Escape Goat
Member
No. Spectacular.
Captain America: Civil War - Final Trailer
- Thread starter strafer
- Start date
- Status
No. Spectacular.
Thats what I theorized, considering masks tend to limit field of vision or cause distortions.
plagiarize
Banned
I hope they lamp shade it, but I'm not expecting to see much of *Peter* in this, just like Spidey shows up for a bit, but it doesn't really go into who he is. We shall see though.
I'm usually very optimistic about Spider-Man. I enjoyed Spidey 3 and both of the Amazing movies.
ShadowSwordmaster
Banned
I knew that those eyes reminded me of something...
It's a new age for spidey memes. This is but a taste of what's to come.
So in other words a comic-book where we can't actually hear the characters? In almost every animated/video game/film version he's sounded like a teenager in/out of the costume.
ScreenSplitter
Member
& Spidey talking smack had nothing to do with the pitch of his voice.
Anything to complain about really. When Garfield was doing his cringey flirting his voice went super-sonic. Same deal with Maguire actually.
BadAss2961
Member
Sounds like Spidey to me. It's the suit that's different for the sake of being different.
The arms and the boots are too industrial or something.
And on the other hand, people pissing their pants (not literally, obviously) over eyes and a belt. Its corporate pop mythology in the Internet age, it comes with the content.
brandonh83
Banned
The moving eyes are going places. Seriously. But that particular pic needs to be a gif and the line needs to pop up when the eyes close in.
plagiarize
Banned
No previous version of the character needed such optics. Why both know why they've done it, and it isn't to prevent glare (something regular none mechanical lenses can do just fine) or let him zoom in to see where to shoot his webs.
Tony zooms all the time in his suit. Where are his zoom lenses or whatever?
unholyrevenger72
Banned
Also, Black Panther and Deadpool's eyes are both CG.
1.I don't know what i'm looking at,
and 2 i said BP and DP's eye's work as CG but not Spidey's
MrCunningham
Member
I really want to see their justification for this
Black Widow is so out of place here. Everyone else can either fly, has power armor, is a genetically enhanced super soldier or can shoot fire out of their hands. But Black Widow... I guess she has a gun or something.
Otherwise, I do like the new Spide-Man costume, even if his voice doesn't fit at all.
Also worth noting that Ultimate Spider-Man dripped with villains hating Spider-Man because he was obviously an annoying fucking teenager.
PadWarrior
Member
Lol that's deep
This trailer is frying people's circuits. It's beautiful.
Vault Dweller 111
Member
Worst post in a thread full of terrible ones.
That is the lens for Spider-Man's eyes.
Sapiens
Member
Raimi's sensibility: "A man imbued with the power of a spider through a weird experiment is fine...but him making his own web shooters defies physics - I know, I'll make the web come out of his wrists - even though on real spiders, it comes out of their ass...whatever - delusional fans will defend me on the internet."
Brother, changing the way Spiderman's webshooters work is like not killing batman's parents. It denies a very certain part of the character's core identity. Sorry.
darkwing-buck
Member
IMO this is the GOAT movie spider suit already
TwoDurans
"Never said I wasn't a hypocrite."
GET OUT.
Are you serious?
Discotheque
Banned
yikes at that spiderman scene. he looks fantastic but they definitely should have ADR'd that voice again. it felt like a first take. very underwhelming energy.
but he looks great for sure (a bit too much like a toy tho) and i like the tone of this trailer. there's stakes here that i actually give a shit about.
but he looks great for sure (a bit too much like a toy tho) and i like the tone of this trailer. there's stakes here that i actually give a shit about.
Glad they went away from the glued on webs. Never liked that.
I think he said "On the roof".
Hawkeye is a super soldier or shoot fire out of his hands?
super-famicom
Member
UNDEROOS!
George Oscar Bluth II
Banned
I think it might be replaced for the final movie. It felt really placeholder/trailer line to me.
Glued on webs look like a pain in the ass to maintain.
plagiarize
Banned
It was part of his character. He spoke a specific way, for specific reasons. Including both his tone of voice and the wisecracking. It made him stand out as different because while there were other cocky superheroes, here was a kid only pretending to be that.
Peter talked like he thought a super hero was supposed to talk. It was a front.
You mean the ones that were criticized for being too static and lacking in expression when Spider-Man is meant to be a lively looking character and animated adaptions often had his mask expressively move with his facial expressions. Even comic panels have had his eyes widen or narrow to communicate more.
They decided they want the eyes to move on the costume, and they also decided they weren't going to do it like Deadpool's where they just move because it's a cartoonish sort of movie, they have them actually mechanically move in the mask. The end goal is moving eyes, but they'll have a reason in-universe made up for them, so what's the problem?
Lashley
Why does he wear the mask!?
As deep as my love for T'Challa.
It's merchandise directly tied to the film which this thread is about. Disney and Marvel gave TLG the OK to mass produce this set and send it to multiple retailers well before the release date. If they wanted to keep it a secret than they would have released the set after the film.
This is no different than someone posting a magazine cover that reveals a new bit of information that you didn't know before. The studio wants that info out in the open and if you want to avoid it you should not enter any thread about the film.
Anyways, this is OT.
TwoDurans
"Never said I wasn't a hypocrite."
Best possible way to introduce the MCU's first spandex.
BronsonLee
Member
Hahahahaha oh my god everyone would just leave
She's there to beat Hawkeye's ass like he owes her money.
AGAIN.
Nah it totally fits what they're going for, which is Spidey being a little bitch
Macadinho94
Member
Anyone notice when they were showing the Avengers the clips of New York, DC and Sokovia that it stated the damages in casualties and money?
unholyrevenger72
Banned
Not the one on the costume in the trailer.
That's a big heaping load of Buuuuuullshit.
I just saw a trailer breakdown that paused to show how many casualties were reported at each of the incidents the Avengers were being lectured about by Gen Ross.
New York: 74
Washington DC: 23
Sokovia: 177
That's really, really, ridiculously low. I'd maybe buy it for DC because the Helecarriers were heavily automated and went down over water but the New York number is just baffling.
I know this falls under the general problem of writers having no sense of scale but you have a full scale invasion of one of the most populated cities on Earth and less than a hundred people died? Why is anyone complaining about the Avengers? It is mind boggling that anyone would be giving them any shit if they managed to keep the casualty rate in double digits.
New York: 74
Washington DC: 23
Sokovia: 177
That's really, really, ridiculously low. I'd maybe buy it for DC because the Helecarriers were heavily automated and went down over water but the New York number is just baffling.
I know this falls under the general problem of writers having no sense of scale but you have a full scale invasion of one of the most populated cities on Earth and less than a hundred people died? Why is anyone complaining about the Avengers? It is mind boggling that anyone would be giving them any shit if they managed to keep the casualty rate in double digits.
OricWindstar
Member
I believe it was "Underoos".
- Status