Tad Devine, you're not helping.
You'd think he'd have learned some lessons after working on the Gore and Kerry campaigns.
Tad Devine, you're not helping.
Well he solidified that he did indeed say exactly what I said he said. So I'm thankful for that. Lol
He's a hack and been doing a terrible job throughout Bernie's campaign.Tad Devine, you're not helping.
http://www.msnbc.com/mtp-daily/watch/panic-time-for-democratic-establishment-605252163874
Chuck Todd spoke with Sanders Strategist Tad Devine.
Todd: Do you believe that Planned Parenthood and Human Rights Campaignthat these are part of the Democratic establishment that's trying to defeat you?
Devine: I do, Chuck. I think the leadership of Washington-based groupsand it's not just those twoare part of a political establishment here in Washington.
(And of course, Bernie would welcome their endorsements should he be the Democratic Nominee.)
I'm gonna say this as nicely as I can.
Bernie is fucking up with this. This is terrible messaging.
I'm so happy for you.
I don't understand why you need the concept of Planned Parenthood. Those should just be services provided by the entire medical complex.
Well I understand why it exists in the US due to the anti-women choice agenda there so it needs to be separated to protect it, but it seems silly to me.
Is this a tactic to make minorities of all sorts the signal that they have to stay at home and just not vote or something?
If he gets the nom be prepared for Republican president,
the good point is that at least the next president will be able to pass some policy past the Congress!
The thing about the entire medical complex, is that its broken and expensive. Its not to promote health, but to pay the members on the board 1 dollar more than yesterday, In the US. PP's needed due to the millions of women getting services there...
And all in all, PP is no where near the biggest offenders using our tax money. Its just the war on women showing its ugly face. Compared to millions of fines to other entities getting tax money, and still receiving tax money, PP isn't a burden to tax payers.
I don't understand why you need the concept of Planned Parenthood. Those should just be services provided by the entire medical complex.
Well I understand why it exists in the US due to the anti-women choice agenda there so it needs to be separated to protect it, but it seems silly to me.
It's also a political entity, one that spends millions on select campaigns via its Super PAC and other 501(c)(4)'s.
But I think the point is that Bernie is trying to address the entire medical complex. You fix that, you don't need an organization like PP, because it's just part of the medical complex.
That's only to counter an entire political party trying to kill it and everything it stands for.
Why would he attack a non profit that helps women just because they endorsed the only other democrat on the ticket? It looks spiteful, however he meant it
Do people not know what PP does and what impact it has? Not the poltical bullshit, but the actual services it provides.
Do people not know what PP does and what impact it has? Not the poltical bullshit, but the actual services it provides.
Yeah, but these are services that the government just provides for it's people as standard in other countries.
Stop being so backwards America.
Pretty sure the vast majority of Democrats know. It's been a talking point of theirs for a good while now.
Right. It's not just a medical organization, but a political advocacy group.
Bernie's answer was too inside baseball. Tad Devine's was too simplistic.
Yeah, but these are services that the government just provides for it's people as standard in other countries.
Stop being so backwards America.
Will socialists better learn, so these Bernie mistakes don't happen in the future
Yeah, but these are services that the government just provides for it's people as standard in other countries.
Stop being so backwards America.
So they're immune from criticism?
Of course not, but what legit criticism did he lay down?
Some people in the organization are too intent on propping up 'establishment' candidates, as evidenced by them breaking precedent to endorse his opponent in the primaries.
Some people in the organization are too intent on propping up 'establishment' candidates, as evidenced by them breaking precedent to endorse his opponent in the primaries.
Some people in the organization are too intent on propping up 'establishment' candidates, as evidenced by them breaking precedent to endorse his opponent in the primaries.
PP exists in Canada bro
But the point is why is that?
I'm sure PP would love it if Republicans got on board instead of characterizing them as baby part dealers and the antithesis of all that is clean and holy. PP has become an increasingly political entity as a means of survival at this point.
Propping them up or believe they are the best fit for their organizational goals?
Bernie already expressed an antagonistic view of them, so they might be right.
It's coming across as "they endorsed Hillary instead of me, so fuck them!"
Bernie btw skipped out on the defund planned parenthood vote in Dec.
So yeah....
What's their argument for endorsing Hillary which, again, goes against prior precedent? Can't be voting record. Is it that they need to get out in front and do what they can to stop Bernie from winning the nomination? If so, again, that fits right into his narrative.
"fuck them" is a bit strong, I think. It's unfortunate that he mentioned them in the same breath as Wall Street, but I think you've put some significant spin on his comments if you really come away thinking he's got a problem with PP that would influence his policies.
Berine skipped out on voting for them as soon as Dec.
We are checking the record right?
When a group that should be focusing on helping others - like HRC and PP - has the spare funds to support and endorse a presidential candidate, then yes. I believe there is something fundamentally wrong there.
Planned Parenthood should absolutely not be using itself as a vehicle for a presidential candidates agenda.
So they should sit back and wait to see if a candidate will be able to keep them functionally alive after one of the two political parties has made it part of their platform to demonize them into non-existence.
Yeah but after they ban all muslims.. surely they aren't just going to stop there. I don't wanna build mexicos wall![]()
Yeah he's going to do that just after discovering a cure for cancer.But I think the point is that Bernie is trying to address the entire medical complex. You fix that, you don't need an organization like PP, because it's just part of the medical complex.
When a group that should be focusing on helping others - like HRC and PP - has the spare funds to support and endorse a presidential candidate, then yes. I believe there is something fundamentally wrong there.
Planned Parenthood should absolutely not be using itself as a vehicle for a presidential candidates agenda.
When a group that should be focusing on helping others - like HRC and PP - has the spare funds to support and endorse a presidential candidate, then yes. I believe there is something fundamentally wrong there.
Planned Parenthood should absolutely not be using itself as a vehicle for a presidential candidates agenda.
To me it's pretty clear statement from PP - meant to boost a struggling Clinton campaign that's down in the 18-45 women demographic. A political move that is meant to shift this trend in the opposite direction. After the comments of DWS recently about young women being complacent I'm not surprised by the move myself but I'm guessing Bernie's camp was surprised by the unprecedented endorsement of Hillary.
Considering both Sanders and Clinton are staunch defenders of PP - endorsing Clinton is nothing more than a political move rather than anything else you are trying to paint it as.
He was kind of busy running a campaign.
Also, his vote wouldn't have amounted to jack shit, and he knew it.
Yeah he's going to do that just after discovering a cure for cancer.
"fuck them" is a bit strong, I think. It's unfortunate that he mentioned them in the same breath as Wall Street, but I think you've put some significant spin on his comments if you really come away thinking he's got a problem with PP that would influence his policies.
When a group that should be focusing on helping others - like HRC and PP - has the spare funds to support and endorse a presidential candidate, then yes. I believe there is something fundamentally wrong there.
Planned Parenthood should absolutely not be using itself as a vehicle for a presidential candidates agenda. It's just another type of lobbying but without "big oil" or some other media buzzword attached to it.