HP_Wuvcraft
Banned
That was awful.
At least we'll always have the original.
At least your post makes sense. You don't like it, fine, that's your opinion. Doesn't act like reality has warped so that the originals no longer exist. Good. Progress.
That was awful.
At least we'll always have the original.
I meant if it was that type of movie, these girls just don't work in PG.
Sony should get Carly Rae Jepsen to do a cover of the theme song, it seems it would fit in with the "girl power" theme the movie has going for it.
Anyways, looks fun. McCarthy and Wiig are awesome.
Does not look good...looks like an also ran reboot where they try to hit all the same lines but in a slicker, faster presentation. Why bother.
Also it seems this will be a rallying cry for certain publications
http://io9.gizmodo.com/everything-we-learned-about-ghostbusters-from-its-trail-1762666819
"Its perfect"
http://www.theverge.com/2016/3/3/11153978/ghosbusters-paul-feig-sexism-pro-tips-for-beginners
A guide to telling your family if they disagree with this movie they are sexist
Jesus....
women heavy movies make people say such weird shit.
Spy would have been just as funny without the stuff that made it an R film
After I read that I kind of wanted a Carly Rae Jepsen version of the theme.
After I read that I kind of wanted a Carly Rae Jepsen version of the theme.
That looked absolutely horrendous. As much as i enjoy watching McCarthy and Wiig, i did not feel this one at all. I got the feeling we were watching 4 women trying to "play" Ghostbusters. Also, the entire tone and look seemed way too saturated...kinda made it look like a Brett Ratner film..ugh.
Tone is right, Kate McKinnon is amazing in every scene she's in, and Leslie Jones character is actually proactive and more useful that Winston. I dig it.
She already did the Fuller House theme. She can't have two themes.
After I read that I kind of wanted a Carly Rae Jepsen version of the theme.
Someone posted this on facebook regarding the trailer and I completely agree:
""I may actually have been in tears about this... like, holy shit guys.
Actual women, being nerdy and awesome. Not sex objects, not classically beautiful, they are not meant to appeal to men. They are smart, geeky, nerds, flawed and human, not at all the "strong woman" stereotype. And they are heroes in a sci-fi movie where batshit crazy happens.
Even if they'd made it an exact copy of the original it would still be completely groundbreaking.""
a redband trailer for a pg-13 movie? so like the only two utterances of "shit" in the entire movie and *maybe* a "fuck"? cursing won't save this trailer.
Someone posted this on facebook regarding the trailer and I completely agree:
""I may actually have been in tears about this... like, holy shit guys.
Actual women, being nerdy and awesome. Not sex objects, not classically beautiful, they are not meant to appeal to men. They are smart, geeky, nerds, flawed and human, not at all the "strong woman" stereotype. And they are heroes in a sci-fi movie where batshit crazy happens.
Even if they'd made it an exact copy of the original it would still be completely groundbreaking.""
Lucille Ball broke that barrier a long long time ago, lets not give a Ghost Busters remake too much credit.
Does not look good...looks like an also ran reboot where they try to hit all the same lines but in a slicker, faster presentation. Why bother.
Also it seems this will be a rallying cry for certain publications
http://io9.gizmodo.com/everything-we-learned-about-ghostbusters-from-its-trail-1762666819
"Its perfect"
http://www.theverge.com/2016/3/3/11153978/ghosbusters-paul-feig-sexism-pro-tips-for-beginners
A guide to telling your family if they disagree with this movie they are sexist
EDIT: And don't forget this is Sony so this thing will be touched so much in post production by execs it will be even worse.
Fun fact this trailer passed the bechdel test in almost every scene.
It's just a bad trailer, I think. I really think it's trying to appeal to people who wouldn't typically be interested in a Ghostbusters movie.
Lucille Ball broke that barrier a long long time ago, lets not give a Ghost Busters remake too much credit.
Let's wait until Hemsworth starts popping up more.
Fun fact this trailer passed the bechdel test in almost every scene.
Not sure if serious.
I liked the trailer for a second but the jokes (esp the end) fell really flat for me. It looks super generic, shit CGI, whatever comedy.
But wow looking through Twitter and seeing shit like this
"only people in feed who're 'meh" on Ghostbusters trailer are men; welcome to the sensation of a film that makes no effort to cater to you"
and
"men responding to last tweet w/"but the trailer just didn't excite me" again, welcome to a piece of media not catering to you"
Like uh, what? Are we dismissing generic comedy reboots just because of a female main cast? I don't know why those tweets irritated me so much. It's Sony pictures for goddsakes. I had the same reaction (a worse reaction) to the goosebumps trailers.
Fun fact this trailer passed the bechdel test in almost every scene.
Look, the movie looks fucking great. Did you miss the part where someone was wearing a silly hat? Or the joke about a machine being hot to the touch?I liked the trailer for a second but the jokes (esp the end) fell really flat for me. It looks super generic, shit CGI, whatever comedy.
But wow looking through Twitter and seeing shit like this
"only people in feed who're 'meh" on Ghostbusters trailer are men; welcome to the sensation of a film that makes no effort to cater to you"
and
"men responding to last tweet w/"but the trailer just didn't excite me" again, welcome to a piece of media not catering to you"
Like uh, what? Are we dismissing generic comedy reboots just because of a female main cast? I don't know why those tweets irritated me so much. It's Sony pictures for goddsakes. I had the same reaction (a worse reaction) to the goosebumps trailers.
Look, the movie looks fucking great. Did you miss the part where someone was wearing a silly hat? Or the joke about a machine being hot to the touch?
It's just a bad trailer, I think. I really think it's trying to appeal to people who wouldn't typically be interested in a Ghostbusters movie.
Have you been around since this was announced?
Viral tie in site discovered (actually contains the video I posted pages back about the tech)
http://www.paranormalstudieslab.com
Photos of the all the gear and even has schematics
![]()
![]()
At least two of those people were attractive. The one girl (the "best at physics"? one?) was basically just the attractive one in the trailer.Someone posted this on facebook regarding the trailer and I completely agree:
""I may actually have been in tears about this... like, holy shit guys.
Actual women, being nerdy and awesome. Not sex objects, not classically beautiful, they are not meant to appeal to men. They are smart, geeky, nerds, flawed and human, not at all the "strong woman" stereotype. And they are heroes in a sci-fi movie where batshit crazy happens.
Even if they'd made it an exact copy of the original it would still be completely groundbreaking.""