Gamergate convinced an anti-sex trafficking org to join crusade against NoA employee

Status
Not open for further replies.
He made some tweets implying he was always a GGer but was afraid to admit it, then asked his SJW followers to unfollow him. Then he flip-flops and claim he's a SJW and want GG's to unfollow him.

To make a long story short: He's bored in his expensive mansion with nothing to do and decided to stir up some "both sides are bad but not me" BS.
He (apparently) zinged me good with the fact that he's a billionaire. Dude seems like he's self-destructing.

He's admitted he has no idea what GG is, but he has admitted he's "anti-PC, anti-censorship, and anti-authoritarian".
 
He made some tweets implying he was always a GGer but was afraid to admit it, then asked his SJW followers to unfollow him. Then he flip-flops and claim he's a SJW and want GG's to unfollow him.

To make a long story short: He's bored in his expensive mansion with nothing to do and decided to stir up some "both sides are bad but not me" BS.

That's hilarious
 
Ah, that's a shame. I would have hoped that Notch wouldn't be on that ship.

The worst thing is that I've seen all too many instances of people being neutral, and then eventually becoming huge GG stalwarts.
 
Ah, that's a shame. I would have hoped that Notch wouldn't be on that ship.

The worst thing is that I've seen all too many instances of people being neutral, and then eventually becoming huge GG stalwarts.
The situation also included him agreeing with Boogie that "there are no sides, just opinions." So - "neutral" affiliation, leaning heavily toward GG.

Anyway, thisnis still notjing compares to the Rapp situation. Although I did see her constantly mentioned by the hateful people mentioning me today
 
To this day I still don't really know what GamerGate is.

Yes......is there even a good side to gamergate?

I'm guessing its just fuck gamergate in general and it shouldn't be here. Because I always thought of the term being a bad thing..(Gamer and Gate's being a barrier/divider which means it would be bad)...but then I see people being GG'ers are all for industry equalization and then its not.....I'm so confused.
 
Yes......is there even a good side to gamergate?

I'm guessing its just fuck gamergate in general and it shouldn't be here. Because I always thought of the term being a bad thing..(Gamer and Gate's being a barrier/divider which means it would be bad)...but then I see people being GG'ers are all for industry equalization and then its not.....I'm so confused.

Lemme go grab the link that really helps to emphasize what GG is

Every trigger warning ever

This is however only one of multiple instances of this kind of thing.
 
I'm sure if she made comments about how shit the Klan is, they could theoretically target her too.
You know what's crazy? This is more a fact than a theory.
When you're vocal about something you become a target. This hurts most if you aren't so powerfull to crush haters or so irrelevant to never pick up haters attention. If you have enough spotlight to be relevant but not enough power to resist hate, you're going to be a prey.
 
Damn. So what's the current state of "You know, this internet harassment shit should actually be illegal"?

I mean it seems way to easy to make people's lives a living hell.
 
The situation also included him agreeing with Boogie that "there are no sides, just opinions." So - "neutral" affiliation, leaning heavily toward GG.

Anyway, thisnis still notjing compares to the Rapp situation. Although I did see her constantly mentioned by the hateful people mentioning me today
You cant pick sides if you dont know much about either. Im still confused as to what GG is. I consider myself pretty pc but I'm staunchly anti-censorship.

edit: well, everything I've heard makes me not want associate with GG, as confused as I am with their intentions. Its mindboggling.
 
What I get from that is that she differentiates between drawn and real child pornography, as in e.g. owning pictures of sexual acts with minors in genres like lolicon and shotacon should not be punished as much (if at all) as REAL children being photographed/filmed while performing the same acts as the drawn material.
So basically differentiating between fictional and real acts child pornography.

And I can totally understand that. Drawings are drawings. Fantasies or ideas put on paper. Fictional. Not real.
No one is actually harmed (only offended on an ethical level at most).
Being into lolicon/shotacon does not a child molester make.

Of course, this is totally subjective on my part, so you don't have to agree with me.
I can see where the accusations come from (it is relatively ambiously worded on her part in that paper) and I might even be wrong in my interpretation of that short excempt, but please don't throw a fit just because I wouldn't put someone in jail for the sole reason that he or she is into drawings of young boys/girls engaging in concensual or non-concensual sexual activities.

Well, no. The thesis supports the decriminalization of possession of even real child porn.
 
He (apparently) zinged me good with the fact that he's a billionaire. Dude seems like he's self-destructing.

He's admitted he has no idea what GG is, but he has admitted he's "anti-PC, anti-censorship, and anti-authoritarian".

he's definitely anti-something. god knows what though
 
The situation also included him agreeing with Boogie that "there are no sides, just opinions." So - "neutral" affiliation, leaning heavily toward GG.

