This would require "you" to ask "they" bud..Why don't they block police parking lots so cops cannot get in or out? Genuinely curious.
blocking traffic is abhorrent behavior, i can't believe you guys don't see that
i'm legit disturbed
That would also be terrible behavior. What would people who genuinely need help do?Why don't they block police parking lots so cops cannot get in or out? Genuinely curious.
Your hysterical hypothetical required not one, not two, but THREE victims? And one was a child no less!
And there aren't any methods of disrupting public and and private services that won't potentially cause the lioss of human life? How should these BLM protestors feel if, for example, a child and 2 adults died in an ambulance stuck in their protest because they needed immediate access to an ER?
They can cut off the bridge if they want, if, let's say, an ambulance needed to drive by and they barred its passage then, yeah, the protesters would be at fault. These aren't idiots, they're going to let emergency and service vehicles through. I would suspect most protests that hinder traffic don't prevent those guys from getting through.
Minneapolis BLM took over a police station and sat in it for weeks just a couple of months ago.Why don't they block police parking lots so cops cannot get in or out? Genuinely curious.
Something tells me you don't get even half as outraged when cops murder your fellow citizens and go unpunished.
Why don't they block police parking lots so cops cannot get in or out? Genuinely curious.
I disagree with the invocation of the quote as a means of saying "you vaguely fit this profile, authority says this about your profile, you are therefore wrong and you are the problem." Which is what you did. I don't categorize rightfully calling that out as shitposting.
of course i do, please don't do that
i'm out, y'all are talking crazy
That's not how blockades work. If an ambulance is sandwiched far back, they can't jsut let the ambulance through. ALl of the trafick has to pass.
Well you're not shitposting because you've elaborated on your position, so that's good.
Tesseract doesn't "vaguely" hit this profile. It's almost literal a word for word description of his deplorable behavior in this thread. He's not the problem because he fits the description of the quote either, he's the problem because he fails to understand the purpose of a peaceful disruptive protest, and considers protesters the "monsters" and "pieces of shit" in this scenario, not the people actually committing the atrocities that fueled these protests in the first place. Legitimate rage about a protest, instead of the cause of the protest, is a fundamental misunderstanding about the very concept of protests at their core. And the fact that yes, this discussion is happening on MLK day makes the quote appropriate in context.
Minneapolis BLM took over a police station and sat in it for weeks just a couple of months ago.
http://www.newsweek.com/minneapolis-mayor-end-encampment-4th-precinct-399452
Almost no one I know knows this ever happened. I didn't until it was almost over. When the protest isn't inconvenient to the public, no one knows about it.
Did it happen? Why is every one of these threads riddled with shit that didn't happen? Actually, nevermind..forgot..
Your hysterical hypothetical required not one, not two, but THREE victims? And one was a child no less!
I don't really take "MLK did it" as a reason why it is okay. MLK did a lot for this country and racial relations, but that doesn't mean all of his methods were ideal or justified like a rule or something.Again, I offer up this post, including many of the successful protests involving Dr. King, which are held up as the gold standard of non-violent protest. Many disrupted traffic.
So that makes it okay? it's one thing to make an impression in ways that stick, even if it inconveniences. It's another thing to risk lives.
I don't really take "MLK did it" as a reason why it is okay. MLK did a lot for this country and racial relations, but that doesn't mean all of his methods were ideal or justified like a rule or something.
both are wrong, how about that? stop trying to think for me, thanks.
Uhhh... that would be you. Here's how King did his marches.
I don't really take "MLK did it" as a reason why it is okay. MLK did a lot for this country and racial relations, but that doesn't mean all of his methods were ideal or justified like a rule or something.
I disagree with the invocation of the quote as a means of saying "you vaguely fit this profile, authority says this about your profile, you are therefore wrong and you are the problem." Which is what you did. I don't categorize rightfully calling that out as shitposting.
What kind of protest would you recommend to solve this problem?
If you've ever wondered what you would have done if you were alive during the Civil Rights Movement, right now is a very good way to find out. It never ended.
People dying in am ambulance is a hysterial situations? it's a totally plausable situation and it's ridiculous to act as if any protestor should choose to do something like this while ignoring the possibility. Nothing good comes out of "If it didn't happen, then we don't have to consider the possibility of it happening.
I don't really take "MLK did it" as a reason why it is okay. MLK did a lot for this country and racial relations, but that doesn't mean all of his methods were ideal or justified like a rule or something.
If you've ever wondered what you would have done if you were alive during the Civil Rights Movement, right now is a very good way to find out. It never ended.
Tesseract called the protesters pieces of shit and compared them to monsters, didn't he?
If you've ever wondered what you would have done if you were alive during the Civil Rights Movement, right now is a very good way to find out. It never ended.
