Eurogamer: AC art used for Uncharted 4 trailer (Up: Naughty Dog responds)

Status
Not open for further replies.
tyTeAQg.gif
I am subscribing to this thread, it has all the elements for an epic thread in the making
 
That is what I was about to post. They took the time to photoshop out the assassin and used the scene as a quick and dirty job. They were well aware.

Also, some people are getting confused with thinking the beautiful beach scene from the game is what is in question here. No, they ripped off art from the AC IV concept art book and used it as picture in the game.

AC IV art:

jpg


Scene in Uncharted 4:

jpg
[/QUO

When Ubisoft developed this artwork, how do we know that this is not borrowed from a natural setting on some island that they took pictures of and added a pirate and a boat to it. What is the threshold of when artwork is considered original and unique. It's not like they copy and pasted the main protagonist of black flag and replaced it with Nathan Drake. I feel like there has to a high degree of originality when it comes to using a natural setting as artwork before someone can consider it as stolen. Take the division, for example. A 1 to 1 recreation of nyc. They changed all the names of all the retail store locations even though you can definitely tell when you are passing by a starbucks in the beta. If only this black flag artwork was from an island that is considered a national landmark, I wonder if that would have made a difference.
 
Heck if they got permission you would think the Ubi guy would have known better than to brag about it on twitter.

Haha yeah. I mean just the idea that any company would go and get a license to use one picture from another game is insane. It's not like this is some famous piece of artwork or central to the game. Why the hell would they do that? Of course it was used without permission.

Hope they find the culprit within the studio and fire his ass. You get caught plaigerizing in college you get the boot it should be the same at work.
 
Too many people are calling it an easter egg... which has me thinking, what makes something an easter egg?

Well, this is an easter egg:

1786117-2011_05_18_00003.jpg


But I guess to your question it has to be an obvious (albeit somewhat hidden) recognizable reference to something else. The pic in the OP is just a piece of concept art copy-pasted into another game.

Lol, they got YOU and tons of other people talking about it. They done did good. Now people will watch who weren't interested in the game and probably end up playing it.

You think they did this for publicity?
 
This is an obvious eff up by ND but I am not going to get my pitch fork out. This seems like a shared asset blunder or an artist who copied his neighbors home work. That doesn't make it ok or remove any of the negativity but I do think people are overreacting.

I mean, I played the Homefront Beta a few weeks ago and it was literally Far Cry 4 reskinned. I didn't see anyone in there blasting the devs for "stealing" from Ubisoft or calling out the devs to cancel their game out of embarrassment (The game itself did that but that is not the point).

It's been brought to light and will likely be dealt with by ND. All that will be left will be these amazing Meme's and GIF's :)

I mean, copying the structure of a familiar game and actually using someone's art without permission are two different things. This isn't actually a *big* deal in the grand scheme of things, no, but it's egg on Naughty Dog's face.
 
In fact I don't give a damn about the "theft". Big companies stealing amongst them, big deal.

However the way people here so easily accept the fact or outright deny the theft... man, I thought we were a little above this.

If Nintendo or Retro fuck up I don't go parading how good they are or how it must be a coincidence.
I get you. Its just the outrage over the stealing of artwork is what I'm finding a bit bothersome. Its probably some lazy copy paste placeholder asset or something in what is a rather tiny scene. How this got through without anyone noticing is beyond me but I'm not about to start accusing people of theft. Lazyness, sure. I just dont believe anyone at ND would be trying to pawn this off as their own.
 
dirty job. They were well aware.

Also, some people are getting confused with thinking the beautiful beach scene from the game is what is in question here. No, they ripped off art from the AC IV concept art book and used it as picture in the game.

AC IV art:

jpg


Scene in Uncharted 4:

jpg
[/QUO

When Ubisoft developed this artwork, how do we know that this is not borrowed from a natural setting on some island that they took pictures of and added a pirate and a boat to it. What is the threshold of when artwork is considered original and unique. It's not like they copy and pasted the main protagonist of black flag and replaced it with Nathan Drake. I feel like there has to a high degree of originality when it comes to using a natural setting as artwork before someone can consider it as stolen. Take the division, for example. A 1 to 1 recreation of nyc. They changed all the names of all the retail store locations even though you can definitely tell when you are passing by a starbucks in the beta. If only this black flag artwork was from an island that is considered a national landmark, I wonder if that would have made a difference.

Come on now. I think the inclusion of the concept was an honest mistake, but the concept art and the painting in the trailer are the exact. same. art. They took a concept from assassins creed. This is not debatable.
 
This is an obvious eff up by ND but I am not going to get my pitch fork out. This seems like a shared asset blunder or an artist who copied his neighbors home work. That doesn't make it ok or remove any of the negativity but I do think people are overreacting.

I mean, I played the Homefront Beta a few weeks ago and it was literally Far Cry 4 reskinned. I didn't see anyone in there blasting the devs for "stealing" from Ubisoft or calling out the devs to cancel their game out of embarrassment (The game itself did that but that is not the point).

It's been brought to light and will likely be dealt with by ND. All that will be left will be these amazing Meme's and GIF's :)

I hear you. I am not getting my pitchfork out, either. I am just calling a spade a spade, but still think that UC4 will easily be one of my games of the year.

I mean, it was obviously ripped off and had the pirate shopped out. As such, it was called out accordingly by Alex at Ubi. Again, it is what it is.
 
Come on now. I think the inclusion of the concept was an honest mistake, but the concept art and the painting in the trailer are the exact. same. art. They took a concept from assassins creed. This is not debatable.

For reals. It's the exact same piece.
 
Well, this is an easter egg:


But I guess to your question it has to be an obvious (albeit somewhat hidden) recognizable reference to something else. The pic in the OP is just a piece of concept art copy-pasted into another game.

Agreed, I don't see how this is an easter egg. Those should be, like you said, somewhat recognizable. I don't see how anyone would see this is a AC easter egg, it looks like a generic piece of artwork.
 
You think they did this for publicity?

I'm just saying whether they did or not it's making a bigger splash than if they hadn't. It's not like anyone cares anyway, just a few, but most people won't be bothered to remember it in a few days after it has blown over.
 
Seems like an honest mistake by the artist. If he/she actually wanted to pass off AC art as UC4 art they would have gone the extra mile to make it extra difficult to discover.
 
Depending on the role of the person responsible for this blunder, they may deserve to be fired. Like if they're a straight up 2D artist who was supposed to be generating artwork like this for the game.
 
People think they purposely stole this?

Depends on who they is. The guy who inserted this picture in obviously stole it on purpose.

If by they you mean ND as a studio, obviously they didn't get together, laugh maniacally and plot to steal one piece of artwork from an AC artbook.
 
Pretty scummy thing to do, though inevitably blown out of proportion on here since you guys all put ND on some untouchable pedestal.

Hopefully someone takes responsibility for this and apologizes.
 
To the people mocking others who are supposedly "defending" ND:

When you guys have someone at your company who does something shady or underhanded and it slips by you do you say "fuck my entire company sucks and so do I! "?

If ND doesn't change this picture and fire the guy who did it though? I will 100% put that on ND as a studio.
 
Pretty scummy thing to do, though inevitably blown out of proportion on here since you guys all put ND on some untouchable pedestal.

Hopefully someone takes responsibility for this and apologizes.

Agreed. Just change the image, fire the individual responsible and call it 'a thief's end.'
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom