Finally finished
Here's why it definitely won't happen.I really don't see that happening. I'll wait until you're both finished with the trilogy before expanding on that thought.
Finally finished (after some weeks of not reading):
![]()
While the main character surviving was necessary for a "welp" ending, I would have preferred a darker one.
Here's why it definitely won't happen.
http://deadline.com/2015/12/neil-cross-hard-sun-drama-bbc-one-luther-1201650784/
I also finished it this AM. Decent book, but ultimately unfulfilling for me. I think I would like it a lot more had I read it back in 1975, but it was fairly generic by modern science fiction standards.
I might need to give this another chance. I read it a few years ago and found it to be a complete and total slog.Next up:
![]()
Don't know if this is generally known, but Whitta is a (former?) GAFer, who is also the screenwriter (or one of them) for the next Star Wars movie.
Just got an alert that the kindle version of The Passage by Justin Cronin is $1.99 right now. I've never read it but I see it mentioned and recommended a lot so I figured I'd pass the word on.
That's one of the books I think everybody should read. I don't go as far as Diamond does in geographical determinism, but it's an important factor in the way the world developed that people don't usually think of.Jared Diamond's Germs, Guns and Steel
I feel like this is akin to calling Lord of the Rings generic because every major epic fantasy since has stolen from it. Or the Bible. It's important to consider the context in which something is written and published, so that we're able to recognize that it influenced tropes, rather than suffers from them.
This isn't a criticism of your opinion, I see that you recognize how your experience reading it in '75 might have been different, but your complaint is a common one, thrown especially against older SF and Fantasy, and it always surprises me a little.
Mind putting that in spoilers? I kinda wanted to read that.
I finished Blood Meridian by Cormac McCarthy last night. This book is pure horror. The scariest thing I've read and also one of the most interesting and beautifully written. It captivated me from the very first sentence. "See the child." I loved it. I'm still trying to figure out what happened in the end, but I can't wait to have a re-read in the future.

Try Blindness by Jose Saramago. I think that's a better fit for "disturbing" than Lolita.
Try Blindness by Jose Saramago. I think that's a better fit for "disturbing" than Lolita.
Try Blindness by Jose Saramago. I think that's a better fit for "disturbing" than Lolita.
Thanks, never heard of Saramago. I didn't find Lolita disturbing at all really, I felt like it kind of just ended up being an expression of the love of language moreso than creepy pedos.
Yeah it's really not a good fit. I know why it'd be listed as such but I think that does the book a disservice.
I also finished it this AM. Decent book, but ultimately unfulfilling for me. I think I would like it a lot more had I read it back in 1975, but it was fairly generic by modern science fiction standards.
I might need to give this another chance. I read it a few years ago and found it to be a complete and total slog.
Well, it can be both. It's an incredibly disturbing story told in the most beautiful language possible. Makes for an interesting disconnect. I don't think it's a disservice to the book to acknowledge that the subject matter is really fucked up and hard to read about for some people.Thanks, never heard of Saramago. I didn't find Lolita disturbing at all really, I felt like it kind of just ended up being an expression of the love of language moreso than creepy pedos.
I don't think it's a disservice to the book to acknowledge that the subject matter is really fucked up and hard to read about for some people.
I get you. I think it's also important to not be like: "Oh, the book isn't really about chid sexual abuse" because it totally is and I don't blame people for not wanting to read it for that reason. Especially since it's something people are more likely to have lived through than stuff that's usually under the shock label.I'm just wary that people will write off the book as "shock" material.
Like if I just described Cabin in the Woods as "horror". I can imagine someone going "oh well, I don't like scary stuff so that's a pass". Personally, I don't like scary stuff either and I would've never watched it if a friend who wasn't very familiar with my tastes pushed it onto me. This is the kind of risk I see in labeling fiction with words that feed preconceptions.
Finished The Machine by the incomparable James Smythe. Since I'm yet again in the mood for southern noir I started reading The Bottoms.
The Bottoms by Joe R. Lansdale
The Museum of Science Fiction has published their first Journal of Science Fiction, and released it for free.
http://publish.lib.umd.edu/scifi/article/view/265/29
![]()
Haven't read this one, but Joe R. Lansdale is one of my favorite authors. Have you ever read "The Drive-In"?
The Enfield Horror trilogy
Nope but now I want to read everything by him. Is The Drive-In your favorite from Lansdale?
Kazuo Ishiguro's The Unconsoled. Only that & the last year released The Buried Giant and I'm done with his works. Quite a few books lost my interest in recent month, but i can rely on Ishiguro. Dunno what to do when I'm done with his books...
I'm about 200 pages into Leckie's Ancillary Justice... can someone tell me what the heck is going on? I am having the hardest time getting into this one but I'd like to stick it out.