The specific method of civil disruption is precisely how he managed to spur momentum for change. It doesnt matter if you personally dont like it, its a large part of the reason he is celebrated today as a catalyst for racial progress and why people here in 2016 seek to emulate his modus operandi.
that's a vaguely racist thing to say, i would've marched hand in hand with the movement
it's getting ugly in here, i better leave now
that's a vaguely racist thing to say, i would've marched hand in hand with the movement
it's getting ugly in here, i better leave now
No idea. I'd be rich if I did know.
Perhaps protesting in front of the houses of the cops that shoot people? That would certainly get the media's juices flowing and keep the cops' names in the public sphere. That would also get people to not complain about road closures.
I have no idea and don't claim to. I wasn't following or responding to that entire conversation. His post was the last one when I opened the thread, and it fit the typical meme-like usage of that block quote.Tesseract called the protesters pieces of shit and compared them to monsters, didn't he?
Good for them, but man. I want to believe protesting like this would work, but I don't think it will.
We already have people here in GAF, a pretty liberal site, not seeing the point of disruptive protesting. Imagine how the rest of the country views it.
And the sadder thing is, you HAVE to protest like this, because yes, why would white people even bother to listen to you if you're protesting out of the way? They don't care. They're not the ones being killed.
But then when you DO protest like this, they see you as monsters who don't think about others.
There is no winning, and that's terrifying. I wish the movement had someone as iconic as MLK or Malcolm X (In his later years) because I think that having a hero like that really helped the movement in the 60's,
yup, disrupting traffic in 2016 is unacceptable
it's getting ugly in here, i better leave now
So he never gave a heads up to the news they were doing a march? That surprises me, I thought he did. I admit, I was wrong about that.
It still doesn't change the fact that it is dangerous. I mean, there were CHILDREN on the highway. Are people still going to be defending them if a child gets hit by a car? I don't know, I guess I am both paranoid and am wary to bad/angry drivers. I mean, that didn't happen to the March during MLK's time where people would get away with it (of course at the end of the march people were arrested and all that terribleness...) so probably not to much of a chance of it happening to a MUCH smaller group on only one road.
And, while I personally would just be annoyed (though find it interesting), people do have a point about ambulances and other emergency vehicles. Thankfully none needed to pass, but why risk innocents dying in trying to protect innocents?
But the worst part honestly is seeing how quickly Neogaf turned on each other. It is true that doing this helps brings awareness to BLM and it is not my position to tell them not to do this. However, acting someone is a scumbag for wanting to get to their job or pick up someone they love over seeing a protest is, ironically, very ignorant. It isn't because they don't care about black lives, but they DO have a life.
But whatever, not trying to demonize the protestors as what they are protesting IS a serious thing. But also not acting like people wanting live their lives don't care about BLM.
So he never gave a heads up to the news they were doing a march? That surprises me, I thought he did. I admit, I was wrong about that.
It still doesn't change the fact that it is dangerous. I mean, there were CHILDREN on the highway. Are people still going to be defending them if a child gets hit by a car? I don't know, I guess I am both paranoid and am wary to bad/angry drivers. I mean, that didn't happen to the March during MLK's time where people would get away with it (of course at the end of the march people were arrested and all that terribleness...) so probably not to much of a chance of it happening to a MUCH smaller group on only one road.
? Did it happen..I forget. Yet, you quoted and never answered.Never said yes or no..
It matters when somebody is trying to use it as an appeal to authority argument towards me.
Where did I say stop protesting. I'm not even saying stop protesting things that can inconvenience others. Is it really asking much to ask to not protest in ways that can cause serious issues people that can even include death?
Surely a line has to be drawn somewhere.
Groups throughout history have done all sorts of things in the name of good causes.
And the argument of "but people are dying" is a very good cause. But some of us just draw lines at different points. I'm just not a fan of that, really.
How would that stop police from unlawfully killing black people?
that's a vaguely racist thing to say, i would've marched hand in hand with the movement
yup, disrupting traffic in 2016 is unacceptable
it's getting ugly in here, i better leave now
You've been making an appeal to consequences argument with the stuck ambulance scenario.
I'm just tired of this hypothetical lives > black lives argument you guys are making. Considering how often the media shits on blm you'd think a story would've surfaced by now at how someone died due to not making it to the hospital in times because of these protests. Does anyone have any actual articles on this? Cause right now it seems you guys are more concerned about hypothetical people dying then actual ones.
Well if you want these radical forms of protest to go away how about you get mad at the actual cause of them and not the effects of it?
Yes. I believe actions should be judged by the consequences that they can be reasonably be determined to make or possibly make. To be okay with this protest is to be okay with potentially dusrupting critical services that save lives.
that's a vaguely racist thing to say, i would've marched hand in hand with the movement
yup, disrupting traffic in 2016 is unacceptable
it's getting ugly in here, i better leave now