Anyway, thisnis still notjing compares to the Rapp situation. Although I did see her constantly mentioned by the hateful people mentioning me today

When you side with Gamergate, you're siding with a group that thinks:

  • Harassing women, feminists, and allies is A-OK.
  • Anita Sarkeesian/Zoe Quinn/Allison Rapp/etc. are she-devils plotting to take away your video games with their vaginas and crocodile tears.
  • All of games journalism is corrupted by a liberal agenda that seeks to take away your video games.
  • Brietbart, select MRA/PUA/Red Pill groups, Neo-nazis, and Jack fucking Thompson are good people and are worth keeping as allies.

And so on...

When you side with the notorious anti-gamergate group, you side with a group that... disagrees with everything listed on top.

What monsters. We need to keep neutral on this. Boogie and Notch know what's up.
 
Fuck this and fuck Jamie for jumping on this without having any idea what's going on.

I wish Jamie were the one getting fired. How unprofessional.

I smell a libel lawsuit brewing.
 
You cant pick sides if you dont know much about either. Im still confused as to what GG is. I consider myself pretty pc but I'm staunchly anti-censorship.

edit: well, everything I've heard makes me not want associate with GG, as confused as I am with their intentions. Its mindboggling.
Oh no, I'm pretty sure Boogie knows plenty about both sides by now.
 
A poster above us said that she was naiive to express her strong opinion and that the backlash was pretty obvious.
Nobody would care about a random girl's opinion. But since she's a Nintendo's employee her opinion have consequences for the company too.
Do you think her employee would be happy to be on news and associated with child-pornography?
GG knows to strike where it hurts the most. That's disgusting but what can you do?
She put her own job at risk with her vocal opinion and that's a fact.
I wake up and we are still doing this victim blaming thing. Sigh.
Stop defending them.
 
When you side with Gamergate, you're siding with a group that thinks:

  • Harassing women, feminists, and allies is A-OK.
  • Anita Sarkeesian/Zoe Quinn/Allison Rapp/etc. are she-devils plotting to take away your video games with their vaginas and crocodile tears.
  • All of games journalism is corrupted by a liberal agenda that seeks to take away your video games.
  • Brietbart, select MRA/PUA/Red Pill groups, Neo-nazis, and Jack fucking Thompson are good people and are worth keeping as allies.

And so on...

When you side with the notorious anti-gamergate group, you side with a group that... disagrees with everything listed on top.

What monsters. We need to keep neutral on this. Boogie and Notch know what's up.

The sad thing is, i watching Sky News (Uk 24/News channel) a few months ago, and they had Milo on there on the side of a debate regarding the treatment of Eva Canerio (Doctor who worked for Chelsea Football club).

It is bad enough with this group terrorising the internet and people life, but when you get co-orporations like Sky giving 'legitimacy' to their actions, i do worry. I understand that everyone has the right to an opinion, but the likes of sky news treat it as a pantomime just for views. Instead of having debate we just have the worse reductive arguments you could get, on all issues.
 
so woman writes a thesis on how laws to protect children from abuse actually do little to protect children from abuse and they curtail the symptoms rather than dealing with the cause.

Gets spun to be made out to be pro CP

wat

seriously what, these guys have such a two dimensional view on child exploitation and paedophiles. and they then go and abuse this woman who wrote this with the ultimate goal of reducing such problems

wat
What else do you expect from scum? A reasoned intelligent dissection of a structured argument?

This here is a character assassination atempt orchestrated and furthered by people who lack the mental capacity to empathise with anything but their own narcissistic ego.

The concern trolling in this thread is disgusting and dishonest at best. Hope that this scum will get the long overdue legal prosecution they deserve.
 
Yes......is there even a good side to gamergate?

I'm guessing its just fuck gamergate in general and it shouldn't be here. Because I always thought of the term being a bad thing..(Gamer and Gate's being a barrier/divider which means it would be bad)...but then I see people being GG'ers are all for industry equalization and then its not.....I'm so confused.
Short answer: no. Long answer: hell no!

The "gate" part is a stupid thing that comes from Watergate.
 
I was referring to myself as people here are suggesting being 'neutral' is nearly as bad as being pro-GG.
Because being neutral is like being willfully "ignorant" of GG's awfulness.

Considering how the media has backed him during his court battles (over Scrolls) and were supportive over his depression I can only assume he's pro-GG because he hates women.

He did primarily argue with women, and call one an idiot, during the debacle earlier. So take that as you will.
 
He (apparently) zinged me good with the fact that he's a billionaire. Dude seems like he's self-destructing.

He's admitted he has no idea what GG is, but he has admitted he's "anti-PC, anti-censorship, and anti-authoritarian".

Considering how the media has backed him during his court battles (over Scrolls) and were supportive over his depression I can only assume he's pro-GG because he hates women.
 
