face hidden for half the movie.
His "TRAITOR" is literally a copy paste "LIAR" of Haydenakin.
Anakin's potrayal was controlled by Lucas, so whatever we got on screen was what he had in mind. You can see in the making of footage that Lucas talks to Hayden in every scene, telling him how to play it.
That doesn't make Hayden an outstanding actor.
But come on, nobody was surviving the sand line, not even adam driver.
It was like a combination of the worst, a serviceable actor coupled with the worst kind of writing.
That being said, a movie isn't about technicalities only, and while the dialog and acting can be wonky, the overall story and character (looks, mannerism..) was not bad, for me.
I never hated the prequels nor felt hate towards Christensen.
I am just surprised to see :
OT Anakin is extremely controlled. Occasionally his emotions slip through but for the most part there is a calmness.
Kylo Ren is a lot like that, except less controlled. He still has that youthful passion.
PT anakin is nothing like Vader. He is a loose cannon. He's whiney, he is all over the place and lacks any sort of discipline
This literally describes Kylo.
Manchild with anger bursts that can't make up his mind and can't control his powers.
Anakin was a kid that was thrown into the Jedi order quite late. He had to hide what he felt, but he showed that he felt plenty (movies and clone wars cartoons).
The reason he was "nothing" like Vader was because Vader himself was a shadow of his former self. He lost everything and everyone he loved, he lost his body, his humanity, his power, his ability to kill the emperor.
He never wanted to be that "Vader". We only got a brief glimpse of fully powered Vader, which was when he plots to overthrow the chancellor and rule over the galaxy. It came back when Luke appeared and Vader saw the opportunity in Luke to have the power to get rid of the emperor.
I know it's not canon "anymore" (despite nothing contradicting it), but maybe my point of view is due to having read some EU things where they really elaborated on Vader's hindsights, and it just made a lot of sense to me. Looking back on the movies I didn't mind the wonkyness at all.
I just hate to see "Kylo is a much better Anakin" when we have literally no backstory on what his motivations are, and he is just a doubtful, weak minded manchild that committed genocide and murder his own family, for no apparent reason but to be evil.
I said in another post, Vader lost everything, Kylo stil had : loved ones, family, his body, his humanity, power. And we know he turned 'as a boy'. So I can't really take him more seriously, to me he is a puppet, and what I want from the sequels is him growing up and opening his eyes about Snoke.
Not him being a Vader clone, because he just can't have a justified and compelling backstory to justify pure evil, given who he is and how old he is, without the inclusion of Snoke toying with his mind.