Greenberg: Quantum Break is not coming to Steam

Alan Wake was one of the most pirated games on PC, when you put a game you really care about also on PC you want it not to be pirated especially in the first weeks

Not again with this shit.

Steam allows any kind of third party of DRM and Valve even offers Steam CEG as DRM.

And do you know what? 99.9% of games don't use DRM besides the Steam client check, which is not intended to stop piracy.
 
Microsoft just refuses to accept what PC gaming is. They fight against it every time they try to leverage their position as the OS platform holder. They see what is out there, they know what is expected on the platform but someone, somewhere in that company refuses to embrace the openness even though the other successful platforms on their OS thrive with it.

I'm sure they wouldn't have minded staying open and being in the position that Steam is in now, but they aren't.

It's more of a ARPPU and MAU thing. MS isn't content with selling a single copy of Windows to Joe Smith every now and then, and continuously trying to hold people hostage and forcing them to upgrade their OS. The user needs to have all the software he owns tied to their locked down service where MS gets a cut of everything that's sold and the issue of solely selling yearly OS upgrades to generate revenue goes away.

Edit: Apple was playing chess 10 years ago while MS got distracted in the sandbox dicking around with Sony, lol
 
The future of all PC games being locked behind their store seems inevitable, it's only a matter of time. It might take 5, 10 years but it will, as long as games are made with DirectX.
if that happens i will just quit gaming ... and with backlog of mine I will have normal to play even fr pension
 
People not wanting to open another/ app are pretty amazing. You click something twice, click once more, and then you have your game. We are incredibly lazy.
It's not about that.

I have no issues buying games on GoG, Origin, Uplay or Battle.net

It's about this:
By being a MS Store exclusive, what exactly isn't possible ?
Any type of executable-level modification or injection, as well as changes to data files in some cases.

So, say goodbye to
  • Performance analysis overlays.
  • Graphics injectors.
  • Integration of useful external applications like Mumble.
  • Community fixes or feature extensions.
  • Freesync.
  • In-depth modding.
  • Support for popular peripherals like the Steam controller. (!)
  • Some GPU features such as SLI or adapter switching.
  • Actual exclusive full screen mode.
.
 
Calling someone a moron and not realizing that this is in the best interest of the company = ??? You know the answer.

People not wanting to open another/ app are pretty amazing. You click something twice, click once more, and then you have your game. We are incredibly lazy.

Yes, it's absolutely about that and there are zero valid rasons in this thread posted so far as to why Win10 comes with a lot more issues than some additional clicks.

You got it!
 
Strong arming them? MS is giving you two ways to play QB. Xbox One and PC via their store. Whatever the case they are giving you more then one option to play a game and that's more then their competitors are offering. I mean if Sony decided to released UC 4 on their own shitty PC app (if they had one) I'll gobble it up in a heartbeat!
It's completely strong-arming for the people who actually want to play this on PC. Microsoft are trying to use the carrot and stick approach to get PC gamers on their side, but they're beating them with the stick and trying to shove the carrot up their ass instead. This should have been an olive branch, but it's instead a monkey's paw situation where if you want to play the game on PC you have to jump through the bullshit hoops of the Windows 10 store and deal with a tremendous amount of functionality that PC gamers expect being removed.

If Spencer was serious about regaining PC gamer trust, they wouldn't be doing this. Stinks of same-old arrogant Microsoft not understanding the market and thinking hubris will do the job.
 
So you'll be able to run Quantum Break on your phone? Swell!

Not now, but who's to say that that's not what they ultimately want to do? What do you think the massive population would prefer? The casuals. An infrastructure that's always the same everywhere you go (like xbox one and win10) or one that's different and you have to get used to every time you use it? It's pretty obvious what they're trying to do.
 
Mac App Store apps can and are being cracked, despite being sandboxed like Windows 10 Store apps.

No one has really looked into cracking Windows 10 Store apps because it's just not been worth it yet I assume.

Could be, but look at Rise of the Tomb Raider for example, it uses Denuvo for Steam version so there is no crack yet, if they can crack Windows Store apps i guess someone would have already done it to bring Tomb Raider to pirates and not even having to deal with Denuvo, though they didn't do that, i guess if it's crackable it is at least pretty hard and perhaps not achievable in just a few months
 
Not on your tablet, or your phone.

You are not going to run Quantum Break on a phone. You can however run Windows & Linux games on tablets should you choose to. There are tablet / convertible options plentifully available, and chances are if you are a Linux user, you are probably capable of switching out Windows for Linux. SteamPlay is a gigantically more useful feature to many than Xbox One cross-purchasing could be (which isn't even available if you are a PC gamer for Quantum Break, only the other way around). Also, should Mac suddenly change stance or have a tablet / convertible come out that does use OSX instead of iOS, suddenly you will have access to all the compatible games; one of the reasons why people like to have PC games be future proofed / flexible with SteamPlay.
 
Totally expected and as a result totally not interested in it for the foreseeable future. A very attractive sale or other kind of promotion later on may persuade me otherwise. It's not even not being on Steam, I totally applaud new competitors, Origin is pretty good now and Uplay is getting better, but the Windows 10 Store is just awful.
 
After the GFWL debacle can't say I'm thrilled by this, I have multiple games that simply no longer work just because they need GFWL and Microsoft can't be bothered to either support or unlock them.

I'm going to need a much bigger public statement of support for W10 store games than they've currently made before I'd be willing to spend that much money through it. At best features like overlays and slow patch releases may never be fixed and at worst they could just decide to drop that part of the store for W11 due to slow sales.
 
As long as the port is handled right then I don't really care if it's on Origin, Windows store or whatever, if I can play QB without having dropping £299 on an XB1, then all the better for me.
 
Calling someone a moron and not realizing that this is in the best interest of the company = ??? You know the answer.

People not wanting to open another/ app are pretty amazing. You click something twice, click once more, and then you have your game. We are incredibly lazy.

Yeah

I'm so fucking lazy

Unlike you, who clearly read the thread and actually understood why people are complaining

I understand that, and yes that is a touch restrictive, but you don't NEED most of that stuff. You can still play the game. It's nice to have bells and whistles, but the fact is you can get by just fine without it.

Wow. Great way to look at it.

e: Just.... Wow

e2: I keep coming back to this

Wow
 
It's not about that.

I have no issues buying games on GoG, Origin, Uplay or Battle.net

It's about this:

.
I understand that, and yes that is a touch restrictive, but you don't NEED most of that stuff. You can still play the game. It's nice to have bells and whistles, but the fact is you can get by just fine without it.
If people vote with their wallets I'm sure things will be reconsidered.
Yes, it's absolutely about that and there are zero valid rasons in this thread posted so far as to why Win10 comes with a lot more issues than some additional clicks.

You got it!
If only you didn't respond like a child. Look above you.
 
As long as the port is handled right then I don't really care if it's on Origin, Windows store or whatever, if I can play QB without having dropping £299 on an XB1, then all the better for me.
This is generally my stance as well. Even if it's a sandboxed app, as long as it's solid I probably won't care. If they screw up the solid part ever they are screwed because that's when external tools come in handy and all hell will break loose. They are definitely flirting with disaster.
 
You are not going to run Quantum Break on a phone. You can however run Windows & Linux games on tablets should you choose to. There are tablet / convertible options plentifully available, and chances are if you are a Linux user, you are probably capable of switching out Windows for Linux. SteamPlay is a gigantically more useful feature to many than Xbox One cross-purchasing could be (which isn't even available if you are a PC gamer for Quantum Break, only the other way around). Also, should Mac suddenly change stance or have a tablet / convertible come out that does use OSX instead of iOS, suddenly you will have access to all the compatible games; one of the reasons why people like to have PC games be future proofed / flexible with SteamPlay.

You can if you create a psnow type service that's 100% based on streaming you can.
 
It's a mild inconvenience for heavy Steam users, nothing more.

I've got games spread across many services, if I want to play a game then having to use a different storefront won't stop me.
 
Of course you can if they are x86 and run Windows 10 or GNU/Linux.

If you are talking about ARM devices, nor you can run these games, despite being Universal Apps.

That's right, though i actually could play Quantum Break on my tablet since i've got a Surface Pro 4, of course at low details, 720p and 25fps, and perhaps it'll be playable even on phones if the rumors about a Surface Phone with intel x86 cpu are true
 
Microsoft just refuses to accept what PC gaming is. They fight against it every time they try to leverage their position as the OS platform holder. They see what is out there, they know what is expected on the platform but someone, somewhere in that company refuses to embrace the openness even though the other successful platforms on their OS thrive with it.

I can't blame MS, plenty of consumers are buying into their "walled garden is gud" narrative.
 
Could be, but look at Rise of the Tomb Raider for example, it uses Denuvo for Steam version so there is no crack yet, if they can crack Windows Store apps i guess someone would have already done it to bring Tomb Raider to pirates and not even having to deal with Denuvo, though they didn't do that, i guess if it's crackable it is at least pretty hard and perhaps not achievable in just a few months

I'm pretty sure ROTR on windows store still has denuvo and that is the reason is also not cracked
 
Could be, but look at Rise of the Tomb Raider for example, it uses Denuvo for Steam version so there is no crack yet, if they can crack Windows Store apps i guess someone would have already done it to bring Tomb Raider to pirates and not even having to deal with Denuvo, though they didn't do that, i guess if it's crackable it is at least pretty hard and perhaps not achievable in just a few months

And how do you know that the Win Store version of the game doesn't have Denuvo?

If I were Square Enix and I paid to use Denuvo on a new release I'd use it with all the storefronts, not just Steam.
 
Could be, but look at Rise of the Tomb Raider for example, it uses Denuvo for Steam version so there is no crack yet, if they can crack Windows Store apps i guess someone would have already done it to bring Tomb Raider to pirates and not even having to deal with Denuvo, though they didn't do that, i guess if it's crackable it is at least pretty hard and perhaps not achievable in just a few months

What? Where did you read the win store version doesn't have Denuvo on it?
 
Didn't knew that Activion, Bandai Namco, Sega, Take-Two, Square Enix, Konami and Warner Bros. all had their own mandatory onlineplatforms.

Mind linking me to them?

Let's pretend Origin, Battle.net, Uplay, GOG and Rockstar Social club don't exist.

If you don't like the Win 10 store, don't buy it. Simple as that.
 
How gsync and freesync are affected?

Remedy, I love your games. I will not buy your game in windows store.
Freesync is out for sure, since I believe it only supports exclusive fullscreen at this point. G-sync could work in borderless windowed mode, but at reduced performance.


I understand that, and yes that is a touch restrictive
Well, I guess you can call eliminating 75% of what makes PC gaming great "a touch restrictive".
 
I understand that, and yes that is a touch restrictive, but you don't NEED most of that stuff. You can still play the game. It's nice to have bells and whistles, but the fact is you can get by just fine without it.
If people vote with their wallets I'm sure things will be reconsidered.

No exclusive full screen mode is pretty bad.

edit: reason posted right above me.
 
I understand that, and yes that is a touch restrictive, but you don't NEED most of that stuff. You can still play the game. It's nice to have bells and whistles, but the fact is you can get by just fine without it.
If people vote with their wallets I'm sure things will be reconsidered.

If only you didn't respond like a child. Look above you.

I can't believe what I'm reading.

So should the ability to use fraps be considered a luxury now?
 
durante's bulleted list needs to be posted on every page, people seeing the thread title or skimming through might actually brush this off as "fanboys salty they cant buy/play the game on steam" and assume its just another origin/uplay scenario that they'll "get over"

but the issue here is about the nature of these universal apps, and its a much more serious one

Words, how do they work?

BcOc3Hs.png
 
Calling you sarcastically out on your terribly uninformed and insulting post is acting like a child? Ok bud. Whatever floats your boat.
You could have responded to my post and we could have a conversation.
I understand why people are upset, I just don't agree that, as some have said, "fuck this shit". As the store grows, I'm sure these options will be available, but not supporting the store just because of a few minor details is absurd.
 
I am aware of the issues, I have Tomb Raider on the MS store (bought it cheap using the region thing) and is it frustrating? Yes. Is it game breaking? No, well not for me at least.

That being said QB will no doubt eventually move on to steam, getting it on windows store will just mean we get it sooner rather than later IMO.

Right. It's just kind of hard to recognise people that think the Win10 store is like Origin and Uplay and who is fine with the walled garden.
 
You could have responded to my post and we could have a conversation.
I understand why people are upset, I just don't agree that, as some have said, "fuck this shit". As the store grows, I'm sure these options will be available, but not supporting the store just because of a few minor details is absurd.

It's not absurd. What is absurd is you looking at that list posted above and saying "you don't need that stuff it's just bells and whistles".

No my friend, that is not bells and whistles, that is the core of the PC gaming experience for many of us.
 
I understand that, and yes that is a touch restrictive, but you don't NEED most of that stuff. You can still play the game. It's nice to have bells and whistles, but the fact is you can get by just fine without it.
If people vote with their wallets I'm sure things will be reconsidered.

If only you didn't respond like a child. Look above you.

Tsl90s4.gif
 
I understand that, and yes that is a touch restrictive, but you don't NEED most of that stuff. You can still play the game. It's nice to have bells and whistles, but the fact is you can get by just fine without it.
If people vote with their wallets I'm sure things will be reconsidered.
Driver being able to switch profiles per game is a vital option when you're using a laptop with Optimus and bad game detection, which in my arguably limited experience means 6 out of 6 Optimus laptops.

Like, seriously, I expected them to make a special hole in virtualizer for this but if they can't be bothered to implement full screen from the get go then ehhhhhhh.
 
Freesync is out for sure, since I believe it only supports exclusive fullscreen at this point. G-sync could work in borderless windowed mode, but at reduced performance.


Well, I guess you can call eliminating 75% of what makes PC gaming great "a touch restrictive".
A vast majority of users don't use FRAPS, or injectors and so on. I'm not happy with it, but I get WHY you can't as of now. It needs time.
No exclusive full screen mode is pretty bad.

edit: reason posted right above me.
Agreed, I never said I'm 100% ok with what's happening.

I can't believe what I'm reading.

So should the ability to use fraps be considered a luxury now?
No, but it in no way hurts your experience not to. Read my responses above.
 
It's completely strong-arming for the people who actually want to play this on PC. Microsoft are trying to use the carrot and stick approach to get PC gamers on their side, but they're beating them with the stick and trying to shove the carrot up their ass instead. This should have been an olive branch, but it's instead a monkey's paw situation where if you want to play the game on PC you have to jump through the bullshit hoops of the Windows 10 store and deal with a tremendous amount of functionality that PC gamers expect being removed.

If Spencer was serious about regaining PC gamer trust, they wouldn't be doing this. Stinks of same-old arrogant Microsoft not understanding the market and thinking hubris will do the job.

It's their game!

If they offered it on Steam, nobody would bother with the Windows store.
The goal is getting PC gamers wrapped up in the Windows ecosystem, where they stand to make the most money.
 
Top Bottom