That is where it gets interesting. The Person in charge of the organization seems to have some ties to GG as she has posted on GG forums which once pointed out the topic she started was quickly deleted. She has also by her own admission led a witch hunt against someone else for being a pedophile "accidently when misled"

So the question becomes is she really legitimate or is she a puppet to try and give GG legitimacy.

Considering they've been directing campaigns against GG targets for over a year I'd hazard a guess they know exactly what they're getting into.

And all of this would be far less transparent if they hadn't moaned so much about Nintendo censoring Xenoblade Chronicles X's skimpy costume on a 13 year old.
 
Some are blaming the internet. I blame social media. The "internet" before facebook and twitter exploded was not perfect, but it wasn't like this. What a world we now live in. Disgusting.
 
How come we all could take the 10 minutes needed to understand the intent of her thesis yet so many people can't and are trying to make a woman lose her job because they couldn't be bothered?
 
You can have fun by just referring to them by two random or nonsense words that start with g. I like grumplegramps.

98SNfAu.png

(Grumple Gromit, from Bubble Bobble)
 
Because being neutral is like being willfully "ignorant" of GG's awfulness.
Their aim is incomprehensible to me, but their tactics are obviously unacceptable. The neutral part is for being anticensorship or overly pc I guess. But maybe im misunderstanding what SJW is as well. Either way she doesn't seem to fit the bill. Looking through her twitter, she seems like an awesome person and its cool shes having fun in Japan.
 
Holy shit I knew some idiots were super salty about the removal of the bust size slider in Xenoblade X and an ass shot in the Fire Emblem DLC to the point of absurdity but this is pathetic. I bet it was the nose ring that instantly convinced them they had found the source of their torment. All it takes is a nose ring, non-natural hair color, or attractiveness to convince them someone is a FAKE GIRL GAMER using her sex to steal power and money.
 
So what does her gender study papers have to do with 'censorship'?
Also why is she just being picked on? You'd think it would be more of a company decision?

Like I get GG is hateful but I don't understand why they are picking on this person who seems to be not that high up on the decision making process
 
Holy shit I knew some idiots were super salty about the removal of the bust size slider in Xenoblade X and an ass shot in the Fire Emblem DLC to the point of absurdity but this is pathetic. I bet it was the nose ring that instantly convinced them they had found the source of their torment. All it takes is a nose ring, non-natural hair color, or attractiveness to convince them someone is a FAKE GIRL GAMER using her sex to steal power and money.

i still don't understand why anyone would want to pretend to be a gamer if this is the shit you'd have to go through

oh yeah, it's all worth it, they've finally accepted me as one of their own
 
Their aim is incomprehensible to me, but their tactics are obviously unacceptable. The neutral part is for being anticensorship or overly pc I guess. But maybe im misunderstanding what SJW is as well. Either way she doesn't seem to fit the bill. Looking through her twitter, she seems like an awesome person and its cool shes having fun in Japan.

what does any of this have to do with censorship or being overly pc?
 
Their aim is incomprehensible to me, but their tactics are obviously unacceptable. The neutral part is for being anticensorship or overly pc I guess. But maybe im misunderstanding what SJW is as well. Either way she doesn't seem to fit the bill. Looking through her twitter, she seems like an awesome person and its cool shes having fun in Japan.
SJW=any person who doesn't want to constantly put down minorities women and want gaming to be more inclusive, somehow in the minds of GG manchildren that's a bad thing. They're absolutely terrified of the fact that the status quo is changing.
 
So what does her gender study papers have to do with 'censorship'?
Also why is she just being picked on? You'd think it would be more of a company decision?

Like I get GG is hateful but I don't understand why they are picking on this person who seems to be not that high up on the decision making process
She's a woman.
 
So what does her gender study papers have to do with 'censorship'?
Also why is she just being picked on? You'd think it would be more of a company decision?

Like I get GG is hateful but I don't understand why they are picking on this person who seems to be not that high up on the decision making process

It's easy to understand why. She's a woman in the game industry.
 
Gamergate is about as disgusting as the Westboro Baptists Church. Fuled purely by hate.
Its beyond me how people like Boogie or TB can support them.
 
He (apparently) zinged me good with the fact that he's a billionaire. Dude seems like he's self-destructing.

He's admitted he has no idea what GG is, but he has admitted he's "anti-PC, anti-censorship, and anti-authoritarian".

Just looked up your tweet and for someone intelligent enough to be against GG you should know better than to mock people over depression.
 
Sorry for living under a rock... But wtf GG is still around? How is this happening? How is the industry not denouncing this movement?
 
So what does her gender study papers have to do with 'censorship'?
Also why is she just being picked on? You'd think it would be more of a company decision?

Like I get GG is hateful but I don't understand why they are picking on this person who seems to be not that high up on the decision making process

They're looking for excuses to justify harassing someone that they do not like
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom