Batman v Superman Spoiler Thread: Don't believe everything you read, Son

Status
Not open for further replies.

I'm not going to go back and forth after I dissect your review because I'm tired and nothing will really convince you anyways;

Ok Bronson, here it is. My review.

I have been pondering this thing since I saw it and the more I think about it, the less I like it. BvS was a really depressing film, in spite of all the hype it had coming into things. BvS really just felt like a combination of multiple scripts, each alone could have been ok but together was just a mess. Let's start at the beginning:

Opening message from Snyder: He looked so disheveled and beaten, he looked like he was like, "Well guys, here it is. Enjoy...I guess." His demeanor was so subdued, it was weird. Like he wasn't overly excited about the movie he turned in...based on that I had a feeling we were in for something.

Movie starts after no trailers (A+ choice!). Intro was standard Batmang origin fare with the Comedian as his father...whatever, cool. The next 15 minutes or so were great. The action of Metropolis being destroyed through Bruce Wayne's eyes. (though I have no idea why Bruce's dude on the leadership team evacuated the building, only to stay up there to die?!?) Wat.

Anyway, that stuff was good, set the table for Batman/Bruce to hate Superman. Perfect. Then the other scene in the opening. The Superman in the desert nonsense. What a confusing scene. Lois is there, i guess to get an interview with a local warlord, but there's some independent contractors there too for a double cross and Superman gets called in as a care package...I still have no fucking idea what the point of that scene was...to frame Superman or whatever...idk, it was dreadful.
There were multiple elements at play here. Lex was securing the kryptonite, I think Lois was doing a piece on the war (not hard to believe, she's a war journalist), and it made people question Superman's role in the world after a false accusation came out that he killed all the soldiers.
Movie moves on and we are introduced to Lex Luthor, who presumably runs a Google like tech company. He is wasting his time scheming and plotting over changing topics throughout the film. I think one of the reviewers said it, he felt like a combination of Joker (from the Batmang script) and Lex from the Man Of Steel 2 script. I liked Lex well enough but his motivations were odd and seemed misplaced a lot of the movie. I was hoping for a Lex that was going to take the loss in Metropolis to openly position himself as the savior that the world should turn to, post Metropolis, .i.e. he helps rebuild, pours a ton of money and "good will" making his case...as I wrote awhile ago in my thoughts for MoS2:
I agree, he was a little too dramatic at points. It seemed less about bringing Lex up in the public, and more about Lex proving his point that god can't be all powerful and good at the same time, presumably because of his upbringing. He also obviously viewed people with contempt, I think he feels threatened by Superman's presence, one of the few people that could challenge his position in the world.
Diana Prince is introduced at a party that Bruce Wayne is going to to try and get information on whatever Lex is up to so he can get the Kryptonite to stop Clark and whatever. What a wasted opportunity this was for Diana to really assert herself more than basically becoming Selina Kyle and one upping Bruce for the McGuffin. I felt that Wonder Woman as a whole was horribly misused in this film. My SO said the same. She hated the way she was protrayed, especially the crotch shot at the end during the fight with...ok, back to what I was saying. She was sorely underused.
I would have loved to see WW used more but she was the second or third main plot thread, which was that metahumans exist. I liked her mannerisms and I thought she had a few clever scenes, outwitting Bruce. She seemed fully capable, and not just some eye candy.
Bruce Wayne/Batmang was hit and miss. They tried really hard to make him the brooding Dark Knight we all know and love but in a movie trying to do so much, there simply isn't enough time to get the setup all in without forcing it. They have a scene where he is hunting some goon or whatever with a presumable human trafficking operation. It isn't enough to build him up and the world of the DCCU seems oblivious to his existence, even though Gotham has a fucking Bat signal AND they mention that for 20 years they have been fighting in Gotham. Long enough to lose Robin and become a weathered old man. It's inconsistent and constantly feels off. The action with him was great but his breaking of the "no kill" rule so blatantly was extremely off-putting. Most of that action could have happened without guns on the Batmobile and flatout murders...oh well...Scar as Alfred was great.
The killing was part of his character development.The central theme for the movie was "There's no good men left", that included Batman himself. I didn't really see anything contradictory with Man of Steel, he's a vigilante and not a meta human, I don't know why comparisons between him and Superman would arise, especially since Superman wasn't a hero at that point, it was essentially his first day, the world didn't know he existed..
Superman...wow...ok. where do I start? He doesn't feel like Superman at all, and certainly not like a Superman in a post Metropolis world. He isn't introspective at all. He cost the world thousands of lives and even if it was collateral damage, he doesn't seem moved by it. The first we see him, he is driving an African warlord through a wall. Where is the reflection? A missed opportunity....what might have been is, having the film open with Superman in the north, in solitude. Maybe this is where you work in the scene with Pa Kent's ghost. Perhaps, the narrative is while he works a day job at the planet trying to move on, he spends his alone time in the fortress broken by the guilt of what he let happen. He still does a save or two, but he is having a hard time coping with the loss he was part of causing...i'll put the fanfic to the side for a bit and come back to it later...Superman feels inconsistent with the world he lives in. He finally comes to Capitol Hill and is once again, powerless to stop the loss of tons of people. The explosion scene was weird and did less to solidify Superman's eventual redemption. The only time it is even brought up, is on Lois' patio and he is sulking, not emotionally broken. As a Christ analog, it was so weird seeing him perform this way. When doing saves in this film, Superman seems so blah about doing any of it. The Dia De Los Muertes scene showed it all. Resigned to a fate of helping people...that isn't the Superman I know or even the one introduced in MoS.
His core conflict was brought on by Scoot's character, whether or not the world needed a Superman. Superman was under the impression that he was causing more harm than helping by Scoot's appearance and points (remember, Zod was drawn to Earth by Superman's existence), which was reinforced when the bomb exploded and he was too naive to have prevented it. The world is proven to need a Superman later on when Doomsday appears out of man's creation, rather than an external threat.
The fight between Batmang and Supermang. It felt sooooo hamfisted and corny. "I have your mother, haha. You will work for me now, hahaha." Ugh. It was Lex's master stroke but it didn't land for me. It could have been a great scene but it all came together so clunky. The movie showed its hand by showing Martha get kidnapped, thereby showing the audience what Supes doesn't know. So the surprise is awful because we know the card that Lex is about to play. Maybe that scene plays stronger if she is taken off screen and we are surprised along with Superman...
The only thing I disliked about the fight was Superman's shove on Batman. It still felt like there was room for dialog. Forcing Superman's hand makes sense, he was never suppose to outright hate Batman, he never intended to apprehend him violently. He first tried the presses and Perry didn't want to run with it, so he threatened Batman in person, finally being forced by Lex (again trying to prove that great power isn't always innocent) to kill Batman. Superman was always the good guy in this film, there isn't suppose to be a morally grey reason for why he wants to fight Batman. He felt the brandings were wrong and wanted to stop him peacefully.
The fight is bad and forced since they had to accelerate the hatred between Bats and Supes. The "Lex said I gotta kill ya!" crap made it feel even more unnecessary. It was a bad premise. Batman using Kryptonite vapor instead of the stone was another misstep by this movie. I know they wanted him to appear clever but it was a bit wasted. Also, what I THOUGHT they were doing was, Batman mixed the Krypotonite with Scarecrow's fear toxin. Batmang started monologuing about Fear and shit and I was like, "Oh shit, this is COOL!" Nope. Just words.

BTW, I totes called that gas plot point.
This is more about expectations than actual results. Batman's plan was solid enough, I don't see any issue with it.
Superman just got owned in that fight and never really had the upper hand and...OH! That reminds me, the armor that Mang wore. I was hoping it was going to be constructed using the Zod armor (to explain it being able to absorb a Supes strike) but nope, it is just powerful because Batmang made it awesome. Missed opportunity once again.
He was pretty much wrecking him until the gas shot, even after that he got a few good shots in
Doomsday was just a 3rd act plot point so I won't address him much. I will address the events around him. Why Batman took off that armor is beyond me. My SO leaned over and asked, "Why isn't he wearing the armor anymore?" I had no answer.
It was literally wrecked, half his face was torn off, he was flying in a jet and it would have been pointess. He never intended to face doomsday in h2h combat, and even if he did, he'd probably would be fucked just by one punch from him without him being affected by kryptonite. Speed would have been more beneficial in this case as we can see him dodging doomsday's attack.
Why did Lois throw the blade in the water? Why didn't Wonder Woman take the challenge to stab Doomsday, seeing as how she is just as strong and not vulnerable to Kryptonite? Superman, decides on a whim, that he needs to self sacrifice, just like Pa Kent, for...uh, reasons. He looking for a redemption that is unearned...which hooks into the fanfic I scribed earlier on. If this movie had established that Clark was in search of redemption throughout the film, and Doomsday posed an immediate threat to thousands of people (like Zod did)...that would have felt earned. That in that moment, he makes the ultimate sacrifice because he doesn't want the loss of millions on his hands as the loss of thousands already are. He could have said as much!
More of an issue of convenience, Superman probably didn't want to risk another Doomsday supernova if he had waited for WW to pick it up, she also is unable to fly and we really don't know (neither does Superman) how strong she is.
I guess that is my biggest issue with this film. Nothing felt earned. Lex's place in the world. Batman/Superman's fight. Wonder Woman's decision to get off the plane and help. Superman's redemption. Because it felt like they were trying to do so much world building in 2 hours and 40 minutes, nothing was fully baked.
I agree the film could have used less plot threads, but ultimately I felt like the result was understandable and the themes were paid off by the end.
All the minor fuckery like the videos of the other JLers and Batmang's email to Wonder Woman and what not has been covered to death so I won't.

There was some good in it. LOVED the soundtrack (I like the Batman theme a lot) and the action as always with Snyder, was top notch. The Batmobile chase scene and the Martha rescue in particular was excellent.

All in all, I was disappointed more than anything else. Had this movie been Man Of Steel 2 or Batman Reboot, it could have been solid. As mutation of both, it fell flat.

I'd give it a C.

Although I disagree with some of your points, I do feel like there could have been some changes that made the film much smoother. There was nothing really wrong with the plot, just the way it was conveyed.
 
Aquaman stared at that camera for twenty seconds. He should know what a camera is. He should've look at it for two seconds just so we get a glimpse of what he looks like then the cool camera smack.

Instead it was like "look, it's Jason Momoa! Don't you remember this guy from Game of Thrones? Pretty fucking cool right. He's got nice tattoos and apparently is too stupid to realize he's being filmed. You got a close enough look yet? No. Okay. How's your day been? You should try the new sandwich joint in downtown, the chicken club is damn good. Oh so you've finished taking in Game of Throne's Jason Momoa as Aquaman? Great. Now we can cut away."

lol

I really wish he handed Lois the spear from deep in the water , or saved her, would have been amazing
 
Im pretty sure Poodlestrikewatched a completely different movie then everybody else...

Perhaps he got the special 30+ minutes ultimate cut? lol

Or, alternatively, y'all just suck at this whole "watching movies" business. Seriously, this is pretty obvious stuff if you were actually paying attention the whole way through, which is tough in parts because again, the editing in the front half is ROUGH.
 
So is there more than one Flash? I don't watch the TV series, but the guy in the movie didn't look like the guy in the ads I see.
 
You took the words off my tongue. This is what I say the movie has a Good story, it works, it makes sense. I just feel it wasn't communicated clearly enough. You and I, as fans, get this..

No True Fan...

LOL

It's NOT a mutual change of heart. It's what starts Batman on the last part of his arc. Superman is already there.

And you're being crazy conservative with the definition of relationship here. Is how two people perceive each other not a relationship? Batman comes to the realization that he's terribly wrong about, well, everything in that moment, that moment where he realizes that he was wrong about Clark, about his development, about what kind of person he is, or that he's a person at all. It's not even that their mothers have the same name, it's the sheer shock of the moment, hearing his mother's name on his enemy's lips, pleading with him to save her.

And then he does. Which idk, I'd call rendering assistance.

Dude, you're not gonna convince me that they told a story that had Bruce and Clark have a meaningful arch that allows but them and us the audience to care when Supes makes the ultimate sacrifice.

I have seen tons of stories where Bruce genuinely cares about Clark and you know what? It didn't get there in one story.

It never does.
 
Oh god the metahuman email, I love it so much.

There was dramatic scrolling of Bruce Wayne's text to Wonder Woman. Also the fact that we finds out about metahumans from

A

freaking

e-mail
 
Can't wait for Darkseid to job to a smoke grenade thrown by Batman.

This does its foreshadowing well, even if it's a mess of a film
Imagine them doing Final Crisis

"But for you I'm making a once in a lifetime exception. A gun and a bullet, Darkseid. It was your idea"

Except that scene would lose any meaning because these writers DO NOT GIVE A FUCK
 
Alternate future Flash. Superman goes off the edge when his mother is killed. He says Lois is the key but then says he's gone back too far, so that's to do with a future plot.

No I think it has to do with Lois dying, because he said "she was his world". When he give Batman that MK fatality I think he said "she was my world and you took her from me"
 
this was a bad movie. a bad, bad movie.

