Batman v Superman Spoiler Thread: Don't believe everything you read, Son

Status
Not open for further replies.
Batman was angry with Superman for what, letting three Kryptonians of equal strength tear shit up across the United States?
Mostly he is bitter about Superman letting one of his companies get cut down by lasers and believes Lex/Future Flash about possible Evil Superman.
He never really questions Lex's motives which is weird...
 
I'm going to say it.

I think Goyer's script in MoS is a masterpiece compared to BvS.

The Smallville Battle in MoS is better than any action set piece in BvS.

Superman's first flight in MoS gave me more feels than the goddamn Trinity together in one shot in BvS.

MoS may have had some questionable editing during certain scenes, but at least it followed the Trey Parker rule and their not seemingly random, than this bullshit.

Faora was much more badass than WW in BvS

Zod was a better villain than both Lex and Doomsday combined by orders of magnitude.

Superman actually smiles MORE in MoS than in BvS

Lois Lane felt more like a character in MoS than the damsel-in-distress used to forward the garbage plot in BvS.

My point? Man of Steel is a better film than Batman vs Superman is just about every fucking way possible and it's an enormous step down.

That pretty much sums up my thoughts.

I think that leaked synopsis on reddit from a year or so ago was the Goyer script and its a masterpiece compared to what we got.
 
After a day away from it I like the movie even more. Lex and Doomsday are the weakest parts, and WW did nothing for me, but overall I can't wait to see it again. I think both Batman and Superman had decent arcs and both finally came to terms with being heroes.

Lex was the weakest? Why? He was magnificent with her performance, mannerisms. He was the scene stealer in this movie.

The only way to salvage this movie was to fire Snyder and Terrio and bring in someone who knows how to write comic book characters.

No amount of editing could've saved this plot

Plot was fine. The editing is why the movie is hated so much. A lot of it doesn't make sense to most people because of the editing. People hate on Superman and Batman being this way because they're not able to articulate the editing problems so it's easier to nitpick when you add your 2 cents. It's why people can be legit upset when "superman doesn't drag Doomsday to the desert".
 
YEs it can kill him, but without the gas you would had needed a greater force to impale him with the spear. that was what I took from the movie, based on Alfred and Batman conversation for Doomsday.

No, this is demonstrated by the corpse of Zod when they explain Krytopnite. When the exposed the tiny sliver of it on a scalpel to Zod's corpse his cells started to decay and they were able to pierce his skin. There was no need we weaken him further with some gas.
 
Alfred was tracking the phone that Bruce cloned earlier in the film...I think.

Yes, it's the same Russian that batman has been tracking and following the whole movie. Batman knew he worked for lex, because he was the guy that led him to the white Portuguese that had the kryptonite that was being transferred to lexcorp.

Batman, with Alfred's help and being the worlds greatest detective put two and two together that the Russian was working for Luthor and that he was probably also involved with Martha's kidnapping.

I actually really enjoyed the movie, I'm surprised it reviewed so poorly.
 
The editing really was terrible. The first half is mostly boring, as the film tries to get through the character buildings scenes but doesn't do it well. The second half is a mess as the film tries to juggle all of its elements.

Snyder said that they are bringing back scenes in the Ultimate Edition that were in the film and really close to making the final cut, and the Ultimate Edition has 30 minutes worth of scenes; I feel like the editing for this movie wasn't kind to the finish product. He probably knows that's a much better cut of the film.
 
It's been more than two days now and I still can't come to terms with 90% of this movie. Snyder and Terrio simply didn't give a fuck about developing the two characters who're ostensibly so important to this franchise, their names are in the title.

Batman was angry with Superman for what, letting three Kryptonians of equal strength tear shit up across the United States?

And Superman's now angry with Batman for going to town on criminals by branding them, pancaking their vehicles with his batmobile and just generally cutting them to pieces with his fucking arsenal of weaponry. Clark Kent literally says he does not agree with his "brand" (lol) of vigilante justice.

Yet Supes, a being with super strength/speed/hearing/vision etc., continues to punch mortal men through walls, turning them into chutney with reckless abandon just because they threaten to kill Lois Lane? I really don't know who's a bigger hypocrite here, Batman or Superman.

Dawn of Justice my ass, neither of them stand for Justice in any sense of the word.

I had the same gripe, earlier in this thread. The relationship between Bruce and Clark - their evolution from foes, to skeptical of each other, to cautious allies, to friends to brothers.

That was necessary, IMO, in order to earn that loss of Superman. Make it impactful. That's why you don't kill Superman in the same movie that you introduce him to Batman.

Sigh...
 
Of course he does.

Crazy ol' Lex and his plans.

You mean the smartest man on the planet didn't wanted the second or third smartest man on the planet to know that those checks were not getting to the Security Guard so his master plan wouldn't be sabotage by Batman?


No, this is demonstrated by the corpse of Zod when they explain Krytopnite. When the exposed the tiny sliver of it on a scalpel to Zod's corpse his cells started to decay and they were able to pierce his skin. There was no need we weaken him further with some gas.

Impaling trough skin, muscles and Bones is way different than cutting trough skin.

so how does batman find out about kryptonite? he was already going after those guys before he hacked lexs computers
BEcause he knew this group was looking for a way to get to Superman, he didn't knew who was behind this, But he told Afred He was looking for them out of a white bomb treat to Gotham, but Alfred caught him in his lies, and then Bruce just explained to him it was something to stop Superman all along.

After MoS, Bruce became obsessed with Superman to a point where it transformed him, this is a major plot in the movie that I see a lot of people confused about this.
 
Mostly he is bitter about Superman letting one of his companies get cut down by lasers and believes Lex/Future Flash about possible Evil Superman.
He never really questions Lex's motives which is weird...

Plot was fine. The editing is why the movie is hated so much. A lot of it doesn't make sense to most people because of the editing.

No, the plot was not fine. The editing was sloppy, and the plot was filled with ridiculous contrivances to set up the cartoonish action scenes. I'd heard rumblings about those specific criticisms about this movie for over a year now, but I had no idea it would be this bad.

People hate on Superman and Batman being this way because they're not able to articulate the editing problems so it's easier to nitpick when you add your 2 cents.

I personally hate on Superman and Batman in this movie because of the demented lengths they go to have that fight with each other in the third act. Nothing they do is remotely consistent with anything they say or do in the film, and that's just as much on the plot as it is on the writing and the editing.
 
Ok so Batman very clearly had no problem killing people. Since that's the case, then why is the Joker still alive? Did Batman used to have a no kill code but now he doesn't? But then you would think it would be the Joker who would be the one to finally make Batman break his no kill code. So why is Joker still alive? Makes no sense. Unless Suicide Squad is a prequel or something.

Also, the movie was decent at best.
They don't make it clear, Joker might already be dead. Suicide Squad takes place before this I believe (or maybe not, I'm probably wrong).
 
Small thing, but DC's decision to forgo post-credit scenes is silly when they paste them in the middle of the movie

That's pretty much what I said in my first impressions. It's completely senseless. Audiences WANT these things, and expect to be spammed with all sorts of information, and no one judges you for it. Yet, their decision here was to not do that, and instead disorientate general audiences. Bizarre decision.

Instead of cramming it all in the movie, I'd have rather had it that they gave us a 15 minute introduction to the justice league world. Fuck it, make it a trailer for all your upcoming movies. Saves 15 minutes.
 
That's pretty much what I said in my first impressions. It's completely senseless. Audiences WANT these things, and expect to be spammed with all sorts of information, and no one judges you for it. Yet, their decision here was to not do that, and instead disorientate general audiences. Bizarre decision.

Chris Nolan told Zack off for entertaining that idea with Man of Steel, so Zack is probably just scared to do it.
 
The only way to salvage this movie was to fire Snyder and Terrio and bring in someone who knows how to write comic book characters.

No amount of editing could've saved this plot

No, I think Snyder and Terrio did pretty well on the story and themes front. Thematically, it tackles the issue of what kind of world would need superheroes and what are the consequences of superheroes. Yea, it's been tackled by Marvel. However, Age of Ultron was far too light in tone for tackling the issue. I have higher hopes for Captain America. In terms of tone, Snyder nailed the depressing atmosphere of collateral damage caused by a vigilante and super powered messianic alien. I also liked that the ultimate resolution for the fight between Batman vs Superman was Batman seeing superman's humanity when Clark's mother was threatened.

There was a lot of unneeded scenes. Sometimes the action was too gratitutious that it truly did feel depressing. However, the core arcs for Superman and Batman make logical sense. I also think Luthor made a lot more sense than most when you read into what he says. Some of what he says hints that he was abused by his father( I think he directly states it when talking to Lois) , and he hates that no hero came to save him from his fathers fist. That's why he wanted the Bat gone, Supes gone, and was tracking metas. No one came to save him so he hates them all.
 
Just saw your review Duckroll, and you kind o hit the nail on the head

It doesn't really work, but it's bold, ambitious, beautiful mess, and the stuff that works really sticks with you, and the stuff that doesn't...well
 
No, I think Snyder and Terrio did pretty well on the story and themes front. Thematically, it tackles the issue of what kind of world would need superheroes and what are the consequences of superheroes. Yea, it's been tackled by Marvel. However, Age of Ultron was far too light in tone for tackling the issue. I have higher hopes for Captain America. In terms of tone, Snyder nailed the depressing atmosphere of collateral damage caused by a vigilante and super powered messianic alien. I also liked that the ultimate resolution for the fight between Batman vs Superman was Batman seeing superman's humanity when Clark's mother was threatened.

There was a lot of unneeded scenes. Sometimes the action was too gratitutious that it truly did feel depressing. However, the core arcs for Superman and Batman make logical sense. I also think Luthor made a lot more sense than most when you read into what he says. Some of what he says hints that he was abused by his father( I think he directly states it when talking to Lois) , and he hates that no hero came to save him from his fathers fist. That's why he wanted the Bat gone, Supes gone, and was tracking metas. No one came to save him so he hates them all.

It attempts to convey that but does it really have anything interesting to say about it? I'd say not.
 
It attempts to convey that but does it really have anything interesting to say about it? I'd say not.

To be honest I hate this theme, I hate it for MCU, I hate it here, I liked it when Superheroes could stop Villains without the government acting like a 3rd source of unwanted Drama.
 
To be honest I hate this theme, I hate it for MCU, I hate it here, I liked it when Superheroes could stop Villains without the government acting like a 3rd source of unwanted Drama.
It is an issue for me in Civil War II because I do not understand how any hero would be cool with the idea of convicting people before they commit crime.
Maybe it makes more sense in the series but yeah.

Government and hero conflict I never seen really work in these types of properties.

Edit: I meant to talk about Civil War 2, DERP.
 
Chris Nolan told Zack off for entertaining that idea with Man of Steel, so Zack is probably just scared to do it.
That's not what happened

Zack said Nolan initially didn't like the idea but they sat down to debate it and eventually they all agreed on it IIRC
 
It attempts to convey that but does it really have anything interesting to say about it? I'd say not.

Well, it doesn't really say anything other than show what the reasonable answer is. Sometimes the best intentions have tragic consequences. While the initial question is posed about superheroes, the movie does also make a statement that governments should be just as cautious with their actions as the presidents decision to launch a nuke incompacitated Superman and made Doomsday that much stronger. It also meant Superman had to die. Now, in this movie, there's a little bit of hope there since Superman came back.

On the other hand, nations actions often do result in exarcebating problems. Unlike Superman, a lot of the people who end up having to sacrifice their life to fix the problems don't come back. That's what I feel is the reason for showing dual funerals and Bruce's statement at Clark's funeral.
 
I'm going to say it.

I think Goyer's script in MoS is a masterpiece compared to BvS.

The Smallville Battle in MoS is better than any action set piece in BvS.

Superman's first flight in MoS gave me more feels than the goddamn Trinity together in one shot in BvS.

MoS may have had some questionable editing during certain scenes, but at least it followed the Trey Parker rule and their not seemingly random, than this bullshit.

Faora was much more badass than WW in BvS

Zod was a better villain than both Lex and Doomsday combined by orders of magnitude.

Superman actually smiles MORE in MoS than in BvS

Lois Lane felt more like a character in MoS than the damsel-in-distress used to forward the garbage plot in BvS.

My point? Man of Steel is a better film than Batman vs Superman is just about every fucking way possible and it's an enormous step down.

I find it not really hard to agree with this!

(Also you can tell yourself that in MoS Superman is actually inexperienced with his powers and that's a reason for all the destruction caused by his fighting. In BvS we learn he really doesn't give a shit and loves trashing buildings)
 
So yeah. Hydra guy really fucked with me lol. The movie was just ok. Affleck was great. Superman was better in MoS (I can't believe I'm saying this). Wonder Woman was fine. Lex is the fucking piss..could stand the fucking guy. The Lois and the staff/spear nonsense was just WTF? I get why she tossed it in, but why was she trying to get it back? Must have ESP.
 
So I've seen the movie. I'm not a comic book person, but I do like superhero movies. I definitely don't rank it as poorly as the critics. It's average stuff at best. I've seen worse movies. There are things I agree with the critics on and there are things I disagree with them on.
 
Just to confirm, the stuff in the senators Jar was Luthor Urine, right?

I had a lot of trouble following Lex explanations, I hate Zuckerberg's talk pattern in all of his movies, even Rio.
 
Just to confirm, the stuff in the senators Jar was Luthor Urine, right?

I had a lot of trouble following Lex explanations, I hate Zuckerberg's talk pattern in all of his movies, even Rio.
Yeah, the senator told him "you can piss in a glass and call it granny's peach tea" when he was talking about his anti-Superman weapons being for the safety of the world.
 
Just got back from seeing it. I'd already read this thread and all of the negative impressions beforehand, but even that wasn't enough to prepare me for how bad it was. I'm not even a huge DC / comics guy, but I caught myself thinking, "Not like this. Not like this."
 
That pretty much sums up my thoughts.

I think that leaked synopsis on reddit from a year or so ago was the Goyer script and its a masterpiece compared to what we got.

I just looked this up and yeah, given the similarities to the final film (characters like the Senator and Mercy, events like the middle-east incident, etc) it does sound like a legit early draft.

It's also significantly better. Here's a link for anyone who's interested.
 
Still kind of laughing at how dumb Superman's sacrifice was. There was no rush to take down Doomsday, they'd been romping on that conveniently uninhabited area for a while. Supes flies to WW, tells her to use the staff, WW picks it up and tears Doomsday to shreds. The end. There was no urgency, no crisis, no person or thing that mandated Superman use the staff that instant. It made him getting grabbed and stabbed - which he could have gotten away from if he'd just let go - both hollow and hilarious.

Heck, he could have even just flow past WW and dropped it off - "Use this it'll kill him!" - and let his momentum move him into a safe zone.

The writing in this movie was such trash.
 
Heck, he could have thrown the spear. Even if he missed, if he got it close enough to Wonder Woman she could finish the job. She was akready putting in serious work with her sword.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom