MLK Day Protesters Block Traffic on the Bay Bridge

Status
Not open for further replies.
Got any examples of disrupting traffic has caused something awful with emergency services?

Do you need me to find an example of a distruption of traffic causing a loss of life befure you'll believe it is feasible or something? I'd rather not waste my time looking for something so obvious.
 
Seriously. These BLM protesters showed up unarmed and not threatening to shoot police that try to remove them. These monsters must be stopped!

Meanwhile, send supplies to the white guys holed up on a Government Building for the last three weeks. Cops haven't even blocked off road access for them to keep breaking the law.
Are you aware of how dangerous blocking roads is?
 
I have no idea and don't claim to. I wasn't following or responding to that entire conversation. His post was the last one when I opened the thread, and it fit the typical meme-like usage of that block quote.

That posters gross language you cite doesn't change the reason why the block quote gets invoked, even if the target actually "deserves" an ad hominem.

I feel it's a bit of a stretch to say the use of the quote amounts to an ad hominem. The King quote is directly a response to the disgruntlement felt when protests are inconvenient, and it was used to shame the response of 'pieces of shit unacceptably blocking traffic in 2016' point of view rather than simply name call, if 'half-hearted white moderate' can be considered any kind of slur.
 
If NeoGaf existed in the 1960s, all one would have to do is change the location and add a few slang terms like "beat feet" here and there to have this resemble the exact reaction to the protests.

"I was driving my Deuce and a Quarter in Birmingham when these NCR (Negro Civil Rights) protesters blocked my way. How inconsiderate! I really hope they beat feet and find a different manner to protest."
 
I'm just tired of this hypothetical lives > black lives argument you guys are making. Considering how often the media shits on blm you'd think a story would've surfaced by now at how someone died due to not making it to the hospital in times because of these protests. Does anyone have any actual articles on this? Cause right now it seems you guys are more concerned about hypothetical people dying then actual ones.



Well if you want these radical forms of protest to go away how about you get mad at the actual cause of them and not the effects of it?

I'm all for disruptive protests. I'm simply drawing a line at distruptions that can have reasonable potential to cause severe harm/death.
 
No one here wants black people to get killed, but disrupting a major roadway is not the correct way to do it. Causes a lot more problems and secondly the protesters get arrested and potentially have it on their records.

Tell me what is the correct way man. I'm all ears. So far I'm hearing a lot of criticism but no solutions.
 
Do you need me to find an example of a distruption of traffic causing a loss of life befure you'll believe it is feasible or something? I'd rather not waste my time looking for something so obvious.

I'll Google with you?

I'm curious because I'm guessing most places with these protests have a lot of emergency service vehicles.

You're making a bad argument because you're not bringing actual incidents to the table. You're being purely hypothetical.

"Trust me! Bad things will happen when streets are blocked!"
*Nothing bad happens*
"It can happen."
 
I'm all for disruptive protests. I'm simply drawing a line at distruptions that can have reasonable potential to cause severe harm/death.

X00077_9.JPG.jpeg


Those MONSTERS, someone could have died!!!

IMSVBve.jpg


Won't somebody please think of the ambulances!
 
I think it got ugly when you used descriptors like "pieces of shit" and "monsters", my friend.

maybe it's because i'm somewhat disabled, and understand how this kinda shit can cause severe pain and discomfort to those involved

it's gross behavior in 2016, i very much doubt mlk would want it

hindsight and all, i'm biased towards the drivers
 
Yes. I believe actions should be judged by the consequences that they can be reasonably be determined to make or possibly make. To be okay with this protest is to be okay with potentially disrupting critical services that save lives.

I could sit here and make up any old bullshit rationalization I suppose.

Critical services, lol. Children on road. Rush hour traffic. What if the bridge explodes due to a terrorist attack and people can't drive away. What if Godzilla strikes.
 
My only concern would be for emergency vehicles. Is that bridge pretty significant? Like, if ambulances and such could take an alternate path then I have absolutely no problem with it.

Then again I also think that if there was an ambulance that people would let them through. It would be nice to have an ideal situation where traffic could be disrupted while still allowing emergency vehicles through without a problem.
 
Do you need me to find an example of a distruption of traffic causing a loss of life befure you'll believe it is feasible or something? I'd rather not waste my time looking for something so obvious.

Yea, just use your time to chastise a proven effective tactic then bail when called on it.
 
I'm all for disruptive protests. I'm simply drawing a line at distruptions that can have reasonable potential to cause severe harm/death.

Then you'd take issue with every form of disruptive protest. People blocking traffic, even foot traffic going into a building, are gonna impede hypothetical people who need medical assistance.
 
I'll Google with you?

I'm curious because I'm guessing most places with these protests have a lot of emergency service vehicles.

You're making a bad argument because you're not bringing actual incidents to the table. You're being purely hypothetical.

"Trust me! Bad things will happen when streets are blocked!"
*Nothing bad happens*
"It can happen."

Never said it will happen.

X00077_9.JPG.jpeg


Those MONSTERS, someone could have died!!!

IMSVBve.jpg


Won't somebody please think of the ambulances!

Never said they were monsters or even bad people.

I could sit here and make up any old bullshit rationalization I suppose.

Critical services, lol. Children on road. Rush hour traffic. What if the bridge explodes due to a terrorist attack and people can't drive away. What if Godzilla strikes.

I'm sure a stuck ambulance with a critically wounded patient is more likely than the bridge exploding.



Can't you guys make an argument that doesn't wildly villianize me for simply apposing exactly how this protest was handled?
 
Even here you get people not getting the point of blocking the bridge. They think it's an inconvenience, that the protesters are doing something bad.

That's the whole point of the protest. That's the whole point of blocking the bridge. Because anything else BLM tries to do, any other form of protest, will be ignored and people will continue on their daily lives ignoring the marginalized.

No, your hypothetical emergencies don't matter. They really, really don't in the grand scheme of things. These type of protests have been going on for over 50 years, and some people still don't get the point.
 
Tell me what is the correct way man. I'm all ears. So far I'm hearing a lot of criticism but no solutions.

I don't know - never been an activist. Maybe get a White House petition for the DoJ to review the possibility of mandating body cameras? Things of that sort. I can safely say that blocking traffic will just make people madder and the message becomes overshadowed with the discussions about the road instead of the protest.

This thread is evidence.
 
You keep making more and more rationalizations. We all will have to live with disruptions as the future unravels from any number of groups. We're in interesting times.

Eh, I'm more trying to look at both sides. Personally I find protests interesting and if something like this continues and actually helps people stop the police brutality I am all for it.

Just saying that I would be massively annoyed if something like this made me late to work and I lose money to pay for rent. Of course, unlike some people (and posters apparently) I would calm down after 5 minutes knowing that my life didn't change at all while there are people getting murdered.
 
I'm just tired of this hypothetical lives > black lives argument you guys are making. Considering how often the media shits on blm you'd think a story would've surfaced by now at how someone died due to not making it to the hospital in times because of these protests. Does anyone have any actual articles on this? Cause right now it seems you guys are more concerned about hypothetical people dying then actual ones.
Huh? This isn't a one or another sort of scenario.

Just because we think this isn't a good idea because something could happen doesn't mean we think black lives don't matter.
 
Then you'd take issue with every form of disruptive protest. People blocking traffic, even foot traffic going into a building, are gonna impede hypothetical people who need medical assistance.

yeah, that behavior is monstrous too

we're better than this, liberals are supposed to be the good guys
 
Ah, another thread turned to "please protest how I want you to protest."

The most dangerous thing to BLM is the so called moderate and their concern over order.
 
Never said it will happen.



Never said they were monsters or even bad people.



I'm sure a stuck ambulance with a critically wounded patient is more likely than the bridge exploding.



Can't you guys make an argument that doesn't wildly villianize me for simply apposing exactly how this protest was handled?

Then you admit your own argument is non-existent.

You're being villain-ized because (1) you're not annoyed similar to how waiting at a doctor's office for an hour annoys you and (2) you're telling them how to protest so it conforms with some hypothetical you thought of that you can't find real life evidence for.
 
I'm unsure how this protest:



was meant to get the city of Chicago to get rid of slums and house discrimination. I mean, those folks probably agreed with the people protesting! Why didn't they protest City Hall?

The west side of Chicago was still changing then, a lot of white people still living there... and the NW side is still extremely white.
 
maybe it's because i'm somewhat disabled, and understand how this kinda shit can cause severe pain and discomfort to those involved

it's gross behavior in 2016, i very much doubt mlk would sanction this

hindsight and all, i'm biased towards the drivers

But, he wouldn't. He did disruptive protests that drained public resources at a near constant pace. There were police officers that could have caught a robber, hoses that could have put our a fire, dogs that could have caught a burglar and roads that could have had a life saving ambulance on it that he blocked in some of his most famous protests.