+ batfleck was good. i'd be a-ok with him helming a standalone batman movie with him in the title role
+ jeremy irons was a great alfred
+ i had my doubts about gal gadot when she was first cast, but she was a great wonder woman

- everything else. the pacing, the editing, the plot, cavill was pretty bad as supes, eisenberg was a zanier zuckerberg as luther, the 30 second montage of "meta-humans" was a really dumb way of trying to introduce those characters, the nightmare sequences were silly and confusing, the pa kent sequence was wtf, the fights were boring.

that's the worst thing. i was fighting to stay awake. how do you make subject matter like this boring?

oh and that whole thing about bats not killing superman because their moms had the same name was the dumbest fucking thing i've ever seen. oh bro our moms are both named martha, im not even angry at you anymore, lets be best bros!
 
Holy cow. My expectations were astronomically low after Man of Steel and the reviews started hitting, but somehow it ended up being worse than imagined. Truly incredible, and an achievement in its own right.
 
Dude, you're not gonna convince me that they told a story that had Bruce and Clark have a meaningful arch that allows but them and us the audience to care when Supes makes the ultimate sacrifice.

I have seen tons of stories where Bruce genuinely cares about Clark and you know what? It didn't get there in one story.

It never does.

Okay, uh, that's not what you asked for, though? You asked me to demonstrate that the relationship between the characters went through a clearly defined positive arc in the movie. I did.

Pls stopping running the goalposts. I'm tired, it's late.
 
The whole Flash sequence was just Snyder throwing in a reference without actual context as a future tease. Or like the nuke thing which was pretty unnecessary, or just copying lines from the comics that sound cool.

The lightning flash recreating the cover was a natural homage that actually worked.

So is there more than one Flash? I don't watch the TV series, but the guy in the movie didn't look like the guy in the ads I see.

The TV show is completely separate.

lol

I really wish he handed Lois the spear from deep in the water , or saved her, would have been amazing

YES. I wanted him to show up there. Just give Lois the spear with a wink.
 
this was a bad movie. a bad, bad movie.

the 30 second montage of "meta-humans" was a really dumb way of trying to introduce those characters

oh and that whole thing about bats not killing superman because their moms had the same name was the dumbest fucking thing i've ever seen. oh bro our moms are both named martha, im not even angry at you anymore, lets be best bros!

These two things right here annoyed the hell out of me.
 
oh and that whole thing about bats not killing superman because their moms had the same name was the dumbest fucking thing i've ever seen. oh bro our moms are both named martha, im not even angry at you anymore, lets be best bros!

moms are clutch, they are the key to the world

moms <3
 
this was a bad movie. a bad, bad movie.

+ batfleck was good. i'd be a-ok with him helming a standalone batman movie with him in the title role
+ jeremy irons was a great alfred
+ i had my doubts about gal gadot when she was first cast, but she was a great wonder woman

- everything else. the pacing, the editing, the plot, cavill was pretty bad as supes, eisenberg was a zanier zuckerberg as luther, the 30 second montage of "meta-humans" was a really dumb way of trying to introduce those characters, the nightmare sequences were silly and confusing, the pa kent sequence was wtf, the fights were boring.

that's the worst thing. i was fighting to stay awake. how do you make subject matter like this boring?

oh and that whole thing about bats not killing superman because their moms had the same name was the dumbest fucking thing i've ever seen. oh bro our moms are both named martha, im not even angry at you anymore, lets be best bros!

WHY DID YOU SAY THAT NAME?!

Reminded me of WHERE IS THE TRIGGER?!
 
Alternate future Flash. Superman goes off the edge when his mother is killed. He says Lois is the key but then says he's gone back too far, so that's to do with a future plot.
It was hilarious. Here's flash, coming from the future, giving Batman a warning but takes it back because he went too far into the past.

It was so bloody ridiculous. Are you seriously telling us the first time we see Flash is when he fucks up?
 
Did anyone catch the GL references? Heard Ferris mentioned once but that's it and I think that was someone in the army called Ferris.

Snippets of other heroes were nicely done.

Was that a motherbox putting Cyborg together?

We don't know, his new 52 origin has New genesis technology though.

Jimmy is in the film (credits), don't know if he was the CIA guy though.

Another Smallville veteran too :P

Was Jena Malone credited to? I didn't stick around for the credits. He could be in the extended edition.
 
Y'know for how much editing there is between scenes and it constantly switching characters, I was never lost on the story.

People seem to be bashing the pacing and structure of the movie just cause there's a lot of brief scenes cut between each other for the sake of editing and not because it actually disrupts everything. I honestly didn't disrupt the flow much for me.

I'm not saying the pacing was anywhere great, but with what the movie had to accomplish in just 2 and a half hours, I'm surprised the story wasn't completely convoluted and unintelligible.
 
It was hilarious. Here's flash, coming from the future, giving Batman a warning but takes it back because he went too far into the past.

It was so bloody ridiculous. Are you seriously telling us the first time we see Flash is when he fucks up?
tbf he's confirmed to be JL's comic relief
 
Did any of you click that the guy working on cyborg was the guy who was working on the terminator arm and chip in terminator 2 ?

:D

Clever cast ? Bit of fun ? heh
 
this was a bad movie. a bad, bad movie.

+ batfleck was good. i'd be a-ok with him helming a standalone batman movie with him in the title role
+ jeremy irons was a great alfred
+ i had my doubts about gal gadot when she was first cast, but she was a great wonder woman

- everything else. the pacing, the editing, the plot, cavill was pretty bad as supes, eisenberg was a zanier zuckerberg as luther, the 30 second montage of "meta-humans" was a really dumb way of trying to introduce those characters, the nightmare sequences were silly and confusing, the pa kent sequence was wtf, the fights were boring.

that's the worst thing. i was fighting to stay awake. how do you make subject matter like this boring?

oh and that whole thing about bats not killing superman because their moms had the same name was the dumbest fucking thing i've ever seen. oh bro our moms are both
named martha, im not even angry at you anymore, lets be best bros!

But...

That's not what happened.

He can clearly barely hear Clark the first time he says the name, all he catches is Martha which leaves him shook because Batman is a man stuck repeating the worst day of his life on a fairly regular basis. This opens him up emotionally in a way he wasn't previously.

Y'know for how much editing there is between scenes and it constantly switching characters, I was never lost on the story.

People seem to be bashing the pacing and structure of the movie just cause there's a lot of brief scenes cut between each other for the sake of editing and not because it actually disrupts everything. I honestly didn't disrupt the flow much for me.

I'm not saying the pacing was anywhere great, but with what the movie had to accomplish in just 2 and a half hours, I'm surprised the story wasn't completely convoluted and unintelligible.

The pacing is pretty clearly a huge culprit here. People lost interest or lost track during the rapid cuts, which lead to them tuning out during important scenes.
 
Dude, you're not gonna convince me that they told a story that had Bruce and Clark have a meaningful arch that allows but them and us the audience to care when Supes makes the ultimate sacrifice.

I have seen tons of stories where Bruce genuinely cares about Clark and you know what? It didn't get there in one story.

It never does.
The movie didn't intend for them to have a meaningful relationship. He relates to Superman because he has parents he's lost or will lose. The context doesn't come from direct interaction; the movie reiterates the theme with Bruce himself, and the little girl from the intro.

"I'm a friend of your son." was a pretty awesome line though.

I am completely confident that a few World's Finest movies can exist between Cavill and Affleck.
 
But...

That's not what happened.

He can clearly barely hear Clark the first time he says the name, all he catches is Martha which leaves him shook because Batman is a man stuck repeating the worst day of his life on a fairly regular basis. This opens him up emotionally in a way he wasn't previously.



The pacing is pretty clearly a huge culprit here. People lost interest or lost track during the rapid cuts, which lead to them tuning out during important scenes.

So he is The Punisher
 
Honestly, I read some of these critiques having seen it, and it's like people watched a completely different movie.

If this was bad, then I don't think we even have a word for Age of Ultron. AoU made BvS look like Casablanca.
 
Did anyone else see a different LEGO Batman trailer than the one currently online? Cause I saw one that was Batman talking to Alfred about all his incarnations. But I can't find it on YouTube.

We don't know, his new 52 origin has New genesis technology though.



Was Jena Malone credited to? I didn't stick around for the credits. He could be in the extended edition.

I was specifically looking for Jena Malone's name, but didn't see it.
 
Okay, uh, that's not what you asked for, though? You asked me to demonstrate that the relationship between the characters went through a clearly defined positive arc in the movie. I did.

Pls stopping running the goalposts. I'm tired, it's late.

Tell me, in detail, how they developed the single relationship in this movie that needed to be developed (Bruce Wayne and Clark Kent) in a meaningful, way that earned the loss/sacrifice at the film's end.

That was the most important thing they needed to nail and overwhelming, people have come away feeling like that didn't work at all.

Then, I went into detail as to what I meant. The relationship that they have going from enemy, to skeptical, to friend, to brothers. You know, a natural relationship that you would expect Bruce and Clark to go through on their way to becoming World's Finest?!?!? That shit never happened and they killed him off because the script.

Jesus, stop trying to convince me that I just didn't look at it deep enough...or I'm "moving goal posts"

The movie didn't intend for them to have a meaningful relationship. He relates to Superman because he has parents he's lost or will lose. The context doesn't come from direct interaction; the movie reiterates the theme with Bruce himself, and the little girl from the intro.

"I'm a friend of your son." was a pretty awesome line though.

I am completely confident that a few World's Finest movies can exist between Cavill and Affleck.

Batman was just blah at this dude's funeral...that isn't supposed to be how Batman is when Superman is killed...which is why you probably don't kill him in the same movie where they first meet!
 
We don't know, his new 52 origin has New genesis technology though.



Was Jena Malone credited to? I didn't stick around for the credits. He could be in the extended edition.

She's not or I missed her. Also in the credits, Momoa and Ezra Miller were listed as Aquaman and Flash, respectively. No mention of Arthur and Barry, although we it's them.
 
Alright time for my full review.

Movie isn't an abortion like some critics are making it out to be. On the comic book scale it's around Man of Steel scale which is around the middle of the road Marvel movies. Not that awful but not that great either. I think people should give it a try anyway because it has enough to like in it.

That said there's still a lot to dislike in this movie and I feel everyone will come away disliking something about the movie.

I think the opening was very, very strong in this movie. The opening credits were excellent minus that pseudo dream sequence of young Bruce being lifted up by the bats... that felt tacky. The Metropolis destruction from Bruce's point of view was absolutely superb.

After this the movie slows down a bit and starts juggling multiple plotlines that all come to head much, much later in the movie. This is where the editing is really really off. You would go to a scene of Bruce waking up in his loft then quick transition to Lois doing some investigation stuff with the weird bullet and then back to the Bruce loft where it's the exact same scene continuing where he does some research stuff of his own. Like... what the hell man.

I felt that there was good built up towards the Senate hearing but I wanted more of the actual hearing. It felt truncated a lot. Holly Hunter really sold the scene preceding that bombing.

Speaking of the Senate hearing... that hearing was NOT about the destruction of Metropolis like it was assumed to be from the trailer. There was certainly some misleading going on there. The Senate hearing was about an incident in Africa where a bunch of people got gunned down and it was made to look like Superman did it (because he came in to save Lois who was doing research there). I don't remember them mentioning it in the movie but somehow the bullets were supposed to mimic Superman's heat vision or something.

After the Senate hearing, you felt like that there was enough ammo for Bruce to go after Superman because after that Senate was bombed there was enough motivation for Bruce to go after Superman. But instead of having them duke it out a bit after... you had to wait ANOTHER HOUR for that to happen. During this time there was weird stuff like the JL tie ins and they had to include a Batmobile chase scene so that people didn't fall asleep before the climax.

They really didn't learn from MoS in that department. They didn't have much in the middle 2/4s of the movie (strong starting quarter) and they crammed three major back to back action set pieces right at the end. That's the exact same formula of MoS where it was that opening Krypton destruction... then a bunch of low stakes scenes of Superman saving people and then near the end the action ramped up to 11 starting with the Smallville sequence leading into the World Engine/spacecraft scenes and then the Zod fight. In this movie the final 1/4th of the movie included the Batman vs Superman fight, the Batman vs the private military guys fight and then the Trinity vs Doomsday fight. This is bad pacing just like MoS. At the very least the final 3 action scenes were different enough where you didn't get too numb to them.

The Justice League tie ins were bad and detracted greatly from the movie along with killing the pace. There were many parts in the movie where you felt the movie was picking up and building the tension but it was quickly knee capped by some random dream sequence or a JL tie in. The Knightmare sequence was a cool standalone sequence but had no relevance to the movie whatsoever. It went over everyone's head. It was Thor in a jacuzzi quality stuff only it went on for much longer than that.

The actual Batman vs Superman fight was a let down but it did have an unsettling feel to it. Batman really felt ruthless especially when he smacked a kneeling Superman with a bathroom sink. I liked the Martha tie-in I felt that was neat and it gave Superman/Batman a common angle. It did feel too sudden that Batman suddenly started trusting Superman but oh well... I guess he realized he was played from the start.

I liked Jesse as Lex although his stupid "ah um" tick was really annoying at times. He also brought levity to the movie and he had a very screen chewing feel to his acting (sometimes good, sometimes bad). He masterminded the whole thing although his motivations were a bit unclear.. you had to read between the lines of all his god monologues. Seemed like he was bitter about his dad beating him up and blamed god (and thus hates Superman as well because he thinks of him as a god) or something.

The actual plot was very straightforward but the editing in the first half made it much harder to follow than it should've been. The bad editing also at times killed the pace of the movie because it gave the subplots a poorly developed feeling.

There were some plotholes that weren't fully addressed in the movie that might be addressed in the 3 hour version:

*Superman knew who Batman was but the audience never knew this until the actual BvS fight.

*Lex knew who both Superman and Batman were but it was never explained how he knew it.

*They never really explained how the bullets in the African massacre were made to look violence committed by Superman.

*The entirety of Lex's plot to have Batman and Superman fight seemed to rely a lot on coincidences.

*It was unclear if Lex actually wanted Batman to find the Kryptonite or not. He gave Bruce a hint of it at the party but when the Kryptonite was stolen from the lab he looked a bit peeved. It's very obvious that Lex was playing the long con of having Batman (with the letters he sent to Bruce) and Superman fight but it would never have worked if Batman didn't have Kryptonite.


Probably some more in the movie but these bugged me the most.


Now to talk about some elephants in the room:

Destruction level was still very high in the movie especially at the end. They wrote the entire Doomsday sequences by saying stuff like "oh but there's totally no one in downtown Metropolis at night" or "oh that island near Gotham is actually uninhabitated" or "I let him to the port of Gotham because I knew no one would be there". It was trying to write away the Metropolis casualty issue in MoS while still letting Zack Snyder have Doomsday wreck havoc. It's of little consequence but it really showed poor writing.

I enjoyed most everything about Batman in this movie but the killing he did was over the top. This Batman uses guns on his vehicles to mow down bad guys and even uses bad guys weapon (including guns) against them in violent ways. I have no idea how they are going to do a Red Hood movie in this universe when Batman is pretty much Red Hood himself. At this point I don't understand why Batman isn't using actual guns himself like he did in the Knightmare sequence and why he bothers branding people. Jeremy Irons was excellent in the role and delivered a ton of much needed levity to the movie.

Gal Gadot as Wonder Woman did fine. Nothing too spectacular or mind blowing that people are saying but there was hardly anything to complain about her portrayal. She didn't have that many lines to work with though. Most of her presence in the movie was really just a JL set up because her being in the movie was because Lex got a pic of her from the 1930s that showed her outfit... wow.

Amy Adam acted really well... but holy shit was here character written very poorly, even worse than MoS. She was a damsel in distress 3 times in the movie... one of which was because of a dumb thing she did herself (threw the Kryptonite spear into a pool of water then tried to get it again when Doomsday popped up only almost drowned himself trying to get it back). Martha Kent was also a damsel in distress and both gave Superman pep talks. If it weren't for WW and Holly Hunter... I would say that this movie really crapped on the few female characters in the movie.

There was no performance that felt bad to me, they were all at least serviceable including even Cavill. It was an issue of the script or the characterization that resulted in boring character moments especially involving Superman (there were very few scenes where he was asked to smile or be friendly).


I know it may seem like I am harping on a lot of elements but it's really not that bad. The movie has a lot of cool scenes, moments and pieces of dialogues but it's stitched together poorly. In that regard it's very, very similar to MoS and I would rate it slightly higher than MoS (MoS had that garbage color filter that made everything look washed out and an over reliance on digital zoom in... this movie corrects that by a lot). That initial tweet was on point... if you liked MoS then you will like this... if not then this is not the movie for you.

Likes:

*Overall solid cast performances.
*Visuals, cinematography and art direction.
*Action was varied and generally well executed. A single take Knightmare action scene, Batmobile chase scene, Metropolis destruction scene from Bruce's PoV, Batman vs Superman, Batman vs goons fight and Doomsday etc.
*Score did its job although it wasn't revolutionary... a lot of the cues were ripped straight from MoS.
*Lots of cool dialogues that makes the movie at least quotable.
*I liked the political aspects at the start that built up to the Senate hearing.


Disliked:

*Editing was pretty bad. Scenes jumped from each other a lot in the first half which gave it a very half baked feel. There wasn't much rhyme or reason to the editing.
*Pacing was also pretty bad thanks to the editing but also because the action was concentrated in the first 5 minutes and in the last 30 minutes. That's around 2 hours of nothing but a Knightmare sequence and a Batmobile sequence for audiences to get entertained overall and IMO is probably the biggest flaw of the movie.
*Batman going off the rails and killing people with lethal weapons is doing a big disservice to the character.
*Plot while straightforward was a bit of a mess with holes and contrivances to move the characters along.
*Way too much Justice League tie in that hurt the movie a lot (the Iron Man 2/AoU syndrome).
*A bit too much freaky weird dream like stuff in the movie that had no place in the movie other than to look cool (like the scene of Bruce visiting their parents mausoleum and then suddenly a giant man bat appears).


To me it's about as good as Age of Ultron but it will be received less well because it takes itself a bit too seriously and there's way too much time spent building stuff. You could've trimmed the runtime by another 20 minutes pretty easily. I personally didn't mind AoU all that much and I don't mind BvS much either but BvS should've been great when it isn't. It was very hard to mess up this movie and it should've been an easy sell. They took too many risks here and it's not going to pay off.

That said critics have been way too harsh on the movie. The fact that this movie might be within throwing distance of garbage like Green Lantern is crazy to me. GL crushed the IP and probably made sure we won't be seeing GL for a long time... after BvS I am still very much interested in seeing the same Batman (with tweaked) and WW just helmed by different directors.
 
But...

That's not what happened.

He can clearly barely hear Clark the first time he says the name, all he catches is Martha which leaves him shook because Batman is a man stuck repeating the worst day of his life on a fairly regular basis. This opens him up emotionally in a way he wasn't previously.

oh so he got emotional and that's why he decided to team up with superman for absolutely no other reason despite 15 seconds ago wanting to spear him in the chest with kryptonite.

¯\_(&#12484;)_/¯
 
Then, I went into detail as to what I meant. The relationship that they have going from enemy, to skeptical, to friend, to brothers. You know, a natural relationship that you would expect Bruce and Clark to go through on their way to becoming World's Finest?!?!? That shit never happened and they killed him off because the script.

Jesus, stop trying to convince me that I just didn't look at it deep enough...or I'm "moving goal posts"

You are tho :/

First you said the relationship with regards to earning the sacrifice. Not that that actually makes any sense, since the sacrifice is the result of Superman's arc, and it impacts the relationship, not the other way around, but whatever.

Now you're on about turning them into the World's Finest. And the very first post, the one that started this whole thing, was you denying that the "scribes" of this movie had any handle on character development at all.

oh so he got emotional and that's why he decided to team up with superman for absolutely no other reason despite 15 seconds ago wanting to spear him in the chest with kryptonite.

¯\_(&#12484;)_/¯

Pls try to walk this through to the end.

He became opened up, which made him consider something that he hadn't allowed himself to previously: that Superman really was what he seemed. That he could be good. That anybody could.
 
I knew this film was going to use Dark Knight Returns as reference for the Batman part of the film. Was a complete and happy surprise that they used Death of Superman elements. I do like that they do show that he's not dead at the very end though is just healing by showing the dirt on his coffin rising which is what happens when he begins to fly.

The Flash cameo is similar to Flash showing up at different times leading up to Crisis on Infinite Earths right?

The Cyborg cameo was the most interesting for me and the longest I think. I like the casting of Joe Morton as Cyborg's father.

Really enjoyed this film and looking forward to seeing it again tomorrow.
 
The pacing is pretty clearly a huge culprit here. People lost interest or lost track during the rapid cuts, which lead to them tuning out during important scenes.

The pacing is absolutely troublesome, I'm not arguing against that. I guess I'm just being slightly more optimistic and positive about the fact that I never really lost interest or felt lost as to where they were going with the story.

The editing is a clear indicator of a film that's afraid of it's own ambition so it needs to hit all these plot points without feeling like it's sacrificing too much time on one character over another. I'm pleasantly surprised that it wasn't worse, as most critics are making it seem.
 
Superhero movies worse than BvS: Iron Man 2 & 3, both Thors, first Captain America, The Dark Knight Rises, Spiderman 1 & 3, X-Men 3, Batman Returns, Forever & B&R, both Hulk movies, and Superman Returns.
 
Minor points here, but I really liked the new batman emblem, and the batsuit. It's closer to the video game batman, which I love.
 
That's why most of Snyder's movies are disjointed messes.

Guy can't edit.

Ok thing is I'm sure it's done deliberately. Snyder wants to go with a Malick's The New World style of editing and pacing.

Just can't work. Not with the type of story, genre, and with his considerably less talent as a director than the aforementioned director.

Also come on, you don't go to a blockbuster movie to wrestle with that, not with the the noisy setpieces these films have. Give our brains a break.
 
The pacing is absolutely troublesome, I'm not arguing against that. I guess I'm just being slightly more optimistic and positive about the fact that I never really lost interest or felt lost as to where they were going with the story.

The editing is a clear indicator of a film that's afraid of it's own ambition so it needs to hit all these plot points without feeling like it's sacrificing too much time on one character over another. I'm pleasantly surprised that it wasn't worse, as most critics are making it seem.

I don't know if it's afraid of its own ambition. Afraid of its runtime, maybe :P

I've got high hopes for that ultimate edition, btw.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom