Batman v. Superman RT Thread: like standing ovations in rain

Status
Not open for further replies.
A lot of the criticism makes me think this is closer to Watchmen more than anything, but with a last third act that is your typical superhero movie explosion fest.
You liked Watchmen, so I think the first half will be right up my alley as well. Hopefully this means the director's cut will pull it more to the Watchmen side.

Tonally its similar to Watchmen, yes, although not quite as much of a cold war apocalyptic feel. It's trying to tackle some very heady themes and does not succeed as well because it lacks the brilliant overarching story to tie it together that wm has. Not a total failure but they're both very snyder films for better or worse.

For me, wm is a five star film, with the asterisk that five stars does mean flawless, just excellent.
 
I think Thor 2 is the only Marvel CU film I haven't seen. I plan to keep it that way, looked dreadful.

It's just there. It's not offensively bad, but it's painfully mediocre. The film does it's job but that's about the best that can be said about it. You may just as well watch it since it's most likely you'll forget about what happened within hours.
 
As a 9-to-5 loser who's only watched the trailers for this and doesn't have the insomnia needed to read a 200 page thread about fatman and the handsome guy, are these reviews surprising? I was under the impression that Man of steel was considered too poor to even be 12 hour flight viewing material and this looked worse than that from the get go.

I think the current consensus is that the film is actually a complete masterpiece and that Kevin Feige personally blew the people behind every negative review so he could release another Marvel movie with the exact same plot as every other Marvel movie in the hopes that no one would notice

Rumor has it there is no Civil War, they're just going to replay The Winter Soldier in theaters but with someone in a Wal-Mart Spider-Man mask green-screened in. Of course because of the Marvel logo it'll hit 90% easy
 
I think the current consensus is that the film is actually a complete masterpiece and that Kevin Feige personally blew the people behind every negative review so he could release another Marvel movie with the exact same plot as every other Marvel movie in the hopes that no one would notice

Rumor has it there is no Civil War, they're just going to replay The Winter Soldier in theaters but with someone in a Wal-Mart Spider-Man mask green-screened in. Of course because of the Marvel logo it'll hit 90% easy

Oh good, well as long as everybody but me is making money off this I can at least sleep peacefully.
 
Agree with all your points, roflwaffles, the good and the bad.

About a half hour into the film I started playing a game: count the number of times characters have a conversation that has a beginning, middle and end. And I don't mean end as in the scene cuts away, or gets interrupted. But actually concludes in a way that two humans talking to each other might. There's plenty of dialogue - this isn't Mad Max - there's just no flow to it. People emote, spout, shout and quip. They don't really converse much. When they do the scenes cut away at odd times, making them feel incomplete.

I think I got up to one, but I've since forgotten which one it was.

My biggest complaint is some people even on this board take all criticism as "Oh they're just marvel fanboys". That is directly ignoring the problem, dark and gritty work for batman, but not for Superman. Superman is supposed to be a beacon of hope, a symbol for justice. And from what I'm seeing Snyder just said "Nah bruh".

Another thing that bothers me personally is when people bring up the fact that his films are "Joyless" they say "Well not every film has to have jokes like Marvel!" but that is missing the point, Bruce should have light moments, and Clark should have inner reflecting moments. No one is going to mock your film for having characters laugh when it feels organic and not like it came off the assembly line
Cough Whedon
, and no one is going to mock your film if they are legitamately in a bad place and is brooding. To me Snyder is a nice guy, but he may not be the Right Guy.
 
How did Eisenberg's Luthor happen? Is this a case where Snyder had no idea what to do with the character and, in effect, "punted" by telling Eisenberg to just do whatever? Was Eisenberg just unable to reconcile Luthor's actions and characterization thereof in the script with any sort of coherent character?

I can't really imagine this is a situation where everyone was coming into it on the same page, dramatically.
 
rASLH4G.png


4sYshhj.gif

This could be my favorite BvS thing on the Internet.

😂😂😂
 
How did Eisenberg's Luthor happen? Is this a case where Snyder had no idea what to do with the character and, in effect, "punted" by telling Eisenberg to just do whatever? Was Eisenberg just unable to reconcile Luthor's actions and characterization thereof in the script with any sort of coherent character?

I can't really imagine this is a situation where everyone was coming into it on the same page, dramatically.

No, he wanted to use Joker, but he was already taken, so he mashed him and Ozymandias together to form Frankenlex.
 
I think Thor 2 is the only Marvel CU film I haven't seen. I plan to keep it that way, looked dreadful.

The thing about Thor 2 is this; it's super safe. There were 2-3 moments in there that I thought was awesome and game changer at first, and then the movie goes "psych!! it's a fake out!!!".
Otherwise it's pretty enjoyable movie due to Loki.
 
Edit: okay maybe hyperbolic but it will be divisive. People either love it or hate it.

Batman vs Superman |OT| The Crows are coming

Lots of positive reviews of the film starting to come out now. Fans love it especially some die hard Marvel fans too.

My phones has been going crazy all night. All my friends love this film.

Critics have severely misjudged this film.

Is this one of your friends : http://www.imdb.com/user/ur65929724/ ?

I have to admit, before going into the theater for this pre screening, I knew it would be good, I didn't know it would be amazing. Batman V Superman is a fresh of breath air in the live action comic book genre. I remember all the hatrid before this movie came out and all the nit picking, well, all of that got washed away with this masterpiece. Let me first point out Ben Affleck's performance as Batman/ Bruce Wayne Surpases all the previous before him. Cavil is Superman, kills it as Clark Kent, very true interpretation to the comics. Jesse Eisenberg, no words can explain how deep this character is and how wonderful of a job Eisenberg does as Luthor. Wonder Woman is fearsome. The action is epic, the story is rich and I can happily say I will be seeing this again and again, hopefully I did not spoil anything as I want to everyone to have as good as a time as I did.
 
Pauline Kael said it was "a monumentally unimaginative movie"

John Simon felt it was "a regrettable failure, although not a total one. This film is fascinating when it concentrates on Bats or Gods ... and dreadful when it deals with the in-betweens: humans ...BvS, for all its lively visual and mechanical spectacle, is a kind of space-Spartacus and, more pretentious still, a shaggy God story."

Stanley Kauffmann of The New Republic called it "a film that is so dull, it even dulls our interest in the technical ingenuity for the sake of which Snyder has allowed it to become dull."

Renata Adler of The New York Times wrote that it was "somewhere between hypnotic and immensely boring."

Andrew Sarris called it "one of the grimmest films I have ever seen in my life ...BvS is a disaster because it is much too abstract to make its abstract points."

Eminent historian Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr. deemed the film "morally pretentious, intellectually obscure and inordinately long ... a film out of control"

These are actually Kubrick's 2001 SO critics

Unimaginative argument or master troll? You decide. Can't wait to actually see the Movie :D
 
Good. So far, I can only amass a short list of comic book films I genuinely think are worse than Batman V Superman.

- Fantastic Four (As mentioned, a genuine disaster. Almost unfair to compare anything else to it)
- Kick-Ass 2 (Lower scale, but the drop in quality from 1-to-2 is unbelievable. Loses touch with every bit of heart. Terrible gross-out comedy. Baffling as to how it happened.)
- X-Men Origins: Wolverine (This one's on the fence. It has a competent structure, but possibly beats BvS in terms of bastardized characterizations. Stitched-mouth Deadpool... that's something else.)

You should go watch Catwoman. It is so bad, but entertainingly so. The editing looks like it was done by someone with a severe case of OCD. I was laughing so hard at it. I feel like Batman V Superman won't be as entertaning, but we shall see.
 
Pauline Kael said it was "a monumentally unimaginative movie"

John Simon felt it was "a regrettable failure, although not a total one. This film is fascinating when it concentrates on Bats or Gods ... and dreadful when it deals with the in-betweens: humans ...BvS, for all its lively visual and mechanical spectacle, is a kind of space-Spartacus and, more pretentious still, a shaggy God story."

Stanley Kauffmann of The New Republic called it "a film that is so dull, it even dulls our interest in the technical ingenuity for the sake of which Snyder has allowed it to become dull."

Renata Adler of The New York Times wrote that it was "somewhere between hypnotic and immensely boring."

Andrew Sarris called it "one of the grimmest films I have ever seen in my life ...BvS is a disaster because it is much too abstract to make its abstract points."

Eminent historian Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr. deemed the film "morally pretentious, intellectually obscure and inordinately long ... a film out of control"

These are actually Kubrick's 2001 SO critics

Unimaginative argument or master troll? You decide. Can't wait to actually see the Movie :D

Reviews are pretty on point for both movies actually
 
Yeah Thor 2 isn't really that bad, just mediocre.

Loki's part of the storyline is actually pretty good, and sets up a lot of interesting stuff for future films.

The bit where Thor gets the underground, asks for directions to Grenwich, and is given directions that anyone who has ever seen a tube map would know make no sense at all is pretty unforgivable though.
 
You should go watch Catwoman. It is so bad, but entertainingly so. The editing looks like it was done by someone with a severe case of OCD. I was laughing so hard at it. I feel like Batman V Superman won't be as entertaning, but we shall see.
I can second this. I found Catwoman so-bad-it's-hilarious.
 
Decent but not amazing. You could see the business requirements forcing the plot to build the universe too quickly and some editing issues. Fight scenes and comic book call outs were pretty cool though.

Critics are way too hard on it IMO. Not amazing tier but not horrible either. Other than IM1, Winter Soldier and GotG - was better than most of Marvel's formulaic stuff.

If I would change something it would be Superman being aligned with the government and being more of a boyscout/not so broody. That would have been maybe a better route.
 
Thor 2 is just... Fine. People wanted Marvel villains to get their own movie, and that's essentially what Thor 2 is: a solo Loki flick with Thor gurning away in the background.
 
You should go watch Catwoman. It is so bad, but entertainingly so. The editing looks like it was done by someone with a severe case of OCD. I was laughing so hard at it. I feel like Batman V Superman won't be as entertaning, but we shall see.

I actually walked out of Catwoman like 30 mins in and I was being PAID TO BE THERE.

I lost out on what was probably 2-3 hours of free money because I said fuck it and told my students to enjoy the movie and just went back to my school to clock out.

Could have finished the movie and taken them to coffee afterwards or something to milk the clock, but no way was I gonna sit through that steaming turd. lol
 
OK, I'm gonna go to the theater and watch it again today. Yesterday I forgot my glasses at home and some things were a bit blurry. I almost fell asleep yesterday too cause I was so fucking tired (3pm screening).

The benefit is that here in Milan almost all theaters do half price tickets for the first screening of the day and students so it ain't costing me shit. I want to see if I feel the same the second time around and if my 2/5 rating will still be valid.
 
7.5 is definately what ill give this film. However it had a potential to be an 9

Honestly I think a good editor could make this a 9, particularly if the editor subbed in some of the deleted stuff.

What infuriated me about the dude saying Age of Ultron was better was that there was literally nothing worthwhile about that film, not even a solid core you could discover with enough editing. AoU exists solely to check some boxes. Making AoU good would require changing almost everything about the film.

BvS could be hugely improved by one dude with a day in Final Cut.
 
I pretty much hated it, but the crowd I saw it with was very excited throughout the whole film, almost to the point of parody. I'm not prude when it comes to clapping for awesome moments, but a half dozen lunatics clapped for kryptonite showing up. I'm not clapping for a fucking rock, man.
 
Angry Joe is goddamn angry.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LMaIhAP7aeo (Non-spoiler review)

I fucking love him so much.
It's also fun that he said he enjoyed it just as much as he didn't like some parts. But overall recommends viewing it because it does live up to a lot of our fan fantasies.
Superman is his boy. If superman loses to Batman, I'm sure that would enrage him. He doesn't want to spoil it, but I hope that's what happens so that I can enjoy his spoiler filled review even more.
 
Man i feel bad for ben, first his family and now this. I don't care how much money you have seeing a project you worked on for so long trashed like this, maaaan.
 
Man i feel bad for ben, first his family and now this. I don't care how much money you have seeing a project you worked on for so long trashed like this, maaaan.

He's been in a lot of shitty movies. I'm sure the first movie he directs that's a disappointment with hit him MUCH harder
 
Watching Batman Begins in theaters was such an amazing experience. I remember people applauding when Falconi is tied to the spotlight, and the camera cuts to show his silhouette forming the bat signal. Thunderous applause at the end too. How was that 11 years ago?
 
Honestly contemplating about not going today to watch this. This was supposed to be freakin' good!
It kinda is. Some bits should work but don't. Some bits shouldn't work but do. It is dark, but not to the point where it's tedious to watch. There's not a lot I can say without spoiling it, but overall the audience reaction was positive and that seems to be the case pretty much everywhere. The things it does wrong are things that the critics would slam it for (I.e. editing) but it's also stuff that the general audience can overlook as long as the rest is good. After watching the film I definitely see where the cast members are coming from with the "it's made for the fans, not the critics line". I thought it was horseshit before watching it, but I kinda get it now. Tbh Wonder Woman's scenes are hype as fuck so it's worth watching it for that alone, never mind the other good stuff.
 
The bit where Thor gets the underground, asks for directions to Grenwich, and is given directions that anyone who has ever seen a tube map would know make no sense at all is pretty unforgivable though.

Wow I really did forget the plot to this movie because I have no idea what you are talking about. 🤔

But yes, I do remember enjoying the parts with Loki and
Kat 😍
 
Poor dude :( starring in a DC film that's worse than all MCU films.

All the reviews pretty much go: "everything sucks, except Ben Affleck."

Pretty sure the guy is on cloud nine. These days, even when a movie he's in gets completely destroyed, he still wins.
 
All the reviews pretty much go: "everything sucks, except Ben Affleck."

Pretty sure the guy is on cloud nine. These days, even when a movie he's in gets completely destroyed, he still wins.

This is true as well, Batfleck is getting almost universal praise. I thought the movie was a fucking mess, but loved Batfleck (didn't like some of the things they had him do though)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom