Super Tuesday 4. I'm really feeling (The After Bern) March 22, 26 contests

Status
Not open for further replies.

NeoXChaos

Member
Republicans

American Somoa-9
Arizona-58
Utah-40
Democrats

Arizona-75
Utah-33
Idaho-23

Saturday March 26th

Washington-101
Hawaii-25
Alaska-16


Arizona as Oblivia

xenoblade_oblivia.jpg


Idaho as Dodonga Caravan

350


Utah as Sylvalum
latest


Alaska as Valek Mountain

latest


Hawaii as Noctilum

2qTZPcR.jpg


Washington(state) as Primordia

maxresdefault.jpg
 
Every time I feel a pang of guilt about not going to the Idaho Caucus tonight, I'm reminded that our 23 delegates aren't worth shit.
 
Woke up at 6am in order to get my PSVR pre-order in and Vote before work this morning. I managed to accomplish both. Since there are apparently only 3 polling places for my area of Phoenix the line was absolutely ridiculously long at 8am.

But I got my Vote in for Hillary and still got to work on time.
 
Arizona and maybe Hawaii goes to Hillary while the communist usurper picks up everything else right?

That's a pretty good assumption, ya. A slight Bernie win in Arizona is more damaging to him than a Bernie blowout is to Hillary.

http://demrace.com/

If anyone wants to play with delegate allocations, here's a site that makes it easy to do. It's still rough, but it's easier than the method I've been using.

Interestingly, Bernie can win every single state from now to the end by 20% (except Cali and NY where he can win by 15%) and Hillary will still have more pledged delegates.
 
Gonna caucus for Hillary in Utah tonight. My first time being involved in the Presidential voting process.

I expect 10 people there altogether.
 
Has there been any recent polls for today's states? I don't remember seeing anything.

Not too recent. The last AZ poll had Hillary up 50 to 24 with a large amount of undecideds. In Idaho, the most recent poll was at the end of Feb that had Bernie up 47/45. The most recent poll of Utah was a Bernie lead 52/44.

Conventional wisdom would tell us that Arizona should be a Hillary win, and the two caucus states should go to Bernie. He needs to win all three by close to 60% of the vote to still be (loosely) still in this thing. If he wins both caucuses, but loses AZ, because of how the delegates are allocated, Hillary will probably wipe out his gains or increase her lead.
 
My Predicktions

GOP
American Somoa Trump
Arizona Trump
Utah Cruz

Democrats
Arizona Clinton
Utah Sanders
Idaho Sanders

*Hillary will still net a bigger gain in total combined Delegates because Arizona is so much bigger LOL
 
What average margin does Bernie Sanders need to win by for each state going forward again? Was it 12%?

I think Hillary is going to come out ahead tonight.
Could've swore 20% was the number being thrown around in the last thread. Well, this is it though, Bernie's true (last) last stand. Gonna be following this thread all night to see how it goes.
 
I don't understand the OP at all. =/ I feel out of the loop.

My predictions: Sanders will win Idaho and Utah by a large margin tonight. He'll either very narrowly win Arizona or very narrowly lose. Basically, the difference will be small.

Washington will overwhelmingly go Sanders. Hawaii...I'm torn on. Could see it going Clinton.

To answer the earlier question, Sanders needs 57% of all remaining delegates to lead Hillary in time for convention.
 
What average margin does Bernie Sanders need to win by for each state going forward again? Was it 12%?

I think Hillary is going to come out ahead tonight.

He would need to win every single state and territory with 58-60% of the delegate allocation from here on out because of proportional representation. He cannot afford a single loss or a single close race from here on out.
 
This OP makes no sense. Can someone decipher it into normal people speak?

Let me sum up. Buttercup is marry Humperdinck in little less than half an hour. So all we have to do is get in, break up the wedding, steal the princess, make our escape... after we vote for Bernie.
 
I think both camps will be able to spin this.

Sanders we took more states

Clinton either gained more delegates or made delegate math more difficult for sanders
 
I don't understand the OP at all. =/ I feel out of the loop.

My predictions: Sanders will win Idaho and Utah by a large margin tonight. He'll either very narrowly win Arizona or very narrowly lose. Basically, the difference will be small.

.

Are we wish-casting? What aboutArizona shows a sanders win?
 
Basically, Hillary has the ball, the two minute warning just happened, Bernie has no time outs left. Hillary just needs to run out the clock. Bernie is berning through money like crazy, and the upcoming media markets are going to be hellish for him.

Add to that most of the upcoming contests, specifically New York and Pennsylvania are closed primaries where the registration deadline is about to pass (before he opened his offices in the states) and his up hill climb is nearly impossible. Plus, in NY, independents who were already registered had to change their party affiliation by last October.
 
Intrigued to see how this goes and to see whether Sander's support is down a bit after his recent losses
 
Some early voting numbers from Arizona on the Dem side.

There were 320,209 early votes cast.

60% came from women. 15% came from Latino voters.

18-24 year olds made up 4%
25-34 year olds made up 8%
35-44 year olds made up 9% .
45-54 year olds made up 12%
55-64 year olds made up 21%
65-74 year olds made up 25%
75+ made up 18%.
 
Find it funny that Somoa has 9 delegates when like, 500 people will vote.

It's not strictly based on population, although that's part of it. States with similar electoral votes are not awarded the same delegate allocations.

Puerto Rico, for example, has 60 delegates, which, based on population, is pretty large.
 
Some early voting numbers from Arizona on the Dem side.

There were 320,209 early votes cast.

60% came from women. 15% came from Latino voters.

18-24 year olds made up 4%
25-34 year olds made up 8%
35-44 year olds made up 9% .
45-54 year olds made up 12%
55-64 year olds made up 21%
65-74 year olds made up 25%
75+ made up 18%.

That's really bad for Sanders. His strongest group was only 12%.

I expect it to be a wash for the primary day as a whole. Clinton gains in AZ are nullified by Sanders gains in UT and ID.
 
That's really bad for Sanders. His strongest group was only 12%.

I expect it to be a wash for the primary day as a whole. Clinton gains in AZ are nullified by Sanders gains in UT and ID.

It's definitely not good. I also read reports that Bernie's people have really only been in the ground for the last 10 days or so. What ground organization he had was very disorganized. Hillary's been there for months. Bernie's been throwing money at all three states. Problem is, that's not a substitute, as we saw when he outspent Hillary in all 5 of the states on last Tuesday and he lost every one of them.

If Hillary has a great night, she could probably net 5-6 delegates. If Bernie has a great night, he can keep it a wash, probably.
 
I don't see much change on the democratic side. I'm imagining it'll be a wash at the end of the day
 
They haven't so far. Fox News, CNN and MSNBC has been terrorist attacks stuff. I was checking throughout the day, and its been this.

Well, there are no exit polls because two are caucuses and AZ has some odd law that makes it harder, so there's nothing to cover yet.

MSNBC said that they would be doing a split screen of the election and the terror attack.
 
This OP makes no sense. Can someone decipher it into normal people speak?

some time state has thing were u vote
pick person you lik
if like trump rite TRUMP
make america great again

today is 22 in march and some state like Utah and other one has thing were u vote

if u win vote u get points witch u need to win president

but even if win presidnet... you need 2 win new vote with only 2 ppl???? in novembe???
 
Are we wish-casting? What aboutArizona shows a sanders win?

Arizona has one of the lowest African American populations of any state in the country, 4.1%, which is half that of Nevada (8.1%), and almost a third of Texas (11.8%).
AZ has ~3% more Non-Hispanic Whites (57.8%) than Nevada (54.1%), and 12% more than Texas (45.3%).
Bernie has 4% more of the Facebook likes among the Democratic candidates in Arizona (76.6%) than he did in Nevada (72.7%%), and 10% more than in Texas (66.6%). This is almost as much as he had in Kansas (78%) and also more than he had in Massachusetts (74.5%) and Oklahoma (75%).
Arizona is also a closed primary, just like Massachusetts and Oklahoma, which doesn’t help Hillary Clinton as much* as open primaries do (edit: for the reason outlined in my previous post that I made a few days ago).
Arizona is also a younger state, with a median age of 36.9, which is to Hillary’s detriment.
Bernie, at this time, has 1.8 the relative search interest on Google than Hillary (a three day average). This is among the highest relative interest measure he has ever achieved of all the states so far. It is greater than Colorado (1.79) and Minnesota (1.55), and far greater than Nevada (1.51), Texas (1.32), and many other states.

Just stuff like this. Only coming form a single statician though.

Being slightly more white, slightly less black, and on average much younger than other states. That bodes well for Sanders.

Latino community? Not so much. We'll see where their vote is tossed.
 
Just stuff like this. Only coming form a single statician though.

Being slightly more white, slightly less black, and on average much younger than other states. That bodes well for Sanders.

Latino community? Not so much. We'll see where their vote is tossed.

Arizona has one of the lowest African American populations of any state in the country, 4.1%, which is half that of Nevada (8.1%), and almost a third of Texas (11.8%).
AZ has ~3% more Non-Hispanic Whites (57.8%) than Nevada (54.1%), and 12% more than Texas (45.3%).
Bernie has 4% more of the Facebook likes among the Democratic candidates in Arizona (76.6%) than he did in Nevada (72.7%%), and 10% more than in Texas (66.6%). This is almost as much as he had in Kansas (78%) and also more than he had in Massachusetts (74.5%) and Oklahoma (75%).
Arizona is also a closed primary, just like Massachusetts and Oklahoma, which doesn’t help Hillary Clinton as much* as open primaries do (edit: for the reason outlined in my previous post that I made a few days ago).
Arizona is also a younger state, with a median age of 36.9, which is to Hillary’s detriment.
Bernie, at this time, has 1.8 the relative search interest on Google than Hillary (a three day average). This is among the highest relative interest measure he has ever achieved of all the states so far. It is greater than Colorado (1.79) and Minnesota (1.55), and far greater than Nevada (1.51), Texas (1.32), and many other states.


giphy.gif
 
Just stuff like this. Only coming form a single statician though.

Being slightly more white, slightly less black, and on average much younger than other states. That bodes well for Sanders.

Latino community? Not so much. We'll see where their vote is tossed.

Tyler is not a statistician. He's a person who got very lucky with his projection in Michigan, and pretty much shit the bed after that.(and before that, to be honest). His model, from what he's released ,made no sense at all, and rests too heavily on things like Facebook likes and reTweets.

Some of what he's saying is factually inaccurate. Closed primaries hurt Bernie, not Hillary. Independents cannot vote in a closed primary. Arizona is also the 10th in the number of people over the age of 65. That age group heavily favors Hillary.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom