People are SERIOUSLY overrating Curry and GS here. All time great player and team? Certainly. But Curry is not as good offensively as Jordan was, and these Warriors are not as good as those Bulls.
GS goes as Curry goes, and Curry is unguardable today for a few reasons:
1) No contact perimeter defense means he can get wherever he wants unimpeded.
Curry is top 3 in the world in basketball handling ability right now. You play him tight at the cost of your ankles.
2) Refs turning a blind eye to the millions of illegal screens which have been set for Curry this year.
Did you never watch prime Reggie Miller? Guy was a push off master and the 90s teams were built around bruisers who could get him open by checking the shit out of people.
3) Incredible spacing due to a bevy of elite 3-point shooters. This, combined with perimeter defenders being unable to be physical, allows Curry to get into the lane at will if he wants to, where he finishes at a good rate because...
This is a plus for Curry and this era, not a minus. Fact is guys back then just couldn't shoot the rock like modern players do from distance. Draymond Green would drive teams insane, and teams would get blown out trying to outscore them by pace or beasting down low. Curry gets into the lane because of his lightning quick shot forces guys to overplay him, and he has elite handles, the opposite of how Lebron/Jordan got so much space just because of their elite ability to blow by people and finish. He can blow by 99% of defenders who play him honestly. There's several gifs on just this page of him making Chris Paul and K Leonard look like fools. A hand check wouldn't have fixed that. There are modern coaches that try to teach "pack the paint" defense and it looks laughably outdated with today's shooting.
4) There are no true shotblocking PF's/C's in the lane, and no hard fouls allowed. So not only can Curry get into the paint a lot more easily today (due to no perimeter contact and WIDE OPEN lanes due to spacing), when he gets there he can finish at a 65% clip despite his smaller size and modest athleticism.
Curry doesn't get blocked a lot because his floater is probably only second to Tony Parker's, he can finish with either hand, he can finish high off the glass with efficiency, his court vision and passing are as good as Lebron's, he almost never tries to dunk in game, if you commit to protecting the rim he can pull up from anywhere mid-range, and he flat out doesn't miss from the FT line so it's a waste of a possession to foul him. The other side of that coin is that if you put Curry next to a 80s/90s style finishing monster like Malone/Barkley/Robinson/Shaq/Kemp, he gets highlight reel alley oops all day all over your team.
Point of fact: you drop Curry in the '87-'96 NBA and yeah, initially he'd hit a ton of 3's (especially in the 80's) because no one would be used to a guy who can shoot like he does. But after the initial shock, coaches would quickly realize that they simply have to play him as a shooter. And why would they be able to do that more easily when defenders today can't? Because his primary defenders would be allowed to be physical with him and guide him where they wanted and wear him out over the course of the game (which also affects legs and his shot). They could also play very close up on him because his inside game would be almost COMPLETELY nullified by the very nature of the game back then: packed lanes, lots of contact inside and on the perimeter, and actual big men shotblockers waiting inside. Curry is not getting in the paint with anywhere NEAR the frequency he does today, and when he gets there he is not finishing at anywhere near a 65% clip against Zo, DRob, Dream, Mutombo etc. There's a reason why no 6'3" players were dominating the paint back then even when they were much more athletic than Curry - the game was just different.
And once you nullify Curry's inside game - that is, the THREAT of his inside game, which is all he needs to keep defenses honest - you simply have to play him as a shooter. The best shooter of all time, yes, but still a shooter. Not the complete offensive player he is today due to the nature of today's game. You can't guard Curry today because you can't take anything away from him due to various rules and the spacing of today's game and of the GS team in particular. Back then, his inside game would AUTOMATICALLY be nullified. That's the difference. He'd be played as a shooter and his effectiveness would drop markedly. He'd still be an all-time great, but he wouldn't be what we've seen this season, numbers or efficacy wise. I'd say he'd be a 22-25 ppg/6-7 ast/60-62% TS player. Still a HOF'er undoubtedly, but there would be zero GOAT or "GOAT offensive season" discussions.