The Omega Man
Member
I am subscribing to this thread, it has all the elements for an epic thread in the making
I am subscribing to this thread, it has all the elements for an epic thread in the making
Difference is, Naughty Dog makes great games so people will be more forgiving.
We need to go deeper.
That is what I was about to post. They took the time to photoshop out the assassin and used the scene as a quick and dirty job. They were well aware.
Also, some people are getting confused with thinking the beautiful beach scene from the game is what is in question here. No, they ripped off art from the AC IV concept art book and used it as picture in the game.
AC IV art:
![]()
Scene in Uncharted 4:
[/QUO![]()
When Ubisoft developed this artwork, how do we know that this is not borrowed from a natural setting on some island that they took pictures of and added a pirate and a boat to it. What is the threshold of when artwork is considered original and unique. It's not like they copy and pasted the main protagonist of black flag and replaced it with Nathan Drake. I feel like there has to a high degree of originality when it comes to using a natural setting as artwork before someone can consider it as stolen. Take the division, for example. A 1 to 1 recreation of nyc. They changed all the names of all the retail store locations even though you can definitely tell when you are passing by a starbucks in the beta. If only this black flag artwork was from an island that is considered a national landmark, I wonder if that would have made a difference.
This.
Heck if they got permission you would think the Ubi guy would have known better than to brag about it on twitter.
Too many people are calling it an easter egg... which has me thinking, what makes something an easter egg?
Lol, they got YOU and tons of other people talking about it. They done did good. Now people will watch who weren't interested in the game and probably end up playing it.
This is an obvious eff up by ND but I am not going to get my pitch fork out. This seems like a shared asset blunder or an artist who copied his neighbors home work. That doesn't make it ok or remove any of the negativity but I do think people are overreacting.
I mean, I played the Homefront Beta a few weeks ago and it was literally Far Cry 4 reskinned. I didn't see anyone in there blasting the devs for "stealing" from Ubisoft or calling out the devs to cancel their game out of embarrassment (The game itself did that but that is not the point).
It's been brought to light and will likely be dealt with by ND. All that will be left will be these amazing Meme's and GIF's![]()
How do you not know they haven't been given permission.
People need to chill.
I get you. Its just the outrage over the stealing of artwork is what I'm finding a bit bothersome. Its probably some lazy copy paste placeholder asset or something in what is a rather tiny scene. How this got through without anyone noticing is beyond me but I'm not about to start accusing people of theft. Lazyness, sure. I just dont believe anyone at ND would be trying to pawn this off as their own.In fact I don't give a damn about the "theft". Big companies stealing amongst them, big deal.
However the way people here so easily accept the fact or outright deny the theft... man, I thought we were a little above this.
If Nintendo or Retro fuck up I don't go parading how good they are or how it must be a coincidence.
Difference is, Naughty Dog makes great games so people will be more forgiving.
dirty job. They were well aware.
Also, some people are getting confused with thinking the beautiful beach scene from the game is what is in question here. No, they ripped off art from the AC IV concept art book and used it as picture in the game.
AC IV art:
![]()
Scene in Uncharted 4:
[/QUO![]()
When Ubisoft developed this artwork, how do we know that this is not borrowed from a natural setting on some island that they took pictures of and added a pirate and a boat to it. What is the threshold of when artwork is considered original and unique. It's not like they copy and pasted the main protagonist of black flag and replaced it with Nathan Drake. I feel like there has to a high degree of originality when it comes to using a natural setting as artwork before someone can consider it as stolen. Take the division, for example. A 1 to 1 recreation of nyc. They changed all the names of all the retail store locations even though you can definitely tell when you are passing by a starbucks in the beta. If only this black flag artwork was from an island that is considered a national landmark, I wonder if that would have made a difference.
This is an obvious eff up by ND but I am not going to get my pitch fork out. This seems like a shared asset blunder or an artist who copied his neighbors home work. That doesn't make it ok or remove any of the negativity but I do think people are overreacting.
I mean, I played the Homefront Beta a few weeks ago and it was literally Far Cry 4 reskinned. I didn't see anyone in there blasting the devs for "stealing" from Ubisoft or calling out the devs to cancel their game out of embarrassment (The game itself did that but that is not the point).
It's been brought to light and will likely be dealt with by ND. All that will be left will be these amazing Meme's and GIF's![]()
Difference is, Naughty Dog makes great games so people will be more forgiving.
Seriously?
Difference is, Naughty Dog makes great games so people will be more forgiving.
Not like the Uncharted games have been very original before. Why start now?
Come on now. I think the inclusion of the concept was an honest mistake, but the concept art and the painting in the trailer are the exact. same. art. They took a concept from assassins creed. This is not debatable.
Um the guy you quoted said they ripped off the art...?
Come on now. I think the inclusion of the concept was an honest mistake, but the concept art and the painting in the trailer are the exact. same. art. They took a concept from assassins creed. This is not debatable.
Well, this is an easter egg:
But I guess to your question it has to be an obvious (albeit somewhat hidden) recognizable reference to something else. The pic in the OP is just a piece of concept art copy-pasted into another game.
People think they purposely stole this?
Come on now. I think the inclusion of the concept was an honest mistake, but the concept art and the painting in the trailer are the exact. same. art. They took a concept from assassins creed. This is not debatable.
You meant to quote someone else, yes? The end of that post was not mine, lol.
Difference is, Naughty Dog makes great games so people will be more forgiving.
![]()
Ah fuck; someone already beat me using that exact gif response!
You think they did this for publicity?
What if Nate is a big Black Flag fan and he bought the art book and had it framed?
What if Nate is a big Black Flag fan and he bought the art book and had it framed?
People think they purposely stole this?
This thread is evolving even more. lolol
Pretty scummy thing to do, though inevitably blown out of proportion on here since you guys all put ND on some untouchable pedestal.
Hopefully someone takes responsibility for this and apologizes.