"*Parity clause still in effect".They're probably waiting to see the small print.
I like how people assume sony will allow it.
really? I had no idea. what games?
There's no precedent for competing console cross-play MP, unless I'm mistaken. PS4 to PC is one thing, but have Sony ever explicitly said they would allow cross play with Xbox? Or Nintendo?
Happy to be corrected.
Cross-Network/Platform games on PS:
- Dreii - PlayStation 4, PS Vita, Wii U, PC, Mac, Linux, iOS and Android
- Pure Chess; Wii U, 3DS, iOS, Android and PS
- Cubemen 2; Wii U, Linux, Mac OS, PC and iOS.
I don't see why Sony would say no when they already allow cross play with every other platform.
I think Phil Spencer or Andrew House showing up on one or the other's stage for the press briefings at E3 could be easily one of the greatest moments ever in gaming history simply from the fanboy salt that would flow out of the internet.
To echo pretty much everyone else and other developers... it's Microsoft.
About 4 years ago, I was working for a publisher that was releasing a multi-platform online shooter for PC, PS3, and Xbox 360. The initial plan for the game included cross-platform servers and cross-platform play. Sony didn't care. Microsoft said no. They scrapped cross-platform play altogether since they were going to need separate servers for the Xbox anyway and it would be easier to just maintain 3 separate communities with our current tech than to develop new cross-platform server architecture and authentication system that only 2 of the platforms used. Plus, the publisher didn't want to piss off Microsoft by having cross-platform play be a feature of only PC and PS3.
I would not be surprised if this happens with a lot of other titles who want cross-platform play, but just don't want to bother with it if you still need to setup Microsoft with their own closed system.
So what happens when you're playing an online game and 2 people on PSN and Xbox Live have the same user name?
I think Phil Spencer or Andrew House showing up on one or the other's stage for the press briefings at E3 could be easily one of the greatest moments ever in gaming history simply from the fanboy salt that would flow out of the internet.
It'd work fine. Games are supposed to use your internal network ID for tracking and not the display name, anyway, because on Xbox your game is (supposed) to handle the gamertag being changed, same with Steam.
I like how people assume sony will allow it.
Out of all the concerns in this thread this is the most legit one lol.So what happens when you're playing an online game and 2 people on PSN and Xbox Live have the same user name?
So what happens when you're playing an online game and 2 people on PSN and Xbox Live have the same user name?
I think Phil Spencer or Andrew House showing up on one or the other's stage for the press briefings at E3 could be easily one of the greatest moments ever in gaming history simply from the fanboy salt that would flow out of the internet.
So what happens when you're playing an online game and 2 people on PSN and Xbox Live have the same user name?
They're probably waiting to see the small print.
MS is kicking open the console doors. Good to see this generation is really starting to innovate.
So what happens when you're playing an online game and 2 people on PSN and Xbox Live have the same user name?
Now console wars can actually happen on... consoles.
Isn't color better used to distinguish teams?One highlights blue and the other green.
No point at all for Sony to do fantasy scenario like that. It would benefit MS way more than Sony. What people don't understand about this? Let me give you another example....it's not directly related to the OP but it's what im referring to in my posts of the past couple pages, about how there's so much mind games and underlying neurotic manipulation going on with this type of things. The example: When Phil Spencer compliments Sony, Playstation, a specific game or what have you...he doesn't just do it b/c he's trying to be unbiased and noble. He does it b/c Xbox is gettin there ass kicked to the moon. If the sides were switched and Xbox was winning, Phil wouldnt say a word. But that's not the case so he and other MS ppl drop little nuggets of amicability to the competitor to get good will their way. Look at how many threads have been made for those type of things where Phil says something nice about the competition....IT'S NOT B/C HE WANTS TO BE NICE AND AMICABLE, it's b/c MS is getting their ass whooped.I think Phil Spencer or Andrew House showing up on one or the other's stage for the press briefings at E3 could be easily one of the greatest moments ever in gaming history simply from the fanboy salt that would flow out of the internet.
It's a win win for MS and a lose lose for Sony.Sony does; they risk major benefit to MS. Sony doesn't; they look bad.
So what happens when you're playing an online game and 2 people on PSN and Xbox Live have the same user name?
It's a win win for MS and a lose lose for Sony.
It'd work fine. Games are supposed to use your internal network ID for tracking and not the display name, anyway, because on Xbox your game is (supposed) to handle the gamertag being changed, same with Steam.
It's a win win for MS and a lose lose for Sony.
Then...well played?
Let the PR spokesman worry about it, for now this is a potentially good move for all consumers
You're right...it would be good for all of us. I just wanted to delve into (what i think) intentions could be.Then...well played?
Let the PR spokesman worry about it, for now this is a potentially good move for all consumers
If most people are buying PS4 & it start a snowball effect where others buy it because they want to play against their friends & you're the company that's getting the bad end of the stick why wouldn't you make this move to get yourself in on the benefits of people buying PS4s?
I wouldn't be as certain. There's less benefit for them than there is for Nintendo and Microsoft.I have no doubt Sony will allow it, if they not already do, that is.
If Nintendo wants to attract 3rd parties (and a lot of gamers playing these games on THEIR platform), it's their hand which is forced right now.
lol I know right? Wtf is going on there lately?Damn, it's like the exact opposite of what people would expect from MS.
Keep the surprises coming.
I see people mentioning SFV. How can they cross play with a Xbone version that doesn't exist ? Will Microsoft help funding the future Xbone version ?
While I am not completely disagreeing, how does this benefit MSFT unless there was a financial catch?
It would benefit MS way more than Sony. What people don't understand about this?
Steam makes the second person of the same name that joined the server have a 1 but their name and so on. Either that or simply putting the system icon next to their name.So what happens when you're playing an online game and 2 people on PSN and Xbox Live have the same user name?
Wasn't the NX already supposed to do this?
And this is why we can't have nice things. I'm sure there is something we can blame MS for in this announcement. I'm sure people will see their evilness in all of this.
FFS /s
For me it's great to see MS putting out great ideas to evolve what console gaming is for the better, but I totally HATE and it bothers me how many people still keep attacking them and calling shit out when they are doing good things for gaming. I'm sure only when Sony 'comes around' if that ever happens they will see it as a good thing overall and not MS trying to fool us with some secret scheme.
I see people mentioning SFV. How can they cross play with a Xbone version that doesn't exist ? Will Microsoft help funding the future Xbone version ?
Nintendo has allowed cross-network play since the Wii. Microsoft is the last to join the party.