Even other protests caused tons of issues for individuals. The Montgomery protest led to plenty of lost revenue for the city, and probably lost jobs. Store sit ins disrupted people who were buying essential items, etc.

The greatest moments of the Civil Rights movement made movement inconvient for hundreds of people and did much more to potentially endager lives than this march on a bridge has. The only difference is that MLK did it 50 years ago and he's had the opportunity to be promoted to Sainthood in mainstream America rather than treated like a troublemaking and selfish negro as he was during his time.
 
these actions are unacceptable by any modern standard

W4stg3y.gif

Almost as unacceptable as the police shooting black men for sport, dontchaknow.

We'll just go back to our homes and hope and pray and maybe ask you pretty please when we can let you know that we're fed up with the racist prison complex and policing in this country. We'll be sure to check with you first so that we let you know our grievances on a timetable that works for you.
 
maybe it's because i'm somewhat disabled, and understand how this kinda shit can cause severe pain and discomfort to those involved

it's gross behavior in 2016, i very much doubt mlk would want it

hindsight and all, i'm biased towards the drivers

People need to stop using MLK to trying to shame black people.

Shows how ignorant they are about MLK and black people in general.
 
My only concern would be for emergency vehicles. Is that bridge pretty significant? Like, if ambulances and such could take an alternate path then I have absolutely no problem with it.

Then again I also think that if there was an ambulance that people would let them through. It would be nice to have an ideal situation where traffic could be disrupted while still allowing emergency vehicles through without a problem.

I can't imagine a scenario where an ambulance would need to get from Oakland to SF or vise versa. There are hospitals in both cities.
 
People acting like this country was founded on people pleasantly asking the British for freedom. Action gets results, disruptive action gets results faster.
 
I don't know - never been an activist. Maybe get a White House petition for the DoJ to review the possibility of mandating body cameras? Things of that sort. I can safely say that blocking traffic will just make people madder and the message becomes overshadowed with the discussions about the road instead of the protest.

This thread is evidence.

If you don't know what the right way is? Then how can you stand there and say that this is the wrong way? Alos methods similar to what you're saying are being attempted the usage of body cameras have been growing but that's not enough and using only 1 form of protest isn't effective either.
 
Then you admit your own argument is non-existent.

You're being villain-ized because (1) you're not annoyed similar to how waiting at a doctor's office for an hour annoys you and (2) you're telling them how to protest so it conforms with some hypothetical you thought of that you can't find real life evidence for.

I didn't admit to anything. You can continue to carry both sides of the argument for yourself since you seem to enjoy it.
 
Can't you guys make an argument that doesn't wildly villianize me for simply apposing exactly how this protest was handled?

Any person can make a million reasons why not to block a bridge in protest. This isn't the first time and it won't be the last time. It's almost like, what are people really talking about? What are they really trying to say? What is the true and core gut feeling?
 
I'm not getting into this, but saying it doesn't happen is false.
Exclusive: Man died after Berkeley protests delayed help

The issue with this is the man had to be revived at the scene so there's no saying when he actually collapsed. Sure, sooner would be better but this isn't a clear cut example of how traffic killed a guy.

I didn't admit to anything. You can continue to carry both sides of the argument for yourself since you seem to enjoy it.

Your refusal to back up your hypothetical to make blocking traffic bad is admitting a bad argument.
 
it's unacceptable behavior by any modern standards, that's my opinion

Y'know...there is a lot of unacceptable behavior in the world we seemingly just shrug and say "oh well, dem's the breaks".

Including the deaths of multiple PoCs, one for being a cosplayer without a license, one for being a 12-year old with a toy gun, one for not knowing how to breath through his skin as he was being choked.
 
it's unacceptable behavior by any modern standards, that's my opinion

What is acceptable protesting? Do you want them to stand idle on the side of the road and tell people to honk their horns in support? Keep it on college campuses where no one sees it?
 
I can't imagine a scenario where an ambulance would need to get from Oakland to SF or vise versa. There are hospitals in both cities.

I've never been in the area so I didn't know, but that makes sense. So long as emergency vehicles can take a different route or otherwise get to a hospital/patient then I say good for them for prostrating. I don't care about my life being inconvenienced, those kinds of things are what spur change.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom